The volume this file occupies should not distract the visitor from the essentials. Here, in a few questions and answers, is a short summary, also existing as a pdf document of one page in A4 format (to be printed and distributed...). The voice comparison, in question #1, is essential evidence. Then you have a pdf document of 2 A4 pages showing how Jean-Michel became Brigitte. The conclusion of chapter 30 is more detailed, with links to the other chapters and to the appendices. Five months of citizen inquiry littered with red herrings and hesitations lead to a new understanding. Here are the answers that we believe are best in the state of our knowledge at the end of May 2022.
|
Alain Beyrand (alain [at] pressibus.org)
with the help of Lionel Labosse (site) and Hortense Fuschia.
File started 13 January 2022, released 17 January with first 15 chapters,
First finalisation (version 1.0) on 24 January with 22 chapters.
Top and bottom photo Stéphane Lemouton, Closer.
Clicking on the thick-bordered illustrations will enlarge them
![]() | Clicking on this image takes you to my tree on geneatet with all its links.
On the left, due to the usual 100 year confidentiality, the branch stops at Jean Trogneux, Jean-Michel's grandfather. The common ancestor Jeanne des Essarts, sister of a mayor of Rouen, had as her brother-in-law the famous Etienne Marcel (1315-1358) (page Wikipedia and his equestrian statue in the vicinity of the Paris City Hall). ![]() |
Mr. MP,
I have studied the file of my distant cousin by marriage Brigitte Macron as I study other genealogical files. I have come to a firm conviction which I have expressed on a page of my blog at http://pressibus.org/covid/index.html#brigitte1 Of course I am interested in any new factual information, even if it might change my mind. Perhaps you can pass some on to me? A little earlier on this page (http://pressibus.org/covid/index.html#inter2), I give an update on the current Covid situation. I end with this: "Everyone has a choice: be an accomplice or a whistleblower to the plotters". Hoping that you will now be in the second category, I wish you, Mr MP, all the best for 2022. |
![]() ![]() On the left Jean-Michel's great-grandfather was not named Jean-Baptiste but Marc, according to the tree shown on the Roglo base and his birth certificate. Mark's great-grandfather was named John the Baptist, so presumably the desire to show a John line caused the two names to be reversed. Jean, born in 1881, Jean-Michel's grandfather, Jean his father, Jean-Claude his older brother and Jean Alexandre his nephew follow. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Magasins à Amiens, Arras, Saint Quentin, Lille et Le Touquet (lien) |
![]() ![]() Contested are: his gender, date of birth, first marriage and spouse, divorce. He would not be the mother of his three children but their father (see below). ![]() The following are contested: her high school diploma, her master's degree in literature, her thesis, her role as a press attaché in the early 1980s, obtaining the CAPES (Appendix A 32), The Alsatian episode, although subject to contestation (Appendix A 5), appears to be fair overall (Appendix A 36). ![]() There, it's about right. However the paucity of bibliographic evidence on Emmanuel as a child and Jean-Michel raises questions about the possibility that they knew each other before 1992.
|
It is strange that the date of birth of "Brigitte" was only made public in May 2016 with the publication, in the short-lived magazine "Pop Story", of a long eenquest by Sylvie Bommel entitled "And Brigitte created Macron". In the Macronian gesture, "April 13" corresponds to the death of Manette [Emmanuel's maternal grandmother] that occurred three years before "Brigitte's" birth date was given. In the story, April 13, 1953 is the date of the launch of MK-Ultra, the infamous CIA mind control program. |
![]() | ![]() See also the end of Chapter 9 and the Appendix A 36 |
![]() After the broadcast of "Brigitte Macron, a French novel" which incidentally revealed the physical existence of Jean-Michel Trogneux, Natacha Rey posted, on the same platform, this more than disturbing assemblage putting side by side the current "Brigitte" and "Jean-Michel" at the dawn of adolescence. |
![]() | The 2018 France 3 documentary "Brigitte Macron, a French novel" shows this photo featuring Brigitte and her first husband André-Louis. This is actually Claude Hugot, a fellow teacher. Then there was a fake tweet the same year, using this photo, reuniting husband, wife and lover (Emmanuel at 12) (article). And a fake interview with Andre-Louis, actually a hoax (article)... |
Anne Fulda, author of the book "Emmanuel Macron, un jeune homme si parfait", had written the following about Brigitte Macron: "She mentions little about André-Louis Auzière, her ex-banker husband. Out of modesty, discretion. Because there are things she doesn't want to, can't say?" In 2017, during the presidential election, international journalists had tried to interview André Louis Auzière, in vain. In an article in Gala magazine entitled "As if he had never existed !", there is a passage by author Sylvie Bommel: "fascinated by this enigmatic man, the English journalists searched everywhere, without finding anything." (link)
The journalist who has most investigated André-Louis Auzière is undoubtedly Sylvie Bommel. Charged with laying down the "official legend" in her river article "Et Brigitte créa Macron" published in Pop Story in May 2016, she wrote that after Emmanuel's arrival in "Brigitte's" life, "he was not seen again in Amiens, he was assumed to have left for Paris, but in truth no one knew anything about it. Wiped out, erased. As if he had not existed. To the point of not wanting to meet his ex-family-in-law at his mother's funeral". She will launch in spite of everything in his search, a game of track which will constitute the essential of "He had just been 17 years old", his second investigation published in 2019. In vain... [F&D501p9] |
![]() A thorough analysis of this wedding photo can be found in Appendix A 9. | ![]() Enhanced image of the bride |
Having become our correspondent in this investigation, Natacha Rey contacted, on June 22 [2021], Catherine Audoy (from the professional contact given by the interested party on the Internet) in order to present her with the multiple inconsistencies nestled in Brigitte's "green years".
If the answer never came, the result was immediate since in the wake, on July 13, 2021, Natacha Rey saw the gendarmerie bursting into her home. She was taken into custody (without being summoned) on the pretext of a complaint filed by Catherine Audoy with the public prosecutor of Lisieux (where Jean-Louis Auzière officiates as a legal conciliator). Our correspondent was released after five hours of tough interrogation, with a moral lesson, humiliations and threats of all kinds. She was asked for the list of journalists with whom she had been in contact (we were not the only ones) and her phone was seized. Had Natacha Rey touched the sensitive nerve by simply exposing the physical similarity between Jean-Michel Trogneux and the current "first lady" and by demonstrating the impossibility that Jean-Louis Auzière was the cousin of an unlikely André-Louis Auzière first husband of "Brigitte" ? |
All this leads to believe that Catherine Audoy could really be the mother of Brigitte's three children, that's what Natacha Rey, Xavier Poussard and their readers, including myself, have deduced. It was only later that another explanation was given (Chapter 29).
![]()
It is then possible to build a scenario where Jean-Michel would be the biological father of his three children Sebastien, Laurence, Tiphaine Auzière, the biological mother being Catherine Audoy married Auzière. On his side, Jean-Louis Auzière can then be considered as an adoptive father, even official from the administrative point of view. A striking resemblance of features between Catherine and Laurence goes in this direction. Xavier Poussard goes further by estimating that the resemblance is strong with the three children [F&D501p10]. However, the Betaface comparison is more mixed, 63% to 60%, between the three Auzière children and Catherine Audoy ![]() |
Strangely these last few days, I was contacted by several people, whose either the math teacher neighbor in Amiens, or the daughter or son knew Brigitte Macron well from the time when " she " was a teacher. Some people, incredulous, tried to defend her and accused me, without even having read the investigation, of spreading rumors or false information and of trying to harm her. However, it turns out that ALL of them, without exception, spoke to me about a Madame Trogneux and not a Madame Auzière, even though she is supposed to have taught under only two names: Madame Auzière until 2006 and Madame Macron from 2007.
Refer to the first issues of Faits&Document devoted to the "Brigitte Macron Mystery", where this name problem is mentioned [F&D503p3], since journalists who interviewed witnesses at the time also called her Madame Trogneux "at the time of the scandal caused by her affair with the young student Emmanuel. Without knowing it, these people did me a favor by bringing water to my mill, confirming, if it were needed, the credibility of my thesis. |
Would Jean-Michel Trogneux have started a family with Catherine Audoy? Did Jean-Michel Trogneux suffer from the psychiatric disorder known as gender dysphoria ? Would he have resorted, late in life, to a GRS (Gender Reassignment Surgery) type MTF (Male-to-Female) operation? After his "gender reassignment", would he have chosen Brigitte as his first name ? "Brigitte" and Jean-Michel Trogneux are they one and the same person ? To what "vital choice" does "Brigitte" refer in "Elle" (August 18, 2017) ? It is indeed hard to believe that it is a "simple" divorce when you read :"I know I hurt my children, and that is the thing I blame myself for most. But I couldn't not do it, there are times in your life when you make vital choices. And for me, it was." |
The scenario could look like this:
|
![]() Warning: this tree is now discarded, as far as Catherine Audoy is concerned, replaced by the one at the end of Chapter 29, in version 3. |
One Trogneux has so far gone completely under the radar (no mention in the press or on genealogical sites), Jean-Jacques Trogneux was born in November 1982. A birth announcement is available in the archives of the Courrier Picard at the BNF (with the problems that this source poses as we have shown). On 15 November 1982 the birth of Jean-Jacques Trogneux is announced, son of Jean-Michel Trogneux and Madame, née Véronique Dreux. |
If the hypothesis of the genealogy of Jean-Michel Trogneux in the 70s / 80s may seem complex, it could be explained by a simple double life (he would not be the first), favored most often by compatible professional activities (commercial kind) ... before his gender dysphoria which, we can easily understand, would have exploded in full flight his conjugal liaisons
Brigitte's biography is clearly false... she can't get 2150 € of retirement pension (source L'Obs in 2017 tax declaration of the Macrons, 17.200 € received between January and August 2016) for an incomplete career, knowing that in the private sector it is calculated on the 25 best years and represents at best 65% of the net salary, or a teacher who moreover is not certified couldn't have an average income of 3.000 € / month for 25 years. With only 31 years of professional activities in her biography even adding 4 quarters per child (3 children or 5?), the discount is severe... [details] |
2017, Brigitte Macron (72) moves into the Elysée Palace. Some of our subscribers wonder about the eight-year age difference induced by the transsexual hypothesis and its implication on "Brigitte's" physique. Without even touching on the difference in skin ageing between men and women and without detailing what plastic surgery currently allows, a simple comparison with Amanda Lear (born Alain Tapp, probably in 1939) or with the singer and trans woman Marie-France (born on 9 February 1946) will allow us to sweep away the objection about the physical/age relationship. |
Similar wigs, some might think the singer Iggy Pop, pictured opposite, born 1947, 75 in 2022, would be his younger brother (or sister ?).
"It all started with Natacha Rey who, as soon as she saw her appear, took it for granted that Brizitte was a transsexual and investigated for three years... Some only obsessed over her wig and blue-plastic contact lenses... already bizarre. In order to deny that he wore a wig, the Élysée Palace used a procedure that will go down in history. The palace published a job advertisement looking for a hairdresser capable of applying extensions [article of 11 January 2018]. Unheard of! The Presidency never publishes a job advert for such a position. It's a bit technical, though, extensions [page Wikipedia] only lengthen a head of hair... and countless close-ups of Brizitte's head corroborate that she only wears wigs. Which are all the more noticeable because they are too big... unless she has a male-like head volume...". Article from 18 January 2022 also featuring short videos showing that in the way she moves and is, Brigitte is not very feminine... | ![]() |
Tweet comment:
"Thanks wind! Here you can see very well the little bit of hair attached to the front on the very small shaved hair and another floor with the hairpiece, I was a hairdresser and I know how it's messed up !". Also noticeable is the wrinkled skin on her hands and forehead. | ![]() |
AV - Have you been a victim of social media too? Recently, you were called a man on social media. First it hurt you, that?
BM - At first I looked at it from a little bit far, I heard about it and then well... And then at some point I realized that they were turning my genealogy upside down. AV - What do you mean? BM - That is, they had changed my family tree. That is to say, three quarters of the family was fine and then all of a sudden you get to my brother. I am my brother. And now we're touching my parents' genealogy and now it's impossible. AV - When you say "they," who are these people? BM - There are three levels. The first level is the transmitters, in this case there are women, transmitters who have apparently been pursuing me for a long time. I don't know, I don't go there. Then there are those who relay and amplify. Then of course there are the hosts. And me, if I don't go there, if I don't do anything, even though I've been against harassment for four years, I won't be heard. They're going to tell me "but you, you don't do anything". AV - Exactly. But you, you have, if I dare say, the means to defend yourself. BM - Completely. AV - I mean, a 13 year old or a 13 year old who continues to suffer in silence... I think it took you five-six days to get some information out... BM - It took me five and a half days... AV - Five-six days, you? BM - Yes, five and a half days, I think, yes. So you can imagine ... With a lawyer who is experienced in the practice... |
The proof
January 23, 2022: while I am in the process of first finalizing this page, I learn of the discovery of a >>>video INA>>> of 1 min 47, dated September 27, 1977 (it has disappeared from the page INA around February 10, I replaced it with a saved version, 15 MB). It features an interview with "Véronique and Martine, transsexuals in the 70s", Martine with her face uncovered and Véronique with her contours in the dark. On the television channel "Antenne 2", they answer the journalist François Desplats with the comment (typing errors included) :"Veronique and Martine, who became women after an operation, bring a testimony on their transsexuality. With her face hidden, Veronique talks about her operation. For her, it is not a transformation because she has always felt like a woman. Martine evokes her difficulties in the working world. Since her operation, she had to change jobs because the environment in which she worked would not have accepted her gender change". This video is incomplete. The rest of the dialogue between Veronique and François Desplat is transcribed in Appendix A 19, but the gist is already here.
This comparison of voices allows us to affirm that Brigitte and the transsexual Veronique are the same person, therefore that Brigitte was born a man. |
Mid-1980s. Jean-Michel Trogneux (40 years), although a family man, becomes aware of the "gender dysphoria" that he has buried for so long and is about to perform his "reassignment". It must be said that the times strongly encourage such steps. [...] The law is beginning to evolve. if it is still legally and medically forbidden to change one's sex by surgery in France, a public care pathway was defined in 1979 on the basis of a two-year psychiatric follow-up before being able to access hormonal treatment and then surgeries (it takes three years) that are quite expensive and generally performed abroad, mainly in the Netherlands and Great Britain.
Under the influence of Pastor Joseph Doucé's Center of Christ the Liberator, which welcomes, connects and files (on whose behalf ?) members of "sexual minorities" (homosexuals, lesbians, sadomasochists, transvestites, transsexuals, pedophiles, etc. ), from Dr. Léon Pérel who operates openly at the Saint François clinic in Paris and from Henri Caillavet (Masonic dignitary of the Parliamentary Fraternity), the media are giving an ever larger place to the subject. |
As an introduction to this chapter, after its writing and before its finalization, I add, on January 22, 2022, a discovery of this day, from twitter : a new photo of Jean-Michel Trogneux ! The context in which it is taken, under a banner of the Groupe de Libération Homosexuelle, and the blatant resemblance with other photos (see below), even more than the one with Pastor Doucé, leaves little doubt.
Here is this photo present here on the website of the magazine "Têtu", in a slideshow of "12 archival photos of the first Parisian prides". It is dated June 25, 1977, Jean-Michel was 32 years old : (P.-S. of February 3: another photo with the banner and the two people on the right) Hypothesis rejected (the figure in the top hat not being Jean-Michel Trogneux after all) |
![]() ![]() In the center photos, you can see the same incisors spread out... |
He is in the second grade. He has a romance with his drama teacher, a married woman 24 years his senior. [...] In the winter of 1992-1993, the high school drama club had been in decline for a few years. Brigitte Auzière did not hesitate to revive it. A dozen high school students are enrolled, including the boy she had seen at the internship report ceremony, Emmanuel Macron, who is in second grade like her daughter Laurence. |
![]() The private Jesuit high school La Providence in Amiens. In 1993, Emmanuel Macron played the scarecrow in the play "La comédie du langage" by Jean Tardieu (a premonitory title for a manipulator of lies and a premonitory role to which was added that of puppet...). Brigitte Trogneux / Auzière, French teacher, in class with another pupil and in front of her pupils. At this time in Amiens, there is no photo or video of Emmanuel and Brigitte in the same picture. ![]() There are quite a few photos on the internet of Brigitte at the "La Providence" high school, with other teachers or with students, often from the France 3 documentary "Brigitte Macron, un roman français". It is difficult to date them, as Brigitte worked at this school from 1991 to 2007. Xavier Poussard [F&D499p5] and Natacha Rey believe that during a certain period, Brigitte systematically wore a scarf around her neck, as if she was hiding the traces of an operation (Adam's apple...). See also this photo from tweet (or over-interpretation of restoration software?). ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() On the left 1st L class in 2000/2001. On the right photo is obtained from the previous one by clearing the hair around the ears. All the photos from that time show Brigitte had a much smaller chest than in her post-2015 photos. |
Journalist Gaël Tchakaloff, born Lucile Gaël Buffet (1971) is a close friend of Brigitte Macron (dixit: calls her when she's not well. "she is a regular at the Élysée, wanders through the corridors, the offices, enters the madame wing (the private part) like a mill." She also wrote a book about her "duality" "Vacarme" (duality man-woman ?) (links : 1 2). Gaël is her middle name at the civil status, a mixed name, which is never neutral, because her mother wanted her to have "the freedom to be a girl or a boy, like George Sand". Strange to find this reference as Brigitte / Véronique does when talking in 1977 about Sand and Chopin who would be transexual. |
"When I told Brigitte Macron, by phone, of my desire to tell the relationship that the First Lady has with the head of state, she reacted very badly," the journalist confided. She then added: "It hurt me. To the point of crying, sobbing, hiccuping." [...]
In his book, Gaël Tchakalof explains that the couple can't stand anyone touching their intimacy and that it's the only subject that can truly piss off Brigitte Macron. As recounted in the book, the latter had moreover indicated: "I do not want anyone to talk about us, I do not want our couple to be exposed". Writing this book was therefore no easy task. The author explained that she spent more time fighting for access to the presidential couple rather than writing. "As soon as it became known that I was writing a book, politics everywhere replaced friendship," she revealed before indicating "I was constantly in the conflict of loyalty between friendship and writing." |
At the Trogneux household, it is a million miles from imagining the vaudeville that was being played out in the family home where the couple met.
Emmanuel took advantage of Jean-Claude Trogneux's [his elder brother] absences to sneak up on Brigitte, who was basking by the family pool. And would run off into the bushes with his towel, as soon as he reappeared.
[...] The confrontation comes, however, when the eldest of the siblings stumbles upon the couple in the garden. This is the starting point of many quarrels. [...] She will not succeed in convincing them of a necessity: the first lady may well assure that she has always perceived Emmanuel Macron as a contemporary, but those close to her measure at the time each of the twenty-four years that separate them |
![]() |
Brigitte is the woman of his life, the one Emmanuel Macron met on the benches of high school. He was a student, she was his drama teacher. A transgressive love that would lead to marriage many years later. But before reaching that point, the lovers had to face the wrath of Emmanuel Macron's parents, who did not look kindly on his romance with an older woman. Worried about the future of their beloved son, Mr. and Mrs. Macron even decided to abruptly remove him from his school in Amiens and "exile" him to Paris. If since then, water has flowed under the bridge, Françoise Noguès, the mother of the former Minister of the Economy, has not forgotten the wounds of the past. She even decided to tell them to the journalist Anna Fulda in the book Emmanuel Macron, "Un jeune homme si parfait". In it, the mother of the family talks about the one who overshadowed her in her own son's heart: the omnipresent Brigitte. In its new issue, on newsstands on Friday 6 April, Closer explains why the relationship between the two women has not always been a happy one, far from it! |
![]() |
In Rue Saint Simon, a neighbour of the Auzières, hiding behind her curtain, counts Emmanuel's comings and goings and decides it is her duty to inform the management of La Providence. At least the latter signs the letter with his name.
[...] During the presidential campaign, when it was indeed necessary to deliver some details about the circumstances of their meeting, the Macron couple did everything to ensure that the three fatal words "détournement de mineur" were never uttered. |
In the heart of Picardy, between Amiens and Vimeu, two young boys grow up with everything in opposition. A few years apart, they don't go to the same schools, the same streets or the same parties. One has a neurologist father, and a wonderful French teacher, his grandmother called "Manette". The other lives in a run-down house, far from everything, and dreams in words.
Both will flee to the capital to fulfill their personal destiny, and make a name for themselves. Eddy Bellegueule becomes Edouard Louis, a famous novelist, translated all over the world, gay, very committed to the left, close to the sociologist Didier Eribon. Emmanuel Macron, Manu for his friends in Amiens, will be President of the Republic.Thus this city - where François Ruffin and Najat Vallaud-Belkacem also grew up - was the field of investigation for Hervé Algalarrondo. He criss-crossed Picardy to understand and trace the only impenetrable world of French glories: youth. He found the teachers, the very close or old friends, the unknown stories and the dreams of our young Rastignac.
"His French teacher Jeanne Verdier admitted to finding out that Emmanuel had exfiltrated to Paris in September and that his parents were close to pressing charges." |
![]() |
On 26 April 2017, an investigation by the "Daily Mail" [link] recounted the episode "Jean-Michel Macron personally contacted the management of Henri IV to ask if they would accept his son with the guarantee that he would be separated from Madame Trogneux. The headmaster kept the family secret." In the same article, Patrice Benoît Delespierre, a journalist with the "Courrier Picard" recounts that "it was a huge scandal. In all honesty, they don't really like to talk about it. The whole thing embarrassed them enormously. His father Jean [Trogneux] was furious." And Christian Monjou, Emmanuel Macron's English teacher at Henri IV, explains that "his father had put him there to get him away from this woman". |
This is how Emmanuel Macron found himself in Paris at the age of 17 to complete his final year at the lycée Henri-IV. In the evening, he returned to his maid's room alone, complaining about his parents' decision to keep him away from his girlfriend. Fortunately, when he returns to Picardy at the weekend, there are moments stolen from the world during which he clandestinely joins Brigitte Auzière in one of the Trogneux family's properties in Amiens. So many moments when, despite the love his parents have for him, he breathes away from them, sometimes considering their decision to send him to Paris as a cruel injustice. A fact, added to the divorce of his parents, that one could suppose to be at the origin of the need for family blossoming that Emmanuel Macron has since cultivated and that he has been able to set in motion with his bride. This is what Tiphaine Auzière, Brigitte Macron's youngest daughter, recalled to Europe 1: "Even if we are not very far apart in years, he has always taken care of me, of the children.(...) He is my father-in-law, that is his place and as such he is also a head of the family. Family is something important to him, that's why he wanted to get married." |
Everything about the wedding footage shown in "La stratégie du météore" [France 3 documentary, November 21, 2016, five days after the presidential candidacy was declared] is strange, from the sleeveless and particularly short dress worn by "Brigitte", to Emmanuel Macron's pink tie, not to mention the wedding cake evoking the horns of a Baphomet. While Emmanuel Macron's witnesses are well known, his fellow Science-Po Paris student Marc Ferracci and his patron Henry Hermand, the wedding witnesses of "Brigitte", presented simply as childhood friends, remain unknown. Strangely, this marriage does not appear in "Les Echos du Touquet" which only mentions a baptism as an activity of the town hall on October 20, 2007... |
![]() | ![]() Image excerpted from a >>>video>>> 2 min 13 min marriage broadcast on FR3 (the one just above is from that too). |
At the ceremony on October 20, 2007 Article 76 of the Civil Code was not applied by the registrar. Only the first name of each of the spouses was mentioned and it was not specified that Brigitte Trogneux had been previously married and to whom
(link).
So was this ceremony indeed a civil marriage or rather a civil partnership between two people of the same sex ?
(link).
Apparently the law does not explicitly prohibit a fake marriage ceremony.
The first name change could have been done previously by remaining a father in the civil registry (link). For the Orleans Court of Appeal on the other hand, a man with a physical appearance close to the other sex and whose real personality and new identity was perfectly accepted in his work relationships justified a particular interest in changing his first name and this, before any surgical intervention. (CA Orléans, 12 November 2011, n°11/171016). It could therefore be that the first name Brigitte was chosen on purpose because it allowed to ensure the confusion with the wife of Jean Claude Trogneux born one year before Jean Michel Trogneux. Brigitte Annick Jacqueline Poillion born on April 28, 1944 in Bressuire, married on September 26, 1990 to Jean-Claude Marie Joseph Trogneux born on August 14, 1933 in Amiens. Pursuant to Article 60 of the Civil Code, any person who demonstrates a legitimate interest may request to change his or her first name (link). Finally, it could be that Jean-Michel Trogneux waited until March 29, 2017 to change his sex at the civil status. It 's on this date that it was possible to do so without performing a sexual reassignment surgery link, Law No. 2016-1547 of November 18, 2016 on the modernization of justice for the 21st century, JORF No. 0269 of November 19, 2016 (Article 56 of the law). Decree No. 2017-450 of March 29, 2017 on procedures for changing first names and modifying the mention of gender in civil status, JORRF No. 0077 of March 31, 2017). |
While investigating the "green years" of Emmanuel Macron, as part of his investigation "Two French youths", the journalist Hervé Algalarrondo has made a blank at every step "That's when I think I have "the right idea, address Brigitte. [...] She is the one who manages relations with the Macron family. A Bigourdan elected official told me his surprise, during a visit of the president to Bagnères. Out of kindness, he had asked her about her sister, Estelle, who lives not far away. Emmanuel Macron turned to Brigitte to know what to answer." |
The character of "Manette" has several uses. First, it essentially helps explain the absence of photos and memories of Emmanuel Macron "So I spent my childhood in books, a bit out of the world. It was an immobile life" (Revolution). Although he never officially lived in her house, Emmanuel Macron sows doubt [...]. This account of a "grandmother whose background is a perfect Epinal image to illustrate the republican rise of a daughter of the people" ("A young man so perfect", Anne Fulda, Plon 2017) served, at first, to reassure François Hollande and the Socialists that "Emmanuel is of the left". Did the "Maman Ninie" of the Mitterrandian gesture inspire the communicators to the role assigned to "Manette" ?
[...]Anne Fulda briefly raised the possibility that Emmanuel Macron had "nearly been adopted by his grandmother", "goddess of his enchanted world", "queen of his childhood and even of his adult life". |
![]() |
At first glance, the real mystery remains the near absence of shots of Emmanuel during his childhood. A childhood that takes place in the 1980s and 1990s, a time of massive democratization of photography and home movies, the golden age of the Polaroid, the camcorder, endless slide sessions and voluminous photo albums.
[...] Emmanuel Macron is said to have insisted on being baptised at the age of 12 in the chapel of the Lycée La Providence [link]. [...] Be that as it may, it is surprising, to say the least, that the first shots of Emmanuel Macron's "official legend" are these three photos taken in the school (and not family) setting, a series dated from his year of 5th grade, i.e. from the year 1989-1990, i.e. twelve years after his birth. |
![]() |
The enigma that is Emmanuel Macron's biography now has a first name "Jean-Michel", his forgotten middle name in his application form to Sciences-Po Paris (section internationnale, 2001). A first name that, in a very strange redundancy, happens to be that of two "phantom" characters of the Macronian gesture, namely his father, Jean-Michel Macron and his uncle and godfather Jean-Michel Noguès... |
In fact, it is essentially from the receptions organised at Bercy by the Macrons that the Mathieu Gallet [CEO of Radio-France, with whom he is said to have a romantic relationship] rumour has been spread.
[...] This is probably the most blatant known example of the assumed perversity of this couple operating as a well-practised acting duo "Every dinner at Bercy is an opportunity for Emmanuel and Brigitte to raise the issue in front of their guests. "You know, they say that Emmanuel is homosexual... but it's totally untrue", says Brigitte Macron, who seems particularly affected. [...] For his part, when he receives editorialists or press bosses in private to prepare for his flight, Macron never forgets to mention "the rumour" in these political conciliabula. He can't help it he is obliged to talk about it.
[This obsession with denial, in a private setting, ends up being counterproductive, because it rekindles the rumour.
[...] A former member of the Macron campaign would later confide "we knowingly relayed the story about Mathieu Gallet" (quoted by Marc Endeweld in "Le grand manipulateur", Stock 2019). A counter-fire in short. |
[sequence 1, in a stationary car, early 2017, before the election]
The one we absolutely must not let pass is Emmanuel Macron. He's the candidate of finance, a former Rothschild banker, so it stinks of conflict of interest. Frankly, I wouldn't vote for a guy like that. Besides, people leave his meetings in the middle of them because it's really crap. On top of that, he puts up black curtains to hide the empty seats. The guy is good at selling wind, frankly... I knew him in 2013, it was when I was in the porn industry and of course I was invited to private parties, private orgies, and I had the opportunity, so I know that this guy is bi... So I had the opportunity to sleep with him and, uh, it was a threesome, but that's not the point actually. The point is that when you see him in private, when you've talked to him, you realise that he's a real scumbag. You really realise how much contempt this guy has for people, it's really... but... phenomenal. Afterwards, I can tell you that I had the chance, I'm one of... maybe not the only one, but one of the Frenchmen who had the privilege to put him in the ass, oh yes, and that's priceless. There are some things you can't buy. [sequence 2, in a garden, half empty bottle in hand, just after the 2nd round of the election, 7 May 2017] Hello everyone, it's Alexis, well I drowned my sorrows in alcohol. Today, I can say it: I fucked the president. Yes, Macron... Well, no, joking aside, those of you who voted for Macron, you're really idiots, because now you're going to have him up your ass for five years. I, at least, have the merit of having fucked him in the swingers' parties. It doesn't matter, we're still going to get it in the ass... It's not for lack of warning, I can tell you that in the months and years to come... Don't come and complain, it's not worth it, frankly, I'm telling you this very sincerely, from the heart. If I voted for Marine Le Pen, it was precisely to counter this guy. You're going to realize in the months to come that this guy is a madman. You're going to have a lot of demonstrations, that's it, too bad for you. It's too bad for you. And those who are going to lose their jobs and who voted for Macron, I won't come to pity you either. And then you will regret and say "Well shit, if we had known...". You followed the media propaganda, that's it... But I think most people are sheep and apparently that's not going to change. That's something to digest, I'm going to finish my bottle, bye... [sequence 3, earlier or later, in the same car, driving] I met an actress who frequented private libertine parties. They weren't parties where you pay, you go in, they were parties with rich people.... there are lawyers, businessmen, showbiz people, who come to these kinds of parties. Some people pay for this kind of party, I was invited. It was this actress who let me in because she knew the owners. And so she got me into this kind of environment. You have to know that in this kind of place, I saw some famous people, even ministers, people in the assembly, from the right and from the left and I can tell you that politics is a joke because they make you believe on TV that they are fighting, that they hate each other, that they don't agree and all that, but in reality you see them fucking together. So they're fucking together and they're talking business together, so it's a little bit contradictory. |
![]() Under the copyright "Réau Alexis/SIPA", we find Alexis photographer in a report by "L'Obs" (link) on the party organised by Brigitte at La Rotonde, a famous Parisian brasserie, on the evening of the 1st round, Sunday 23 April 2017. He takes photos 3, 4, 5, 8 of a 14 photo slideshow. Here three extracts. ![]() After their wedding cake in the shape of a giant phallus with devil horns, the Elysian couple have on several occasions displayed astonishing attitudes, including receiving DJ Kiddy Smile's tranny and trans group at the Elysée (link). Aunt Yvonne must have been turning in her grave... Less surprising is the long friendship between the Amiens-based Brigitte and Michou, born Michel Catty in 1931 in Amiens, openly gay, died in 2020, famous director of a concert hall in Paris (link). |
My analysis of Emmanuel Macron comes from both the images I have in my possession and the biography the candidate claims to have. The young Emmanuel Macron at the age of 15 was severely sexually assaulted by his teacher who at the time was 39 years old.
Instead of the rosy view of this union, which could be defined as a reparative marriage (to repair the rape), I see in it rather the fact that Emmanuel Macron's development was prematurely blocked in the middle of adolescence because of a seduction operation, both psychic and physical. What happened was to go beyond a taboo and to go beyond a limit. The very limit prescribed by the taboo. So the first passage was the conviction that everything was allowed.
Naturally this feeling of omnipotence took place within the good bourgeois society of Amiens in the North of France. If this union had taken place in a proletarian social environment, that environment which Emmanuel Macron deeply despises, well Emmanuel Macron would have been destroyed and would be followed by the social services and Brigitte Macron would be in prison. This is the sad truth. We are facing a pedophile type problem. Once the limits of the taboo were exceeded, it happened that the idea of omnipotence proper to each child was subsequently encouraged. The paradox is that the child is not only a child of the world, but also a child of the world of his or her parents, and that he or she is not a child of the world. The paradox is that he seems pathologically normal but we are in the midst of narcissism. Since his youth, Macron has nurtured an extraordinary ambition. He needs the gaze and admiration of others to compensate for an inferiority complex. So we are faced with 3 paradigms that define a certain type of personality :
What do these 3 paradigms structure? It structures what we call a psychopathy because we are confronted with an individual, Emmanuel Macron, who as a psychic organisation is perfectly definable as a psychopath. The word "psychopath" is not an insult. A great American analyst, Nancy Mac Williams, explains verbatim that a psychopath can reach the highest levels of the American administration. So the psychopath can of course be a deviant but if he is well organised culturally, socially, etc., he can also reach the top of the elite in politics, finance, which is the case in the profile studied. The psychopathic personality is characterised by an infinite number of items, let's say reference points for example:
This we see clearly in Macron's hysterical outbursts as admiration pales and highlights the weaknesses of his identity. This hysteria is characterised by his interest in theatrical productions which, by a disturbing coincidence, recall his personal history with his teacher who taught theatre. The psychopath is untrustworthy but succeeds in convincing his interlocutor through his fascination. He has no remorse. When Macron talks about the poor or insults the proletarians of the North by reducing them to smokers and alcoholics, when Macron denigrates women by reducing them to the rank of ignoramuses, we return to the discourse perfectly explained by Jacques Lacan. For he believes in what he says and cannot help but express it. So Macron defends himself by changing the meaning of his statements but without ever expressing remorse because he never feels guilt. So what is the problem from a psychiatric point of view? How dangerous is the character? I answer that there is no doubt about it: Emmanuel Macron, like all psychopaths, is particularly dangerous. A specialized American intellectual, let's call it "well-integrated disturbances" among notables said verbatim " serial killers destroy families while psychopaths in office at the top of politics and economics ruin societies. " Why is Macron dangerous? He is dangerous because :
The conflictuality with Marine Le Pen is not for him a conflictuality only of political level. He cannot accept that a woman, the Marianne, the representative of France is his antagonism. He needs a nurturing mother. Any other relationship with a woman becomes difficult to assume. So this fragility is very dangerous because like all psychopaths who work only for themselves and who consider others for their own greatness underlines in this case how dangerous a country like France is at the moment when faced with a candidate of this kind. |
![]() The feeling of omnipotence of "Jupiter" on coming to power, in front of the Louvre pyramid on 7 May 2017 (link). In hindsight, the slogan "Ensemble la France" is revealing of a character with an assertive psychopathological profile who did not hesitate in a crisis situation to impose segregationist measures affecting millions of French people in their daily lives, even assuming that he wanted to screw them to the end ! |
"The unvaccinated, I really want to fuck with them. And so we're going to keep doing it, all the way. That's the strategy". Signed Emmanuel Macron. The most fanatical Macronist defenders will cry that this is fake news. Well no, it comes from Le Parisien dated January 4, 2022, picked up by AFP, then in all the newspapers and is running at full speed on social networks. The new year is starting well.
Yes, with this statement Emmanuel Macron has insulted millions of French people by annoying them. This did not fail to cause a general outcry, whether from the political parties or on the internet.
We have never seen a President of the Republic who has so divided and fractured the people, treating them with rare contempt. We remember his invective about "those who are nothing", "the illiterate", "the lazy", and "the Gallic people resistant to change". But even more seriously, we are concerned about the mental health of the President of the Republic. For to hurl such insults, especially when one is head of state and has responsibility for nearly 68 million French people, one must be totally politically suicidal, or suffering from a serious pathology. This is why many internet users are seriously asking the question: is Emmanuel Macron suffering from psychosis? The hashtag #Macronisunpsychopathe (Macron is a psychopath) appeared on Twitter after these statements. If he is not, he does have many of the characteristics. Psychosis is defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Psychiatry (DSM) 4 and 5 as an antisocial personality disorder that is based on antisocial behaviours resulting in "a pattern of disregard and transgression of the rights of others that has occurred since the age of 15 years" that can be associated with at least 3 manifestations below :
Furthermore, the profile of the psychopath is presented as "an arrogant, manipulative, insensitive, seductive, dominant and fearless person". Our national button fits this definition well. What are the deputies and senators waiting for to start the impeachment procedure immediately? What are the police doing? This man and his government are a danger, a disturbance to public order that the French will not put up with for another 5 years. It remains to be seen how Macron's supporters, the Marcheurs (hey guys Winter is coming!), as well as the staunch covidists, will come up with ideas to continue defending the indefensible. Good luck with that. Our solution is a psychiatric diagnosis and probably a straitjacket. |
![]() This sign "Macron degree" has a history. It was shown in a France 3 report with the word "degree" deleted (photos, link). |
In his second video, Adriano Segatori repeats that "Macron has no morals", that he is a "predator" who must successfully immobilize a prey. Symbolically, this can be France, or the French... which he is rightly warning. According to him, a being endowed with reason should be afraid when a president declares, "We will limit access to social life for the non-vaccinated." Those who do not go in "the direction of good", in other words the Yellow Vests, the non-vaccinated or even the anti-sanitary passes, seem to be his adversaries, his prey. Emmanuel Macron pursues a goal without bothering with moral and ethical considerations and crushes those who do not adhere to his policy. |
![]() |
The date of birth of "Brigitte"
Remember that before being given precisely in May 2016, the date of birth of "Brigitte", was commonly located at "the late 1950s". We reported the birth of a Brigitte Trogneux in the civil status of the "Courrier Picard" of April 14, 1953 (not April 13, 1953, the generally accepted date), a civil status published in the April 15, 1953 edition of this local daily newspaper in which there was also a birth announcement for Brigitte Trogneux (reproduced in F&D #500). It had escaped us that a first announcement had been published in the previous day's edition (April 14, 1953), but that this birth was not mentioned in the civil status of April 13, 1953. Strangely, this first announcement omits one of Brigitte's sisters, Monique Trogneux. If it is surprising to say the least that a birth can give rise to two different announcements, let us stress that these documents are subject to caution. Indeed, if on an extremely reduced set of documents (in this case the one attesting the existence of a Brigitte Trogneux born on April 13, 1953), we already find a significant number of forgeries (false testimonies, false wedding announcements, false pictures of "Brigitte" child, etc.. ), doubting the authenticity of the rest of the documents in the file becomes a methodological imperative, which is indeed the difficulty of this investigation where it is a matter of disentangling the true from the false and not of "believing" or "not believing". |
Constituting one of the most explosive episodes in Emmanuel Macron's biography, his meeting with "Brigitte" was placed at the centre of the Macronian gesture by the "spin doctors". A way of taking the lead and mastering this narrative in order to gradually make the French swallow it. A declension of the fable of the frog [in the Marie bath] to modern propaganda techniques, this strategy involved changing the story in small steps and therefore lying by playing, as is often the case, with the chronology of the facts.
Although it has since been identified, this large-scale media manipulation left behind a fog in the minds of the general public, allowing for a subliminal acceptance of a story that could never have been accepted if it had been made clear from the start. |
The media provide the staging and support the official version of the Elysian characters, but, of course, they are not the string-pullers, the ones who decide, as depicted in the image opposite [from microtaxe.ch, with regard to the words of psychologist Adriano Segatori presented in the previous chapter, link]. The media have owners, here presented, and, as a result, journalists also flail around with a status of television puppets. The media owners are the real stagehands behind the scenes. However, the image is correct, the Invisible Hand is indeed that of capital, the French billionaires with their media empire. Thus in the hierarchy Macron is effectively the Pinocchio of the political farce through the distorting mirrors of the press. No one is fooled, in other words, the major French media are in the hands of very few large groups, which facilitates manipulation and silencing. A few details: SFR for Patrick Drahi, LVMH for Bernard Arnaud, whose son-in-law is Xavier Niel, co-owner of the newspaper "Le Monde", who declared in 2011 "When journalists piss me off I take a stake in their duck and afterwards they leave me alone" (link).
For the title of this chapter, I hesitated in the qualifier to attribute to the media : diligent, indigent, servile, complicit... There are all of these. Serge Halimi spoke of "reverent journalism". |
![]() |
![]() |
On the left, a case of the lie factory, and its denunciation. Macron has increased the pressure on the hospital and weakened it with the non-renewal of strategic stocks of masks, with budget cuts and bed cuts, even during the health crisis of 2020, with the exclusion of staff in July 2021 (vaccine obligation). He is therefore the first responsible for the hospital crisis of late 2021 and he blamed the non-vaccinated !
Right, a case of covering up the lie, and exposing it. The lies follow one another, but, discreetly, Macron tries to erase some of them to better persevere in his flight forward. |
![]() |
![]()
|
![]() ![]() ![]() Saturday afternoon demonstrations, here on 4 September and on the right on 31 July 2021 (in Rennes, photo Ouest-France). 1: Eyes in the eyes "The health pass will never be a right of access that differentiates the French. It cannot be mandatory to access everyday places, such as restaurants, theaters and cinemas, or to go to friends" Emmanuel Macron, source Le Parisien of 29/04/2021. The word of this government is worth nothing ! 2: Billions for the hospital. Not for the multinationals. Let us eradicate the macronavirus. 3: I am a trader, not a health policeman |
Moreover, while I sometimes sense a lesser combativeness among the Resistance, I think that we have here more than a subject of indignation, we also have a subject of laughter, of mockery, of quips, of sauciness, and we would be wrong not to laugh at the back of those who oppress us. There is no transphobia in laughing at ultra-mentors. What would Pierre Dac have said on Radio London ? Let's not let this opportunity pass, it's a morale booster and allows us to attack 2022 in good spirits with the will to knock down the house. |
Alongside novlanguage [reference to Orwell and his novel 1984], accusatory inversion has a prominent place in the propaganda tools of the oligarchy. Let's decipher it.
Accusatory inversion is a well-known defence process in court, which consists of imputing the final cause of a crime not to the guilty party but to the victim. Thus, for example, if a tourist was the victim of a pickpocket, it is because he was careless in displaying his money: in a way he incited the thief to commit the act. The accusatory inversion has become a weapon in the hands of the oligarchy, all the more formidable because it relies on media stifling. The oligarchs never cease to accuse their opponents and the European peoples of their own vices. An example is conspiracy theory, which is a right-wing extremist disease that sees conspiracies everywhere. But in reality it is the oligarchy that is constantly plotting against the peoples of Europe: against their sovereignty and their identity. The oligarchy is not plotting, but it is negotiating the Transatlantic Treaty in the greatest secrecy. They are not plotting, but they are using every means to draw us into increasing hostility towards Russia. It is not plotting but imposing on the French people, with the Lisbon Treaty, a European treaty that they had rejected by referendum. |
![]() ![]() "The manufacturer is not responsible, the government is not responsible, the vaccinator is not responsible, but if you are not vaccinated, you are irresponsible". "Not a health or political crisis, but an insane criminal enterprise" (link) |
![]() (the existence and date of the marriage Jean-Michel Trogneux - Véronique Dreux are explained in the next chapter) Attention : this tree is now rejected regarding Catherine Audoy : it is replaced by the tree in Chapter 29 Part 2, in version 3. The assumptions for Emmanuel Macron remain valid. |
Given the above and which is not in question, this act can only be falsified. The failure to indicate the 1st marriage which we know is fictitious is not proof of this, but other elements point in that direction.
First of all, the Town Hall of Amiens has already communicated forgeries. I spoke of the non-birth in Amiens of Jean-Michel Trogneux on a deed of April 15, 2021, there are two other similar deeds, dated March 24 and April 12, 2021. It is therefore from December 2021 (when the Jean-Michel Trogneux affair breaks out) that the Amiens City Hall begins to disseminate the birth certificates of Jean-Michel and Brigitte Trogneux, the first appearing right and the second false, we will now see another reason to consider it as such. With a real and a false document, we find there a way to blur the tracks. Xavier Poussard adds "How to explain the fact that on these two birth certificates, provided by the same administration, relative to two individuals born at the same time, that of Véronique Dreux lists three marriages in the marginal mentions, while that of Brigitte Macron omits her first marriage to André (-Louis) Auzière" [F&D504p04]. Hypothesis rejected |
I can tell you, as a doctor who has family members who are medical advisors to the CPAM, that there is very little possibility that the person you are talking about, who was suffering from a morphological sexual ambiguity, was referred to Dr. Françoise Noguès by the CPAM. It can only be the intervention of a specialized association and of colleagues also specialized in this field. This shows for sure that Dr Françoise Noguès was very sensitive to this type of situations and close to these associations. This is a point that strongly caught my attention, it struck a chord, because this is not really the daily life of a cashier's doctor. Sensitized by what? This proximity, when compared to the cases of "her lifelong friend" [Jean-Michel / Brigitte Trogneux], and her brother "with troubled youth" [Jean-Michel Noguès, there the relationship is less obvious, cf. Appendix A 13] strongly questions. There are very few medical advisors dealing with this type of problem, and as if by chance, the name of Françoise Noguès pops up. This leaves one wondering. |
I have long suspected that the Auzière children were born in the United States, more precisely in New York, where former flight attendant and painter Catherine Audoy (the real mother) resided.For the official version, Tiphaine would have been born in Amiens in 1984, while at the time her parents were supposed to live in Strasbourg. She had to obtain a certificate of French nationality before taking the lawyer's exam in 2009, a procedure that is only justified when there is a doubt.
I'm pretty sure she has dual French-American citizenship, as do her brother and sister. The fact that the nationality of the 3 Auzière children is not mentioned on the court summons, while that of Brigitte Macron and her double Jean-Michel Trogneux is specified, only reinforces my opinion. |
No one seems to mind:
|
April 2. A correspondent sends me the photo below, of a Première class in Algiers in 1960/1961 at the Collège-lycée Notre Dame d'Afrique. He wonders about the unidentified student in the second position from the left of the top row.
![]() ![]() ![]() With a photo reworked to firm up the features, the comparison Betaface increases from 70% to 72%. The comparison at a glance and by Betaface is not very convincing (nor prohibitive). But with someone else from another class? It is possible that Jean-Michel spent several years in Algiers, including in a high school. April 4. Here are new photos from the Saint Joseph El-Biar boarding school in Algiers in 1961, with a student who could be Jean-Michel Trogneux (links : 1 2). At this point, not much can be inferred... ![]() ![]() ![]() André Salette, the only one named in these two photos was probably born in 1945 in Marseille, the son of an unknown father and of a mother born in Algeria (link Geneanet). 1945 is also the year of birth of Jean-Michel Trogneux |
![]() |
André [André-Louis Auzière, Brigitte's husband] was transferred to Alsace. [...]
In order to find a place for his little family to stay, André leaves first to take up his new position as deputy director of the Banque de France's regional delegation of Foreign Trade (which will later become Natixis). One of his professional relations, Jean-Marc, who works at the Autonomous Port of Strasbourg, praises the merits of his village of Truchtersheim, where his wife runs the nursery school. [...]
Truchtersheim (don't pronounce the second h, but you can save yourself the trouble and just say Truch as the locals do) is then a village of 2,000 souls that can be reached in half an hour from Strasbourg. [...] André and Brigitte rent from a farmer a yellow house leaning against the hill [violins, thanks Maxime Le Forestier. [...] At Truchtersheim, Brigitte uses the method of concentric circles to expand her network at record speed. Invited to dinner at the Uhrweiller home, the ones through whom they got to know Truchtersheim, the Auziéres meet other couples there. Whom they invite to dinner. Who then invite them back with new nipples. And so on. [...] In 1991, the Auziéres leave Alsace. With the exception of Mrs. Uhrweiller, the former school principal, none of her Alsatian friends will hear from her again, until the day in 2016, when, dumbfounded, they discover her on the cover of Paris-Match on the arm of a very young man, a minister. |
The citizen survey continues and continues to bring us new evidence. First, I return to Jean-Michel Trogneux's jewelry store in Toulon, covered in the Appendix A 20. One of our correspondents, knowing the city of Toulon well since 1988. does not remember the Gallice jewelry store. She believes that the most famous jewelry stores are in the "haute ville", while the Rue des Boucheries where Jean-Michel Trogneux's store was located is in the "basse ville". It was therefore a common jewelry store. This means that the purchase of this store was not a very large investment.
Another of our brigittologist correspondents brought us, in the evening of April 9, valuable information :
|
![]() About her portraits of the Auzière children on her Facebook account, Catherine Audoy reportedly spoke the truth when she said they are family, but not on her side, - implied - her husband's side. They are the children of a niece of her husband and also the grandsons of his great friend. As for Jean-Jacques Trogneux, he is the son of the great friend. It is understandable that she painted them, but it was a detail that stimulated the sagacity of Natacha Rey ... |
This citizens' inquiry is moving forward on several fronts. Significant progress has thus been made on the Alsatian side. And that makes the readers' (and our team's) brains work. On April 30, a new brigittologist correspondent sent me a message, reproduced at the end of Appendix A 5 where he raised two unpublished remarks that caught my eye :
An unidentified woman? While just before, on April 25, almost certainly, Brigitte Trogneux (aka Jean-Michel) was identified in a 1990/1991 photo in Strasbourg (Appendix A 32)... Brigitte Trogneux, who was called Brigitte Auzière at the time, would know Truch less well than her children, even though she is supposed to have lived there since 1984 (Appendix A 32) or at least since 1989 according to the election leaflet (Chapter 7) ? How can these two pieces of information be reconciled ? It is true that the election leaflet shows a young woman who is not Brigitte Macron. To explain it, it was believed that this tract was rigged after the fact. But if it was not? If the Brigitte Auzière of 1989 was not the one of 1990/1991? And that's where Proba Auzière comes in, you know? This Proba Auzière knows Jean-Michel-Trogneux very well, since they are the parents of the three Auzière children. We even saw that they reversed their roles, the mother Proba Auzière became the father (André-Louis Auzière) and the father became the mother Brigitte Auzière, later Brigitte Macron. Proba is a first name invented because we did not know what to call this niece of Jean-Louis Auzière. The presence of two Brigitte Auzière in Truch shows that her real first name is Brigitte ! And there it is, the sleight of hand, the magic illusion: Brigitte Auzière née Auzière is replaced by Brigitte Auzière née Jean-Michel Trogneux ! In addition we have a photo of this Brigitte née Auzière, it is on the 1989 leaflet (assuming it has not been doctored...) : ![]() ![]() Brigitte Auzière the probable mother of Sebastien, Laurence and Tiphaine Auzière. Let's go back to the magical illusion and try to pin it down further:
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() The first three appearances of Brigitte Auzière, née Trogneux, in the "Lucie Berger" faculty photos. On the right, this same Brigitte with Tiphaine, aged about 7, around 1991. In 1984, Sébastien was 9 years old, Laurence 7 years old. We would be curious to know a photo of them with their mother before that age... |
Date | Location | Event | See |
11/2/1945 | Amiens |
| |
1949-1960* | Amiens |
| |
1961*-1963* | Alger |
| |
1969 | United States |
| |
1972-173 | Amiens |
|
|
1973-1979 | Blangy-Tronville |
| |
1980-1984 | Beauvais |
| |
1984*-1991 | Truchtersheim |
| |
1991-2007 | Amiens |
| |
2007-2015 | Paris |
| |
2017-2022 | Paris |
| |
Notes :
|
|
Level | Hypothesis | Reference | |
6 - Certain | AA. Brigitte and Veronique the transsexual (operated or not) are the same person, so Brigitte was born and raised male. | red box
from Ch. 14 | |
AB. The three childhood photos of Brigitte Macron represent three different children. | Ch. 9 | ||
AC. André-Louis Auzière and Brigitte Macron wedding photo is doctored. |
Ch. 7 and
App. A 18 | ||
AS. Brigitte Macron, under the married name Brigitte Auzière, taught several years in the high school "Lucie Berger" in Strasbourg. | App. A 36 | ||
5 - Almost Sure
(intimate conviction) | AD. Jean-Michel Trogneux and Brigitte Trogneux married Macron are the same person. | Ch. 8 | |
AE. The 1950s family photo is dated 1954. |
Ch. 3 and
App. A 11 | ||
COMIC. Brigitte Auzière, niece (or cousin) of Jean-Louis Auzière is the mother of the three Auzière children. | Ch. 29 + App. A 25 | ||
4 - Likely | AG. The man sitting next to Pastor Doucé is Jean-Michel Trogneux (for both photos, the color one from "Faites entrer l'accusé" and the black and white one of unknown origin) |
Ch. 14 and
Ch. 25 | |
AH. Emmanuel Macron's biological father is not Jean-Michel Macron but a friend of his mother Françoise Noguès (Joseph Doucé or whatever). |
Ch. 23 and
App. A 21 | ||
AI. Andre-Louis Auzière is a made-up character. | Ch. 9 | ||
BA. Jean-Michel Trogneux and Jean-Louis Auzière met in Algiers around 1961 or in the US around 1969. | Ch. 27 | ||
BC. Jean-Marc Uhrweiller and Jean-Michel Trogneux met in Algiers. | Ch. 28 | ||
AK+AU. Jean-Michel Trogneux had a younger sister Brigitte who died young, she is the one in the family photo. | App. A 37 | ||
| end of App. 18 | ||
3 - Fairly likely | AJ. Joseph Doucé is the biological father of Emmanuel Macron. | Ch. 25 | |
AL. Jean-Michel / Brigitte Trogneux is a transsexual (operated). | end of Ch. 22 | ||
AM. Jean-Michel / Brigitte Trogneux is a transvestite (non-operated transsexual). | end of Ch. 22 + video of Ch. 13 (fly) | ||
2 - Maybe | AN. Jean-Michel Macron is the biological father of Emmanuel Macron | Ch. 23 | |
BB. Jean-Michel Trogneux and Jean-Louis Auzière met in Amiens around 1972. | Ch. 29 | ||
1 - Unlikely
but plausible | QA. Emmanuel Macron and Jean-Jacques Trogneux have the same father Jean-Michel / Brigitte Trogneux. AP. | Ch. 23 | |
AR. Emmanuel Macron and Jean-Jacques Trogneux have the same grandfather Jean Trogneux. | App. A 24 | ||
AO. The 1950s family photo is faked (adding the little girl or adding Jean-Michel). |
Ch. 3 and
App. A 11 | ||
|
Ch. 6 and
App. A 11 | ||
BE. An Auzière woman, who is not a niece of Jean-Louis, who may be his close or distant relative or unrelated, is the mother of the three Auzière children. | Ch. 29 + App. A 25 | ||
0 - Rejected |
| Ch. 10 + Ch. 29 | |
| App. A 11 | ||
|
red box
from Ch. 14 | ||
| Ch. 14 | ||
| Ch. 23 |
![]() This photo found on a tweet is from the German magazine Der Spiegel. It was taken on September 26, 1991 for the diamond wedding anniversary (60 years of marriage) of the couple Jean Trogneux - Simone Pujol. The added captions appear good. "Brigitte Trogneux" is present, but her husband "André-Louis Auzière" and her brother "Jean-Michel Trogneux" are missing. Why is the photo released not the one where everyone is facing the lens ? Perhaps to hide the presence of Véronique Dreux, the mother of Jean-Jacques and Valérie Trogneux? |
![]() Tastes and colors, we don't judge, but it's hard to resist a good word : "With such a taste of shit, no wonder he wants to fuck !" As a bonus, the official photo of the Pompadour show on the Elysee website and a article. | ![]() |
![]() "The Republic in action: speech by the President of the Republic on the theme of the fight against separatism". The institutor of apartheid, the great separator, the one who trampled on freedom, equality, fraternity. Lies, always lies... (from the Elysée website ) |
Brigitte Macron lived for several years in Alsace, in Truchtersheim, with her first husband André-Louis Auzière and their three children.
[...] Alsace holds a special place in the heart of the first lady, and for good reason. She lived for several years in the town of Truchtersheim with her first husband André-Louis Auzière and their three children, Sébastien, Laurence and Tiphaine, born respectively in 1975, 1977 and 1984. They rented a house in Truchtersheim from 1987 to 1991 and she was a literature teacher at the town's secondary school and then at the Lucie-Berger Protestant secondary school in Strasbourg, a past recounted in the documentary Brigitte Macron, un roman français broadcast on France 3 last June. It is thus with great nostalgia that she returned there in the afternoon of November 5, 2018. [...] Happy to return to Truchtersheim, Brigitte Macron asked to see a circle of close friends again , a request honored by Justin Vogel, the mayor of the town. If the interview took place away from the cameras, one of the people authorized to discuss with the first lady confided, and not just anyone, the former nanny of her daughters. "I am very, very moved to find her"... |
![]() [format initial] In other words, the brigittologist (or the) Fiko first noticed that this photo was deposited there in 2017, the year of Macron's election, by a woman named Sarah K with a blurred face. This one had deposited on the site two photos in all, this one and one other with Brigitte). Among the students in the class, the identity of 13 of them was presented and listed in the database. Fiko had the idea to go and look for the information attached to them and discovered with surprise that these former students of the same class had very different ages today, between 33 and 67 years old... Sarah K. should have been in less of a hurry and more cleanly executed her trickery... |
[As noted in this chapter,] there are strong inconsistencies in the official Alsatian narrative. JMT/BM's presence in Truch is disputed on social networks. There is a cluster of elements that seem to say that it was not him who was there but an unidentified woman. In the TV movie "A French Novel", a lot of things seem fake: illustrative images, hesitant testimonies of Thiphaine and the mayor, there is also a visit of BM to Truch and there too the mayor says yes yes yes but doesn't seem to believe in what BM says (video). The meeting sounds artificial with the women they meet.
In a article in L'Express, Elise Karlin described in 2018 a meeting of BM with former acquaintances and wrote "...the wife of the head of state calls one of her daughters and passes her interlocutor to her, so that she herself asks for news..." Amazing that one of the girls stands behind her phone to catch up if problems... Uhrweiller met Auzière in Algiers and probably JMT, I'm not sure what his testimony is worth if out of friendship he covers for his former friends. However, it is his testimony that Bommel reports and that gives a little consistency to the Alsatian story and to the Auzière man who is perhaps non-existent. All the photos from the period are from the BestImage agency so possibly doctored. |
The "transparency charter on the status of the spouse of the head of state" is a little masterpiece of camouflage. The spouse is entitled to a director of cabinet, a chief of cabinet, police protection, operating costs... But, I promise you, he or she does not receive any remuneration, he or she does not have any presentation expenses and he or she does not have his or her own budget! In August 2018, on a page of his blog, Paul Cassiat had drawn up a one-year assessment of this "management of opacity" entering an "Orwellian way of managing public affairs". In 2022, transparency, which was based on this agenda, became very obscure. |
Regarding Jean-Michel Trogneux's residence at 14-16, rue des Vergeaux in Amiens (lot VC 26), we have been able to establish that this address corresponds to an apartment located on the second floor of a three-story building. [...] Jean-Michel Trogneux bought this property on March 28, 1996. [...]
The research that we have carried out comes up against several anomalies. For example, the mention "nothing" is displayed in the Fichier informatisé des données juridiques immobilières (FIDJI) concerning Jean-Michel Trogneux for the urban building section VC number on plan 26 (co-ownership rue des Vergeaux 14-16 and 9-11 rue des Lombards lots 2, 21 and 251) while his identity is taken into account by Télé@ctes. [...]
Our team in Amiens interviewed shopkeepers and residents of the neighborhood. All are categorical : "never seen or heard of a Jean-Michel Trogneux". In the building of 14, rue des Vergeaux, the name J-Michel Trogneux, written by hand, is stuck "à l'arrache" on one of the mailboxes placed on two makeshift trestles. The building, its layout and maintenance do not seem to correspond at all to the economic and social level of the Trogneux described during our investigation. In the apartment (1st floor, left), inhabited, the television turns at full speed (one hears it since the street) but nobody answers, neither with the intercom, nor when one knocks at the door. The inhabitant seen through the window is an individual whose physical appearance is totally different from the "little fatty" presented earlier. We contacted one by one the inhabitants of 14, rue des Vergeaux. One person answered us, Mrs. Regond, who, surprised, specified us formally not to know Jean-Michel Trogneux. |
![]() |
It is in the form opposite that appeared in the BNF (Bibibliothèque Nationale de France) copy of "Echos du Touquet" of June 28, 1974, the announcement of the marriage of André-Louis Auzière and Brigitte Trogneux. We have seen that the photo is faked, but how could it appear in this newspaper ?
Since this newspaper is probably not digitized or microfilmed, the most likely hypothesis is that the BNF copy was stolen and replaced by a modified facsimile. This is technically difficult to achieve: finding the same paper, the same ageing, the same font. The State has these means (it is a question of protecting a State secret) and it is within the reach of specialists. Some of them are capable of creating false documents that deceive historians, who are by nature very suspicious... With such technical means, even if the substitution appears more delicate when it is about big bindings, the trickery being easier to discover, one can also modify a civil status record... The film Les compagnons de la marguerite de mocky by Jean-Pierre Mocky (1967) deals with this subject. To return to this announcement, we are surprised by the absence of the first names of the bride and groom, while the caption of the photo, including the involvement of the father of the bride in the life of Touquet, appears skillfully done. We return to this photo and Jean-Louis Auzière in Appendix A 18. |
![]() This photo has two light sources. Orange colored arrows indicate where the light is coming from, those in blue show the presence of shadow. The characters on the left are lit from above but from the right, the characters on the right from above as well but from the left. Now, the sun illuminates everyone in the same way, its light is diffused over the whole Earth and casts the same shadows unlike a projector which is omnidirectional. This would indicate that the characters on the left do not come from the same photo as the characters on the right. Another surprising fact is that they do not all look in the same direction. Or not at all. Normally one stares at the photographer. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
After searching long and hard for a photo that would show Laurence Auzière and Emmanuel Macron, who according to the official version were together in class at the "lycee", that is to say from the second grade. I finally found it again, although it could not be found on Copains d'Avant or Trombi and the press curiously never revealed it to us. I now understand why!
In truth, they were college buddies and together only in 9th grade. At the beginning of this school year, the year when his affair with his teacher Brigitte Trogneux known as "Auzière" began, the young Emmanuel born in late December was only... 13 years ! [...] Macron's parents themselves testified that they believed at the time that their son was dating Laurence, his young classmate, before discovering with horror, that he had in truth started an affair with her "mother" ! In public education, the latter would have been fired on the spot, prosecuted in Justice (prison sentence) and struck off the National Education. The press and media have been lying to you from the beginning [...]. By reducing the age gap and making the "romance" start later, they were trying to make the general public accept the unacceptable. Mass manipulation and lying, as always ! Hypothesis rejected |
![]() |
At first we thought this little girl would be Christine Boulogne, the first grandchild, daughter of Anne-Marie and her husband Gerard Boulogne. Strangely enough her existence "has never been incorporated into an official caption", she would be born on March 26, 1957 [F&D501p2]. But then the photo would be dated 1958 or 1959 which would make Jean-Michel 13 or 14 years old, that's not possible. Unless she was born before or it was another niece...
This made me doubt Christine's date of birth, is she sure? I did a search on the web. I found a Christine Haquin (her husband's name, first name Benoît) born in 1951 living Brégy in Oise (link). She is indeed the one married to Benoît Haquin (link on dirigeant.societe.com), living in the same town of Brégy and this 1951 date on an official company declaration document is more reliable than a date from Généanet. Assuming that Christine is 2 years old, we are in 1953, or even 1954, and Jean-Michel, born on February 11, 1945, is 8 years old, which seems the most likely. Correction of January 30, 2022. As I indicate at the beginning of Chapter 23, the publication of this page has provoked a citizen emulation, a small technical team has formed, gathering elements found on the Internet and analyzing them. First, yesterday, a message arrived indicating, with supporting documents, that there were two sisters-in-law in Brégy named Christine and married Haquin, one born in 1951, the other in 1957. And the one whose maiden name is Boulogne was born in 1957, as Xavier Poussard thought! The above explanation did not hold anymore and the one of Xavier Poussard, dating the photo from 1959, or even 1958, still did not hold, as explained above. We were thus in a dead end to date this photo. Happily, we had accumulated observations on this photo. First, very curiously, it also existed without the lampshade above Jean-Michel, as in this photo. This cleverly done retouching had whetted the curiosity of some Internet users who tried to solve "The mysteries of the lampshade". Thus the two tweets below were issued : ![]() ![]() The explanation for the first tweet does not appear to be conclusive, but the explanation for the second would be when you consider that the mother's right arm is facing backwards. The little girl would therefore be added. ![]() So it seems likely that this photo is a careful photomontage between the group photo of 1953, or even 1954 (with Jean-Michel and Monique's ages indicated in the two unbarred parts above), and another photo of 1961, or even 1962 where Nathalie Farcy is 2. Or also Christine Boulogne, the second photo dating from 1959, or even 1960. Or even a little girl unrelated to the Trogneux family... We can also add the hypothesis (expressed at the end of Chapter 8) of a Brigitte little sister of Jean-Michel who died very young, in which case there would be no photomontage, assuming that she was born around 1951 to justify the age gap with Jean-Michel. Or an older sister of Christine Boulogne who died young.
|
![]()
|
![]() ![]() ![]() | 1992/1993 ![]() In the trombinoscope |
Apparently, it was customary at La Providence to have a nature outing every year. So the bucolic photo is a school photo (like all the others of Macron). I have no objection to accepting the June 1993 date, even though I had originally dated it to the summer of 1992.
Apparently several classes were participating in the outing since Sebastian is present despite being 2 years older (if 1993, he is a senior). If several classes are participating, no oddity to see Laurence on the picture with Emmanuel. Prior to this outing, it is perfectly plausible that Brigitte would have requested and obtained that her youngest daughter participate in this field trip, especially if she was an accompanying teacher. |
Jean-Michel Noguès's medical thesis shows no dedication, only the names of the thesis director (Pierre Galibert, a neurosurgeon at the C.H.U. in Amiens) and the members of the jury. Its technical content seems clear, methodical, with balanced conclusions that are addressed to neurosurgeons.
In the Rosenwald Guide (directory of the French medical profession), for 1977-1978 and 1996 (last available at the BnF) : Noguès (Jean-Michel), general medicine, 27 rue Léo Lagrange, Amiens (today still a medical practice in a building bar). In 1977 as in 1996, Pr Pierre Galibert is the neurosurgeon of the Amiens Hospital. Jean Michel Macron, for his part, defended a scientific postgraduate thesis. In 1996 he was appointed professor of physiology (option "biological" and not "clinical") in the laboratory of functional explorations of the nervous system. So Françoise Noguès had a career as an office doctor, and her husband, Jean-Michel Macron, that of a physiology laboratory doctor (link). So doctors who do not treat patients directly. This may explain why Emmanuel Macron lacked confidence in the medical staff during the Covid epidemic, preferring to rely on Big Pharma. |
There is a kind of generalist-specialist segregation, still tenacious today, as some consider that a doctor is only a generalist because he or she could not access a University Professor specialty. Manette would have liked her son Jean-Michel Noguès to have had such a university career. Her daughter Françoise started a specialty in pediatrics, but did not finish it. She compensated by marrying Jean-Michel Macron, a PU-PH (University Professor - hospital practitioner). Her other daughter Marie-Christine is an ophthalmologist (she is married Bové, apparently Philippe Bové veterinarian in Amiens).
Of the three children of Manette, it is indeed Jean-Michel "the least graded", at least in the eyes of an ambitious mother, for whom the eldest son necessarily carries all the family hopes, almost the family honor. Ten years apart from her sister, Manette has indeed had time to hope... Personally, I consider the generalist profession to be the most beautiful, but prejudices have a hard skin. |
Germaine Arribet, daughter of an illiterate valet, born in Tarbes in 1915 and became a schoolteacher [then a geography teacher] then a college principal. Before the Second World War, she married Jean Noguès, whose parents were merchants in Bagnères-de-Bigorre. The couple moved to the Nièvre region and then to Amiens. [...] Every school vacation, Manette and Jean Noguès, whom the future president affectionately nicknamed Coulou, returned to Bagnères-de-Bigorre, to the family home, with little "Manu" in their luggage. [...]
Also his grandmother as well as his great-aunt Nicole are thus hardly surprised when one summer, barely of age, Manu comes to Bagnères to introduce them to Brigitte, his companion, 24 years his senior. "We took her kayaking, hiking," recalls Nicole. She immediately loved Bagnères and the Pyrenees. Brigitte adopted Bigorre and the whole family at the same time. Besides they also came back every winter to ski in La Mongie." |
In his book Revolution, Emmanuel Macron recalls his sweet childhood memories. "My grandmother taught me to work. From the age of 5, once school was over, it was with her that I spent long hours learning grammar, history, geography. And to read." More generally, she raises him at the expense of parents overwhelmed by their professional activities. So much so that at the age of 5, the boy asked his parents if he could go and live with her.
"As he spends most of his time in the house of his beloved grandmother, why not settle there permanently ?", write journalists Bernard Pascuito and Olivier Biscaye, authors of the book Politicians also have a mother. The parents refuse. "He was built a childhood with Epinal images that sell well. With his grandmother a teacher and his great-grandmother illiterate," said Jean-Michel, Emmanuel Macron's father in the book by journalist Anne Fulda, A young man so perfect. To the great despair of his parents, "Manette" considers Emmanuel to be her "son." And he returns the favor. He literally has an unwavering admiration and love for the one who is his preceptress, his compass, in short, his emotional pillar. And for good reason, when Emmanuel Macron, then a teenager, tied a romance with his teacher Brigitte, a married woman 24 years his senior, his grandmother is well the only one to support him. |
Although he never lived in her house, Emmanuel Macron sows doubt [in his book "Revolution"] : "So I spent my childhood in books, a little out of the world. It was a still life". "I remember those early mornings when I would go to join her in her room where she would tell her war anecdotes, her friendships. As a child, I would pick up the thread of the interrupted discussion each day and travel through her life like picking up a novel. And the smell of the café au lait that she would sometimes prepare in the middle of the night. And the door of her room open as early as seven in the morning when I had not yet come to join her, exclaiming with feigned concern "Are you still sleeping ?""
"According to several witnesses, Manette lived her retirement cloistered at home, among books. She almost never went out, the rooms were plunged into darkness. [...]At Bagnères de Bigorre too, the shutters often remained closed, she was never seen outside" [Deux jeunesses françaises]. Anne Fulda briefly touched on the possibility that Emmanuel Macron had "nearly been adopted by his grandmother", "goddess of his enchanted world", "Queen of his childhood and even of his adult life" [Such a perfect young man] [...] In a relationship akin to family instruction (now violently opposed by the government), one might wonder about the literature Manette would have recommended to her grandson. According to Candice Nedelec and Caroline Derrien, "as a teenager, the young Macron escaped by reading. [...] André Gide or even "Le roi des aulnes" by Michel Tournier are on his bedside table. Authors that his beloved paternal grandmother [...] gave him in sharing". [...] Let's skip André Gide ["The concerns of a private life marked by assumed homosexuality and the desire to shake up taboos are at the origin of" some of his texts, according to the introduction to his page Wikipedia] to focus on Le roi des Aulnes, Prix Goncourt 1970, a chemically pure synthesis of the obsessions of the intelligentsia at the time of its publication, in which Michel Tournier pompously manipulates signs and symbols (the concept of "phoria". ..), plays on the ambiguity between Hitler Youth and death camps ("malignant inversion") to rewrite the myth of the ogre and, ultimately, deliver a radically pedophilic work. [...] Is the strange mention of this work in Emmanuel Macron's official biography one of those signs he is so fond of ? A key to reading ? Would his official caption be made up of "malignant invertions" ? |
![]() [excerpt from a article from Paris-Match on January 5, 2018] [Reuters photo / Philippe Wojazer : Paris Book Fair, March 2017, in the middle of the presidential campaign] |
Emmanuel Macron's book, "Revolution," will be released on Monday in China on the first day of the state visit of the French president and his wife. [...]
Emmanuel Macron will be in China from January 8, 2018. So will his book. "Revolution", his book , in which he tells his personal story , his inspirations, his vision of France and its future [...] The French edition, released in November 2016 at the time of the announcement of his presidential candidacy, has sold more than 200,000 copies. The book is also already available in about 20 countries and translated into a dozen languages. [...] The French president is well known to the Chinese... for his love affair and marriage to his wife Brigitte. The age difference between the couple caused a sensation in a country where men tend to marry women significantly younger than them. |
It was in the 60s, Marie-Claire Stubbe had been received then by Germaine Noguès who occupied the post of principal of the elementary school [in Poix de Picardie]. At the origin of this interview, a terrible fact that Marie-Claire Stubbe would have done well without. "Until she was 6 years old, one of her four children attended school near Poix-de-Picardie. But her teacher was violent towards her. He beat her because she had visible marks on her face. And even, we could see bloodstains in a book."
So this unbearable and unbearable situation pushed him to find a new school for his daughter. That's when Germaine Noguès stepped in. "I will always remember that meeting. As soon as we told her about the problem, she didn't hesitate to welcome my daughter into the facility. She was very warm. It warmed my heart. I will always be grateful for what she did." |
At first glance, the story could only further enhance the luster of the saintly laywoman and "avant-gardiste" halo. On closer inspection, this one may well be tarnished by some awkward shadows. The journalistic narrative is designed to exalt the pious grandson through the uplifting life of his grandmother, and so it focuses on what Manette did...but not on what she didn't do. Faced with the drama of the little martyr, the caring and warm principal took her in without hesitation or delay. And that was it.
A teacher unabashedly indulges in unspeakable violence against one of his young students. She may not be the only victim, nor the first or the last. And the beating she received could also be a cover for something even worse. Taking in the child in this way can also be interpreted as the easiest way to discreetly cover up the tragedy... and ensure impunity for the perpetrator, allowing him to continue. Nothing in the story indicates that Manette did anything else. Like advising the mother to file a complaint, urgently alerting the school management about the teacher's behavior, reporting it to the rectorate, to the prosecutor... In short, what one would expect from such an open-minded, attentive and forward-thinking teacher in the face of "a terrible fact", "an unbearable and unbearable situation". |
Looking hard, we found three other photographs of Emmanuel Macron in the 1980s (still in his family). Diffused only once in the n°3547 of Paris Match, these photos were not diffused on Internet as it is now the custom. Inexplicably they were not incorporated into the authorized biographies produced later. |
![]() Brigitte has known Manu since at least the beginning of the 1991 school year (her daughter Laurence is in the same class as him). Let's even admit that, suffering from visual problems and a failing memory, Brigitte only became aware of the existence of the child, er... of the man in her life at the end of spring 1993. Manu was then 15 and a half, Laurence no more, Sébastien two years older, and Tiphaine at 9 years old was still in elementary school... Let's always admit that Sébastien, a 17-year-old teenager, finds it perfectly normal that a 15-year-old boy sleeps with his mother that Laurence, out of generational solidarity, finds it very "cool" that Mom's lover is a classmate; and that Tiphaine finds it convenient that between two cuddling sessions with Brigitte on the living room couch Manu kindly helps her with her homework. .. ![]()
![]() To summarize. The being apart and dignified banker forty years old regularly finds his wife in bed with a teenager, spends his weekends alone with his youngest daughter while his wife cheats on him... takes the first train to Lille and disappears until his death on December 24, 2019, abandoning wife, children, relations, reputation and money... Once again we are confronted with the absurdity of the official story that tries - very clumsily - to hide a frightening reality. As it has already been demonstrated before that the marriage Brigitte Trogneux - André-Louis Auzière is fictitious for lack of the existence of the husband, it is necessarily the same for the Auzière family ! But if there is no tangible trace of the real existence of the Phantom of the Bank, it is not the same for the "Auzière" children. They are real and were at once witnesses, accomplices and victims of the actions of their "mother". Before asking the question of their true identity, we must already question what they have suffered. Despite the lack of formal evidence, everything points to Brigitte/Jean-Michel Trogneux as the real father of Emmanuel Macron. But also as the author of a sexual attack on a minor of 13 years doubling as an incest according to the unambiguous statements - for once! - of the father/wife and the son/husband. If "Brigitte" was capable of such a crime on her son how could she imagine that she could not also have committed it on her other children, the Auzière children? Tiphaine admits it moreover : the three "Auzière" children were witnesses to the sexual assault on Manu, found it perfectly normal... and probably participated in it if we judge with what amoral candor a lawyer and politician tells about the sexual life of her "mother" and her very young lover ! |
Gabrielle Russier, born April 29, 1937 in Paris and died September 1, 1969 in Marseille, was a professor agrégée of literature. Following a love affair with one of her sixteen-year-old students, she was sentenced to a one-year suspended prison term for kidnapping and abduction of a minor. She committed suicide in her apartment in Marseille.
Her story has inspired many artistic works such as André Cayatte's film, Mourir d'aimer (1971), Serge Reggiani's Gabrielle (1970) [paroles], Anne Sylvestre's Des fleurs pour Gabrielle [1971] [paroles] and Mourir d'aimer by Charles Aznavour (1971) [paroles), or Josée Dayan's TV movie, Mourir d'aimer (2009), which will be criticized by the protagonists of the case. |
![]() |
![]() Gabrielle Russier had been expelled from the National Education. Brigitte Macron is introduced as a teacher by Minister Blanquer on November 18, 2021. We see that students and teachers are muzzled, victims of government harassment. | ![]() Already in September 2020, the pedocriminal dared to pose on the cover of a magazine against child abuse. |
Another extraordinary character is her husband ALA [André-Louis Auzière]. This one corresponds to the second administrative identity created in 1951 for JLA [Jean-Louis Auzière] born in 1943. This one was declared as their child by his grand parents. His administrative mother in fact his grandmother was 46 years old at his birth. She already had three other children born in 1917, 1919 and 1923. JLA was always called by his middle name André. It is him who under the identity ALA married Baphomet [Jean-Michel / Brigitte] in 1974. ALA, born abroad, never asked for a SS [Social Security] number, contrary to JLA who obtained it automatically, being born in France. It is thus under JLA's SS number that ALA's career was made at the BFCE and Natexis. However, he signed AA [André Auzière] as many documents attest. The JLA identity was used to take shares in companies. These company documents show that the AA signature is assured and consistent over several years, whereas JLA's signature over the same period is very inconsistent and therefore changing. Indeed JLA has always called himself Andre.
Some of the witnesses to JLA's existence are sincere. Notably the witness mentioned in the book "He had just turned seventeen by Sylvie Bommel". This witness, a former commercial director of the Autonomous Port of Strasbourg [Jean-Marc Uhrweiller, Chapter 28] knew JLA as a child in Algeria and always called him André. It is therefore possible that JLA served as a cover for Baphomet during his stay in Alsace. ALA on the other hand inherited from his parents at their death and therefore had a tax number. In 2003, ALA sold a property in joint ownership on rue du Faubourg Saint Honoré in Paris. JLA certainly transferred funds from ALA's bank account to access the proceeds of the sale. JMT [Jean-Michel Trogneux] also inherited from his parents and owns a property in joint ownership with Baphomet in Le Touquet. Finally, JMT was a witness at Baphomet's [fake] wedding with ALA and Baphomet [no, the 1st Brigitte Auzière, cf. Chapter 29] was a witness at JMT's wedding in 1980 [with Véronique Dreux]. The facts are statute-barred and most of the accomplices are dead. The crime was almost perfect. |
Francois Desplats (FD) - I can just assure you of the authenticity of Veronique's testimony. Veronique, I would like to know if, at the time you had this operation, which is the one you had, it was a difficult moment for you or it was just a culmination of something that had happened before ?
Veronique (V) - I believe that in fact there is not transformation because the psyche is already feminine and the individual, in this case me, is already prepared to this kind of mutation by necessity in the sense that one feels woman and one regularizes a situation without more. There is no mutation, there is regularization FD - You are completely female so you were operated on how long ago ? V - I don't really like the word become completely female. That is, we become a kind of woman who can copulate but cannot procreate. Hence the legal problems that we will talk about later. That is to say that the integration is done without problem on the individual level. They only exist on a social level; |
FD - You have a job that we're not going to reveal here, let's just say it's a public facing job
V - That's right, I'm a craftsman. I have regular contact with the public. I'm around customers. I don't have any problems. I used to have some, because I had a phenotypic gender, meaning an ambiguous appearance. I was taken for what I was not, that is to say for a homosexual, which was not the case, neither in my behavior, nor in my way of thinking. But unfortunately, this image resulted in a non-integration. And I regularized a situation for my integration. And I live very legally and very honorably. For the civil status, it is possible to change your first name for an ambiguous one. This is very important because it allows insertion, or pseudo social insertion. In the sense that there are always problems but that the problems are soluble at the administrative level, that is to say, by mutual agreement. But legally, there is no solution unlike all foreign legislation except for Belgian legislation which is modelled on ours. FD - Do you feel that you are now completely yourself? Do you no longer have any problem identifying yourself since you were of yourself since you had the operation? V - To tell the truth I only had identification problems with third parties, I didn't have any with myself. I considered myself as what I was as what I was, that is to say as a woman having a body which did not belong to her. It is very difficult to conceive for someone who is well in her skin. I use the term "comfortable in her skin" because it's the typical image because I didn't have any problems but people created them for me. Now I don't have a problem. To tell you the truth, this surgery, that is, this removal of an organ that is useless in our case because it is both unusable and unused... FD - Do you live alone? V - I am not with someone but I lived with a woman. And conceived this union in the style of George Sand and Chopin. Chopin was most likely a transsexual [Note by Xavier Poussard: we had not heard of this transphobic conspiracy theory...]. His melody, his way of playing, indicates it quite clearly. [...] I think the image that has been given of the Rimbaud/Verlaine union is a distorted, caricatured image that does not correspond in any way...[FD stops the conversation] |
Let's go back to a question that has just been asked: what craft may have been practiced by Jean-Michel Trogneux, aka Véronique, in 1977 and in the 1980s ? Chocolatier ? Perhaps, but rather a jeweler, since it is established that he owned a jewelry store in Toulon (where he married in 1980 with Véronique Dreux, as we have seen). Here is what Xavier Poussard says [F&D501p3] :
|
Even though Xavier Poussard specifically stated his source of information, we wanted to verify it. Here is that source :
![]() Document A So by books.google one had to query the "bulletin des annonces civiles et commerciales" from 1973. But this search engine no longer worked the same way. Depending on whether one searched by "Gallice" (link) or "Trogneux" (link), one would get, each time on the same page 13.133 the following extracts : ![]() Document B ![]() Document C By concatenating a morcau from "document B" with another piece of "document C", an "extended document A" similar to "document A" with additional information was obtained: ![]() Expanded Document A We could have stopped there and confirmed the Gallice information. Fortunately, there were several of us and one of us asked the right questions. Do these two fragments of ads, automatically assembled a few months ago, manually assembled with the new version of Google Books, reconstitute the ad ? Or do they belong to different ads? The wider knowledge of the ads and a careful reading of the "extended document A" gave the answer. Is Jean-Michel Trogneux the buyer or the manager? Can a jewelry store transform "materials, especially iron" ? Is it not rather the neighboring company, Picardie-Métal that processes iron ? And it is based in Blangy-Tronville, where Jean-Michel Trogneux married Véronique Dreux in 1980... At this point, we could only notice that there had been a confusion: the first part of "A" and "A étendu" corresponds to the Gallice jewelry store in Toulon, while the second part, the one concerning Jean-Michel Trogneux, corresponds to Métal-Picardie. The final proof was brought by a second assembly, of a "document D", which reconstitutes the integral announcement of Picardie-Métal : ![]() Document D (larger) |
It so happens that, by chance of common relations, we were able to get in touch with a friend of Jean-Jacques Trogneux [son of Jean-Michel, see three chapters before]. A relatively close friend since he was even his roommate for several years, in the early 2000s. By contacting this individual, we thought we could finally validate or invalidate our working hypothesis as simply as definitively. However, during the first telephone exchange (December 13 at 11 am), our correspondent certified to us that he had never physically seen Jean-Jacques Trogneux's father, had never seen photographs of him, and that Jean-Jacques Trogneux had never spoken to him about his father.
When we submitted our working hypothesis to him, the individual remained pensive before remembering that at the time, Jean-Jacques Trogneux often spoke of a young politician who was going to break the mold and that it was probably Emmanuel Macron. Three hours later, we were contacted again by the same individual who, in a completely different tone, affirmed that the current existence of Jean-Michel Trogneux was proven, that he had been a jeweler in Toulon, that he lived at 14, rue des Vergeaux, that Jean-Jacques Trogneux organized parties at the home of this father who simply did not wish to appear because of a failed curriculum and an unattractive physique ("a little fatty"). Furthermore, we needed to contact a third person who would tell us more. This third party did not respond to our solicitations. |
We are faced with three levels of disinformation :
Along with disinformation (including "trolling" on the Internet), there is, symmetrically, censorship. It can be useful to the researcher in pointing out the right leads... However, none of this is as effective as the very upstream and sophisticated editing done by Jean-Louis Auzière. I think he's really strong. |
Emmanuel Macron: The drama that haunted his childhood!
The energetic and charismatic presidential candidate, Emmanuel Macron, hides deep inside a family tragedy that occurred shortly before his birth. [...] When you read the biography of the Picard, you discover that he is the eldest of a sibling group of three children. This is not entirely accurate. Indeed, ten months before bringing Emmanuel into the world, Jean-Michel and Françoise experienced the cruelest of trials: losing their baby. A stillborn baby girl. Could the couple have avoided this terrible accident? It is possible that being both doctors, he at the city hospital and she at the Social Security, this question haunted them. Even though just two months after the tragedy, Françoise was pregnant again. Is it to implore divine protection on their unborn boy that they named him Emmanuel, which means "God is with us" ? In any case, it was a gift from heaven that fell to them on December 21, 1977, four days before Christmas. But if life takes over, death is still lurking. As Claude Askolovitch writes in Vanity Fair: "Françoise carries the wound. Every February, the pain is throbbing. Retired today, she exhales a suspended suffering that I feel the day I meet her because she wants to talk to me about her son." How does a child who succeeds a dead baby build himself? [...] |
In 2017, in his book "Revolution, he devoted five pages to his grandmother Manette. Against barely one to his parents. And two lines to his brother Laurent, and his sister, Estelle, just enough time to mention that they are radiologist and nephrologist and that he was therefore the only one in the family not to participate in medical discussions that lasted hours. No mention either of his half-brother Gabriel, born in 2005 from his father's second marriage, and even less of his father's partner, Hélène, a psychiatrist in a hospital in Amiens (and a doctor to boot!). On the other hand, he takes care to mention the first names of the three children of Brigitte and their spouses and those of his grandchildren [...]. |
Brigitte, the wife of the French president, Emmanuel Macron, will visit, the Central Faculty of Algiers (Benyoucef Benkhedda University) where she would have memories. Indeed, Emmanuel Macron will make an official visit to Algeria on December 6 as part of his tour in Africa. According to our information, the Algerian authorities have been informed of the desire of the first lady of France to visit the Fac Centrale d'Alger, where she would have studied. Currently, we have noticed all the same work of beautification of the university in question. According to our information, the work targets more particularly a room that Brigitte Macron would like to visit. |
![]() To the left Mickael Robinson, with his friend Barack Obama (disputed photo, comparison with variant or original more feminine, the retoucher is good...). On the right Michelle Obama, née Robinson, with her husband, presidentvof the United States from 2009 to 2017. Is this the same person ? Yes for this article, no for this one. |
I was looking, in this scenario, who might have prepared this before. I thought, this can't be right, there's an American in the loop. But I found a trace in an article in the newspaper Le Monde from 2019 of a man named Joel Benenson. He comes to Bercy [Paris, Ministry of the Economy] in 2015 when Macron is a minister to advise the Macrons on their communication. So who is Joel Benenson? He is the one who handled the construction of the Obama couple. |
Reputed member of the Grand Orient de France [Challenges, February 23, 2019], it is with a fairly extensive address book that Ismaël Emelien joined Emmanuel Macron at Bercy in 2014. The one for whom he has been working behind the scenes for at least two years will even introduce him as his "closest collaborator" to the influential "spin doctor" Joel Benenson during his visit to Bercy, in November 2015. Introduced by the Sarkozist Julien Vaulpré via the networks of the French American Foundation, Joel Benenson arrives haloed by his success in the 2008 and 2012 American presidential elections, having developed the strategy of selling the Obama couple rather than a program.
Let us note here that the more than substantiated suspicions about a transsexuality of Michelle Obama (cf. F&D 487] are today worth to Barack Obama's wife to be listed in the register of "famous transgenders and transvestites" established by the very informed website on the issue doublegenre.wordpress.com [site in French]. |
![]() ![]() On the left, in February 2014, Emmanuel Macron, accompanying François Hollande to Washington, had dinner with Joel Benenson [article with guest list, photo by Mark Wilson, Getty Images]. At right, Joel Benenson, referred to as "Obama's Guru" in a article in Challenge, was in Paris in July 2019 [photo AFP]. |
Manette [Germaine Arribet, married Noguès, Emmanuel's grandmother] was able to have a relationship with Jean Trogneux [father of Jean-Michel / Brigitte], and thus give birth to Françoise [Noguès, Emmanuel's mother]. She could, unlike others, be certain of this because of the absence of relations with her husband during this period. Françoise would then have had a special place. Through her biological father Jean Trogneux, with whom her mother Manette would have kept some links, she would have known very young her half-brother Jean-Michel /Brigitte. This explains both their long friendship, the resemblance between Manu and Jean-Jacques and the attitude of Manette during the liaison Brigitte-Manu. Somewhere, the fruits of his great love transient ... |
I think we need to dig into the Stonewall Inn in 1969 and also the first gay pride in 70. Brigitte Macron said she was in the US when Armstrong walked on the moon.... And only one month later.... Anyway here are some pictures of the event in Greenwich village at the Stonewall Inn. It deserves in my opinion further research... |
In 1980, Pierre Meyer decided to create a small show stage in the room of the family restaurant he had just taken over with his wife Cathy. At first, he presented shows by seven artists, recruited in Paris, once a month, then very quickly every weekend. In 1989, he invested the equivalent of 1.5 million euros in the construction of a 200 m2 stage [...] In 1996, the establishment was renovated. A new complex of 800 m2, renamed the Royal Palace, was built [...] |
![]() This postcard shows us the "seven artists, recruited in Paris". None of them bear a marked resemblance to Jean-Michel / Brigitte Trogneux (Betaface comparisons: 1 2 3 4). |
![]() Jean Trogneux was not a man of the field. Rather, he was a person made to evolve at a higher level in rather political spheres. Jean Trogneux remained in office until December 1978. He had decided to resign two years before his mandate expired, before the Moscow Games. Games that were marked by the forfeiture of some nations like the United States. |
Was Jean-Michel Trogneux conceived under the American bombing ? If we go back 9 months before his birth, we get May 1944. And it is precisely at this period that the Americans bombed the city, which had already been bombed in 1940.
This page tells about the bombing of Amiens on May 27, 1944 by the Americans, 4000 houses had been destroyed.
We notice that the Trogneux establishments remained open during the German occupation (ads : 1 (1940) 2 (1943) 3 (1943) 4 (1944) 5 (1944)) (18 rue Duméril is currently 12 place notre Dame). And Jean Trogneux was still competing in tennis. However, there had been the battle of Amiens from May 20 to June 8, 1940. From May 20, 1940 to August 31, 1944, Amiens had suffered four years of occupation by the Wehrmacht with its attendant humiliations, shortages, restrictions, despoilment, stigmatization, repression, deportation and extermination. It was liberated by the British and the FFI on August 31, 1944. 25% of the city was destroyed, including 60% of the city center. With the population fleeing the city, only about 5,000 inhabitants remained out of a population of 95,000 in 1939 (page Wikipedia). Had the Trogneux family, in part, fled this hell ? Perhaps to Algiers ? |
![]() |
[F&D500p4] This relationship [between Emmanuel and his grandmother] is akin to family instruction, now violently opposed by the government.
[F&D499p10] In "Les Macron" [Fayard 2017], it is stated that Emmanuel Macron was schooled at the elementary school in his neighborhood, the Delpech school. No class photo from these elementary school years is known [now we know one]. Then, when he entered middle school, the child would have been schooled at La Providence where he would have immediately bonded with Renaud Dartevelle [link], the main witness of these "green years" who however evokes a "quite superficial relationship", while specifying to Hervé Algalarrondo to have been received "at his parents' house". About these years of college, it was reported that Macron did his internship at the end of the third year in Paris, in publishing, at Bordas. And it was on the occasion of the delivery of his internship report that he would have caught the eye of "Brigitte"... |
![]() |
André Louis Auzière (or André-Louis) [F&D501p6]
Her first husband was a bank executive at the Crédit du Nord in Lille, then director of the Banque française du commerce extérieur in Strasbourg. ("As if he had not existed," see Chapter 9). Jean-Louis André Roger Auzière [F&D501p9] : In contrast to André, there is no shortage of sources for writing the biography of Jean-Louis, André, who was born on February 28, 1943 in Meudon (Hauts-de-Seine), the same day - a February 28 - as André, Louis. After studying law and foreign languages, Jean-Louis Auzière made a career in the luxury goods industry where he successively held the positions of sales and marketing director at Fabergé (1972-1978) and Revlon (1978-1981) before joining Parfums Grès as General Manager (1981-1987). Still in the same sector, he launched and chaired Indipar in Jouy-en-Josas (Yvelines), while also joining various professional organizations, having served as General Secretary of the Federation of Crystal and Mixed Glass Works and of the Table Arts Committee. He has been a French Foreign Trade Advisor (1983 and 1996), Knight of the Order of Merit (2012), and was sworn in before the Court of Appeal of Caen in February 2021, thus becoming a judicial conciliator in the jurisdiction of Lisieux (Calvados). |
|
![]() |
I'm leaning towards something secret service related for a one-time mission that matches the reversal of first name order.
Sometimes they also use deleting a letter in the name or replacing one letter with another. Also keep the birthday. It's not a "legend" per se, but it avoids cross-referencing and if the cover falls, it allows the mistake or the name of use to be invoked without embarrassment.
The fact that Jean-louis Auzière was a French Foreign Trade Advisor (1983 and 1996) could correspond to functions held in parallel "under cover" and "a minima" at the BFCE i.e. Natixis, under a slightly modified identity. |
Years | Person - City - Street |
![]() |
1975 | Auzière A - Issy les Moulineaux - 1 rue Claude Matrat | |
1977-1984 | Auzière André - Croix - 5 resid. Flanders | |
| Auzière André - Strasbourg - 26 rue Lorraine Meinau | |
| Auzière André - Truchtersheim - 4 rue des coquelicots | |
| Auzière André and Brigitte- Amiens - 17 rue St Simon | |
2003-2004 | Auzière André and Brigitte- Amiens - 66 bis rue Boucher de Perthes |
![]() ![]() To the left, a recent book by Odette Ducarre, published by Robert Morel, featuring the book by André Auzière (link). At right, two pages from this book. It was part of the "Collection O" : "Round books, created by Odette Ducarre, 96 pages, 6 cm in diameter, bound by a 3 cm diameter brass ring, patent pending for all countries" (link). |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Louis Auzière, his career plan.
![]() His appointment in the Official Journal of French Equatorial Africa of November 15, 1947 (link) |
After studying classical letters and a master's degree in these subjects (thesis on "L'amour courtois"), she brilliantly passed her CAPES in classical letters, which allowed her to teach French at the prestigious Lycée La Providence in Amiens. [...] In detail, there are several minor variations. [...] One of the media writes: "Brigitte Macron's qualifications: agrégée de Lettres Classiques".
DISCUSSION 1) The blurring of dates No matter how hard we look:
[...] By searching exhaustively on the internet, one learns for sure that Brigitte Trogneux is not a holder of the CAPES, but of the CAFEP. [...] However, the CAFEP [Certificat d'Aptitude au Professorat de l'Enseignement Privé] exam was only created in 1995. |
The Blangy property belonged to Jean (Georges) Trogneux and his wife Simone Pujol, as indicated in A directory from before 1973, "Trogneux J confis av Mail", the subscriber's trade being confectioner, they were indeed Jean-Michel's parents, the Amiens pastry cooks. They lived there occasionally, in a villa on a vast 3,142 m2 plot of land with a warehouse. In 1973, the couple installed their youngest son Jean-Michel, aged 28, perhaps returning from the USA, who set up, or was offered, a hardware business project, which we can assume corresponded to a previously acquired qualification (Chapter 27). Housed at goodwill by daddy-mommy in Blangy during the first year, a lease was established in May 1974 for 15 years in favor of Picardie Métal.
![]() ![]() Picardy Metal lease with Jean Trogneux, extract from the mortgages The domain, is subdivided into smaller plots in 1983, proof of the stop of the company Picardie Metal at this date (it is dissolved the following year). This subdivision looks like a subdivision company, to sell or rent to several third parties. The warehouse (parcels 139 and 142) is sold to SCI Blangy-Tronville as early as 1983. ![]() ![]() To the left is the Picardie Metal warehouse. On the right, the land register, at the end of Rue du Mail, with the 1983 division (link) (this is the total of the surfaces of these parcels, which makes 3,142 m2) + view by Google Map (link). |
She learns that the college of Truchtersheim is looking to replace a French teacher who must be absent for a few weeks, neither one, nor two, Brigitte is gone. She had never given a private lesson before, but discovered that she loved teaching and, even better, that she was gifted. The students love her. Brigitte has found both an audience and a profession.
Without a CAPES, however, it was impossible to land a tenured position in a public school. Luckily, private schools abound in the land of the Concordat and the storks. Brigitte was recruited by the Protestant college Lucie Berger, located in Petite France, a charming district of the Alsatian capital along the Ill River. |
Emmanuel Macron's wife has never made a mystery about what she thinks of her teenage years. It was one of the most painful periods of her life. When she was 8 years old, while she was still mourning the death of her older sister in a car accident, she faced another tragedy. A few months later, she lost one of her nieces, only 6 years old. The latter died as a result of acute appendicitis. |
In 2019, Senator Nathalie Goulet in the context of a fact-finding mission on social fraud and its impact on public finances noted that the RNIPP file has many inconsistencies. For example, according to the senator, of the 110 million people registered, 84.2 million are "reputed to be alive," according to the INSEE formulation. 3.1 million people are also registered in the RNIPP as being over 100 years old and "reputed to be alive," half of whom were born abroad (for comparison, Insee estimated that there were 21,000 centenarians in France in 2016). Nathalie Goulet recommends that the file be urgently updated this one conditioning the payment of social benefits. |
![]() Beauvais, the prefecture of Oise, is 66 km south of Amiens, halfway to Paris [Google Maps]. In March 1984, Jean-Michel lived in Beauvais with his wife Véronique Dreux and their two children Jean-Jacques and Valérie Trogneux. His three other children, Sébastien, Laurence and Tiphaine Auzière live in Croix, near Lille, with their mother Brigitte Auzière. During 1984, or a little later, Jean-Michel moved to Truchtersheim, near Strasbourg, with his three Auzière children, and from then on passed himself off as their mother... |
Years | Person - City - Street |
![]() |
| Trogneux J. confis - Blangy-Tronville - Av Mail
(this is Jean, Jean-Michel's father) | |
1972-1978 | Trogneux J-M. confis - Blangy-Tronville - Av Mail | |
| Trogneux Jean-Michel - Beauvais - 4 r Saint Pierre
(1981 could not be accessed) |
This general meeting of the Arasse company, a family business, takes place in its headquarters, in a room in the rue des Vergeaux in Amiens. It is May 25, the vacations are approaching, the atmosphere is relaxed. The participants, members of the Trogneux family, know each other very well, nobody is embarrassed by the fact that Jean-Michel is present under the aspect of Brigitte. We are in 2007, it has been about 25 years that the whole family is aware. The meeting goes smoothly, all the right decisions are made without conflict, and we gradually move into pre-apéro mode, gags and jokes beginning to colonize the seriousness of the notary.
The moment of the signatures comes in the midst of an aperitif transition. A pen is slipped into Brigitte's right hand, and she keeps her glass of sparkling wine in her left hand. She signs, as she is so used to doing as a teacher. It is then that the treasurer, who has remained on his first glass, realizes that Jean-Michel has taken the wrong side and has inadvertently affixed his female signature. Sapristi! What to do? We quickly decide to limit ourselves to asking the clumsy teller to add, while momentarily recovering his momentarily regain his senses, his old Jean-Michel claw. There is little space left, so much the worse if it overflows in margin. And for the duplicate, no more blunders, we stay on two signatures... Nobody will pay attention to this detail, we think then. |
On the left photo, the fly, proudly put forward, appears padded, the Adam's apple is not very apparent, there is no trace of beard and on the right photo the chest appeared discreet. Above all, the resemblance between the photo on the left and the one in the center appears striking enough to raise the question of the confusion of identity of the two people.
Then a thought process began that led to the opening of this new hypothesis. ![]() ![]() Hypothesis rejected (after rejecting the 1977 photo). |
We then asked ourselves, "what obstacle is there to this hypothesis of a mother looking like a man ?" On the spur of the moment, our little citizen team answered none, hence the first title. Two days later, on January 31 (actually the night before), we found this obstacle : Françoise Noguès appears shorter than the 1977 protester. The potential use of heels or a slope of the street does not allow to be sure. Another clue is that Françoise Noguès' chest is less "discreet" than estimated in the previous comparative photo. It is therefore likely that she is not in the 1977 photo and that the resemblance of the faces is coincidental. |
After the previous addition on January 29, here is the one for February 6, with these photo comparisons :
The woman with the tambourine from 1977 and Françoise Noguès, Emmanuel Macron's mother in 2017. Similarities, including the same pout in the left and right photos, and also potential differences such as the earlobe, smaller waist in 1977. Here we come to compare Emmanuel Macron's mother with a participant of the 1977 Gay Pride other than the one at the beginning of this chapter. If the comparison appears better, it remains uncertain. The reader will be able to judge this, as he will be able to judge the complementary elements brought on February 12 in the following chapter. Hypothesis rejected (after rejecting the 1977 photo) | ![]() ![]() Two photos ( 1 2 2 bis) of the 1977 gay pride, already reported in Chapter 14.
|
The presidential couple is in Honfleur (Calvados) where the head of state has offered a small crowd bath after having lunch at the Bistro des Artistes in the old town. Questioned by reporters to know if he was tired as implied by several of his relatives, Emmanuel Macron brushed aside any decline in form. "I'm not letting go of anything, I'm just like all our fellow citizens I'm attached to the balance of my family and the habits we have, he explained at the microphone of BFMTV. It's been more than 20 years that I come to this same café and I will continue to do so. I was there when I was campaigning, I was there last year, I will continue to be." |
![]() Except in the case of a woman with a particularly elongated face, this is constant. Even if there is a surgery to break the angle of the lower jaw and/or decrease the relief of the chin, the length of the lower tier remains unchanged, more or less. This is what gives Brigitte Macron that strange look, and the reason for the wigs (not extensions) that go to the shoulders. This is, in my opinion [that of the brigittologist Maria, speaking], the simplest way to recognize whether a skull is that of a man or a woman , by simple proportion. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Tucking is a technique where an individual hides the shape of their penis so that it cannot be seen through their clothing. This practice is often used by transgender women, as well as cisgender men in drag. There are fertility-related side effects caused by tucking, such as reduced sperm count. Some types of clothing are specifically designed to conceal the penis, such as gaffs or boxers. |
![]() ![]() Without counting on the 62,400 euros per year incurred on the public purse in hairdresser and makeup artist costs to ensure the facelift that is required, a smooth skin and a shiny scalp to the presidential couple. That is to say, the equivalent of 4 smics per month for Brigitte's styling. Because after all, Bel Ami, You and your cougar with the hairpiece elegance, your pimbic who parades in Prada, your "peroxide cagole", to use the qualifiers of the "Financial Times", are worth it ! ![]() We can say that it is really the bouquet, especially since your Brigitte plays us to the good Samaritans, with an ostentatious charity absolutely dripping with hypocrisy, in a poor play of boulevard theater, via its operation of com of the "yellow coins". Thus, she does not hesitate to appeal to the solidarity and national generosity of the vile populace, so that it contributes by its miserable obole to restore your tarnished image at little cost, to maintain as well as possible in place your stature, to perpetuate all your imposture. ![]() ![]() The union of this strong dubious duo, which we were portrayed as a beautiful romance, a touching and exceptional fusional idyll, a heartbreaking hymn to difference, a shattering love story in the water of roses, as passionate as unabashed, where the love defies the conveniences, whereas it is only a summit of indecency out of any propriety, was indeed according to the point of view, as precocious as late and should have in all logic, fallen under the blow of the law... But of law, it would not know how to be question of it for these good people above any suspicion! However, it is not a minor fault, when at the bend of a very bad play, in a combination of circumstances more than aggravating, we let ourselves be tempted by providence and that we suddenly feel an irresistible as well as frightful attraction for the young scarecrow who declaims his text on the boards, that we see ourselves struck by a flash of lightning for our youthful Jupiter. No decidedly, it is not a commonplace thing when one makes the court instead of dispensing its courses and that one surprises oneself to seduce behind the scenes, behind the curtains, one of its pupils, a young youth still virgin of 14 years, to welcome this cuistre between its thighs, whereas one is oneself in the flower of the age, that to be its mom of 39 years and that a gap of 25 years of age separates us ! |
![]() ![]() ![]() By the way, for those who know how to read, it is even written in all letters by the manufacturers on their mask boxes that they are not medical devices and that they do not protect in any way against viral attacks! Legally, the mask manufacturers certainly do not want to be held responsible in case of contamination with Covid-19... It is a guarantee for them not to be condemned in justice in case of complaints. In this world, money doesn't lie. "No study proves any usefulness of the mask to prevent viral respiratory diseases, whether indoors or outdoors. Period !" - Prof. Denis Rancourt ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() As the singer Jacques Higelin would say, "Those who are afraid to die are often afraid to live. They breathe cautiously while waiting for the end." What exactly is the meaning of a life cut off from everything that makes it valuable, from what makes it so precious, unique and authentic, namely: emotions, laughter and smiles, carelessness, love, sharing, encounters, escape, discoveries, leisure? From now on, we are immersed in a program of death, led by these psychopathic elites, so-called philanthropists in an ultra-controlled, artificial, sanitized and dehumanized society, more and more deprived of love and authentic human relationships. In fact, what they fear most is love, because it allows for a world that is beyond their control. "Should we forbid ourselves to live in order not to die" |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Do YOU seriously think that the exponential myriad of cuckolds of vaccination, who do not see the fulfilment of any of the beautiful promises that were made to them, but sometimes suffering in the depths of their flesh from devastating side effects, or seeing around them the sudden disappearance of loved ones, will continue eternally to swallow McKinsey's snakes and boas constrictors of Big Pharma's shameless lies? One can legitimately doubt it, hypnosis has its limits and the awakening after the hangover is likely to be violent. ![]() YOU are by far the most destructive virus to ever enter our lives. |
![]() |
![]() December 12 - 1. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease cases seem to be forgotten. I went and read Marc Doyer's tweets. It's still increasing in France, we're now up to about ten confirmed cases. And also a case in Belgium, one in Israel, "The scandal will soon go beyond the borders of France". A very hushed-up scandal in France... P.-S. of December 13 : Marc Doyer and Pr Luc Montagnier spoke together on Radio Courtoisie (article with 24 mn video). Eight cases are proven, Prof. Montagnier believes that it is "a time bomb" and calls, once again, to stop vaccinating. | ![]() Photo from February 22, 2022 at the funeral of Luc Montagnier. The whistleblowers may exaggerate or the facts may prove them wrong, and that is to be hoped for. But it was necessary to alert so that it does not go further... |
"Men must be warned that they are in danger of death, science becomes criminal." - Albert Einstein in 1946
"Because I know the full potential of RNA, administering it to healthy individuals seems to me to be on the order of madness." - Alexandra Henrion Caude, geneticist and RNA specialist. "The cutoff for stopping a vaccination program is 20 to 25 deaths, and today, in May 2021, we have more than 4,000 deaths" - Prof. Mc Cullough As the geneticist Alexandra Henrion-Caude aptly puts it, in an extraordinary reversal, we are all presumed sick and contagious, we have lost our right to be presumed healthy automatically. We would all be potential sick people who ignore themselves, like in the classic play "Knock or the Triumph of Medicine" by Jules Romains. A bit like if in justice, the presumption of innocence was definitively banished and that we would be automatically considered as potential criminals... What society can still function on such a postulate? Wearing a mask means accepting to be presumed sick. Paradox of paradoxes in this pseudo-pandemic, if on the one hand we assume that everyone is sick even healthy people, on the other hand, we refuse to treat the real sick! |
![]() |
Recently, it was an international study in Frontiers in Virology that caught his attention, published by several scientists who were surprised by the presence of the PRRA sequence in SARS-CoV-2 RNA and questioned why it was inserted. The scientists in the study did a blast. That is, they "looked for homology with all kinds of sequences that exist," in other words, similarity to other publicly available sequences in public databases. They then discovered that the PRRA sequence matched the sequence ID11652 patented in 2017 by Moderna, under US 958 7003. Among the 13 inventors was Stéphane Bancel, CEO of Moderna, a pharmaceutical company that, remember, supplies Covid-19 vaccines internationally...
Those who are accustomed to using the term "conspiracy theorists" at every turn should be reassured. This information has been circulating among mainstream media such as the American newspaper Daily Mail. On February 24, 2022, Stéphane Bancel replied to a Fox News reporter who asked him why a sequence patented by his pharmaceutical company had been found in the RNA of SARS-CoV-2 that "scientists are analyzing whether these data are real or not". He did not rule out "the hypothesis of laboratory leakage by accident" and the virus having escaped from the Wuhan laboratory in China during research on gains in function. If he had uttered these words at the beginning of the Covid crisis, would he have been censored as Alexandra Henrion-Caude was?... In any case, it is surprising that such information, if not killed, does not make the headlines... |
Everyone has at least heard of the famous "mythe of the cave" by the Greek philosopher Plato.
Let's summarize it in broad strokes: human beings are chained in the depths of a cave. They represent, metaphorically, the ignorance in which the common man is immersed. They have never seen the sun, from which they only receive very weak rays.
very weakened rays. A fire at their backs casts shadows on the walls of the cave, both of themselves and of the surrounding objects, which they take to be reality itself; they wiggle their bonnets like debilitated people, following the
movements of these shadows. They thus represent, according to Plato, the state of cognitive daze in which the overwhelming majority of humanity is immersed.
What is, on this good basis, the job of the philosopher? It is to undo these prisoners of their chains, and to guide them towards the sun of the true Knowledge, metaphorized by the Sun; and which is, in reality, the intelligible Ideas of Philosophy, armed in particular with Mathematics. Which is called, incidentally: freedom. Of course, such an approach is risky. The prisoner may, at first, not be able to bear the liberation, i.e. the dazzling of the Truth. He may prefer to return to his former condition, and thus have wasted the time of the Philosopher in charge of the Awakening of Consciousness. Worse, he may take it out on the one who, claiming to liberate him, will have violated him in his obscurantist superstitions. But the thing can also happen very well, and the prisoner can free himself for real; illuminated by the adequate Ideas of the Sun of the authentic Knowledge, he can return in the cave with the aim of freeing more than in his turn his fellow men. Nothing is, in short, a foregone conclusion. But finally, it is at one's own risk that one embarks on the task of awakening the captive prisoners of cognitive mirages, main vocation of philosophy. What would be the modern, timely version of the prisoner of the cave? Wouldn't it be, for example, as we say in French, the figure of the beauf slumped in his couch after a day of thankless work, to consume without interruption, the eye riveted to his giant flat screen television "the chronic torrent of uninformed information" ? Answer: yes, we do have a modern version of the good old prisoner of the cave. [...] The truth is that we have been living, for the last two years, in the most gigantic hoax that has ever been perpetrated against humanity: in the most crude simulacrum that has ever darkened the view of our fellow human beings. This simulacrum has a name, "pandemic," and a trademark, "Covid 19." I've been putting the word "pandemic" in quotation marks for over a year. And, for many months now, I've not even called it a "pandemic", but an IQ test again the most constraining that has ever been put to the cognitive abilities of homo sapiens. The good news is that this test is profoundly "egalitarian" and that I have met peasants from Correze understand perfectly what the situation we have been living for the last two years was all about, and Bac+12 get it all wrong on the same subject. |
![]() |
In the allegory of the cave the world of culture and philosophy is completely separated from the world of beliefs and superstitions; there is no relationship or filiation between the sphere of enlightenment and rational knowledge and the obscurantist sphere of the irrational. At the bottom of the cave, men chained from head to toe since their childhood elaborate alone their false ideas about the shadows. While in "The Cultural Production of Ignorance" for the contemporary world, the misconceptions propagated by the media to the masses are elaborated by people with high level of study and quite often by scientific luminaries. In reference to ancient Greece, Plato and Socrates [opposite, painting by David, 1787] the sophists, ("persons using sophisms, specious arguments or reasoning to deceive or delude"), we have for the sophists of today, invited on TV sets, eminent scientists, doctors and experts of all kinds barded with titles and diplomas.
As Mehdi Belhaj Kacem deplores about the intellectuals of his rank, we must make the sad observation that they have put themselves en masse at the service of Big Pharma and finance to impose the "pandemic" sham and vaccine coercion with an ineffective and dangerous biotechnological product. The number of lucid, courageous and critical scientists and intellectuals has unfortunately remained too sparse. If knowledge has spontaneously been put at the service of the economic power, the political power has not hesitated to brandish administrative threats to ensure at least the silence or neutrality of many academics. In spite of the awareness of the imposture, the mass of graduate sophists remained compact and overwhelming to stir up in the caves the great historical fears of contagion and the specter of death, thus allowing the prolongation and extension of the vaccination campaign, even when its inefficiency became more and more evident. Mobilized on the TV sets, they stigmatized the non-vaxxed as the cause of the contagion and tried to impose experimental mRNA injections to all, even to infants... |
Didn't you, even for a minute, begin to find it suspicious, to say the least, that 24 hours a day the media is only telling us about "Covid 19," which was killing no more than a seasonal flu, and rather less? Didn't you find it somewhat strange that the very
Agnès Buyzin (now on Bill Gates' payroll) banned hydroxychloroquine in January 2020, the second most widely used drug in the world for the past 70 years, especially in Africa? Then the banning of Azithromycin, Ivermectin, and even, recently, of vitamin D (on the pretext that it would be an "endocrine disruptor")? That, for the first time in the history of medicine, doctors are forbidden both to treat and to prescribe? That we continue, in the midst of the worst "pandemic" that ever was, to close hospital beds by the thousands (more than 17,500 under the Macron era) ? That our president, in the midst of a "pandemic" ravaging on all sides, does not allocate one more cent to the public hospital, but nearly 3 billion euros to the mass media, including 500 million just recently? And so many other "details", more and more dubious, more and more anti-scientific, more and more irrational; and in which you will have given, head completely down. [...]
By calling for mandatory vaccination, your responsibility is this time directly engaged. It is also so that you, as well as all the other intellectuals who have supported the absurd governmental measures of the last two years, may bear this responsibility with full knowledge of the facts, that I am writing this open letter. None of you will be able to say, "I didn't know" anymore. None. |
![]() |
![]() It's 9pm on this November 12 and I decide to give special importance to what I wrote this afternoon. I feel this information is momentous, more so than any of the above. "Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) is a degeneration of the central nervous system characterized by the accumulation of a prion (an abnormal form of a protein that can transmit the disease). The incubation period can be years or even decades before balance and sensitivity problems appear, followed by dementia. The outcome is consistently fatal within approximately one year." (page wikipedia). The authorities have been prevaricating for months to claim that there would be no proven deaths from the "vaccines" Covid, only coincidences, even though there have been thousands of suspicious deaths (reported or not) in France (see Nov. 1 - 6). There is no doubt about it, the fact that this disease is almost non-existent in France and that there have been at least six patients in a short period of time following Pfizer injections shows that Pfizer's product is definitely responsible. All the more so as other cases have been detected, notably in the USA. And the victims are young people without comorbidity, in good health. So rather than continue to promote the 3rd dose and cause willingly new deaths for this and other causes, the urgency is to stop everything. Never has it been more blatantly obvious that these injections are poisons and those who refuse to stop them when they have the power to do so can only be considered criminals. Unless this information from the six cases can be proven wrong. |
![]() |
Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease of humans is the equivalent of trembling disease of sheep and bovine spongiform encephalopathy or mad cow disease of cattle, with a pattern of transmission described opposite.
Appearing in 1986 in English cattle herds, it peaked at 37,280 cattle in 1992 in that country, spreading to Europe and some other countries. Transmission to humans is discovered in 1996, 232 cases will be diagnosed worldwide [article]. These cases are similar to recent cases detected after mRNA injection, except that the incubation period is much shorter. |
|
Warning
A study published in preprint since the writing of this article, co-authored by the neurologist C. Moret Chalmin, Pr L. Montagnier and the mathematician J.-C. Pérez confirms the hypothesis that we support here: "Towards the emergence of a new form of neurodegenerative Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: Sixteen cases of CJD reported a few days after a COVID-19 "vaccine". The findings of this study will be presented at the 16th World Congress of Controversies in Neurology (CONy) to be held virtually in London on March 24-27, 2022. Note It will be recalled that Luc Montagnier and Alexandra Henrion-Caude had announced that they had discovered, during the sequencing of the SARS-CoV2 genome carried out shortly after its release : for the former, HIV and malaria sequences; for the latter, a sequence present at the furin cleavage site, found identically in a patent filed by Moderna in 2016, as confirmed in an article published on February 21, 2022 in the journal Frontiers of Virology, which demonstrates that the probability of a natural origin of the virus containing such a patented sequence is statistically zero. |
And then, at the same time [early April 2020], I realized that inexpensive treatments (Prof. Raoult's hydroxychloroquine/azithromycin, ivermectin...) were being banned in incomprehensible ways. I understood much later that it was to put on the market vaccines in test phase. Before getting their "authorization to market" (AMM), they were granted a "temporary authorization to use" (ATU) for "a limited period of time" on the condition that there was "absence of other appropriate treatment" (source). This is why Big Pharma (and thus WHO, and this is true for other countries) used extreme pressure to have no early treatment recognized. |
For the vaccines, they did not have a UTA, but they did get a conditional MA, which as the name suggests had been issued with conditions :
So conditional MA + the vaccines distributed in the West are all in experimental phase, in phase 3 more exactly (3 out of 4). Normally, the development of a drug is carried out by the manufacturer's laboratory, at its own expense, and above all, the patients are seriously monitored (and are not released into the wild 1/4 hour after the injection). The current pharmacovigilance is almost non-existent. The follow-up of the vaccinated subjects = nothing, whereas normally there should be a regular follow-up to be able to pass in phase 4. None of the usual rules for the development of a drug (or a vaccine) have been respected. It is a total opacity. For prion diseases, we obviously cannot exclude anything since pharmacovigilance has not been carried out. Professor Montagnier spoke about this and he is not the only one. The information must go back up, and in France as in many countries, autopsies are not performed, which would give vital information. Here is a quick summary of the facts (this is not an opinion) |
The shadow of this multinational consulting firm that is as opaque as it is sprawling looms over Emmanuel Macron's career path from the Attali Commission to the organization of the vaccination campaign (as revealed by Politiuco, January 6, 2021), through the sale of Alstom, but also that of Technip, without forgetting the 2017 presidential election, the high point of this collaboration. In the MacronLeaks, we indeed identify "a score of very active employees of the firm. Partners ("associates") seasoned as well as young enthusiasts. To write the candidate's program as well as to manage the stewardship" (McKinsey, a firm in Macron's footsteps, February 6, 2021 [link]). [...]
From an operational standpoint, Emmanuel Macron's candidacy can, to some extent, be seen as a product delivered in kit form by McKinsey & Company. |
That the booksellers, who, to their great detriment, have walled themselves up in the covidist rituals for two years do not put on sale the numerous works released on this subject (Perronne, Raoult, Kennedy, Fouché etc.) is perplexing! Contrary to the me(r)dias of the high road, they are not however directly financed by the billionaires. This is apparently a phenomenon of self-censorship, of great significance for the uncertain future of the industry. It is a little-noticed aspect of the West's ongoing cultural suicide... |
In mathematics, chaos theory studies the behavior of dynamical systems that are highly sensitive to sine conditions, a phenomenon generally illustrated for the general public, by "the butterfly effect". For such systems, minute differences in initial conditions lead to completely different results, generally making any long-term prediction impossible. Thus the illusory idea that it was possible to predict the number of deaths in a population by simulating frustrating models, based on parameters estimated in approximate ways, was considered by somewhat serious scientists to be a vast joke. After all, as Milan Kundera wondered: "But what is "serious" ? Is serious the one who believes in what he makes others believe". This is indeed the drama that we have experienced during this Covid crisis, because the authorities wanted to believe people who made them believe chimeras. Thus we had the disaster and chaos. |
![]() |
![]() Communiqué. We inform you that the lawyer Virginie de Araujo-Recchia was arrested this morning and placed in police custody. We have no idea on what basis such a measure was ordered and what she was accused of. Since this morning we are trying to find out where she was taken. All our efforts in this regard remain in vain. Thank you for running this press release without changing a single word. We will keep you informed as soon as possible. The lawyers who are working with her. |
There has been a significant increase in the number of police custody in the recent period against lawyers or journalists. In the absence of serious or sufficient evidence, the State tends to intimidate these two professions, which are one of the foundations of any democracy. [...]
The interviewer asked me to outline my "ideology". To which I replied that it was not ideology but proven and justified facts that I have been meticulously cataloguing for two years. All the hearings of the International Court of Public Opinion/Grand Jury have allowed me to hear the testimonies of some of the world's greatest experts in scientific and medical matters, in psychopathology and psychology, in history, economics, geostrategy as well as the testimonies of victims from the present and the past. I have personally collected testimonies from victims' parents, caregivers and French firemen in order to present them to the Grand Jury. It is about expertise, professionals, witnesses, victims. It is not about ideology. The only goal here is to find the truth. [...] Some media outlets have reported a "terrorist dossier" and, with my name being cited as "lawyer representing various figures in conspiracy circles" or even "extremist groupings", the defamatory nature of this amalgam will not have escaped anyone. I will not leave it at that because it is pure defamation and intent to harm but I will request a right of reply. |
Since the beginning of the epidemic, the official narrative has been that the response to the crisis has been similar around the world. In other words, there are no early treatments, containment measures and mask wearing are necessary measures, and finally, vaccines are the only solution. As a cardiologist specializing in internal medicine and a world-renowned expert on the Covid-19 pandemic, I can say that nothing could be further from the truth, that this is propaganda, and that there are early treatments. [...]
Regarding vaccination, not only is its effectiveness still to be proven, but it has caused many side effects (still not taken into account in most countries). [...] On July 12, 2021, President Macron's peremptory assertions had nothing scientific about them (I have everything at hand to prove it), but yet prompted many French people to get vaccinated. We got the same message in the United States: two vaccines and you get your freedom back. To discuss all these issues, not to mention confinements and different vaccine passports, I proposed to be heard by the French Parliament. My proposal was not accepted, although I testified at U.S. Senate hearings in 2020 and 2022. Today, when nearly 65% of the population is vaccinated and case curves still oscillate, we can say with certainty that this monolithic strategy is wrong. Reason why it will have to be examined by the justice system in the next few years. |
God I am glad to see this show!!!
I have been prone since my 1st pfizer injection to spasmophilia attacks, or something close to it. The 1st one was extremely violent, 3 hours of convulsion starting 5 minutes after the injection. I was at the vaccinodrome of Lille Grand Palais and left without having been admitted to the emergency room. Without any proof of what had happened to me other than the photo of the liaison sheet of the Sdis doctor that I had demanded to take.
I then fought thanks to my doctor so that the pharmacovigilance accepts to take into account the incident. 4 other crises since July, a strong weight gain. My doctor wrote me a prescription for a contraindication to the vaccine recall... without effect and I found myself classified as antivax and without a health pass on February 15. And the medical profession as a whole explains to me that it is psychological and that there can be no link with the vaccine. Mind boggling.
The medical checkups don't show anything specific so I'm told I need to do the booster with a little relaxation. General blindness. Fear has taken the place of a rational attitude. I am angry and worried about what the aftermath might be for my health. My spouse is traumatized by the successive crises she has witnessed. She is therefore not vaccinated. And so we are suspect in the eyes of the majority, convinced that we are conspiracy theorists. I am going to get closer to these groups. I am 50 years old and had never had this type of health problem. I have never doubted our political and governmental authorities and I have never doubted our health care system. Now I do. And the media brainwashing for 2 years has been surreal. It has sown fear and done far more harm than the virus. I want to join these people and fight to stop this blindness. |
In reality, very few manage to escape the hierarchical grid of submission to the established order. In his famous experiment to test the degree of obedience of citizens, Professor Milgram succeeded in getting his (paid) human guinea pigs to inflict punishment in the form of electric shocks on designated culprits. In reality, the experimenters and the "culprits" were actors and no electric shocks were delivered. But the guinea pigs were unaware of this and eventually obeyed the inane orders given to them.
Only 15% of them refused to obey. Look closely, this is about the percentage of French people who still resist the first dose of vaccine. When the winds have shifted, when the old established order has totally collapsed (which is bound to happen), it is they, the resisters, who will impose the new order, which the relieved masses will rally around. The only important task for the resistance fighters is to prepare this new world, calmly, quietly, patiently. Their time is coming. |
![]() Brigitte Macron returns to her relationship with Professor Didier Raoult and takes the opportunity to bend the neck of certain rumors. After clarifying that neither she nor her husband have been tested, as they have no symptoms, the President's wife says she has not "taken her daughter to be treated in Marseille by Professor Raoult or asked the President to go there to meet him." Now that is clear! Then, she confides that she did indeed receive a call from the scientist. "He treated several of my friends and one of them gave him my number". She tells our confreres that he reassured about the health of these friends in question and that he discussed with her this famous treatment with chloroquine. However, Brigitte Macron is careful not to give an opinion on its effectiveness. "No treatment to date works," she concluded. |
January 9, 2021. We received three phone calls from the First Lady of France, who was interested with one of our members to [find out] the treatment...
April 20, 2021. We have evidence of phone records and text messages illustrating that he [President Macron] as well as Mrs. Brigitte Macron tried to get things moving but came up against the medical "system" and its potential "grip" on a lost population but also on city doctors tetanized by the threats looming in case of "treatment" other than Doliprane. January 26, 2022. We have text messages from Macron. Doctors in our group have contacted Macron's ministers. Doctors in our group have contacted Madame Macron and have been in direct and constant contact with [her]. And Macron at one point sent us a text message, [via] a former minister who rebroadcast it to us, so we have this text message, "Yes I totally agree. I think the early outpatient track is a good track. But the system is opposite. I'm following this closely." April 23, 2022. [Macron] replied to his minister. [In] a text message that we have at [your] disposal:"Yes I agree with this way of thinking. Unfortunately the system is against it. I'll take care of it"... May 5, 2022. Doctor Alain Branchereau...told the President of the Republic: "I treated [with] azithromycin/zinc, and I had no deaths" At that time, we had sent through a doctor, who was treating one of his ministers, all of our work to Mr. Macron... It is known that in February 2021, we were able to count among the conspiracists a famous person who was the President of the Republic! I am going to read you the answer, mail of the president of the Republic to his minister. It is an email that is in our hand, we reserve it in case France Inter has fun saying that it is [a] fake news: "Formidable. I have believed in this for a long time. But the "system" believes in it too little it's crazy. I'm seizing on it. Thank you. I embrace you."[At the same time] one of our doctors who was in direct contact with Madame Brigitte Macron, testified that she too had many people around her who were treated with early outpatient treatment and who had been pleased with the results. |
My first article on #brigittegate entitled "Brigitte Macron: "What if she were a man?" was quite successful, having been for about 50 days the only one on the Internet to relay the investigation of Faits & Documents (more than 230,000 views to date on Profession gendarme for both versions combined). The affair finally exploded with the first interview of Natacha Rey broadcast on December 10, 2021. The watchdogs of state journalism published some rebuttals falling under what I call "fact-shaking", which I addressed in a 2nd article entitled "Journalism on its knees in front of the "first lady man of France"". The creature of the Élysée ended up speaking pitifully about the affair to journalists worthy of Pravda. The journalists continue to either remain silent or publish pathetic denials. The worst is the overwhelming silence of the journalists of the so-called free press, as well as the stars of anti-Covidism. The very life of Natacha Rey being threatened, Richard Boutry also being persecuted by procedures worthy of a macron republic just for having considered interviewing her, the fact of not treating the affair is, in my humble opinion, non-assistance to a person in danger. The attitude of "journalists" towards whistle-blowers is getting worse and worse, but that doesn't tell us anything; we had already noticed it in their lack of reaction during the Julian Assange affair. No one is being asked to headline "Brigitte is a man", just to mention the investigation, which is information in itself, with its assumptions and certainties.
[...] Alain Beyrand got to work, as an amateur genealogist seized in his intimate conviction, and provided a synthesis that will be a landmark in this citizen investigation against the media-political system. My interest for this investigation comes from converging coincidences. On the one hand, I am an anti-communist from the beginning. I started at the beginning of March 2020 the series of now 11 articles chronicling national-covidism; secondly, I am a subscriber to Faits & Documents, so I didn't waste any time wondering if it was a serious journal; thirdly, I am an altersexual (a word of my own invention), so this investigation was particularly relevant to me, and I was a relative expert in this field, and able to distinguish between what falls under the heading of transphobia and homophobia, and what falls under the heading of public interest. |
![]() |
|
Silence rather than yet another lie?
Nor did she take advantage of her two recent interviews on TF1 and RTL to finally clarify the situation, saying how unpleasant it was for her to be denied since she was equated with her brother. Mademoiselle (?) Trogneux has again deliberately chosen to remain silent, a choice that will not interrupt the countless questions and investigations underway, as this subject is of such great interest to many French people and millions of others, and she does not forgive her husband for having said that he wanted to "piss off to the end" the non-vaccinated and for having declared them non-citizens. There are definitely a lot of people out there looking for Jean-Michel... who might invite himself into the campaign. |
![]() |
Kyle Kemper (KK) - Look at what Toole [Erin O'Toole, Trudeau's political opponent] is doing compared to what Justin is doing. They're both pushing vaccination right now. And I don't even call it a vaccine, it's a fake vaccine. It doesn't provide immunity, it doesn't stop transmission, therefore it's not a vaccine. It is an experimental biotechnology, magnetic nanotechnology. I am not interested.
Journalist (J) - Well it's interesting that you bring that up because I've been, sort of, following you on Twitter and I saw some of the responses that you were giving, not just to your brother Justin Trudeau, but to people who tweeted about him. I saw a tweet where you said... Your hashtag "fake vaccine" and your response "Investigate the vaccine, follow the money." This is way beyond Justin. So, having said that..., my question for you is are you implying that your brother, our Prime Minister, is some kind of pawn ? Are you saying that he is controlled. What are your thoughts through this tweet ? KK - The Covid scam is a globally orchestrated phenomenon to... consolidate power and generate huge profits, facilitate more wealth transitions from countries to corporations. I don't know how anyone can deny that. Canada has spent over a trillion dollars, more money than the most unfathomable amounts of money! J - And so you think Justin Trudeau would support that. Do you think he would support it if he totally knew what the agenda was ? KK - I think in my heart of hearts, it goes back to the hypnosis condition. I really believe that he believes that what he's doing is a good thing even though he knows it's the World Economic Forum [WEF] agenda. He believes it's the right thing to do. He believes the WEF, you know, the Great Reset [Great Reset], the 4th industrial revolution agenda. You'll own nothing and be happy and we're bringing in a universal basic income. We impose central bank digital currencies on people. We are putting social credit systems on the people. These are incredible... hysterical-tyrannical dreams. And in my opinion, they have been slowly implementing them. And it takes more than governments, governments are just an arm of that. Look at Big Tech, the media, Big Pharma, all working together in this giant, gigantic farce. There is farce in everything we see now. |
Macron was presented with a choice: either he accepted a PCR test by Russian authorities and was allowed to get closer to Putin, or he refused and had to submit to a stricter social distancing. "We knew very well that this meant no handshake and that long table. But we couldn't accept that they would get their hands on the president's DNA" one of the sources told Reuters. [...] On Thursday, three days after the meeting between Macron and Putin, the Russian leader received Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev. The two men shook hands and sat next to each other, separated only by a small coffee table. [article from February 11] |
When Macron was in Russia, Putin had Macron escorted out by a man in a skirt. A way of telling him "My boy, I know your wife is a transsexual, I don't argue with gays, go away." [February 11 tweet] (>>>video>>> of 19 seconds) |
BRIGITTE MACRON AND THE AUZIERES FINALLY PASSED TO THE VOTE! Apparently, Brigitte Macron advised by the inenarrable Jean Ennochi (the fake news hunter who lies faster than his shadow !) gave up the idea of suing me on the first ground, knowing that she was sure to lose it, in view of all the elements I have (some of which have not yet been revealed) and all the legitimate questions they are quite incapable of answering, in order to dismantle my thesis... or rather the TRUTH. A bailiff came to my home yesterday and left a notice in my mailbox, in my absence, so that I could pick up some documents at his office, in this case a summons before the 17th chamber of the Paris Court. 30 double-sided pages. I thought it was a joke or a delirium tremens when I discovered the content. In spite of the intolerable pressures and judicial persecutions that I continue to undergo (seriously affecting my state of health), I could not help but burst out laughing - like all those who read it - so much the accusations are grotesque and come under the heading of the grand guignol. There is absolutely no longer any question of "transsexuality", "gender reassignment", "imposture", "dissimulations", "state secret", "fabricated biography", "imaginary ex-husband", "fake photos" or that turn out not to represent the right people as on those of the communion, the campaign leaflet or the wedding... but of distribution of photos (belonging to the public domain, that I did not take without their knowledge), of enlargement, colorization, comparisons with the help of a software of restoration or facial recognition. . without their authorization! YES, you read that right! That's not all....! If I am not reproached for having demonstrated that Jean-Michel was Brigitte and vice versa (the most important point of my investigation however ! ), I am accused of having spied on him, of having been intrusive, by trying to get in touch with him, by questioning his neighborhood, the shopkeepers or the people of the district, in order to know if they knew him and if he lived well in this building of the 14 rue des Vergeaux in Amiens, where NOBODY has ever crossed him and knows him (I can reaffirm it to you, since it is the strict truth !) to have claimed that Tiphaine Auzière, Laurence Auzière and Sébastien Auzière were not Brigitte Macron's children, whereas I have NEVER claimed that, on the contrary, having never questioned Brigitte's paternity, so much her children resemble her ! Voluntary misunderstanding in order to play on words and distort my words! This is anyway my freedom of expression and opinion. No mention of the fact that I suspect another woman to be the real mother of the children, on the other hand, her name not appearing anywhere. Master Pinocchio included Jean-Michel (who now only exists virtually) in the plaintiffs, at the request of B-M/J-M who has been illegally surfing the two identities for a long time, as a transsexual cannot erase all administrative traces of his past. When one checks more closely, one realizes certain things... I won't say more at this time, but know that more records will be coming out before June. To close this great farce, we learn that Libération, Le Monde, Le Figaro, Public, Closer, Ici Paris and France Dimanche are also being sued for "infringement of privacy and right to image" by having relayed what for them was only a "fake news" and damages are claimed from them (they have the means !) as well as the obligation to make their condemnation appear in large print on the 4th cover. The watering can be done! It is true that all these titles and many others (TV channels, radio stations, pseudo-journalists or philosophers) did me a great service by talking about me (even badly) and contributed to the propagation of the Truth, everyone or almost everyone being well aware that if the merdias claim in unison that it is false... it is because it is true ! All in all, the Trogneux/Auzière are asking me for more than 50.000 € in damages for having shown their public photos on the YouTube channel of a medium, who is also summoned to court at the same time as me for the same reasons ! You will judge for yourselves. |
While after four days the #JeanMichelTrogneux was "deleted from trends by Twitter moderation" [there was] an amplification of the "rumour" internationally from 20 December with the Daily Mail followed, two days later, by Reuters agency for a dispatch picked up worldwide. It may be pointed out here that from an external point of view, there is no "rumeur" (a woman suspected or accused of being her brother) easier to "debunk". It would have sufficed, to immediately extinguish the fire, for a snapshot
of Brigitte Macron next to Jean-Michel Trogneux, alone or with their children (on the occasion of a Christmas Eve, for example) was published by the Élysée via an anonymous account, and taken up, under the #JeanMichelTrogneux, by all the accounts linked to La République en marche. It is also surprising that Tiphaine Auzière did not take up the cause, as she systematically does when Brigitte Macron is mocked for her appearance [example].
[...] While the Reuters dispatch (22 December 2021) was picked up by almost all the international press, the While the Reuters report (22 December 2021) was picked up by almost all the international press, Turkey's leading news channel a Haber (21 December 2021) devoted a story to the case, as did the Russian state news channel Rossiya 24 (formerly Vesti). [...] Since then, the "Jean-Michel Trogneux affair" has fuelled dinner parties, especially in gay Tout-Paris, on the theme of "his crooked wig", "a contraption like that", etc. The tip of the iceberg, the general burst of laughter on Laurent Ruquier's set (On est en direct, 15 January 2022), during the passage of Spanish actress Victoria Abril who came to promote the play "Drôle de genre", the story of a leading politician who discovers that his wife is transsexual : "No relation to the polemic of the moment" laughs Laurent Ruquier, joined in a burst of frank laughter by Léa Salamé and, under his breath, by Stéphane Guillon and by Philippe Besson. It is surprising that the latter, a hagiographer of the Macron couple ("Un Personnage de roman", Julliard, 2017), rewarded with an appointment to the French Consulate General in Los Angeles (an appointment retracted by the Council of State), was not outraged by the mocking echo given in a flagship programme of the public service to a rumour as odious as it is violent. |
![]() |
Thus, #brigittegate has become a polich secret that is only exchanged between trusted people, without sharing it openly in public. Comedians are having a field day ("Emmanuel Macron, his wife is Patrick Juvet", Laurent Gerra on 3 January on RTL), all over France and abroad, people are laughing at the strange Madame Macron and the couple's stubbornness in denying what is now obvious to those who know...
And, in all seriousness, the media news is going on as if nothing had happened. They serve us a Macron who is the great favourite in the presidential election, a super president, wowing everyone in France and abroad. "By dint of being postponed, Emmanuel Macron's declaration of candidacy resembles a mirage: we think we see it, but it evaporates when we get close" (article). Far from such lowly contingencies, he has made it his mission to prevent Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The setbacks inflicted on him by Putin do not stop him, his priority remains to safeguard peace in Europe... "Presiding "until the last quarter of the hour": Emmanuel Macron, who is multiplying consultations on Ukraine, should push back the question of his candidacy as close as possible to the deadline set by the Constitutional Council on March 4, 2022, a deadline that worries several of his competitors." (article). "But the president of the Republic has no use for competing whining. [... He is letting]the contenders for his office fight it out a little more to get to the second round when he, himself, is confirmed in his position by all the polls with about 25% of the vote in the first round and around 55% of the vote in the second" (article). Candidate or not, Emmanuel Macron is guaranteed to fall from his artificial cloud and lug around quite a pot... Is Edouard Philippe's time coming ? |
![]() |
The dailies Libération, l'Obs, le Monde and l'Express total more than 8,000 articles mentioning Emmanuel Macron from January 2015 to January 2017; by comparison, the total number of articles mentioning Jean-Luc Mélenchon, Arnaud Montebourg and Benoît Hamon in the same dailies and over the same period of time amounts to only 7,400." [...]
Macron the romantic. Notice to the suckers and the ambitious among the high school students: sleeping with your French teacher seems to be a good way to make the headlines for several weeks. At least that's what one might think, considering the number of covers and articles dedicated to the minister's love life. The celebrity press is not the only one to have focused on the sentimental life of the minister. The case of Brigitte Macron has become a hotly debated issue in the political press. The romance of the Macron couple, reminiscent of a form of courtly love to the French? This is what Le Monde and Le Figaro suggest, according to which the relationship between Brigitte and Emmanuel Macron helps explain the success of the Minister of the Economy among the female electorate. Le Figaro Madame : "Brigitte Trogneux has thus become the "great romantic" and "ideal son-in-law" guarantee of the candidate. Far from the classic image of the "political seducer" who flirts with the artistic milieu. Closer, therefore, to the French and the female electorate". Le Monde Politique: "A 16-year-old first-grader, winner of the general French competition, he fell in love with his teacher, Brigitte Trogneux, mother of three children and twenty years his senior. All of France now knows the romance that so appeals to the female electorate." Liberation: "The reversal of ages within the presidential couple in swimsuits is both a sign of egalitarian progress and a tradition maintained." |
[Speaking of the Figaro Madame" article] Nothing about the exercise of power, nothing about the foul rumor saying she was a transsexual that inflamed social networks and dumbfounded the foreign press. She still reacted on RTL, pointing to the damage in her family, before relativizing : "I took five and a half days to make these rumors disappear with a lawyer experienced in the exercise. So you can imagine for the others..."
Brigitte Macron, always impeccable. First Lady haute couture, apricot complexion, golden helmet finely woven from her extensions which she speaks so naturally, as well as her false lashes that hem her azure eyes. [...] [Speaking of Mimi Marchand] "Mimi" did so many favors - including keeping the paparazzi, the tabloid snoopers, from approaching her former husband, André-Louis Auzière... He had become depressed, recluse in psychiatric clinic. The communicant cleaned up his trail on the Internet, set up, with Alexandre Benalla a surveillance system at the doors of his room until his death at Christmas 2019. "Mimi" has always been loyal, respectful of the photo archives of the presidential couple, early digitized by her care, generous with their grandchildren that she covers with gifts. You don't let go of a friend like that. |
March 5. Dalida's song "Il venait d'avoir 18 ans", with music by Pascal Auriat and Jean Bouchéty, was a big hit in 1973. Here it is reinvented by Coccyx Grue on lyrics and Marie-Line Weber on vocals, under the title "Il venait d'avoir 14 ans" (knowing that it would be more like 15 years old, cf. Appendix A 10) :
>>>song>>> 2:53 mp3. // copy and paste pdf : https://pressibus.org/gen/trogneux/14ansMarieLineWeber.mp3 // Posted online March 18: the >>>clip>>>, hang on!... Marie-Line Weber: "Life is a joke to cry with laughter and the passing years make me want to laugh more and more, to perhaps dry the tears of the past. From laughter to tears it's just a step." And don't miss his >>>song/clip>>> "We're Singing" of 4 mn 02 with lots of Saturday demonstrators (directed by Martin Loizillon, actor and coordinator of ReinfoCovid Ile de France)... |
![]() | |
He had just turned 14.
He had just turned fourteen He was as handsome as a young fawn A line that is erased It was winter of course And I counted as I ogled him My pheromones I tidied up my wig On my tits I put stucco He got scared When I looked at his face I felt my superego quivering For that minor |
He had just turned fourteen
It was the most beautiful argument To force him We didn't talk about love He knew nothing about love He was trying hard I made him see at the cinema My best film in large format Some people like it hot In the hollow of a premeditated bed I tasted, titillated This artichoke |
He had just turned fourteen
But he wasn't innocent Little scoundrel And while he was getting dressed Looking at his back, I laughed Without a qualm. I did everything I could to pervert him How could I refuse to invest So much wealth He told me "It didn't hurt me." This will go down in our annals One drunken night. I tidied up my wig A little bromide on my thing By imposture I was proud as I seduced him For I was three times fourteen years old |
Jean-Bri, a teacher like no other >>>song>>> 2:58 mp3. And, from April 4, the >>>clip>>> ! | ||
Jean-Bri iel's name is Jean-Bri
I'm crazy about iel She was a teacher like no other We like money, it's not our fault Even though I know You'll never love us Jean-Bri iel's name is Jean-Bri This is my seventh heaven Iel set my first trap He's the one who set me up in high school He only told me He only told me that I was envious of him |
It was four in the afternoon
I was skipping alone on a problem I was alone on a Latin problem He said to me, "Come and have some kosher" And he told me about Michou I laughed and he cried (But) Jean-Bri iel's name is Jean-Bri This is my only home On his head there's surgery I'm selling France for Attali We did the great reset |
I'm not gonna let that happen.
Every night we're having parties I've been in a place where the chicks Have silicone breasts Yes I know we like money You'll have to make up your mind Don't try to forget me... but Jean-Bri iel's name is Jean-Bri That's my main thing She was a teacher like no other We like money, it's not our fault Even though I know You'll never love us |
Five more years >>>song>>> 4 min 11 mp3. And the >>>clip>>>. | ||
I get up
I take my pills You look straight ahead As usual On you and whatever it takes I glue your hairpiece back on As usual Your hand caresses my wig And you put it on me As usual But you turn your back on me As usual And then I dress up quickly I come out of the room As usual I take my shot all by myself I swallow my mixture As usual Without a sound I leave the Elysium All is blue outside As usual I'm cold, I straighten my back As usual |
Five more years
All day long I'll play pretend Five more years I'll smile Yes Another five years I'll "that is." Five more years Receiving roses Five more years And then old age will come With its arthritis Decrepitude! You will have played At the council of defense As usual Alone I will go to the clinic Sewing up my relics As usual My tears I will hide As usual |
But five more years
Even at night I'll play pretend Five more years You will reign Yes, five more years I'll pretend Five more years You'll fuck up Yes, five more years Five more years You'll take my makeup off Five more years You'll go to bed... Five years to go In front of the moguls Five more years Five years to go We'll pretend Yes, five more years Playing the game Yes, five more years We'll pretend Five more years... |
![]() This question follows a January 24, 2022 publication of a article in the people magazine Gala: "Brigitte Macron : when my daughters had their children Emmanuel was with me in the delivery room". No but how is it possible !!! what a family ! Is the crazy lady of the castle still in her full faculties ? Excess of hormones? Cocaine? ![]() Who can believe for one second that a "beau-père" Emmanuel - lover of his (supposed) mother, of the age of his daughter Laurence - could have attended the births of Brigitte's daughters, Laurence and Tiphaine having had 2 children each, as alongside his daughter-in-law wife of Sebastien Auzière their brother who also had 2 (?) !!! From customary sources in each family we know that for simply a few decades "ONLY ONE person" can accompany a woman giving birth, a person who is most often the husband, or the cohabitant, but who could be the mother in case of defection of the latter, or even another person "expressly designated by the parturient", provided that she herself would be consenting... any midwife or obstetrician could testify to this. How could "iel" have forgotten these very basic maternity admission requirements? And / or how could the 2 sons-in-law or daughter-in-law have "agreed" to such a rape of a *** most extreme moment of marital intimacy*** with all shame... to share it with a stepfather, patch !!!!!!!!! This assertion "when my daughters had their children Emmanuel was with me in the delivery room" is one of the most grand-guignoles of this dossier ! It falls under psychiatry ! |
It is extremely painful to (re)immerse oneself in Emmanuel Macron's biography, not because he sometimes lies, but because the very notion of truth is fundamentally alien to him. Indeed, his lies are not "ordinary" little arrangements with the truth, exaggerations or lies by omission. In his case, they are indeed those big lies that a child normally stops telling when he enters college. On February 1, 2017 on TF1, thus in front of all of France, Emmanuel Macron thus refers to Amiens by speaking of "his" constituency. Now everyone knows and can easily verify that he has never been elected and that he has never deigned to run in any election until then.
Until 2012, the whole of Paris believed him to be a "normalien", and he is presented as such in the first portraits devoted to him. After verification, it was established that this was not the case and that he had failed the competitive examination twice. We could also talk about his philosophy thesis on "the general interest" [sic], directed by Etienne Balibar. This thesis obviously does not exist and Louis Althuser's disciple told "Marianne" (October 10, 2014) "have strictly no recollection of it." In "President Burglar" (Fayard 2020), Corinne Lhaïk praises his "chutzpah," a Hebrew term for impudence. But she forgets to mention that Emmanuel Macron's lies would have socially disqualified him from the beginning without the protection of his omnipotent sponsors. |
![]() |
Emmanuel Macron told everywhere that he was cueed cold during his velo ride at Le Touquet (with "Brigitte") by François Hollande's phone call on August 26, 2014 announcing the news of his appointment as Minister of Economy. The day before, however, he was answering questions from journalists of the "Point" (published on August 28) for what will become his first interview given to the press as a minister... |
After investigation, we are able to confirm that Emmanuel Macron has been wearing a wig since 2019.
Specifically, a gold-priced hairpiece of blond or brown human hair, depending on the season, which he sticks on the top of his head and is changed every month. The hairpiece turn was made in 2019 when his baldness became untenable in relation to the image of dynamic, young and modern man he wanted to give. Very soon, we will pepper this article with visual evidence of this sad reality. The question of financing these Macron wigs is open as the hair complements he uses are custom-cut on human heads to not stain and pretty much match his previous hair situation, even though the gain in volume is obvious, as well as the disappearance of extremely hollowed gulfs. Macron was careful not to tell us about this well-kept secret, as well as his photographer "Soizig de la Moissonnière" (paid a fortune just to photograph him), who is trying to make us believe that we have James Dean at the Elysee when without artifices, we are closer to Sim or Alain Juppe. |
![]() |
From the back as well as the front, even without a tie...
[March 15 tweet]
![]() March 15. The aforementioned article by Etienne Duhamel has just been censored by Médiapart in the name of freedom of expression. It was a crime of lèse-majesté, a contempt of the King... Médiapart has become a guardian of the power in place. The censorship of an article by Laurent Mucchielli on the adverse effects of vaxxin had provoked indignation in 2021. Now it is laughable... |
![]() |
This is a disappearance that will cause a lot of ink to flow on social networks. After the arrest of several yellow vests at home as well as lawyers and military, a committed citizen has just been found 400 kilometers from home, dead in the middle of winter, by "drowning". One of her friends is testifying, and it's absolutely heartbreaking.
Isabelle Ferreira, a committed citizen, was about, according to those close to her, to make revelations about Brigitte Macron. She even had an appointment with journalists for an interview but she did not go to the appointment. Normal, she was already dead, far from home, "near the parking lot of the Rance dam, sea side". Finally, this is what Ouest France [March 11] tells us. Yes, because she still had the right to her article in a major French newspaper, which is not in the habit of devoting articles to every death by drowning or to every suicide. But let's move on. The article does specify "that it was a drowning". But takes care to add. "It could be an accident or suicide but there is no evidence of third party intervention. An autopsy has been performed. The complete results are not yet available, but the first elements confirm that the drowning was recent. The woman had arrived the day before in St. Malo where she had rented a hotel room." And to make the narrative perfect, the reporter adds that she was in a precarious situation (when she had supposedly just paid for a hotel room and transportation), that an "investigation has been entrusted to the police to trace the background of this woman, who lived in the Paris region, and the circumstances of her arrival in Saint-Malo. Her situation seemed to be precarious. She was taken care of by the Samu social in Paris". According to those close to her, she was going to make revelations with the help of a journalist about the Jean-Michel Trogneux affair. It is probably a simple coincidence, a chance. But if thousands of citizens are questioning and investigating at this very moment, it is probably not for nothing. By the way, Amandine Roy who is being sued by Brigitte Macron for interviewing Natacha Rey who explained that she thought Brigitte was actually a transsexual, also paid tribute to Isabelle Ferreira. The most surprising, is one of the sms sent by Isabelle earlier this year [January 19], now public. One of her friends also tells what just happened. We leave it to you to judge for yourself.
Even stranger is the testimony of the person who was contacted by the police to announce his death. He publishes :
The big question that hundreds of Internet users are asking tonight is "what was Isabelle Ferreira doing in Saint Malo ?" And many are worried that the hashtag #IsabelleFereira will disappear from Twitter. Worse it is already no longer suggested in automatic typing, which indicates that there is indeed a problem somewhere. But where? That's the question. |
As you may know, I have received 2 summonses for 2 proceedings, one of which will take place on April 5 at the Court of Lisieux (1st hearing only and we will ask for cancellation or postponement for various formal defects and anomalies) which will oppose me to the diabolical Auzière couple, protected by the Elysée. [...]
These big rich people close to the power and to the Trogneux-Auzière children dare to claim from me, through their lawyer, astronomical damages, for having emitted a hypothesis, spoken in the conditional tense (it is necessary to try to find a rational explanation to the Brigitte -Jean-Michel/André Louis Auzière mystery, with the clues we have, since we have been lied to about everything since the beginning) and stating some implacable truths like the fact that the wedding photo of the so-called "Brigitte Trogneux" is a photo trick, a cruder montage, a BIG fake that leaves no doubt. [...] But bad faith and arrogance will be well and truly on display in this trial of the pot of earth against the pot of iron! If they could put me in jail, believe me they would, as long as I would bother them! I've already been held in custody 2 times TOTALLY illegally according to my lawyer, who will ask for compensation. They want war, they will have it, because I will not calm down, given that I am in my right, did not commit any crime, no offence ! These corrupters and manipulators do not scare me, will not stop me, and I still have many surprises in store for them. [...] |
May 1. Here are the numbers for April:
![]() |
Five years ago, the media invented an exceptional character, a Mozart of finance, an accomplished philosopher, of an extraordinary intelligence, an enarque but also a comedian.
enarque, but also an actor, a fine politician, dynamic, young, rich and formidable.
This character did not exist. Behind this fiction, there was only Emmanuel, a Frenchman born under Giscard, raised in the provincial bourgeoisie, with all that it entails in terms of precautions, prejudices, and fears, and whose only exceptional fact was the hijacking of a minor. Crime transformed by the magic of media enslavement and systemic collusion, into a passionate and touching romance; the meeting with a future first lady prepared all her life for this role, having found the dream partner. The myth, when tested by reality, became a tragedy for the majority. The stage became an arena, and the play a circus game. Emmanuel, now Macron, was in reality a man without quality. President, after an unprecedented media bludgeoning, he retains power only through violence and the unfailing support of the oligarchy that made him king. |
The bloody repression of the Yellow Vests movement and the scam of the "Grand débat" should have alerted all editorial offices to the reality of Macronian power. Instead of an awakening of consciences, the project has been reinforced, through two tools specific to dictatorships : censorship and propaganda. This new campaign uses the codes of the previous one. But Macron has never governed. He has managed the country like a consultant, using quarterly targets, unable to see and understand what is foreign to him, having never stopped humiliating the French.
A few days before the presidential election, the consent factory is not far from overheating. Yet a second round without Macron is possible. All we need to do is unplug the TVs. |
The phenomenon is historically old, the "moderate" are not and they have always distrusted the people who vote wrong, they were very few in the ranks of the Resistance in 39/45 ... They supported Pétain as in Germany the Zentrum of Von Papen opened the doors of power to Hitler. [...]
![]() This is David Adler's other important result: he shows that not only are centrists less sensitive to democratic values, but they are also more in demand of strong power. Thus, centrists are not only distant from democracy; they also have authoritarian tendencies. This attraction to authoritarianism can be explained by a form of incomprehension with respect to elections: it is the feeling that the people do not follow, and that they must be brought back into line. It is clear that for some years now, the results of the ballot boxes have been considered disappointing by some of the elites. The people vote badly. The success of populist parties regularly reinforces this mistrust. Voters are accused of not being faithful to democratic values. However, if we follow Adler's analysis, it is precisely the opposite: it is in the name of democracy that voters turn away from governing parties. In short, it is always the voters' fault, never the elites'. However, in a company, if a product doesn't sell, we don't have fun saying that it's because the customer isn't up to it. Voters who vote poorly are equated with would-be fascists, when many of them are instead aspiring to make democratic principles prevail. The other, more important risk is to discredit democracy. The situation is rather comical: it is the protesting parties that claim to be democratic (just look at the FN or the France insoumise, which are constantly calling for referendums) while the government parties hesitate to use the word, preferring to denounce populism and demagogy. |
![]() ![]() For the left, AFP photo. Right resume of a tweet drawing accompanied by this text:"When we know how adept Macron is with symbols and that he plays it "Hamelin player" version state for his induction, any parent should start to tremble. For in the Grimm fairy tale the children were taken away, and alive, the parents never saw them again ". |
On Sunday, April 24, Emmanuel Macron was re-elected with 58.7% of the vote. He will therefore once again be the president of France, "failing to be the president of the French", and this for the next five years. For his inaugural speech, he arrived hand in hand with his wife, surrounded by several children of his campaign team members.
This staging, if it pleased some, has indignant many others. Notably because Emmanuel Macron excludes neither the return of the vaccine pass, nor even mandatory vaccination for his next five years, and could therefore force more young people to be pricked. A stance that has been at the origin of successive liberticidal measures, themselves having led to a considerable increase in the suicide rate among children during the last two years. Note also that some of his collaborators (and friends) have been accused of incest, or even pedophilia, such as Olivier Duhamel or Claude Lévêque. As a result, this proximity displayed by Emmanuel Macron surrounded by young people, if it looks good on camera, sounds rather false on paper. Moreover, some Internet users could not help but to note the rather sheepish pout of Brigitte Macron. |
![]() ![]() Left. Galen "My belief is that #Brigitte has been going through hell since December because of the #jeanmicheltrogneux case. She knows it's only a matter of time before everything comes out. She didn't want EM to run again, but her lust for power is stronger than anything. This couple is broken." Laurent Montel "Yes, Brigitte Macron has a problem: body closure, sadness, disgust ... Presumption of personal factor (disappointment, betrayal, infidelity). By making freeze frame, it is the couple which has a big discomfort... A bit like Cecilia & Nicolas Sarkozy. "Right. Raspberry of Bourges "To conquer without peril, one triumphs without glory." Caramba "Brigitte no longer smiles from the tower as before". ![]() ![]() Right. "Was little #jeanmicheltrogneux all sad last night or was he just pouting?" Verity France "Spectacular politics, the newly re-elected president surrounded by those who will work until 70 to pay off the 600 billion in debt made by their idol." EmmanueilMacaronade. "We wonder what the mummy is doing there.... The re-elected child needs to have his Mummy around. What about these kids? What are they doing there, have they adopted the Ténardiers or what??" |
She sends fifteen emails to the teacher, sometimes three pages long, during school vacations, or late at night, castigating his teaching methods and attitude. She doesn't understand her daughter's poor grades in literature. [...]
"Yesterday evening : seven emails from you, one of which versed in insult, and this until one o'clock in the morning...", writes the teacher, copying the head of school and her assistant. He asks the mother to address, henceforth, to them directly. Among some teachers of the Rembrandt-Bugatti college in Molsheim, the method of Brigitte Macron's office does not pass. "The reaction of the rectorate is disproportionate, insists a colleague of Didier Jodin, who follows the case closely. It is not the role of a First Lady. If she absolutely wanted to react, she could have transmitted this message to the ministry. There, at least, a hierarchical scheme would have been followed. Mrs. Macron is neither elected nor a minister !" |
After a long reflection, the Courier has decided to talk about the Jean-Michel Trogneux affair, which occupies many minds and many conversations in the most perfect silence of the subsidized media. We have chosen to talk about it because of this discrepancy between the conversations in town and the silence of the press, which is subsidized by the regime and cartelized by the billionaires who elected Emmanuel Macron. It seems to us that there is an indication of a disconnection that sums up the French democratic malaise in itself.
Until now, we have never mentioned the excellent, breathtaking investigation by Xavier Poussard and his Faits & Documents, on the Macron legend, which he demonstrates with talent and rigor the complete forgery. From my point of view, the main revelation of this long and meticulous investigation is the systematic measurement of the distance between the official "narrative" and the facts such as indisputable evidence allows to trace them. But, until now, the Courier has always considered that the private lives of elected officials were not a political issue. After all, if Brigitte Macron is suspected of having had a sex change, and if there is convincing, plausible evidence to support that suspicion, what does it matter in politics? Everyone does what they want in their private lives, and it is nobody's business. A matter in every conversation in town. I recently hosted a dinner party at home and, to my surprise, the six guests I had invited that evening (and who did not know each other) spontaneously talked about the details revealed by Xavier Poussard about Brigitte and Emmanuel Macron's private life. And I brutally measured the political impact that this affair had on ordinary public opinion in France. On the substance, no guest was embarrassed by the suspicions of homosexuality or transsexuality that are now supported by circumstantial elements published for several weeks and never attacked by the presidential couple. On the other hand, all are convinced that the Macronian power is based on a logic of permanent lies. There is the staging for the little people, relayed by newspapers under orders, and there is the truth, totally different from this narrative. We could not find better evidence on the rupture between the people and the caste, which holds our system. |
![]()
|