Back to home - Short address of this page: // copy-paste pdf: //
Original page in french - Automatic translation with Translator - Also in english : Victorina, ruler of Gaul

#brigittegate, the Pressibus dossier, the citizen survey
You can download this entire page in pdf gb format (16 MB) - Version gb 25.0
From Jean-Michel to Brigitte Trogneux,
lies at the Elysée

  1. Introduction: this is not a rumour but a solid case
  2. The genealogist's intimate conviction
  3. The Trogneux line: chocolate makers in Amiens
  4. The "legend" of Brigitte Trogneux married to Emmanuel Macron
  5. Two investigative journalists: Xavier Poussard and Natacha Rey
  6. The family where Jean-Michel Trogneux grew up
  7. Brigitte before 1990, according to the "legend"
  8. From Jean-Michel to Brigitte, their likeness
  9. André-Louis Auzière, Brigitte's ghost husband
  10. The biological mother of the three Auzière children, first hypothesis
  11. Jean-Michel Trogneux's two families
  12. 77 years old in 2022...
  13. The backbone of a man...
  14. 1977-1990, Jean-Michel Trogneux and Pastor Joseph Doucé
  15. 1991-1992, Brigitte in Amiens, her meeting with Emmanuel
  16. 1993-2007, the beginnings of the Brigitte-Emmanuel couple
  17. The family where Emmanuel Macron grew up
  18. Emmanuel Macron and homosexuality
  19. Dangerous psychopath runs France
  20. A "legend" riddled with lies for diligent media
  21. Macron the pain in the ass sets up an apartheid in France
  22. The accusatory inversions of the Elysée's perverted couple
  23. Questions about Emmanuel Macron's childhood
  24. Does Brigitte Trogneux, Macron bride, have a legal existence ?
  25. Could Joseph Doucé be Emmanuel Macron's biological father ?
  26. Questions about the three Auzière children
  27. Jean-Michel Trogneux and Jean-Louis Auzière, great friends in Algiers?
  28. From Algiers to Truchtersheim, the other boyfriend Jean-Marc Uhrweiller
  29. The magic trick of the two Brigitte Auzière
  30. Conclusion: family secrets, intertwined lives and pacts of silence
  31. Hypothesis Summary Table
  32. Appendices A: supplementary documents
  33. Appendices B: additional comparisons
  34. Appendices C: Macron and Covid
  35. Appendices D: developments, the #brigittegate


The volume this file occupies should not distract the visitor from the essentials. Here, in a few questions and answers, is a short summary, also existing as a pdf document of one page in A4 format (to be printed and distributed...). The voice comparison, in question #1, is essential evidence. Then you have a pdf document of 2 A4 pages showing how Jean-Michel became Brigitte. The conclusion of chapter 30 is more detailed, with links to the other chapters and to the appendices.

The Pressibus Brief in short answers to 10 frequently asked questions
Five months of citizen inquiry littered with red herrings and hesitations lead to a new understanding.
Here are the answers that we believe are best in the state of our knowledge at the end of May 2022.
  1. Are we sure Brigitte Macron was born and raised a man?
    Yes. In 1977, a transgender woman calling herself Veronique was interviewed on television. The audio comparison of her voice with that of a recent interview with Brigitte Macron proves that it is the same person. Without going as far as this scientific proof, everyone can realize this by listening to the juxtaposition of the two voices : the proof is here in a 1mn 27 video.

  2. Is Brigitte Trogneux married Macron the same person as her brother Jean-Michel?
    Yes. Jean-Michel Trogneux, born in 1945, did have a sister born in 1953, but she died young, around 1959. They are therefore two different people. The wife of Emmanuel Macron is not this Brigitte. She is Jean-Michel who usurped (reincarnated) the identity of his sister, whose death had not been declared, or was erased. It is from about 1984 that Jean-Michel used the identity of his missing sister, thus having her birth certificate, her identity card, her social security number, etc. (Appendix A 37)

  3. Is Jean-Michel Trogneux the father or mother of the three Auzière children?
    The father. Since he was born a man. After the birth of his youngest daughter Tiphaine around 1984, after taking the identity of his sister Brigitte, he passed himself off as their mother.

  4. What about Brigitte Macron's first marriage to André-Louis Auzière in 1974?
    It is both real and fictional. Fictional because the bride was deceased and the groom was imaginary. Real because it was recorded in the registry, without verification of identities (Appendix A 43).

  5. Who is the mother of the three Auzière children?
    Brigitte Auzière. In 1975, 1977, January 1984, dates of birth of the three children Sebastien, Laurence and Tiphaine Auzière, Jean-Michel has not yet turned into their mother. He is not married to her. In 1980, he even married another woman from whom he had two children in 1982 and February 1984. The three Auzière children bear both the surname of their fictitious father and their mother. There is continuity of the mother's name before and after 1984: before "Brigitte Auzière née Auzière", after "Brigitte Auzière née Trogneux". Knowing that the maiden name fades behind that of a married woman, the mother remained Brigitte Auzière. Thus the father, now a woman, took the place of the mother.

  6. What happened to the mother of the three children?
    We don't know. The secret is well kept, we do not know what became of Brigitte Auzière born Auzière after January 1984. She may be dead, seriously ill, exfiltrated under another name... We have only found a signature of her.

  7. Who imagined such a scenario?
    Jean-Louis Auzière. This friend of Jean-Michel's, probably known in Algiers around 1961, has a father and an older brother who worked in the secret service. He often uses his middle name, André, to duplicate himself. So he invented André Louis Auzière and proved to be effective in concealment.

  8. Is the Trogneux family complicit?
    Yes. Parents, brothers and sisters were all affected by Brigitte's death around 1959. They were understanding when one of them, tormented by "gender dysphoria," resurrected her. A pact of silence was established. The three Auzière children also adhered to it.

  9. Is the Trogneux family photo from the 1950s doctored?
    No, except at the margins (lampshade...). It presents the parents and their six children in the fall of 1954. Jean-Michel, 9 1/2, is on the left, Brigitte, 1 1/2, on her mother's lap.

  10. Is this all legal?
    No. It is against the law to impersonate a deceased person, whether or not their death has been declared.

Summary of Appendices
  Appendices A: Supplemental Materials
  1. Emmanuel Macron at college in 1990
  2. The Trogneux family in 1991
  3. The Elysee Palace in Macron fashion
  4. Freedom, equality, fraternity...
  5. Brigittology: fake news from Alsace...
  6. February 11, off his calendar, it's his birthday!
  7. Moadab and Blanrue's "counter-investigation"
  8. Jean-Michel Trogneux's Amiens "home"
  9. The making of the fake 1974 wedding photo
  10. When did Brigitte and Emmanuel meet?
  11. The family photo and the mystery of the niece who died young
  12. The three Auzière children with Emmanuel in June 1993
  13. Uncle Jean-Michel Noguès in 1980
  14. Manette, a strange and dark grandmother...
  15. Emmanuel Macron's family photos
  16. The absurd Auzière family
  17. The Gabrielle Russier alibi and the accusatory inversion of harassment
  18. The brothers Jean-Louis and Louis Auzière, their nephew André-Louis
  19. Brigitte when she was Veronique transgender
  20. The Gallice jewelry store and the Elysian disinformation
  21. Emmanuel Macron's big sister, stillborn
  22. Alger 1963
  23. The Obama precedent
  24. Possible link between Emmanuel Macron and J.-J. Trogneux
  25. The birthplaces and homes of the Auzière children
  26. Jean-Michel Trogneux in the US in 1969
  27. Jean-Michel Trogneux and the Adam Meyer Music Hall
  28. The Trogneux family, tennis and Algeria
  29. Emmanuel Macron and elementary school
  30. What role did Jean-Louis André Auzière  play?
  31. Father Auzière was an intelligence officer in Tunisia
  32. 1991, did Brigitte Macron obtain her CAPES in Strasbourg?
  33. 1973-1984, Jean-Michel Trogneux manager of Picardie Métal
  34. In 1988, Jean-Michel had already become Brigitte...
  35. Jean-Michel and Brigitte, one person, two identities
  36. The real news from Alsace and the 1989 leaflet
  37. Did Jean-Michel have a sister-niece Brigitte who died young ?
  38. Jean-Michel Trogneux in Beauvais
  39. 2007, Jean-Michel signs Brigitte Trogneux, a blunder?
  40. Emmanuel Macron's mother, mostly false leads...
  41. The five Brigitte Trogneux and Auzière, one then four
  42. Honfleur, meeting place of the Auzière and Macron couples?
  43. Fictions and realities of the 1974 marriage
  44. The logic of the present scenario Jean-Michel - Brigitte
  45. The Elysee's fluctuating defense of stubborn realities
  Appendices B: additional comparisons
  1. Jean-Michel and Brigitte
  2. Brigitte's childhood photos and photos of her daughters
  3. Brigitte and her children
  4. Françoise Noguès (Emmanuel's mother) and her mother Manette
  5. Veronique the transsexual and Brigitte
  6. André-Louis and Jean-Louis Auzière
  7. Rejected likenesses
  8. Jean-Michel Macron , Emmanuel Macron and Joseph Doucé
  9. Dossette and diastema (Joseph Doucé and Emmanuel Macron)
  1. Backstage
  2. Sexual Pirouettes
  3. Brigitte, her close shave and other masculinities
  4. Grapefruits, oranges and lemons
  5. And the little bird ?
  6. Brigitte Macron as seen by Olivier Probst
  Appendix C: Macron and Covid
  1. Vaxxination, the perfect crime
  2. Ode to Macron Mephisto
  3. Omicron less dangerous than vaxxin among youth
  4. Luc Montagnier, a Nobel Prize-winning whistleblower
  5. The end of the vaxxinal pass: a hard-fought victory
  6. Emmanuel Macron's hatred of the non-vaxxed
  7. Refusal to treat and willingness to risk poisoning
  8. Alexandra Henrion-Caude's suppressed revelations
  9. Fighting the techno-sanitary monster
  10. Socrates, Plato, and Proctor versus the Covid Sophists
  11. Wikipedia conspiratorial and conspiratorial
  12. Vaxxins Covid and variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease
  13. The McKinsey boy Macron facing McKinseyGate
  14. Misinformation right to the booksellers, chaos erased
  15. Workers, lawyers, public subjected to state terrorism
  16. Consequences of Covid "vaccines": the dead and disabled
  17. An epidemic of coincidences
  18. A very large-scale Milgram experiment
  19. Masks for all made the health crisis worse
  20. Early treatments and the involvement of the Elysian couple
  21. Are the 2022 provaxxins becoming deniers?
  Appendixes D: developments, the #brigittegate
  1. Media and transphobia
  2. Emmanuel Macron in withdrawal mode
  3. Always the journalistic flabbergast and omerta
  4. Craignos, the yellow wigs!
  5. Freedom Convoys and Young Global Leaders
  6. Brigolades, Putin Knows about Jean-Michel....
  7. Jean-Michel and Brigitte Trogneux complain together...
  8. Polichinelle's secret
  9. From one election campaign to another...
  10. André-Louis Auzière: to talk about it is to make it happen
  11. Brigolade: song "He had just turned 14"
  12. Emmanuel present at the deliveries, what a family!
  13. Jean-Michel Trogneux conquering the world
  14. The notion of truth is fundamentally foreign to him
  15. The hairpiece to Macron
  16. Tweets, brigolades, malice and hypocrisy...
  17. Was brigittologist Isabelle Ferreira drowned ?
  18. Jean-Louis Auzière's complaint against Natacha Rey
  19. Le Canard Enchaîné and Le Monde, two ways to disinform
  20. Macron, beyond the lies, the cynicism
  21. For immediate reinstatement of suspended caregivers
  22. A runoff without the far center is possible
  23. Against any return to a QR-Code apartheid
  24. A fateful march to five years of quips
  25. On the back of accusatory reversals, more Elysian harassment
  26. A fabricated life displayed to the public to be considered private !
  1. Introduction: this is not a rumour but a solid case

      This page is based on the comments I made about Brigitte Macron over the last few months on the neighbouring page devoted to the Covid crisis. After having read the whole file, it seemed relevant to me to deal with the subject from its main angles, favouring the genealogical approach because it allows us to understand what happened more effectively, because I have experience in the matter and because, incidentally, I am a distant cousin by marriage of the Trogneux family.

      How did this case come to me? For some time I had been hearing some astonishing remarks about Brigitte Macron née Trogneux, wife of the President of the French Republic Emmanuel Macron. Like many people, it was difficult for me to really grasp the allusions... In hindsight, I realise that many people knew, as many people knew about Mitterrand before the existence of a hidden daughter was revealed.

      On 18 December 2021, I first heard, in a article by Eric Verhaeghe of the fact that : "the rumour is running with strange vivacity, claiming that Brigitte Macron is in fact a man, or a transgender. This assertion initially appeared in Faits & Documents in October 2021 and hardly aroused any passion. One wonders why, all of a sudden, it has become a scoop on social networks. Again, it smells like a campaign stink bomb" and "In this chapter, we'll pour the perfidious words uttered by Gérald Darmanin, referring to Emmanuel Macron's husband and explaining that, given the violence of the personal attacks, the President was not yet sure of running" (>>>video>>> of 18 seconds). I didn't really click, since it was presented as a "rumour". One rumour among many...

      That same December 18, shortly thereafter, I found an argumentative article by Lionel Labosse that was based on the dossier in issue 501 of the journal "Faits & Documents" (here in pdf), published in early October 2021. The thesis was daring, was it substantiated?

      From that date and without waiting, I was thus able to read and directly analyse the main part of the file at the origin of this "rumour" advancing the hypothesis that Brigitte Macron would be according to the current vocabulary a "transgender man", a male individual who would have taken the social appearance of a woman. This is a long investigation by Xavier Poussard, an investigative journalist, of which there are too few nowadays. I found it well constructed, asking pertinent questions and putting forward common sense hypotheses. As a genealogy enthusiast, I am used to conducting such investigations to find the relatives of an ancestor, weighing up each hypothesis... The search for administrative or biographical archive documents is well conducted. The author notes their absence in large numbers, which quickly appears suspicious. The same applies to the inconsistencies which seem to be deliberate, probably in order to confuse the issue.

      After this initial study of the dossier and before undertaking a more in-depth analysis of its contents, I wanted to know the counter-arguments. What a surprise! While this revelation had been making the rounds on social networks (in which I do not participate) for five days, I could not find anything serious in the official press to stop the rumour. It was very easy, for example if Brigitte and Jean-Michel appeared together in front of the media. Why didn't they do that already?

      In the current context this void is a sign of great embarrassment, because, as we know, in these times, "fake news" are very quickly disproved. The newspaper Libération, mobilised in the front line to save the respectability of the presidential couple, did present a "checknews", which was taken up, for want of a better word, in a few other newspapers. I read it carefully, it was completely vacuous on the facts and only made one ad personam attack after another to discredit the investigator Natacha Rey, the one who unveiled the most difficult points to find in this affair that the Elysée services have strewn with false leads.

      Despite the enormity of the attack, the contrast between the seriousness of the prosecution's case and the factual vacuity of Libération's journalistic pleadings gave me the intimate conviction that Xavier Poussard and Natacha Rey are telling the truth: Emmanuel Macron, born in 1977, married Jean-Michel Trogneux in 2007, born in 1945, who then became his fictitious sister Brigitte, fictitiously born in 1953. The transformation would have taken place at the end of the 1970s. Before Brigitte did not exist or was "fabricated" a posteriori, after Jean-Michel disappeared. From being the father of his three children, he would have become their mother. On this basis, I proceeded as I do in genealogy : I adopted the hypothesis. Should I give this (state) affair a prominent place on my Covid page? I quickly answered yes, for reasons that will be presented later, and I was one of the first to blog about it. The threat of a complaint from the Elysée and reported by Libération seemed to me to be very artificial in the face of the reality of the facts.

      This page was started on 14 January 2022, almost a month after my discovery of this Brigitte affair that I call "the brigittegate". I am doing it because, obviously, the media and politicians (including my MP, as we shall see) have decided, for want of anything better, to marginalise the affair and treat it with contempt as a rumour and a tissue of lies. It is therefore appropriate to try to convince Internet users of the validity of the questions and the hypothesis adopted. I am therefore trying to do this by dividing it into chapters which, I hope, will allow the reader to orientate himself towards his points of interest.

      As Xavier Poussard writes "The difficulty of this investigation is to disentangle the true from the false". It is not easy, I am trying, but it is possible that on some points, which I think are secondary, this recognition of the true or false is questionable. Knowing this, I will make corrections.

      I would add that, on my own, I am not adding anything new apart from my cousinly link and a photo dating to 1953, I am simply repeating information that already exists elsewhere.

      I invite each reader to make up his or her own mind by confronting the hypothesis presented here with the legend told by the mainstream media, based on the verisimilitude and consistency of the facts.

      Alain Beyrand (alain [at]
      with the help of Lionel Labosse (site) and Hortense Fuschia.
      File started 13 January 2022, released 17 January with first 15 chapters,
      First finalisation (version 1.0) on 24 January with 22 chapters.
      Top and bottom photo Stéphane Lemouton, Closer.
      Clicking on the thick-bordered illustrations will enlarge them

      Post-Scriptum of April 13 and 30, 2022: as time went by, contacts with correspondents bringing their clues and remarks multiplied, a real citizen's survey was set up that I coordinated. The initial hypotheses have evolved, some of them, and not the least, have been put forward here for the first time. So, contrary to what I wrote on January 13, this page brings something new. It reports the progress of the investigation, including the erroneous hypotheses that were rejected, which are kept in boxes on a red background. There have been some adjustments (like this Postscript) but practically nothing has been deleted. This file is therefore both a diary of the investigation and a status report on its progress.

  2. The genealogist's intimate conviction

      Several reasons led me to carry out this study and present it on my website. To denounce the heavy lies at the highest level of the State, which join the lies told about Covid-19, as if it were usual to present false realities to the French. To denounce and help to pierce the omerta of the Elysian presidency and the media, whose denial is based on wind.

      But the impetus is more anecdotal, it is genealogical, I had already studied the Trogneux family and positioned it in my genealogy. Indeed, my wife and our children are cousins with the Trogneux, as this family tree shows.

      Clicking on this image takes you to my tree on geneatet with all its links.
      On the left, due to the usual 100 year confidentiality, the branch stops at Jean Trogneux, Jean-Michel's grandfather.
      The common ancestor Jeanne des Essarts, sister of a mayor of Rouen, had as her brother-in-law the famous Etienne Marcel (1315-1358) (page Wikipedia and his equestrian statue in the vicinity of the Paris City Hall).

      Christian Settipani is a renowned genealogist-historian. I draw on his method described in this page : "Research is an intimate conviction! I read critics who say "it's not safe because we don't have enough clues". In reality, when you do nothing else for decades, when you are confronted with academic research, you manage to obtain an intimate conviction, even if it will never replace a proof. An intimate conviction is not synonymous with precision either, it more often concerns a kinship rather than a precise filiation." I use the same notion of intimate conviction in my genealogy, especially for ancestors named XXX (there are some in the tree above).

      For several decades I have been expanding my genealogy (my associated site) and conducting real investigations to try to get out of certain dead ends, when no written document validates a filiation, or when a biological parent must be found. Comparing photos, trying to find similarities, trying to distinguish between what is legendary and what is real, finding hidden parentage links behind strong cooperation, etc... I therefore treated this Trogneux dossier with this experience. After having amassed the clues and having tried to find coherences or inconsistencies, when I finally arrive at the intimate conviction of having found the solution, it is rare that I am wrong. This is what gives me the confidence to publish this page.

      It has happened a few times that a new element challenges my conclusions, I then correct them and generally it is not too far from my first conclusion. Here, it's the same, I'm acting in good faith and I only ask to see documents. If there are any that contradict the hypothesis I have adopted, for example, Brigitte's first marriage certificate or the birth certificates of her children or photos of her with her young children, let them be shown to me, I will change my mind, while trying to understand why documents that are so easy to show have been hidden for so long.

      I tried to get one or more additional elements to strengthen or shake my conviction about Jean-Michel and Brigitte. I did so through the official channel, by sending the following email on 26 December to my MP, Philippe Chalumeau, of the presidential majority (LREM) :

      Mr. MP,
      I have studied the file of my distant cousin by marriage Brigitte Macron as I study other genealogical files. I have come to a firm conviction which I have expressed on a page of my blog at
      Of course I am interested in any new factual information, even if it might change my mind. Perhaps you can pass some on to me?
      A little earlier on this page (, I give an update on the current Covid situation. I end with this: "Everyone has a choice: be an accomplice or a whistleblower to the plotters".
      Hoping that you will now be in the second category, I wish you, Mr MP, all the best for 2022.

      I have had no response. Is that any wonder? So far, I have found no evidence to weaken my conviction, while there are many that strengthen it.

  3. The Trogneux line: chocolate makers in Amiens

  4. The "legend" of Brigitte Trogneux married to Emmanuel Macron

      Femme d'influence - Sa vérité sur son couple - Vacances en amoureux avant l'offensive -
      "Les Français doivent savoir ce que je fais"

      Officially and mass-mediatedly, the wife of the president of the president of the Republic Emmanuel Macron, elected in 2017, is presented according to a largely fabricated and deceptive narrative that we will call the "legend." She is presented to us as such in her Wikipedia page (from January 14, 2022) :

      Contested are: his gender, date of birth, first marriage and spouse, divorce. He would not be the mother of his three children but their father (see below).

      The following are contested: her high school diploma, her master's degree in literature, her thesis, her role as a press attaché in the early 1980s, obtaining the CAPES (Appendix A 32), The Alsatian episode, although subject to contestation (Appendix A 5), appears to be fair overall (Appendix A 36).

      There, it's about right. However the paucity of bibliographic evidence on Emmanuel as a child and Jean-Michel raises questions about the possibility that they knew each other before 1992.

      She met Emmanuel Macron when she was his high school teacher

      French teacher with a passion for literature, Brigitte Trogneux was teaching at the high school "La Providence" in Amiens when she had Emmanuel Macron as her Première student. She was then 36 years old and he 17. Fascinated by the intelligence of the young man, she passed on to him her passion for the French language but also for theater since she animated a club within the establishment. "In class, she was always quoting him as an example," recalls a classmate for "Le Parisien. She was totally transfixed by his writing skills. [...] He wrote poems all the time and she read them in front of everyone." Today "L'Express" reveals that she teaches in "a renowned religious institution in the capital".
      In 2015, the caption of the Emmanuel-Brigitte meeting was noticeably different. Here cover of VSD of 5 March 2015 and excerpt from article of L'Express of 25 June 2015. Brigitte was then Emmanuel's French teacher, their age gap was only 19, he was 17 and not 15, yet she did not have him as a pupil (other than in drama club) and the age gap, readjusted to 24, would in fact be 32. There is no evidence that Emmanuel had any writing talent. From 2015 to 2022, Brigitte's "legend" was thus readjusted as various revelations were made.

      By relying on the celebrity press (on which Wikipedia is largely based), which was based on the lies of Brigitte, the French were thus led to believe in the romantic love of a hyper-talented 17 year old high school student who would have subjugated his teacher, when in fact it was a 47 year old teacher who hijacked a 15 year old (see Appendix A 10). Wikipedia rightly points out that this is a serious offence under French law. Such would be the perverted couple who have been installed since 2017 in the Elysée Palace, at the head of France.

      April 24. In an aside, I stated this at the beginning of this chapter  "there is also a Wikipedia page on the Trogneux family and another page on the Jean Trogneux company." The first of these two pages has disappeared, without explanation. It is archived here.

  5. Two investigative journalists: Xavier Poussard and Natacha Rey

      It took the persistence of two journalists, Xavier Poussard and Natacha Rey, who investigated for a long time, to get out in part of the lies of this "legend".

      According to the mainstream media. They would be of extreme droute, conspiracy, antivaxx, even sexist, transphobic, anti-Semitic, everything goes through it as in this article of the numerama site. And to repeat that these are only vile "fake news" conveyed by the vile social networks, the dregs of the Internet etc.

      What can we learn from this? Not much. In any case, reading the two journalists' investigations there is nothing that is not sexist, transphobic, antisemitic. Saying that someone has had a sex change does not automatically mean that they are being blamed for it. In this (state) case, the blame lies elsewhere, in the fact that he is lying on a grand scale by claiming the opposite. As for the rest, it is better to be opposed to experimental injections than to want to force everyone to be vaxxed, it is better to be a denouncer of a plot than an accomplice. There are still links with the extreme right, but nothing that is contrary to the law, and how does that invalidate the facts revealed?

      Xavier Poussard is editor of the magazine "Faits & Documents". His Wikipedia page presents it in a dismissive way, "relaying many conspiracy theories with a far-right anti-Semitic and anti-Zionist bias". A little further on, the "editorial line" is described as "anti-Semitic and unconfessed anti-Masonic". I have only read the six issues on brigittegate, there is occasional mention of the Rothschild bank (of course, Macron worked there...) and of Masonic lodge (of course, some of his supporters are Freemasons), but I didn't recognise anything antisemitic and anti-Masonic. In my opinion that depends on the reader more than the writer. And even if it were, it wouldn't mean that one should a priori not read. It also says "About the content of the magazine, the press speaks of "fake news" [18,19], of "disinformation [20]"" with in notes 18, 19 and 20 the example of the Brigitte affair. On the contrary, we can understand that before this affair, the magazine had not made any disinformation!

      And this is the case, because this magazine also has a very good reputation, that of not losing its trials, like Le Canard Enchaîné and Médiapart. It is based on carefully verified information. Its title is in fact characteristic of its content. Emmanuel Ratier was its first editor from 1996 to 2015, Arnaud Soyez the second, Xavier Poussard is the third since 2017. More than 500 issues, distributed by subscription, on a monthly basis, have been published.

      From what is written in Wikipedia and elsewhere, it should be understood above all that this journal is very disturbing to the establishment.

      The six issues 497 to 501 and 503, each 12 pages long, deal with the case.
      I recommend reading them for those who want to go deeper into what is presented here.
      With the n° 504 added since, they are available on the site of the magazine at the price of 56 euros.

      In pdf format, you can find here an overview of the Poussard dossier with the first pages of each issue and the entire issue 501, the one that in its last two pages reveals the true identity of Brigitte Trogneux, wife Macron.

      On 3 October 2021, in a lengthy audio interview of 1h 41 min (partly reprinted in article), Xavier Poussard shows mechanisms that may underlie the current Covid crisis, with the Epstein case (article on the recent ruling) and its French ramifications, a Mega group, the Great reset. He finishes with Macron, the sale of Alstom, a "corruption pact" that cripples his political opponents and a "minor bribery" that allows him to be manipulated.

      Natacha Rey gave Xavier Poussard an essential hand at the end of issue 501 to show that Jean-Michel is surely the father of the children attributed to Brigitte, more on that later. Apart from this collaboration, Natacha worked in parallel with Xavier, it was another journalist, Richard Boutry, who brought them to work together briefly.

      Emmanuel Ratier, creator of F&D, and photo released by Natacha Rey

      Natacha Rey is not at all the same kind of journalist as Xavier Poussard. He is very orderly, methodically linking facts together, quite discreet, building files and publishing them with regularity. She appears scrambling, exuberant, going off in different directions, sometimes clumsy (notably in January 2022 with regard to Xavier Poussard), hardly relying on written material but on video interviews in which she shows a wearying logorrhea. And yet, she has essential qualities that allow her to investigate beyond what appears possible: she has solid common sense, she has nerve and above all she has intuition. And she manages to confirm (or deny) her intuitions. It took the combination of the Poussard rock and the Rey spur to succeed in piercing a crucial point of the Brigitte Macron mystery.

      So, while Natacha Rey does not have the official title of journalist (she is only self-proclaimed), she has qualities that far too many journalists with accreditation cards lack.

      Here are the available videos of interviews with Natacha Rey :
      • >>>video 1>>> (lost link) of 4hrs 35mins with Amandine Roy, 10 December,
      • >>>video 2>>> (lost link) of 1h 53 with Mike Borowski (also on the previous link), on 14 December. It is this video that is the most interesting to follow,
      • >>>video 3>>> of 3h 47 with Chloé Frammery and Hayssam Hoballah, on 8 January,
      • >>>video 4>>> of 2hrs 11mins with Mike Borowski, 21 January.
      • The rest is hard to follow. See this page from April 6.

  6. The family where Jean-Michel Trogneux grew up

      Généanet is the most popular genealogy site in France, everyone can put their own tree or that of their neighbour there. As a result, one can find everything and its opposite there, it is not really a reference site. However, there is generally a consensus. I don't show contemporary individuals on my personal tree, but many genealogists do for famous people, usually without giving dates. Here is a classic family tree of Jean Trogneux and Simone Pujol, as found before the brigittegate revelation in December 2021 (as of 14 January 2022, 14 genealogies show a roughly similar tree on geneanet):

      This is the tree corresponding to the "legend" of Brigitte Trogneux. We will see later that there are important corrections to be made on Jean-Michel and Brigitte, with two additional grandchildren for Jean and Simone.

      Let us bring some generally accepted elements on the children of Jean Trogneux and Simone Pujol, all born in Amiens:
      1. Anne-Marie Gisèle Marguerite (Annie), born July 9, 1932, married in 1955 to Gérard Boulogne (1929-2022)  two children Christine born in 1957, married in 1983 to Benoît Haquin, and Thierry,
      2. Jean-Claude Marie Joseph, born August 14, 1933, first married to Danièle Courbot with three children including the current successor of the chocolate factory, Jean Alexandre Trogneux born in 1961 ; remarried in 1990 with Brigitte Poillon, commonly known as Brigitte Trogneux, which is a source of confusion (example)  he died in 2018,
      3. Maryvonne, born January 17, 1937, died with her husband Paul Farcy of a car accident on February 24, 1960; their daughter Nathalie, born September 23, 1959 and thus 5 months old at the death of her parents, married Richard Bataille (1954-2015) and would have had two daughters in the Lille area.
      4. Monique, born August 7, 1941, married Jean-Claude Gueudet (born 1940), France's leading car distributor (presentation Wikipedia) ; three children,
      5. Jean-Michel Henri, born February 11, 1945, about whom we will return at length,
      6. Brigitte Claude, born April 13, 1953, married to André-Louis Auzière and then Emmanuel Macron.

      Brigitte would thus be the youngest of a large family, born eight years after her brother Jean-Michel, when her mother was 40 years old. According to the "legend", she would have married in 1974, at 21 years, with André(-Louis) Auzière, 23 years, she would have given birth to three children, Sébastien, Laurence and Tiphaine Auzière, born respectively in 1975, 1977 and 1984 (without knowing the birth certificates), when she was 22, 24 and 31 years. Everything seems usual, a classic life of a young French woman, nothing to attract attention...

      The following beautiful photo of a large and happy family was broadcast, without caption, on June 13, 2018 on France 3, in the documentary "Brigitte Macron, a French novel" telling the Brigitte legend (>>video>> of 1 hour and 27 minutes) (>>trailer>> of 3 minutes and 20 seconds), "Their couple intrigued France before fascinating the world. How can a 40-year-old woman, married with three children, leave everything for a 16-year-old student ?". "An unbelievable but true story", um...

      This photo is the only one where everyone agrees to accredit the presence of Jean-Michel Trogneux : the boy on the left. We can estimate that he would be 8 or 9 years old. It is also the only photo where, according to the "caption", one sees the whole family, including Brigitte on her mother's lap. We will see in the next chapter that there are two other photos of Brigitte as a child and that would be it, before she was more than thirty years old. What other person in France who grew up in a close-knit family would have so few photos of her childhood? Or why would she want to hide them?

      The photo appears authentic, there are the two parents, seated, surrounded by their children. Standing, from left to right, are Jean-Michel, Maryvonne, Jean-Claude, Annie and Monique. But is the "legend" true? Rather than the last child, Brigitte, could the little girl be the first grandchild ?

      In a first time, in early March, we concluded that this little girl could be a niece who died young, mentioned by Brigitte Macron, about which we did not know much. The mystery of this dead niece continued. On May 12, the new light of the Appendix A 37 allowed us to consider that she was Brigitte Trogneux, Jean-Michel's civil status sister and possibly biological niece. She would have died in 1959. Jean-Michel would have been very marked by the early death of this niece-sister and would later want to resurrect her by transforming himself into a woman and adopting the name and date of birth of the little girl. This will will be understood and partly shared by his parents, brother and sisters who have lived the same drama. This explains their acceptance of the gender change.

      Let's go back to the photo. Considering what has just been said (especially the girl's birth date of April 13, 1953), and Jean-Michel's winter shirt, it would be dated fall 1954 or winter 1954/1955. Perhaps Christmas 1954? Anne-Marie is then 22 years old, Jean-Claude 21 years old, Maryvonne 17 years and a half, Monique 13 years old, Jean-Michel 9 years and a half, Brigitte one year and a half.

      [Getty Images]

  7. Brigitte before 1990, according to the "legend"

      Let's start with the birth on April 13, 1953. Here it is presented on this excerpt from a page of the genealogical site Geneanet :

      Geneanet should not be under any illusion since, as already said, anyone can create such a page (even under a pseudonym) and invent a birth certificate #640 etc. This is not verifiable, only very close family members have access to contemporary civil status (over about a century). This page is run under the name "" with Freemasonic reasoning (cf. page Wikipedia), it presents the Brigitte "legend" at length.

      Let's look at the revelation of the date of birth. Xavier Poussard talks about it this way, implying that it could have been set after the 2007 wedding [F&D500p10] :

      It is strange that the date of birth of "Brigitte" was only made public in May 2016 with the publication, in the short-lived magazine "Pop Story", of a long eenquest by Sylvie Bommel entitled "And Brigitte created Macron". In the Macronian gesture, "April 13" corresponds to the death of Manette [Emmanuel's maternal grandmother] that occurred three years before "Brigitte's" birth date was given. In the story, April 13, 1953 is the date of the launch of MK-Ultra, the infamous CIA mind control program.

      The "legend" attributes only three photos to Brigitte as a child:

      The 3 official photos of Brigitte Trogneux small... So, same face or not ?
      Illustration of a tweet with a sensible question...

      We just saw, in the first of these black and white photos, Christine Boulogne aged two on her grandmother's lap. The second is of Tiphaine Auzière, the third of Laurence Auzière, the two daughters of Jean-Michel / Brigitte, which explains a certain resemblance [F&D500p5]. For the last two photos, a technical analysis shows that the central photo was originally in colour and has been much reworked to bring it back to the 1950s, while the right-hand photo, which is still in its original state, is dated from the mid-1980s [F&D503p6], whereas the future first lady of the start-up nation should be a woman of more than 20 years of age in this decade!

      With her two daughters, Tiphaine on the left, Laurence on the right. Then the two sisters with their brother Sebastien. 2017.

      Hungry for images, forced to add illustrations that can create an illusion, the documentary "Brigitte Macon, a French novel" also shows a short video sequence of a granddaughter dancing, and a photo of the Trogneux parents very later than the 50's :

      There are some accounts of Brigitte's life before 1990, but they are vague and in this case the artistic vagueness hardly seems convincing even for a national novel [F&D500p6]. Xavier Poussard points out that several journalists have tried to find friends or youthful comrades of Brigitte, in vain [F&D500p8]...

      However, there was a biographical twist in 2017  it was learned that Brigitte had become involved in politics in 1989 ; Emmanuel was only 12 years old.... Finally, something concrete, a woman in the flesh committed to action... "It is a document that was sleeping, well stored in the drawers of a Truchtersheim family and that is now a collector's item: the electoral leaflet of the "Truchtersheim tomorrow" list, and its 15 candidates, among whom a certain Brigitte Auzière. Brigitte Macron, married at the time to the banker André-Louis Auziere, lives in Truchtersheim with her husband and three children. She is a literature teacher at the Lucie-Berger Protestant secondary school in Strasbourg" [article from France 3 Grand Est]. It is about the municipal elections of 12 March 1989, here is this document :

      See also the end of
      Chapter 9 and
      the Appendix A 36

      At first, the investigation failed to cross-reference information, despite some testimonials (article). Factual elements were missing, in general for the stay in Alsace. The face of this leaflet, worked automatically with a restoration software (above right), did not appear blatantly to be that of Brigitte. Eventually it did, it would be her, as shown in Appendix A 36, consistent with other Alsatian information discovered.

      As a conclusion to this chapter and the previous one, the biographical and iconographic record of an affluent middle-class girl is quite thin. In the absence of other more consistent documents (why hide them?), nothing proves that a Brigitte Trogneux, daughter of Jean and Simone Pujol, born in 1953, would have existed before 1984 and her 31 years. We will see later that we have gone back to about 1985. It remains very thin.

  8. From Jean-Michel to Brigitte, their likeness

      "Jean-Michel Trogneux was concealed for a very long time and remains largely a mystery, a "phantom" character. His existence was initially confined to a document issued by a company belonging to the Trogneux family, the minutes of the company Exploitation des Etablisselent Arrasse organised on 25 May 2007. He is a shareholder and scrutineer alongside his brother Jean-Claude and his nephew Jean-Alexandre. But it was quick, as he was no longer in the statutes on 17 October 2007, three days before Brigitte and Emmanuel's wedding [F&D501p2].

      In 2018, at 73 years old, he is present on the death announcement of his brother Jean-Claude [F&D501p3]. It is also in 2018, in the TV movie of FR 3, that appears the family photo with Jean-Michel, without caption. He will be able to be named only in 2019 with the book of Sylvie Bommel [F&D501p3].

      Other elements appeared during the investigation, including his marriage in 1980, but after 1984 it remains a dotted life, on paper, without photo or physical public presence. In short before 1984 we have a Jean-Michel present and a Brigitte absent, after 1984 a Brigitte very present and a Jean-Michel almost erased : as if Jean-Michel had become Brigitte...

      At this point and without yet addressing the thorny issue of Brigitte's first husband and their three children, a first question arises, since their strange life itinerary suggests : is it physically possible that Jean-Michel became Brigitte ?

      At the end of his investigation, strong also of other elements that will be presented later, Xavier Poussard in "Facts & Documents" n°501, page 10 comes to ask the question about Brigitte: "What if it was a man ". Could she be Jean-Michel ? He relies on the parallel research of Natacha Rey on her Facebook page (private) and on this comparison of photos :

      After the broadcast of "Brigitte Macron, a French novel" which incidentally revealed the physical existence of Jean-Michel Trogneux, Natacha Rey posted, on the same platform, this more than disturbing assemblage putting side by side the current "Brigitte" and "Jean-Michel" at the dawn of adolescence.

      Similarity by comparison Betaface: between 71 and 67%

      Later, Xavier Poussard will use the facial recognition software of the Chinese company Megvii, which will establish a good probability that these two faces, which are chronologically very far apart, belong to the same individual. Natacha Rey will do the same and everyone can compare photos:

      Other details in Brigitte's earlier life support this hypothesis. For example, in her third video, Natacha Rey reports that Brigitte recalled living alone in the United States during Neil Armstrong's moon landing in 1969 (link). She would have been 16 at the time, what was she doing there alone at that age? Jean-Michel, on the other hand, was 24 years old and this stay seems then much more likely. See also Appendix A 26.

      Other questions deserve to be asked. In particular, these raised by associated investigative internet users :
      1. Is it possible that a Brigitte Trogneux was born in Amiens in 1953 (or rather 1951, see chapter 6 the box on the family photo), who would have died shortly after ? His brother Jean-Michel would then have somehow resurrected his sister...
      2. Jean-Michel had a niece who died young (Appendix A 11), who could be in this family photo. Similarly Jean-Michel would have wanted to resurrect her by taking or not taking her identity depending on whether she would be named Brigitte or not.

      It remains that the legend presents Brigitte as having had a first husband, André-Louis Auzière, and three children, how is this compatible with the hypothesis that has just been formulated?

  9. André-Louis Auzière, Brigitte's ghost husband

      Following the caption on the Geneanet record, the life of Brigitte Trogneux's first husband appears thus :

      On close inspection, the blurring is widespread  :
      • According to the documents, his first name varies, André, André Louis, André-Louis, Jean-Louis. In fact it would be André for the first name, Louis for the second and André-Louis would be a passing mistake of Sylvie Bommel, often repeated later. For Jean-Louis, her uncle, we will come back to it several times and at length. Starting, anecdotally, in the Figaro Madame article illustrated below.
      • Her birthplace, Eséka in Cameroon, only became a commune in 1954; why would a young European girl have given birth in such a remote place? There is no chance of finding a civil status there.... The presence of the parents at that time in Eséka seems to be proven, however (Annex A 18). The remaining vagueness will lead to the question of who was born there (Chapter 29).
      • He would be a banker at Crédit du Nord and then "sub-director of the regional delegation of the Banque Française du Commerce Extérieur" in Strasbourg but there is no record of him in the banking industry [F&D501p7] .
      • Isn't it strange that he quietly leaves the marital home when his wife falls in love with a teenager, leaving him with custody of the three children aged 17, 15 and 8 ?
      • The date of the divorce in 2006 appears strangely late, when it's been about fifteen years since the spouses have been living together..
      • The three photos that have been released of him, below, are of someone else.
      • Death certificate #3888: is this usually known information?
      • Why did it take the celebrity press a year to report on the death of the first husband (and father of her children) of the "first lady" ?
      • Tiphaine, the youngest daughter, announced, "my father died, I buried him on December 24." This is contradictory with a death on December 24 and a cremation on the 28th.

      The 2018 France 3 documentary "Brigitte Macron, a French novel" shows this photo featuring Brigitte and her first husband André-Louis. This is actually Claude Hugot, a fellow teacher. Then there was a fake tweet the same year, using this photo, reuniting husband, wife and lover (Emmanuel at 12) (article). And a fake interview with Andre-Louis, actually a hoax (article)...

      Anne Fulda, author of the book "Emmanuel Macron, un jeune homme si parfait", had written the following about Brigitte Macron: "She mentions little about André-Louis Auzière, her ex-banker husband. Out of modesty, discretion. Because there are things she doesn't want to, can't say?" In 2017, during the presidential election, international journalists had tried to interview André Louis Auzière, in vain. In an article in Gala magazine entitled "As if he had never existed  !", there is a passage by author Sylvie Bommel: "fascinated by this enigmatic man, the English journalists searched everywhere, without finding anything." (link)
      The journalist who has most investigated André-Louis Auzière is undoubtedly Sylvie Bommel. Charged with laying down the "official legend" in her river article "Et Brigitte créa Macron" published in Pop Story in May 2016, she wrote that after Emmanuel's arrival in "Brigitte's" life, "he was not seen again in Amiens, he was assumed to have left for Paris, but in truth no one knew anything about it. Wiped out, erased. As if he had not existed. To the point of not wanting to meet his ex-family-in-law at his mother's funeral". She will launch in spite of everything in his search, a game of track which will constitute the essential of "He had just been 17 years old", his second investigation published in 2019. In vain... [F&D501p9]

      Since the man could not be found, the focus was on an almost homonymous man, a certain Jean-Louis André Auzière. There is even a confusion between the two on this document, as pointed out by Xavier Poussard [F&D501p9] :

      The confusion between Jean-Louis and André-Louis made by Salomé Garganne on in May 2017 (extract, link).

      This photo of André-Louis as a young man is the one from his wedding, below. The idea comes then to compare it with a recent photo of Jean-Louis. There is a resemblance, confirmed by the Betaface software of comparaisson (71%, Appendix B 6). The wedding photo would therefore be that of Jean-Louis Auzière's wedding to his first wife Susan Spray. Indeed, the bride, below right automatically retouched by software, does not look like Brigitte.

      A thorough analysis of this wedding photo can be found in Appendix A 9.

      Enhanced image
      of the bride

      Those close to Brigitte's first husband describe him as very self-effacing "so neutral", Tiphaine says her father "prefers to remain in complete anonymity". Perhaps, but from there to leave no trace... No information could be obtained from his immediate family.

      The France 3 documentary also shows André-Louis Auzière mowing his lawn. In fact,
      that would be Jean-Paul Debes, present on the Truchtersheim municipal election flyer seen in Chapter 7.

      According to Généanet, including this tree, Jean-Louis Auzière, born in 1943, would be an uncle of André-Louis, born in 1951. Jean-Louis would have married a first time with Susan Spray and they would have had two children, Pascal born in 1966 and Marc born in 1974. Then he would have remarried with Catherine Audoy born in 1944, the couple having no children. Recall that Geneanet data may not be reliable. Complements on the Auzière family in Appendix A 18, A 30 et A 31.

  10. The biological mother of the three Auzière children, first hypothesis

      This chapter deals with the biological parents of the three Auzière children, Sebastien, Laurence and Tiphaine, born in 1975, 1977 and 1984. We now know that Jean-Michel / Brigitte Macron is not their mother but their biological father. The identity of the biological mother has changed during this investigation. We will stay, in this chapter, only on the first mother, revealed in mid-October 2021, popularized in mid-December. In retrospect, it was a necessary step to know, on April 12, 2022 (in a probable way becoming May 25 an intimate coinviction) the mother we retain in this file, which will be presented in Chapter 29.

      It was while analyzing the information around André Louis and Jean-Louis Auzière that Natacha Rey had the intuition that this Jean-Louis, so close to André, could be the one who passed on his Auzière surname to Brigitte's three children. She then had the idea to contact his second wife, Catherine Audoy. Xavier Poussard tells the rest in "Faits & Documents" n°501, it is an anthology moment, the key to the enigma was about to be revealed :

      Having become our correspondent in this investigation, Natacha Rey contacted, on June 22 [2021], Catherine Audoy (from the professional contact given by the interested party on the Internet) in order to present her with the multiple inconsistencies nestled in Brigitte's "green years".
      If the answer never came, the result was immediate since in the wake, on July 13, 2021, Natacha Rey saw the gendarmerie bursting into her home. She was taken into custody (without being summoned) on the pretext of a complaint filed by Catherine Audoy with the public prosecutor of Lisieux (where Jean-Louis Auzière officiates as a legal conciliator). Our correspondent was released after five hours of tough interrogation, with a moral lesson, humiliations and threats of all kinds. She was asked for the list of journalists with whom she had been in contact (we were not the only ones) and her phone was seized.
      Had Natacha Rey touched the sensitive nerve by simply exposing the physical similarity between Jean-Michel Trogneux and the current "first lady" and by demonstrating the impossibility that Jean-Louis Auzière was the cousin of an unlikely André-Louis Auzière first husband of "Brigitte" ?

      Obviously the marshal, with its unfriendly methods, had a message to send to the journalist. If so far the investigation on the biographical trail of Brigitte was advancing by the search and laborious study of documents difficult to find, the surprise irruption of the pandores at the home of Natacha signals that the latter is at least on the right track. In any case we can say that such a disproportionate reaction of the police to a banal contract is very revealing of something that should not happen in the public place. The hypothesis below, known as "Catherine Audoy mother", formulated in mid-October 2021, was going to impose itself on brigittologists for six months before another one was expressed in this file, where the rejection of this starting hypothesis is now acted :

      All this leads to believe that Catherine Audoy could really be the mother of Brigitte's three children, that's what Natacha Rey, Xavier Poussard and their readers, including myself, have deduced. It was only later that another explanation was given (Chapter 29).

      Catherine Audoy is a painter and designer. "In particular, she paints children's faces whose resemblance to "Brigitte's" grandchildren is unsettling, to say the least, as if they were the models..." [F&D501p10].

      Illustrations (from Catherine Audoy's old facebook account) and comments found on the internet

      It is then possible to build a scenario where Jean-Michel would be the biological father of his three children Sebastien, Laurence, Tiphaine Auzière, the biological mother being Catherine Audoy married Auzière. On his side, Jean-Louis Auzière can then be considered as an adoptive father, even official from the administrative point of view. A striking resemblance of features between Catherine and Laurence goes in this direction. Xavier Poussard goes further by estimating that the resemblance is strong with the three children [F&D501p10]. However, the Betaface comparison is more mixed, 63% to 60%, between the three Auzière children and Catherine Audoy 

      This explained the custody of Natacha Rey, extraordinary custody for which no other explanation could be found at the time. In another oddity, just after this episode, Natacha Rey tells of being contacted by others (link). After the revealing act of the gendarmes, tongues were loosened to come spontaneously to help the investigation and thus try to direct it :

      Strangely these last few days, I was contacted by several people, whose either the math teacher neighbor in Amiens, or the daughter or son knew Brigitte Macron well from the time when " she " was a teacher. Some people, incredulous, tried to defend her and accused me, without even having read the investigation, of spreading rumors or false information and of trying to harm her. However, it turns out that ALL of them, without exception, spoke to me about a Madame Trogneux and not a Madame Auzière, even though she is supposed to have taught under only two names: Madame Auzière until 2006 and Madame Macron from 2007.

      Refer to the first issues of Faits&Document devoted to the "Brigitte Macron Mystery", where this name problem is mentioned [F&D503p3], since journalists who interviewed witnesses at the time also called her Madame Trogneux "at the time of the scandal caused by her affair with the young student Emmanuel. Without knowing it, these people did me a favor by bringing water to my mill, confirming, if it were needed, the credibility of my thesis.

      How were the parents of the three Auzière children declared at their births in 1975, 1977, 1984? We don't know. Everything seems to have been carefully looped, as with the life of André-Louis Auzière. Similarly, we don't know under what conditions Jean-Michel turned into Brigitte and how he was recognized as the mother of his children.

      From left to right, Tiphaine, Laurence and Sebastien Auzière with Emmanuel and Brigitte (photo Gala).
      Emmanuel Macron at his wedding: "I wanted to thank Brigitte's children.
      If there are any for whom it might not have been very easy, it was for them.
      And it had, thanks to them, the force of evidence.
      " (link).

      The hypothesis thus constructed seemed to be the only one that could coherently assemble the emerging pieces of the Brigitte puzzle. It corresponded to positive answers to the following questions posed by Xavier Poussard [F&D501p10] (added links to Wikipedia) :

      Would Jean-Michel Trogneux have started a family with Catherine Audoy? Did Jean-Michel Trogneux suffer from the psychiatric disorder known as gender dysphoria ? Would he have resorted, late in life, to a GRS (Gender Reassignment Surgery) type MTF (Male-to-Female)  operation? After his "gender reassignment", would he have chosen Brigitte as his first name ? "Brigitte" and Jean-Michel Trogneux are they one and the same person ? To what "vital choice" does "Brigitte" refer in "Elle" (August 18, 2017) ? It is indeed hard to believe that it is a "simple" divorce when you read :"I know I hurt my children, and that is the thing I blame myself for most. But I couldn't not do it, there are times in your life when you make vital choices. And for me, it was."

      The scenario could look like this:
      • Catherine Audoy has three children, Sébastien, Laurence, Tiphaine, whose biological father is Jean-Michel Trogneux. Jean-Louis Auzière (duplicated as André-Louis Auzière in the legend) recognizes them. They therefore bear his Auzière surname.
      • At the time of the births, Jean-Louis Auzière has for wife, Susan Spray. He thus has two homes, one with his wife and their two children, the other with Catherine Audoy and her three children of whom he has become the adoptive father.
      • 20 years after the births, he divorces and marries Catherine Audoy..
      • Administratively, the mother of the three children remains Catherine Audoy and it is hidden from the general public.
      Variations are possible. The hypothesis that Susan Spray is five times mother is not to be ruled out.

      This scenario is now replaced by another, presented in Chapter 29, which also answers Xavier Poussard's questions positively.

  11. The two families of Jean-Michel Trogneux

      Now that we are approaching reality, we can admire the way the Brigitte legend was built. The making of her first husband André-Louis Auzière is particularly clever, allowing to keep the patronymic Auzière leaving in the shadow the one who can be forgiven as the adoptive father, Jean-Louis Auzière. Transforming Jean-Michel from the father of his children into a mother is clever and has been masterfully interpreted by the family. Having practiced acting classes proves effective....

      However, the reality would be even more complex, since it appears that, according to the diagram below, Jean-Michel would be the father of two other children, Jean-Jacques and Valerie. This tree has lost its relevance since we know that the three Auzière children are not the children of Catherine Audoy. The reader's attention will be drawn to the right side of the tree, correct, showing another affair of Jean-Michel Trogneux, with another woman, Véronique Dreux, and the other two children, Jean-Jacques and Valérie.

      Tree version 1, Catherine Audoy mother
      Tree made up from two trees found on the Web (1 2), keeping only what fits the hypothesis presented here
      Warning: this tree is now discarded, as far as Catherine Audoy is concerned, replaced by the one at the end of Chapter 29, in version 3.

      Xavier Poussard [F&D503p4] :

      One Trogneux has so far gone completely under the radar (no mention in the press or on genealogical sites), Jean-Jacques Trogneux was born in November 1982. A birth announcement is available in the archives of the Courrier Picard at the BNF (with the problems that this source poses as we have shown). On 15 November 1982 the birth of Jean-Jacques Trogneux is announced, son of Jean-Michel Trogneux and Madame, née Véronique Dreux.

      Also born was a sister of Jean-Jacques, Valérie Anne-Catherine Trogneux on 20 February 1984 in Amiens. She married Frank Limpens on 21 June 2008 in Amiens [F&D503p5]. Jean-Jacques Trogneux was present at the Elysée Palace during Emmanuel Macron's inauguration. His sister was not there. Their mother Véronique Dreux, born in 1952 in Amiens, married in 1998 in Toulon Alain de la Simone, born in 1935 in Paris (whose nephew is the singer Albin de la Simone) [F&D503p5].

      Jean-Jacques Trogneux sporting, apparently portrayed by Catherine Audoy (from a tableau by Botticelli ?)
      and in front of the Elysée Palace in 2017

      Thus, contrary to the family tree of the legend, presented in the first chapters, Jean-Michel Trogneux would not have remained a childless bachelor, he would have had five children with two wives and, after a change of sex, he would have become Brigitte, would have married Emmanuel Macron, reaching the unofficial title of "First Lady of France". Extraordinary journey cleverly disguised... to the point that it is hard to imagine... It is so much more comfortable to believe in an idyllic legend carefully romanticized by the communicators, diligently spread by the magazines and media. Once again we have the illustration that the bigger the lie, the better it is... until we realise that behind the actors in the play, reality exceeds fiction.

      As Njama points out in a comment from Agoravox :

      If the hypothesis of the genealogy of Jean-Michel Trogneux in the 70s / 80s may seem complex, it could be explained by a simple double life (he would not be the first), favored most often by compatible professional activities (commercial kind) ... before his gender dysphoria which, we can easily understand, would have exploded in full flight his conjugal liaisons

      Brigitte's biography is clearly false... she can't get 2150 € of retirement pension (source L'Obs in 2017 tax declaration of the Macrons, 17.200 € received between January and August 2016) for an incomplete career, knowing that in the private sector it is calculated on the 25 best years and represents at best 65% of the net salary, or a teacher who moreover is not certified couldn't have an average income of 3.000 € / month for 25 years. With only 31 years of professional activities in her biography even adding 4 quarters per child (3 children or 5?), the discount is severe... [details]

      Indeed, these pension amounts are an additional proof of the vast fabric of lies on which the "legend" of Brigitte Macron is based. This could be a new line of inquiry for an investigating judge who really has the means to investigate.

  12. 77 years old in 2022...

      Does the hypothesis of Jean-Michel becoming Brigitte lead to inconsistencies? The one that seemed strongest to me is related to the age of the character. With this biographical merger, Brigitte gets eight extra years. This is quite an old age, and she will be 77 years old in 2022. Does this correspond to the canon of the primped beauty that magazines show us? Xavier Poussard gives the following answer [F&D503p6] :

      2017, Brigitte Macron (72) moves into the Elysée Palace. Some of our subscribers wonder about the eight-year age difference induced by the transsexual hypothesis and its implication on "Brigitte's" physique. Without even touching on the difference in skin ageing between men and women and without detailing what plastic surgery currently allows, a simple comparison with Amanda Lear (born Alain Tapp, probably in 1939) or with the singer and trans woman Marie-France (born on 9 February 1946) will allow us to sweep away the objection about the physical/age relationship.

      Amanda Lear at 71 (2010), 80 (2019), 81 (2020) (link). Even at 5 years younger, this is still amazing...
      Marie-France in her youth (link), at 67 (in 2013) (Fabien MacRa, same link) and at 73 (link).

      So in this world of appearance there are illustrious antecedents in show business and Brigitte is no exception. However, not all the photos are to her advantage. In some pictures, the ravages of time and the hours spent flying in the jet set are visible and betray her true biological age, to bring it into line with that of Jean-Michel...

      Comparing the photos, we see that, like any elderly person, her height as a teacher at La Providence has diminished, she is shrinking. And videos show that at 72 years old on 12 cm heels, it is difficult to gambol, her unassertive gait is problematic when she walks on stilts...

      Similar wigs, some might think the singer Iggy Pop, pictured opposite, born 1947, 75 in 2022, would be his younger brother (or sister ?).

      "It all started with Natacha Rey who, as soon as she saw her appear, took it for granted that Brizitte was a transsexual and investigated for three years... Some only obsessed over her wig and blue-plastic contact lenses... already bizarre. In order to deny that he wore a wig, the Élysée Palace used a procedure that will go down in history. The palace published a job advertisement looking for a hairdresser capable of applying extensions [article of 11 January 2018]. Unheard of! The Presidency never publishes a job advert for such a position. It's a bit technical, though, extensions [page Wikipedia] only lengthen a head of hair... and countless close-ups of Brizitte's head corroborate that she only wears wigs. Which are all the more noticeable because they are too big... unless she has a male-like head volume...". Article from 18 January 2022 also featuring short videos showing that in the way she moves and is, Brigitte is not very feminine...

      Tweet comment:

      "Thanks wind! Here you can see very well the little bit of hair attached to the front on the very small shaved hair and another floor with the hairpiece, I was a hairdresser and I know how it's messed up !".

      Also noticeable is the wrinkled skin on her hands and forehead.

      Brigitte would therefore be 77 years old on Friday 11 February 2022. Will we remember to wish her a happy birthday? Yes, see the Appendix A 6.

      And from a March 11 tweet, four photos betraying the age  : 1 2 3 4.

  13. The backbone of a man...

      A woman may look (bone structure) close to a man, she may have a short neck, long feet, flat buttocks, it is probably very rare for her to have all of these characteristics together. Also, as shown in this tweet photo, it is usual that men have the knee out, women the knee in, again Brigitte is in the first category. And also for his overdeveloped lower face (photo), for relative finger length (Manning index, photo), even hairiness (photo). These elements are taken up and developed in the Appendix B 12. Yes, it is very rare that a woman has so many characteristics generally male...

      Variants of the photo on the left : 1 2 3 [Bestimage Agency], avenue Montaigne, Paris, June 21, 2018.

      "Brigitte Macron, is she a transsexual? The question that the french are asking
      themselves at the moment... (instagram: @facial.cupping)

      The neck of a nymph, graceful, light, delicate, sleek, supposed to be that of a Lady of the High.
      Reproduced without trickery by Natacha Rey.

      These illustrations and comments were collected from the web.

      What big feet... No comment. No comment.

      In her way of being, Brigitte can also have masculine manners. Such is the case for the way she sits with her legs spread in a video from the France 3 documentary "La Stratégie du Méteore," available on Youtube under the title "Macron's diabolical strategy to win the presidential elections" (>>>vidéo>>> of 1 h 21).
      Here's this >>>video>>> 29-second clip showing a very masculine way of sitting.
      // copy and paste pdf : //

      Nevertheless, often dressed by renowned couturiers, Brigitte was able to create an illusion (excerpts from this page in Gala magazine):

      According to another page in Gala, Brigitte Macron has "a hot look" and "a real star figure",
      with "an Olympic shape". Her "5 beauty assets" are her sylphid line, her rocky eyes, her sunny disposition,
      her endless legs ("Julia Roberts better watch out") and her California blonde.

  14. 1977-1990, Jean-Michel Trogneux and Pastor Joseph Doucé

      Three times in this month of January 2022, the Brigitte Macron affair has taken us back to the year 1977, which appears to be the year when Jean-Michel Trogneux begins to become a woman.

      1. 1977, the interview with the transsexual Veronique.

        While her reaction should have been immediate, to stifle the rumor as soon as possible, Brigitte Macron opposed a long silence to the revelations on her transsexuality. These had however inflamed the social networks, in mid-December 2021. Apart from the censorship and the outraged and unargued denials of the complacent media, the Elysée avoided the subject and was even very discreet. It was only in mid-January that Mrs. Macron brought the first answers in two media interventions. During the one of January 12, she is brief  "Of course it's a lie, but hey... Once I said that, I didn't say anything...", also speaking vaguely about a complaint.

        The second time, on RTL radio on January 14, she speaks at greater length on the subject. She spouts her nonsense with aplomb, in a natural way (she has so much experience...), of course without the slightest proof, birth certificate, marriage certificate, photos or other documents, in short the classic tools of the genealogist... She enters as if she were at home in any big media and she talks in front of journalists who do not know how to study a file and who swallow any bluff ("rumor", "transphobic"...). The one who assaulted a teenager, the one who, through her husband, assaulted all French citizens, dares to present herself as a defender of teenage harassment (see also the Appendices A 17 and D 25). How long will this grotesque play last, when will we get back to reality and the documents and facts (not to say Facts & Documents...) that testify to it  Since its formation, this couple has erected lies as a way of life, later becoming its way of governing. Here is the transcript of this >>>video RTL>>> of 1 mn 21, Brigitte Macron (BM) answering the questions of the journalist Alba Ventura (AV)  :

        AV - Have you been a victim of social media too? Recently, you were called a man on social media. First it hurt you, that?
        BM - At first I looked at it from a little bit far, I heard about it and then well... And then at some point I realized that they were turning my genealogy upside down.
        AV - What do you mean?
        BM - That is, they had changed my family tree. That is to say, three quarters of the family was fine and then all of a sudden you get to my brother. I am my brother. And now we're touching my parents' genealogy and now it's impossible.
        AV - When you say "they," who are these people?

        BM - There are three levels. The first level is the transmitters, in this case there are women, transmitters who have apparently been pursuing me for a long time. I don't know, I don't go there. Then there are those who relay and amplify. Then of course there are the hosts. And me, if I don't go there, if I don't do anything, even though I've been against harassment for four years, I won't be heard. They're going to tell me "but you, you don't do anything".
        AV - Exactly. But you, you have, if I dare say, the means to defend yourself.

        BM - Completely.
        AV - I mean, a 13 year old or a 13 year old who continues to suffer in silence... I think it took you five-six days to get some information out...

        BM - It took me five and a half days...
        AV - Five-six days, you?

        BM - Yes, five and a half days, I think, yes. So you can imagine ... With a lawyer who is experienced in the practice...

        This 2022 interview is going to be valuable to us for the comparison it allows with another interview, from 1977 :

        The proof

        January 23, 2022: while I am in the process of first finalizing this page, I learn of the discovery of a >>>video INA>>> of 1 min 47, dated September 27, 1977 (it has disappeared from the page INA around February 10, I replaced it with a saved version, 15 MB). It features an interview with "Véronique and Martine, transsexuals in the 70s", Martine with her face uncovered and Véronique with her contours in the dark. On the television channel "Antenne 2", they answer the journalist François Desplats with the comment (typing errors included) :"Veronique and Martine, who became women after an operation, bring a testimony on their transsexuality. With her face hidden, Veronique talks about her operation. For her, it is not a transformation because she has always felt like a woman. Martine evokes her difficulties in the working world. Since her operation, she had to change jobs because the environment in which she worked would not have accepted her gender change". This video is incomplete. The rest of the dialogue between Veronique and François Desplat is transcribed in Appendix A 19, but the gist is already here.

        This Veronique's voice and Brigitte Macron's voice are practically the same. Also, Veronique has the same "That is" speech tic as in the above RTL video from January 14, 2022, from 1:21.

        Listen the comparison is striking :
        >>>video>>> of 1 min 27
        // copy and paste pdf: //

        The silhouette in the INA video looks very similar to Brigitte's. And the same body language...

        This comparison is proof that Brigitte and Veronique are the same person. Certainly the expert is self-proclaimed, but his words appear accurate, no adversarial analysis was presented and especially everyone can see with the video above that the voices are the same...

        This comparison of voices allows us to affirm that Brigitte and the transsexual Veronique are the same person, therefore that Brigitte was born a man.

        From this we can say that Brigitte Trogneux is a fictional character, invented, well not completely invented, we will see later. The proof that Brigitte was born and grew up under the name of Jean-Michel Trogneux is not established. However, the number of clues accumulated in this sense leaves little doubt.

        Jean-Michel Trogneux would have become a woman around September 1977, to believe the title of the two "transsexual", implied operated. A change of sex is not carried out in three months (Xavier Poussard indicates 3 years), it is possible that the interview was carried out at the beginning of the process. However, this is prior to the birth of three of Jean-Michel's five children (out of his two "families") : Tiphaine (1984), Jean-Jacques (1982) and Valerie (1984), which could create an impossibility. We notice then that to the question of the journalist seeking to know if she was operated, Véronique shuts up... It is thus later that she was operated, supposing that she was really operated. Or she was only operated on her face. There are still questions, but the darkness is beginning to dissipate.

      2. 1977, the meeting with Pastor Joseph Doucé.

        On January 8, 2022, at the end of her 3rd video, Natacha Rey opened a new lead. She presented the first photo below pointing, in the foreground, to a young man, looking pensive, leaning on his knees, cigarette in his mouth (on the right he is compared with an image from the video in the previous chapter) :

        In the photo on the left, from left, probably Pastor Doucé and Jean-Michel Trogneux
        On the right montage, Jean-Michel in 1977 and Brigitte in 2017, same way of sitting, also on this photo of tweeting in 2021

        Natacha Rey emphatically implies that it would be Jean-Michel Trogneux. There would be formal evidence presented in a few weeks, in February 2022. Why wait? However, no proof was brought in the following months, there is only a physical resemblance and a certain logic which is explained in what follows. It is therefore appropriate to be cautious about the presence of Jean-Michel Trogneux on this document. The photo is taken from the television program "Faites entrer l'accusé", broadcast in 2005, devoted to the assassination of Pastor Doucé (>>>video>>> of 1 hr. 09 min).

        Joseph Doucé was a Belgian Baptist pastor, excommunicated, with a degree in psychology-sexology from the Protestant University of Amsterdam, naturalized French in 1982. He disappeared at the age of 45 on July 19, 1990, his body reportedly found in the forest of Rambouillet on October 24, 1990. He had founded the Center of Christ the Liberator (CCL) in Paris in 1976. According to the profession of faith of this group, it was to provide a space of welcome and speech for believers belonging to sexual and gender minorities: homosexuals, transgender, sado-masochists and also for other sexual perverts including pedophiles, a criminal group in terms of the law. Declaring himself "homosexual practicing [his sexuality]" as much as a pastor (believer practicing his faith), he welcomed in various meetings or in his bookstore, under the good auspices of Christ, young people in suffering encountering difficulties in affirming and living socially their specific sexuality considered as marginal, deviant or psychopathological.

        Pastor Doucé, his store, his meetings, two of his books, and a title about his passing.

        For young people, changing their gender at the time almost required going through prostitution. For older people, who had become parents and integrated into society, badly in their skin, listening to the pastor, his meetings and his networks allowing to be discreetly operated, constituted a relatively accessible step. It is therefore not surprising that Jean-Michel Trogneux followed this path. Xavier Poussard brings details (we find the Fraternelle already mentioned on a Généanet site) [F&D503p6] :

        Mid-1980s. Jean-Michel Trogneux (40 years), although a family man, becomes aware of the "gender dysphoria" that he has buried for so long and is about to perform his "reassignment". It must be said that the times strongly encourage such steps. [...] The law is beginning to evolve. if it is still legally and medically forbidden to change one's sex by surgery in France, a public care pathway was defined in 1979 on the basis of a two-year psychiatric follow-up before being able to access hormonal treatment and then surgeries (it takes three years) that are quite expensive and generally performed abroad, mainly in the Netherlands and Great Britain.

        Under the influence of Pastor Joseph Doucé's Center of Christ the Liberator, which welcomes, connects and files (on whose behalf ?) members of "sexual minorities" (homosexuals, lesbians, sadomasochists, transvestites, transsexuals, pedophiles, etc. ), from Dr. Léon Pérel who operates openly at the Saint François clinic in Paris and from Henri Caillavet (Masonic dignitary of the Parliamentary Fraternity), the media are giving an ever larger place to the subject.

        On Pastor Doucé, there is a page on Tom Reucher's Transidentity site and, on the BoyWiki site, another page of introduction and, in full, his book "Pedophilia in Question". In it, we learn that Joseph Doucé was a member of the Senate Committee on Freedoms. On September 12, 1989, he had the European Parliament vote on a "Resolution on discrimination against transsexuals" and on September 29 of the same year on a "Recommendation on the condition of transsexuals". The pastor also speaks in this >>>INA video>>> of 3:39.

        Because of his militancy and his very wide eclecticism in the sexual sphere, but especially because of his unrestricted tolerance of pedophilia associated with his sometimes high placed relations, Joseph Doucé quickly acquired a sulfurous reputation, including in institutional homosexual circles, to the point of becoming unfriendly. Is it for all that, as some say or imply, that there would be suspicions of pedophilia (in the usual sense, with an immature child) in the support that Jean-Michel Trogneux found with the pastor? Nothing really goes in this direction at this stage of our knowledge.

        The evidence that Natacha Rey did not bring could call into question the link uniting Jean-Michel Trogneux and Joseph Doucé. This meeting however leaves little doubt. Because of the pivotal role of the pastor to change sex at the time. Moreover, the interview of Véronique the transsexual in 1977 is a confirmation. A TV producer wanting such testimonies could only turn to the pastor. Moreover, the photo opposite, of unknown origin, appears to gather the pastor and Véronique, thus Jean-Michel. Let us recall that the pastor's CCL was founded in 1976, one year before the interview.

        After 1977, a little before too, an obscure period appears where Jean-Michel alternates lives of man and woman. Until about 1985 and his arrival in Alsace, in his definitive female form. There is still much to discover...

      3. 1977, the false trail of gay pride

        As of January 22, this chapter has been augmented by the addition of a photo in which Jean-Michel Trogneux was thought to be recognized, according to the box below. On February 15, we learned from a reliable source that it is another person [confirming F&D504p12], which leads us to consider this photo as a false lead abandoned. Also, it is dated March 5, 1977, not June 25, on the sidelines of an MLF lesbian demonstration.

        As an introduction to this chapter, after its writing and before its finalization, I add, on January 22, 2022, a discovery of this day, from twitter : a new photo of Jean-Michel Trogneux ! The context in which it is taken, under a banner of the Groupe de Libération Homosexuelle, and the blatant resemblance with other photos (see below), even more than the one with Pastor Doucé, leaves little doubt.

        Here is this photo present here on the website of the magazine "Têtu", in a slideshow of "12 archival photos of the first Parisian prides". It is dated June 25, 1977, Jean-Michel was 32 years old :

        (P.-S. of February 3: another photo with the banner and the two people on the right)

        Hypothesis rejected (the figure in the top hat not being Jean-Michel Trogneux after all)

        In the center photos, you can see the same incisors spread out...

        The militancy of the transsexual cause that Jean-Michel / Veronique conveyed in the 1977 interview made us believe in other public expressions of this cause, or the homosexual one often associated. We revived this type of hypothesis for the first New York gay pride (Appendix A 26) or for an Alsatian Music Hall (Appendix A 27), but it seems that Jean-Michel remained discreet thereafter...

  15. 1991-1992, Brigitte's beginnings, her meeting with Emmanuel

      Jean-Michel's first appearance as Brigitte would correspond to the start of the 1991-1992 school year at the private high school "La Providence" in Amiens where she was a French teacher. For Xavier Poussard  "Jean-Michel Trogneux begins a new life at the Lycée La Providence in Amiens. Under the name Brigitte, he joined the teaching profession like many "reassigned" men, the famous transgender showgirl Bambi (born Jean-Pierre Pruvot) being the best known example" [F&D503p7].

      It was at the beginning of the following school year 1992-1993 that Brigitte and Emmanuel are said to have met. After several variations, over the course of articles and books, it appears that we can settle on this version written by Sylvie Bommel in her book "I'd just turned seventeen" in 2019 :

      He is in the second grade. He has a romance with his drama teacher, a married woman 24 years his senior. [...] In the winter of 1992-1993, the high school drama club had been in decline for a few years. Brigitte Auzière did not hesitate to revive it. A dozen high school students are enrolled, including the boy she had seen at the internship report ceremony, Emmanuel Macron, who is in second grade like her daughter Laurence.
      Important addition of February 23: apparently, the affair between Brigtte and Emmanuel began a year earlier, see Appendix A 10.

      Books from 2017, 2018, 1018, 2019, 2020 and 2021. The narrative of the Brigid legend is then stabilised.
      The authors of these books have tried to pierce the opacity of the first lady's past life, to no avail.

      A real legend of a prince and princess was embroidered by the communicants of the Elysée and disseminated on a large scale in the national press. In such a factory of lies one does not skimp on exceptional, providential or emotional biographical details of the kind "She is 39, he is going on his 15th birthday. She, a teacher admired by her pupils, spontaneous, direct, sunny. He, a gifted man who knows everything about everything, looks like a poet. A few months together at the theatre workshop, and their complicity turns into a romance" [L'Obs, 2017].

      But the chronological and biological reality borders on the sordid. No Sleeping Beauty... In September 1992, the date of the declared beginning of their meeting, Emmanuel, born on 21 December 1977, was 14 years old, Jean-Michel, born on 11 February 1945, was 47 years old (they are 32 years and 10 months apart). Thus the princess of the Elysian farce is approaching half a century with the ravages of time, unlike Sleeping Beauty, whom Prince Charming wakes from her sleep in her frail youth. For the sad Elysian idyll, it is clear that with such an advanced age of the princess, it is no longer possible to ensure a large number of progeny in the service of the start-up nation.

      In 2017, Caroline Derrien and Candice Nedelec imagine: "Emmanuel is perfectly serious when he dares to undress his heart to his teacher". Can we believe that the teenager would have seduced the adult and declared his love for her?

      The private Jesuit high school La Providence in Amiens. In 1993, Emmanuel Macron played the scarecrow in the play "La comédie du langage" by Jean Tardieu (a premonitory title for a manipulator of lies and a premonitory role to which was added that of puppet...). Brigitte Trogneux / Auzière, French teacher, in class with another pupil and in front of her pupils. At this time in Amiens, there is no photo or video of Emmanuel and Brigitte in the same picture.

      There are quite a few photos on the internet of Brigitte at the "La Providence" high school, with other teachers or with students, often from the France 3 documentary "Brigitte Macron, un roman français". It is difficult to date them, as Brigitte worked at this school from 1991 to 2007. Xavier Poussard [F&D499p5] and Natacha Rey believe that during a certain period, Brigitte systematically wore a scarf around her neck, as if she was hiding the traces of an operation (Adam's apple...). See also this photo from tweet (or over-interpretation of restoration software?).

      On the left 1st L class in 2000/2001. On the right photo is obtained from the previous one by clearing the hair around the ears. All the photos from that time show Brigitte had a much smaller chest than in her post-2015 photos.

      Gaël Tchakaloff, author of the 2021 book "Tant qui'on est tous les deux" gives us a glimpse of Brigitte's character when we try to approach her secrets in a revealing article entitled "Brigitte Macron very upset : she loses control in front of a journalist". Presentation of the author by a correspondent then excerpts :

      Journalist Gaël Tchakaloff, born Lucile Gaël Buffet (1971) is a close friend of Brigitte Macron (dixit: calls her when she's not well. "she is a regular at the Élysée, wanders through the corridors, the offices, enters the madame wing (the private part) like a mill." She also wrote a book about her "duality" "Vacarme" (duality man-woman ?) (links : 1 2). Gaël is her middle name at the civil status, a mixed name, which is never neutral, because her mother wanted her to have "the freedom to be a girl or a boy, like George Sand". Strange to find this reference as Brigitte / Véronique does when talking in 1977 about Sand and Chopin who would be transexual.
      "When I told Brigitte Macron, by phone, of my desire to tell the relationship that the First Lady has with the head of state, she reacted very badly," the journalist confided. She then added: "It hurt me. To the point of crying, sobbing, hiccuping." [...]

      In his book, Gaël Tchakalof explains that the couple can't stand anyone touching their intimacy and that it's the only subject that can truly piss off Brigitte Macron. As recounted in the book, the latter had moreover indicated: "I do not want anyone to talk about us, I do not want our couple to be exposed". Writing this book was therefore no easy task.

      The author explained that she spent more time fighting for access to the presidential couple rather than writing. "As soon as it became known that I was writing a book, politics everywhere replaced friendship," she revealed before indicating  "I was constantly in the conflict of loyalty between friendship and writing."

  16. 1993-2007, the early days of the Brigitte-Emmanuel couple

      In May 2016, in the pages of Pop Story, according to the confidences of a close friend [F&D497p6] (how much of this is legend ?, the swimming pool episode is also told when Emmanuel was studying in Paris) :

      At the Trogneux household, it is a million miles from imagining the vaudeville that was being played out in the family home where the couple met. Emmanuel took advantage of Jean-Claude Trogneux's [his elder brother] absences to sneak up on Brigitte, who was basking by the family pool. And would run off into the bushes with his towel, as soon as he reappeared.

      [...] The confrontation comes, however, when the eldest of the siblings stumbles upon the couple in the garden. This is the starting point of many quarrels. [...] She will not succeed in convincing them of a necessity: the first lady may well assure that she has always perceived Emmanuel Macron as a contemporary, but those close to her measure at the time each of the twenty-four years that separate them

      In April 2017, Closer magazine gave Emmanuel Macron's mother a voice with this feature (link):

      Brigitte is the woman of his life, the one Emmanuel Macron met on the benches of high school. He was a student, she was his drama teacher. A transgressive love that would lead to marriage many years later. But before reaching that point, the lovers had to face the wrath of Emmanuel Macron's parents, who did not look kindly on his romance with an older woman. Worried about the future of their beloved son, Mr. and Mrs. Macron even decided to abruptly remove him from his school in Amiens and "exile" him to Paris. If since then, water has flowed under the bridge, Françoise Noguès, the mother of the former Minister of the Economy, has not forgotten the wounds of the past. She even decided to tell them to the journalist Anna Fulda in the book Emmanuel Macron, "Un jeune homme si parfait". In it, the mother of the family talks about the one who overshadowed her in her own son's heart: the omnipresent Brigitte. In its new issue, on newsstands on Friday 6 April, Closer explains why the relationship between the two women has not always been a happy one, far from it!

      In 2019, Sylvie Bommel, in her already quoted book "He had just turned seventeen", writes:

      In Rue Saint Simon, a neighbour of the Auzières, hiding behind her curtain, counts Emmanuel's comings and goings and decides it is her duty to inform the management of La Providence. At least the latter signs the letter with his name.

      [...] During the presidential campaign, when it was indeed necessary to deliver some details about the circumstances of their meeting, the Macron couple did everything to ensure that the three fatal words "détournement de mineur" were never uttered.

      In January 2021, Hervé Algalarrondo published with Grasset (link) the book "Deux jeunesses françaises", of which here is, in part, the presentation and an extract :

      In the heart of Picardy, between Amiens and Vimeu, two young boys grow up with everything in opposition. A few years apart, they don't go to the same schools, the same streets or the same parties. One has a neurologist father, and a wonderful French teacher, his grandmother called "Manette". The other lives in a run-down house, far from everything, and dreams in words. Both will flee to the capital to fulfill their personal destiny, and make a name for themselves. Eddy Bellegueule becomes Edouard Louis, a famous novelist, translated all over the world, gay, very committed to the left, close to the sociologist Didier Eribon. Emmanuel Macron, Manu for his friends in Amiens, will be President of the Republic.Thus this city - where François Ruffin and Najat Vallaud-Belkacem also grew up - was the field of investigation for Hervé Algalarrondo. He criss-crossed Picardy to understand and trace the only impenetrable world of French glories: youth. He found the teachers, the very close or old friends, the unknown stories and the dreams of our young Rastignac.

      "His French teacher Jeanne Verdier admitted to finding out that Emmanuel had exfiltrated to Paris in September and that his parents were close to pressing charges."

      Once again, Xavier Poussard provides details [F&D497p9] :

      On 26 April 2017, an investigation by the "Daily Mail" [link] recounted the episode  "Jean-Michel Macron personally contacted the management of Henri IV to ask if they would accept his son with the guarantee that he would be separated from Madame Trogneux. The headmaster kept the family secret." In the same article, Patrice Benoît Delespierre, a journalist with the "Courrier Picard" recounts that "it was a huge scandal. In all honesty, they don't really like to talk about it. The whole thing embarrassed them enormously. His father Jean [Trogneux] was furious." And Christian Monjou, Emmanuel Macron's English teacher at Henri IV, explains that "his father had put him there to get him away from this woman".

      Thus, when he turned 17, Emmanuel was "exfiltrated" from Amiens, where his relationship was deemed scandalous, to become a student at the prestigious Lycée Henri IV in Paris. These facts took time to be recognised. Thus, the newspaper Le Monde, self-proclaimed fighter of "fake news" or "infox" (including on December 20, 2021 for brigittegate, link), declared on October 28, 2012  "He married in 2007 a woman 20 years older than him, a French teacher and mother. He had met her in Amiens when he was in the first year of high school, on the occasion of a theatre course". And also, a different version, on 27 August 2014  "Emmanuel Macron married Brigitte Trogneux, twenty years his senior, whom he met when she was his first-year French teacher at the lycée Henri IV" [F&D497p4]. At the time, the legend downplayed the age gap, 20 instead of 24 (without being able to suspect 32 yet) and twisted Emmanuel's age at their first meeting, 17 instead of 14, here in première class when it was in seconde class. And Brigitte did not teach at Henri IV and was never Emmanuel's French teacher.

      Emmanuel as a high school student at Henri IV then as a student in an amphitheatre. On the right Brigitte, perhaps at the Lycée Franklin
      (it is difficult to find a photo of her in this school...)

      What happens next, he in Paris, she in Amiens? In 2017, Closer, in a article devoted to Tiphaine Auzière, explains :

      This is how Emmanuel Macron found himself in Paris at the age of 17 to complete his final year at the lycée Henri-IV. In the evening, he returned to his maid's room alone, complaining about his parents' decision to keep him away from his girlfriend. Fortunately, when he returns to Picardy at the weekend, there are moments stolen from the world during which he clandestinely joins Brigitte Auzière in one of the Trogneux family's properties in Amiens. So many moments when, despite the love his parents have for him, he breathes away from them, sometimes considering their decision to send him to Paris as a cruel injustice. A fact, added to the divorce of his parents, that one could suppose to be at the origin of the need for family blossoming that Emmanuel Macron has since cultivated and that he has been able to set in motion with his bride. This is what Tiphaine Auzière, Brigitte Macron's youngest daughter, recalled to Europe 1: "Even if we are not very far apart in years, he has always taken care of me, of the children.(...) He is my father-in-law, that is his place and as such he is also a head of the family. Family is something important to him, that's why he wanted to get married."

      First known photo of Brigitte and Emmanuel together, in 2006, at the wedding of a couple of friends [Paris-Match 3547].

      The wedding on 20 October 2007 was preceded by Brigitte's divorce from André-Louis Auzière on 26 January 2006 (according to legend, without confirmation...) and Brigitte's move to Paris for the start of the 2007/2008 school year. She left La Providence in Amiens to become a French teacher at the very prestigious Lycée Saint Louis de Gonzague, also called Franklin. How did she get this job when she has no diploma? She stayed there until 2014/2015, teaching "de la haute" students, including children of Bernard Arnault, Renaud Dutreuil, Jacques Attali, who would later be strong supporters of Emmanuel Macron. As for the wedding, in Touquet-Paris-Plage, this is how Xavier Poussard tells it [F&D497p8] :

      Everything about the wedding footage shown in "La stratégie du météore" [France 3 documentary, November 21, 2016, five days after the presidential candidacy was declared] is strange, from the sleeveless and particularly short dress worn by "Brigitte", to Emmanuel Macron's pink tie, not to mention the wedding cake evoking the horns of a Baphomet. While Emmanuel Macron's witnesses are well known, his fellow Science-Po Paris student Marc Ferracci and his patron Henry Hermand, the wedding witnesses of "Brigitte", presented simply as childhood friends, remain unknown. Strangely, this marriage does not appear in "Les Echos du Touquet" which only mentions a baptism as an activity of the town hall on October 20, 2007...

      Image excerpted from a >>>video>>> 2 min 13 min marriage
      broadcast on FR3 (the one just above is from that too).

      April 4. I discover the words of a man named Webcraft on a page from January 1, 2022, with some interesting things about this marriage that questions. Was it legal? Was the bride's identity valid or falsified ? In 2007, gay marriage was forbidden and the change of sex very restricted. These questions are taken up later, in Chapter 24 part 4.

      At the ceremony on October 20, 2007 Article 76 of the Civil Code was not applied by the registrar. Only the first name of each of the spouses was mentioned and it was not specified that Brigitte Trogneux had been previously married and to whom (link). So was this ceremony indeed a civil marriage or rather a civil partnership between two people of the same sex ? (link). Apparently the law does not explicitly prohibit a fake marriage ceremony.

      The first name change could have been done previously by remaining a father in the civil registry (link). For the Orleans Court of Appeal on the other hand, a man with a physical appearance close to the other sex and whose real personality and new identity was perfectly accepted in his work relationships justified a particular interest in changing his first name and this, before any surgical intervention. (CA Orléans, 12 November 2011, n°11/171016).

      It could therefore be that the first name Brigitte was chosen on purpose because it allowed to ensure the confusion with the wife of Jean Claude Trogneux born one year before Jean Michel Trogneux. Brigitte Annick Jacqueline Poillion born on April 28, 1944 in Bressuire, married on September 26, 1990 to Jean-Claude Marie Joseph Trogneux born on August 14, 1933 in Amiens. Pursuant to Article 60 of the Civil Code, any person who demonstrates a legitimate interest may request to change his or her first name (link).

      Finally, it could be that Jean-Michel Trogneux waited until March 29, 2017 to change his sex at the civil status. It 's on this date that it was possible to do so without performing a sexual reassignment surgery link, Law No. 2016-1547 of November 18, 2016 on the modernization of justice for the 21st century, JORF No. 0269 of November 19, 2016 (Article 56 of the law). Decree No. 2017-450 of March 29, 2017 on procedures for changing first names and modifying the mention of gender in civil status, JORRF No. 0077 of March 31, 2017).

  17. The family where Emmanuel Macron grew up

      Emmanuel Macron is the son of Jean-Michel Macron, born in 1951 in Vouël in the Aisne, a doctor and professor of neurology at the CHU in Amiens, and Françoise Noguès, born in 1950 in Poix de Picardie, a medical doctor, a medical adviser to the Social Security. They were married around 1976 and divorced in 2010.

      Genealogical record of Emmanuel's father, according to Généanet (the fraternal and another tree whose information
      are more complete on the descendants), with the addition of a photo of Emmanuel's parents in 2017 during the investiture
      at the Elysee Palace. Below is the fiche of Françoise Noguès on the  Geneanet database:

      Not counting a possible stillborn older sister (see Appendix A 21), Emmanuel thus has a brother Laurent and a sister Estelle apparently born in 1979 and 1984. As he became famous, Laurent didn't want to hear about him, saying he was a "vague cousin," before making some contact (link). Estelle could be even more distant, because of this anecdote told by Xavier Poussard [F&D500p2] :

      While investigating the "green years" of Emmanuel Macron, as part of his investigation "Two French youths", the journalist Hervé Algalarrondo has made a blank at every step  "That's when I think I have "the right idea, address Brigitte. [...] She is the one who manages relations with the Macron family. A Bigourdan elected official told me his surprise, during a visit of the president to Bagnères. Out of kindness, he had asked her about her sister, Estelle, who lives not far away. Emmanuel Macron turned to Brigitte to know what to answer."

      According to the official biography, Emmanuel Macron spent most of his childhood with his grandmother, Germaine Noguès, born Arribet in 1916 in Tarbes, who lived in Amiens, a few streets away from his parents' home. Here, on Généanet, is Manette's file, with her photo added as an inlay:

      The act of Marie Louise Germaine, usually called Germaine or Manette, Arribet's birth on October 5, 1916, confirms her death in Amiens on April 13, 2013, and reports her marriage on January 10, 1939, in Amiens to Jean Gabriel Noguès. The latter was born on March 15, 1914 in Florensac in the Hérault (act). He died on December 14, 2002 in Amiens (fiche). Supplements in Appendix A 14.

      But as with the legendary Brigitte biography, digging deeper, the reality looks different. Xavier Poussard [F&D500p2] :

      The character of "Manette" has several uses. First, it essentially helps explain the absence of photos and memories of Emmanuel Macron  "So I spent my childhood in books, a bit out of the world. It was an immobile life" (Revolution). Although he never officially lived in her house, Emmanuel Macron sows doubt [...]. This account of a "grandmother whose background is a perfect Epinal image to illustrate the republican rise of a daughter of the people" ("A young man so perfect", Anne Fulda, Plon 2017) served, at first, to reassure François Hollande and the Socialists that "Emmanuel is of the left". Did the "Maman Ninie" of the Mitterrandian gesture inspire the communicators to the role assigned to "Manette" ?

      [...]Anne Fulda briefly raised the possibility that Emmanuel Macron had "nearly been adopted by his grandmother", "goddess of his enchanted world", "queen of his childhood and even of his adult life".

      Xavier Poussard [F&D500p4]:

      At first glance, the real mystery remains the near absence of shots of Emmanuel during his childhood. A childhood that takes place in the 1980s and 1990s, a time of massive democratization of photography and home movies, the golden age of the Polaroid, the camcorder, endless slide sessions and voluminous photo albums.

      [...] Emmanuel Macron is said to have insisted on being baptised at the age of 12 in the chapel of the Lycée La Providence [link]. [...] Be that as it may, it is surprising, to say the least, that the first shots of Emmanuel Macron's "official legend" are these three photos taken in the school (and not family) setting, a series dated from his year of 5th grade, i.e. from the year 1989-1990, i.e. twelve years after his birth.

      The first photos of Emmanuel Macron's "legend" (link). On the left, in 1990 the baptism (noted "confirmation of communion").
      Center taken from a trombinoscope of the fifth grade class in 1990. At right in the same class.

      The enigma that is Emmanuel Macron's biography now has a first name "Jean-Michel", his forgotten middle name in his application form to Sciences-Po Paris (section internationnale, 2001). A first name that, in a very strange redundancy, happens to be that of two "phantom" characters of the Macronian gesture, namely his father, Jean-Michel Macron and his uncle and godfather Jean-Michel Noguès...

      We are not done with the obscurity of the childhood of the very bright President of the Republic. See above this illustration and these words from Xavier Poussard [F&D500p5]. If he exaggerates, in my opinion, to consider that Jean-Michel Macron, the father, is a ghost (even if he has opacities), he puts his finger on a new character who could be a complete ghost: Jean-Michel Noguès. Yet he exists, above, on Manette's genealogical record, he is the brother of Françoise Noguès the mother of Emmanuel and married to "Lucette N". Above all, he is supposed to be very close to the twelve-year-old baptized, since he is his godfather (the godmother is the grandmother Manette). Before questioning his existence, Xavier Poussard found some other available information : "Born in 1940 and died in 2006, Jean-Michel Noguès is said to have become "only" a general practitioner "because of a troubled youth" (Deux jeunesses françaises). A little light for an uncle to whom Emmanuel would have given enough importance to make him his late godfather...". Whether Emmanuel got his middle name from his father or his godfather is incidental, the question concerns the existence of the godfather thus presented. And this induces another question  "Could this godfather Jean-Michel be Jean-Michel Trogneux ?". At this stage of our knowledge, nothing confirms it, nothing invalidates it.

      The above was written in mid-January 2022. In early March, the existence of Jean-Michel Noguès happened to be confirmed, as explained in Appendix A 13. Born in 1940, he was, as mentioned above, a doctor who died in 2006, he had married Lucette Duponchel with whom he had two children Isabel and Florence in 1969 and 1971.

  18. Emmanuel Macron and homosexuality

    Issue 499 of "Faits & Documents" has a chapter entitled "Macron and Homosexuality", a subject covered in two pages with the first of those below as an illustration. Xavier Poussard begins by revealing the background to a rumour which, at the time, had a fairly widespread media echo, whereas brigittegate more than a month after its revelation still remains hushed up. This shows that the media know how to relay fabricated rumours and keep carefully constructed dossiers quiet. The rumour will run from mid-2016, when Macron is still Minister of Economy, until early 2017, when he is a candidate for the presidency of the Republic. From that moment on, the press muted the subject below the belt, or more precisely the big press bosses sounded the call to bring the journalistic troops back into line to unanimously ensure the moral respectability of their chosen candidate. In contrast, François Fillon the most threatening rival candidate has served as an outlet to satisfy the stipendiary journalists' need for freedom of expression.

    In fact, it is essentially from the receptions organised at Bercy by the Macrons that the Mathieu Gallet [CEO of Radio-France, with whom he is said to have a romantic relationship] rumour has been spread. [...] This is probably the most blatant known example of the assumed perversity of this couple operating as a well-practised acting duo  "Every dinner at Bercy is an opportunity for Emmanuel and Brigitte to raise the issue in front of their guests. "You know, they say that Emmanuel is homosexual... but it's totally untrue", says Brigitte Macron, who seems particularly affected. [...] For his part, when he receives editorialists or press bosses in private to prepare for his flight, Macron never forgets to mention "the rumour" in these political conciliabula. He can't help it  he is obliged to talk about it. [This obsession with denial, in a private setting, ends up being counterproductive, because it rekindles the rumour.

    [...] A former member of the Macron campaign would later confide  "we knowingly relayed the story about Mathieu Gallet" (quoted by Marc Endeweld in "Le grand manipulateur", Stock 2019). A counter-fire in short.

    The buzz during the election campaign, February 2017, Closer (link) and France-Dimanche.
    After the election, in September 2017, a photo montage on the cover of Garçon Magazine (link).

    In hindsight, this provoked rumour had a numbing effect on the media, which considered it a real rumour based on a false reality. When, five years later, they are told that a new rumour turns Brigitte into a man, the repetition effect takes precedence and does not invite the consideration that it is a solid case...

    Let us return to Xavier Poussard's chapter. He points out that, for those around him, Emmanuel has "a sexual side", Jean-Baptiste de Froment, his fellow student at Henri IV, assures us that he "didn't give the feeling of being interested in girls". And, for a Socialist politician, "he doesn't look at men anymore". Only Brigitte's love seems to count. It also reveals that "Alexis du Réau de la Gaignonnière has recounted in several videos posted on Youtube with his face uncovered, how in 2013, during one of these private swingers' evenings prized by the "zealites" (politicians, lawyers, businessmen, show business, etc.) to which he was invited as an actor in pornographic films, he allegedly "sodomised" Emmanuel Macron."

    A >>>video>>> gathering three sequences in 4 mn 30 was released at the beginning of January 2021. It is astonishing. This 4 mn 30 video is amazing. Even supposing that Alexis is making up a story for the sake of it, the fact remains that he has a formidable talent for guessing in 2017, to make Nostradamus jealous. He had discovered (alone or with others...) the true nature of Emmanuel. Here is the full transcript (so in spoken language) of this video:

    [sequence 1, in a stationary car, early 2017, before the election]
    The one we absolutely must not let pass is Emmanuel Macron. He's the candidate of finance, a former Rothschild banker, so it stinks of conflict of interest. Frankly, I wouldn't vote for a guy like that. Besides, people leave his meetings in the middle of them because it's really crap. On top of that, he puts up black curtains to hide the empty seats. The guy is good at selling wind, frankly... I knew him in 2013, it was when I was in the porn industry and of course I was invited to private parties, private orgies, and I had the opportunity, so I know that this guy is bi... So I had the opportunity to sleep with him and, uh, it was a threesome, but that's not the point actually. The point is that when you see him in private, when you've talked to him, you realise that he's a real scumbag. You really realise how much contempt this guy has for people, it's really... but... phenomenal. Afterwards, I can tell you that I had the chance, I'm one of... maybe not the only one, but one of the Frenchmen who had the privilege to put him in the ass, oh yes, and that's priceless. There are some things you can't buy.

    [sequence 2, in a garden, half empty bottle in hand, just after the 2nd round of the election, 7 May 2017]
    Hello everyone, it's Alexis, well I drowned my sorrows in alcohol. Today, I can say it: I fucked the president. Yes, Macron... Well, no, joking aside, those of you who voted for Macron, you're really idiots, because now you're going to have him up your ass for five years. I, at least, have the merit of having fucked him in the swingers' parties. It doesn't matter, we're still going to get it in the ass... It's not for lack of warning, I can tell you that in the months and years to come... Don't come and complain, it's not worth it, frankly, I'm telling you this very sincerely, from the heart. If I voted for Marine Le Pen, it was precisely to counter this guy. You're going to realize in the months to come that this guy is a madman. You're going to have a lot of demonstrations, that's it, too bad for you. It's too bad for you. And those who are going to lose their jobs and who voted for Macron, I won't come to pity you either. And then you will regret and say "Well shit, if we had known...". You followed the media propaganda, that's it... But I think most people are sheep and apparently that's not going to change. That's something to digest, I'm going to finish my bottle, bye...

    [sequence 3, earlier or later, in the same car, driving]
    I met an actress who frequented private libertine parties. They weren't parties where you pay, you go in, they were parties with rich people.... there are lawyers, businessmen, showbiz people, who come to these kinds of parties. Some people pay for this kind of party, I was invited. It was this actress who let me in because she knew the owners. And so she got me into this kind of environment. You have to know that in this kind of place, I saw some famous people, even ministers, people in the assembly, from the right and from the left and I can tell you that politics is a joke because they make you believe on TV that they are fighting, that they hate each other, that they don't agree and all that, but in reality you see them fucking together. So they're fucking together and they're talking business together, so it's a little bit contradictory.

    Above, Alexis du Réau in each of the three sequences from 2017. Defense Council at the Elysee [drawing diverted from "The Duck Year 2021"]. He also directed a >>>video>> of 27 min 19 "Brigitte Macron live" with a yellow wig (opposite), where he states (at 21 min 55) : "Did you know that Brigitte is a trans?".

    Under the copyright "Réau Alexis/SIPA", we find Alexis photographer in a report by "L'Obs" (link) on the party organised by Brigitte at La Rotonde, a famous Parisian brasserie, on the evening of the 1st round, Sunday 23 April 2017. He takes photos 3, 4, 5, 8 of a 14 photo slideshow. Here three extracts.

    After their wedding cake in the shape of a giant phallus with devil horns, the Elysian couple have on several occasions displayed astonishing attitudes, including receiving DJ Kiddy Smile's tranny and trans group at the Elysée (link). Aunt Yvonne must have been turning in her grave... Less surprising is the long friendship between the Amiens-based Brigitte and Michou, born Michel Catty in 1931 in Amiens, openly gay, died in 2020, famous director of a concert hall in Paris (link).

  19. Dangerous psychopath rules France

      Below is a transcript from (link) of a 9-minute video>>> by Italian psychiatrist and psychotherapist Professor Adriano Segatori, dated 3 May 2017. Like Alexis du Réau, he shows here some beautiful qualities of divination... I have also had indirect knowledge of a French psychologist who has similar conclusions. Here is how Emmanuel Macron is a "particularly dangerous psychopath" :

      My analysis of Emmanuel Macron comes from both the images I have in my possession and the biography the candidate claims to have. The young Emmanuel Macron at the age of 15 was severely sexually assaulted by his teacher who at the time was 39 years old. Instead of the rosy view of this union, which could be defined as a reparative marriage (to repair the rape), I see in it rather the fact that Emmanuel Macron's development was prematurely blocked in the middle of adolescence because of a seduction operation, both psychic and physical. What happened was to go beyond a taboo and to go beyond a limit. The very limit prescribed by the taboo. So the first passage was the conviction that everything was allowed.

      Naturally this feeling of omnipotence took place within the good bourgeois society of Amiens in the North of France. If this union had taken place in a proletarian social environment, that environment which Emmanuel Macron deeply despises, well Emmanuel Macron would have been destroyed and would be followed by the social services and Brigitte Macron would be in prison. This is the sad truth. We are facing a pedophile type problem.

      Once the limits of the taboo were exceeded, it happened that the idea of omnipotence proper to each child was subsequently encouraged. The paradox is that the child is not only a child of the world, but also a child of the world of his or her parents, and that he or she is not a child of the world. The paradox is that he seems pathologically normal but we are in the midst of narcissism. Since his youth, Macron has nurtured an extraordinary ambition. He needs the gaze and admiration of others to compensate for an inferiority complex. So we are faced with 3 paradigms that define a certain type of personality :
      • The idea that there are no limits.
      • A sense of omnipotence from childhood but even more present in adulthood.
      • A narcissism that is not forbidden to define as malicious.

      What do these 3 paradigms structure? It structures what we call a psychopathy because we are confronted with an individual, Emmanuel Macron, who as a psychic organisation is perfectly definable as a psychopath. The word "psychopath" is not an insult. A great American analyst, Nancy Mac Williams, explains verbatim that a psychopath can reach the highest levels of the American administration. So the psychopath can of course be a deviant but if he is well organised culturally, socially, etc., he can also reach the top of the elite in politics, finance, which is the case in the profile studied.

      The psychopathic personality is characterised by an infinite number of items, let's say reference points for example:
      • A fascination with the superficial.
      • The capacity for attraction.
      • The discomfort in confrontation.

      This we see clearly in Macron's hysterical outbursts as admiration pales and highlights the weaknesses of his identity. This hysteria is characterised by his interest in theatrical productions which, by a disturbing coincidence, recall his personal history with his teacher who taught theatre. The psychopath is untrustworthy but succeeds in convincing his interlocutor through his fascination. He has no remorse. When Macron talks about the poor or insults the proletarians of the North by reducing them to smokers and alcoholics, when Macron denigrates women by reducing them to the rank of ignoramuses, we return to the discourse perfectly explained by Jacques Lacan. For he believes in what he says and cannot help but express it.

      So Macron defends himself by changing the meaning of his statements but without ever expressing remorse because he never feels guilt. So what is the problem from a psychiatric point of view? How dangerous is the character? I answer that there is no doubt about it: Emmanuel Macron, like all psychopaths, is particularly dangerous.

      A specialized American intellectual, let's call it "well-integrated disturbances" among notables said verbatim  " serial killers destroy families while psychopaths in office at the top of politics and economics ruin societies. " Why is Macron dangerous? He is dangerous because :
      • Like all psychopaths Macron has a high opinion of himself.
      • Macron does not love France and does not fight for the people of France.
      • Macron loves himself immensely and is struggling to maintain the fragile identity.

      The conflictuality with Marine Le Pen is not for him a conflictuality only of political level. He cannot accept that a woman, the Marianne, the representative of France is his antagonism. He needs a nurturing mother. Any other relationship with a woman becomes difficult to assume. So this fragility is very dangerous because like all psychopaths who work only for themselves and who consider others for their own greatness underlines in this case how dangerous a country like France is at the moment when faced with a candidate of this kind.

      The feeling of omnipotence of "Jupiter" on coming to power, in front of the Louvre pyramid on 7 May 2017 (link). In hindsight, the slogan "Ensemble la France" is revealing of a character with an assertive psychopathological profile who did not hesitate in a crisis situation to impose segregationist measures affecting millions of French people in their daily lives, even assuming that he wanted to screw them to the end !

      Nothing surprising that throughout the Macronian quinquennium, this pathological character was noted and denounced forcefully by many people. Thus, in August 2018 Guy Millière on a page of : "There are in Emmanuel Macron the dimensions of a being ready to do anything to achieve his ends[...]Living in full view of everyone with his drama teacher and knowing that he will have no children and no future (no future, the punks used to say) can make him a modern-day Nero. Where will France be in four years? I leave the question open. I prefer not to give him an answer". On September 19, 2019, comedian Christophe Alévêque  "Macron inspires me enormously. I summarize this man in one sentence  "what's the point of being so brilliant if it's to light up your ass ?" For me, this guy is unbalanced. I say it on stage. [...] He's a psychopath. We are led by a great sick man" (link). And Eudoxe de France on the site "Le libre penseur" on 5 January 2022 (link) draws up a very partial but so revealing assessment of the mental state of the President of the Republic, with the title "A psychopath at the Elysée" and with for illustration the one taken up below, to close the quinquennium in the opposite way to its opening :

      "The unvaccinated, I really want to fuck with them. And so we're going to keep doing it, all the way. That's the strategy". Signed Emmanuel Macron. The most fanatical Macronist defenders will cry that this is fake news. Well no, it comes from Le Parisien dated January 4, 2022, picked up by AFP, then in all the newspapers and is running at full speed on social networks. The new year is starting well. Yes, with this statement Emmanuel Macron has insulted millions of French people by annoying them. This did not fail to cause a general outcry, whether from the political parties or on the internet.

      We have never seen a President of the Republic who has so divided and fractured the people, treating them with rare contempt. We remember his invective about "those who are nothing", "the illiterate", "the lazy", and "the Gallic people resistant to change". But even more seriously, we are concerned about the mental health of the President of the Republic. For to hurl such insults, especially when one is head of state and has responsibility for nearly 68 million French people, one must be totally politically suicidal, or suffering from a serious pathology.

      This is why many internet users are seriously asking the question: is Emmanuel Macron suffering from psychosis? The hashtag #Macronisunpsychopathe (Macron is a psychopath) appeared on Twitter after these statements. If he is not, he does have many of the characteristics. Psychosis is defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Psychiatry (DSM) 4 and 5 as an antisocial personality disorder that is based on antisocial behaviours resulting in "a pattern of disregard and transgression of the rights of others that has occurred since the age of 15 years" that can be associated with at least 3 manifestations below :
      • Inability to conform to laws and social norms
      • Tendency to deceive for profit or pleasure
      • Impulsivity or inability to plan ahead
      • Irritability or aggressiveness
      • Inconsiderate disregard for one's own safety or that of others
      • Persistent irresponsibility
      • Lack of remorse.

      Furthermore, the profile of the psychopath is presented as "an arrogant, manipulative, insensitive, seductive, dominant and fearless person". Our national button fits this definition well. What are the deputies and senators waiting for to start the impeachment procedure immediately? What are the police doing? This man and his government are a danger, a disturbance to public order that the French will not put up with for another 5 years. It remains to be seen how Macron's supporters, the Marcheurs (hey guys Winter is coming!), as well as the staunch covidists, will come up with ideas to continue defending the indefensible. Good luck with that. Our solution is a psychiatric diagnosis and probably a straitjacket.

      This sign "Macron degree" has a history. It was shown in a France 3 report with the word "degree" deleted (photos, link).

      April 29. Professor Adriano Segatori recorded in 2022 a second >>video>>> of 11 min 27. France-Soir published on April 28 a article, with excerpts, of which this is the end :

      In his second video, Adriano Segatori repeats that "Macron has no morals", that he is a "predator" who must successfully immobilize a prey. Symbolically, this can be France, or the French... which he is rightly warning. According to him, a being endowed with reason should be afraid when a president declares, "We will limit access to social life for the non-vaccinated." Those who do not go in "the direction of good", in other words the Yellow Vests, the non-vaccinated or even the anti-sanitary passes, seem to be his adversaries, his prey. Emmanuel Macron pursues a goal without bothering with moral and ethical considerations and crushes those who do not adhere to his policy.

  20. A "legend" riddled with lies for diligent media

      When he begins the first of his six issues of the Brigitte Macron dossier (the first five will come out in a flurry in October 2021), Xavier Poussard knows that he is setting off into the unknown, "in a breathless thriller". He knows that "the Macronian gesture slips away, events cancel each other out, and in so doing, leave unknown areas populated by enigmas and phantom characters". We have seen that in the fifth of his six issues, with the help of Natacha Rey, he finds the key to transforming the father of the family Jean-Michel into the mother of the family Brigitte thanks to the discovery of the very probable biological mother of the three children. The puzzle then takes shape and the continuation of the investigation will reinforce the overall picture, even if there are still many missing pieces.

      The date of birth of "Brigitte"
      Remember that before being given precisely in May 2016, the date of birth of "Brigitte", was commonly located at "the late 1950s". We reported the birth of a Brigitte Trogneux in the civil status of the "Courrier Picard" of April 14, 1953 (not April 13, 1953, the generally accepted date), a civil status published in the April 15, 1953 edition of this local daily newspaper in which there was also a birth announcement for Brigitte Trogneux (reproduced in F&D #500).
      It had escaped us that a first announcement had been published in the previous day's edition (April 14, 1953), but that this birth was not mentioned in the civil status of April 13, 1953. Strangely, this first announcement omits one of Brigitte's sisters, Monique Trogneux.
      If it is surprising to say the least that a birth can give rise to two different announcements, let us stress that these documents are subject to caution. Indeed, if on an extremely reduced set of documents (in this case the one attesting the existence of a Brigitte Trogneux born on April 13, 1953), we already find a significant number of forgeries (false testimonies, false wedding announcements, false pictures of "Brigitte" child, etc.. ), doubting the authenticity of the rest of the documents in the file becomes a methodological imperative, which is indeed the difficulty of this investigation where it is a matter of disentangling the true from the false and not of "believing" or "not believing".
      Facts & Documents #503 of January 2022

      I have not listed the successive known lies of the two legends, that of Brigitte and that of Emmanuel. Two legends that are one and the same, that of the couple, so much concordance. Surprisingly, both of them become clearer around 1992 with what is presented to us as their first meeting. Xavier Poussard [F&D497p4] :

      Constituting one of the most explosive episodes in Emmanuel Macron's biography, his meeting with "Brigitte" was placed at the centre of the Macronian gesture by the "spin doctors". A way of taking the lead and mastering this narrative in order to gradually make the French swallow it. A declension of the fable of the frog [in the Marie bath] to modern propaganda techniques, this strategy involved changing the story in small steps and therefore lying by playing, as is often the case, with the chronology of the facts.

      Although it has since been identified, this large-scale media manipulation left behind a fog in the minds of the general public, allowing for a subliminal acceptance of a story that could never have been accepted if it had been made clear from the start.

      Before 1992, there are no photos of each of them, no factual elements to support the legendary story we are told, this correspondence is disturbing. If the darkness is so strong before, is it not to hide what happened there?

      Before 2017, the lies and concealments were rather cobbled together, oral in scope, like the CAPES in French that Brigitte never got or the master's degree on Machiavelli that Emmanuel never got. Parallel lies. Parallel coups de piston too, like Brigitte being propelled as a teacher at the prestigious Franklin high school even though she doesn't have the required diplomas, and like Emmanuel being exempted from the compulsory procedure of being placed on leave from the civil service when he joins the Rothschild bank, "unprecedented." Who is behind them? Who supported this couple in their conquest of the Elysée ? We know some French names like Bernard Arnault, but there are others, also abroad. They knew what makes this couple strong and fragile at the same time, they were more or less aware of their hidden history, they had a very strong means of pressure to transform the duo into puppets.

      This impression of a puppet Macron, executing decisions made outside France, doing France harm, was felt on several occasions. Notably for the sale of Alstom (link), the sale of Alcatel (link), the submission to Big Pharma in the Covid crisis (we come back to this in the next chapter) and the appalling increase in debt ("unprecedented", link). And, in retrospect, certain behaviours can be explained, such as Alexandre Benalla's confidence in his impunity.

      After 2017, the couple benefited from the resources of the French state. False documents may have been fabricated outright, some of them contradictory to cover their tracks. And we don't know everything that was erased... We don't know the extent of it, it's possible that it's not important, only "surgical"...

      The Macron puppet as seen by Lutte Ouvrière (link), the site "Les moutons rebelles" (link) and JERC (link).

      Everyone imagines the puppet showers, there are suspicions (above centre, Patrick Drahi, X, Jacques Attali)... Isn't the first manipulator Brigitte? So, according to a phenomenon of transitivity, who manipulates Jean-Brigitte? First of all, those who know about his heavy past and helped him to climb the ladder...

      The media provide the staging and support the official version of the Elysian characters, but, of course, they are not the string-pullers, the ones who decide, as depicted in the image opposite [from, with regard to the words of psychologist Adriano Segatori presented in the previous chapter, link]. The media have owners, here presented, and, as a result, journalists also flail around with a status of television puppets. The media owners are the real stagehands behind the scenes. However, the image is correct, the Invisible Hand is indeed that of capital, the French billionaires with their media empire. Thus in the hierarchy Macron is effectively the Pinocchio of the political farce through the distorting mirrors of the press. No one is fooled, in other words, the major French media are in the hands of very few large groups, which facilitates manipulation and silencing. A few details: SFR for Patrick Drahi, LVMH for Bernard Arnaud, whose son-in-law is Xavier Niel, co-owner of the newspaper "Le Monde", who declared in 2011 "When journalists piss me off I take a stake in their duck and afterwards they leave me alone" (link).

      For the title of this chapter, I hesitated in the qualifier to attribute to the media : diligent, indigent, servile, complicit... There are all of these. Serge Halimi spoke of "reverent journalism".

      Brigittegate illustrates their herd behaviour. First complete silence from mid-October to mid-December 2021. Then a few denials, including Libération on 15 December (link). And then, on 20 December it's an avalanche of articles, Le Monde ("The episode reveals the media world's dread that the presidential election could be parasitized by infamous conspiracy theories"), there weren't so many precautions in 2017 for the case, albeit less serious, of François Fillon), Le Figaro, all start denouncing the odious rumour, which has the consequence of clogging up the search engines, which in the first positions present plenty of articles that say the same thing. Since then, we have returned to the omerta. As for the Canard Enchaîné and Médiapart, they stick their heads in the sand, see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing... They don't even ask a few questions, like "Where is Jean-Michel ?, Let's get it over with...") They too now seem manipulated. Will the news have to break through abroad first ?

      On the left, a case of the lie factory, and its denunciation. Macron has increased the pressure on the hospital and weakened it with the non-renewal of strategic stocks of masks, with budget cuts and bed cuts, even during the health crisis of 2020, with the exclusion of staff in July 2021 (vaccine obligation). He is therefore the first responsible for the hospital crisis of late 2021 and he blamed the non-vaccinated !

      Right, a case of covering up the lie, and exposing it. The lies follow one another, but, discreetly, Macron tries to erase some of them to better persevere in his flight forward.

  21. Macron the pain in the ass is setting up an apartheid in France

      What lies, what cover-ups, what propaganda in this international Covid-19  coronavirus crisis! It is a context in which the Macron couple could only move with ease... France was indeed one of the most active elements along with the United States, Great Britain, Italy, Austria, Australia and a few other so-called rich countries. Beginning in early 2019, what is considered a pandemic has disrupted life in some countries, including those just mentioned. However, others have hardly been affected, and there are even many in Africa and Asia, in so-called poor countries that are supposed to have less health protection. What a paradox... Let's stick to the official figures and consider the graph below (from the site presenting the cumulative number of deaths from Covid reduced to one million inhabitants so that it is independent of the total population of each country :

      The situation in mid-January 2022 is confirmed, as an inset graphic, by the situation in late April 2022
      (article), with an additional graph showing the ineffectiveness of sanitary passes (article).

      If you examine it carefully, this graph, the result of two years of Covid, reveals things that are essential for understanding what has happened. In contrast to the political and media statements, it shows:
      • the success of early treatment, whether for countries that have used it since the beginning, Madagascar with artemisia, Senegal with hydroxychloroquine/azithromycin advocated by Prof Didier Raoult or with ivermectin from September 2021 for India (except for some states), Japan, Bangladesh and Indonesia. Which major media in France announced this essential information? None. Almost two billion people in these last four countries were rid of Covid in one or two months because they adopted the ivermectin treatment and almost nobody knows about it in France. Since the beginning of the Covid crisis, few parliamentarians have denounced the senseless accumulation of lies and unspoken words (Martine Wonner, Alain Houppert...). For each of the countries just mentioned (except the few states in India that have not adopted ivermectin), there are currently zero Covid deaths.
      • The failure of vaxxins (I don't write vaccines, since their definition has changed to include messenger RNA and adenovirus injections, one can be anti-vaxxin and pro-vaccine, in fact, last July I had my tetanus booster shot, etc.). Indeed, now look at the other countries, not only did they all have many more deaths, but, see on the far right the profile of each curve, it is rising, they still, in January 2022 have deaths every day.
      • The failure of containments, masks, curfews, sanitary passes and other constraints. The example of Sweden shows this on this graph and it could be observed on other countries. One can estimate that constraints or not, the virus acts, so we might as well do as Sweden does rather than piss off the citizens as Macron likes to do.

      Since the lethality of the virus depends on the territories and the application, or not, of early treatments, it can be argued that this pandemic is not one. It was largely manufactured by the banning of these treatments, the evidence of which is beginning to mount (link). There has similarly been a global manipulation of PCR tests causing "epidemics of positive cases" with a large proportion of people not sick at all or with some mild cold symptoms. The paranoia of rich countries across the planet has brought us into a kind of new kind of third world war, orwellian. I describe this on this neighbouring Covid page, I also show the danger of vaxxins passed over in silence by the media but the seriousness of which is clear from pharmacovilance and the increase in some deaths in young people, particularly from heart attacks.

      I come to the apartheid declared by the Macron couple on 12 July 2021 and introduced in a progressive manner. In this month of January 2022, the "health pass" becomes "vaccine pass". It's a bit technical : before a non-vaxxed, hated as antivax, could go to a restaurant or cinema or travel far away showing a negative Covid test, now he can't. And I'm not talking about the other constraints, wearing a mask that is of almost no use indoors (except for the carers) and of no use at all outdoors (link), having to queue outside to enter a shop etc. The worst was for the nursing staff forced from July onwards to be vaxxed even though it was in this profession that there was the best awareness of the danger of piquouzes.

      The Larousse french dictionnary defines apartheid, a word of French origin ("apartite" for the Huguenots, link), as follows  "Discrimination, or even exclusion, of a part of the population, which does not have the same rights, places of residence or jobs as the rest of the community" (link). This hadn't happened in France since 1942 for the Jews (enforcement measures) under Philippe Pétain and since 1685, the revocation of the Edict of Nantes for Huguenot Protestants under Louis XIV. I never thought I'd live through this...

      When faced with this kind of historic event, everyone reacts in their own way. From March 2020 to July 2021, I had experienced the Covid crisis passively, like everyone else, a little lost for the first four weeks of confinement and then well aware of what was happening afterwards. In addition, at the end of April 2020, someone very close to me had caught Covid (in its most severe variant) and had done very well being treated with the early course of ivermectin combined with azithromycin. Luckily, her doctor had caught Covid a little earlier, studied it and found a solution. Just as Dr Raoult had found another solution that could have been applied in France in the same way as in Senegal, and at a low cost, without making Big Pharma fat. In that month of July, I also knew the dangers of vaxxin. Two people around me had had serious side effects, whereas I only knew of two Covid patients with serious effects (in all cases without hospitalisation). Anyway, on July 26 I answered the call of the July 22 of the Reinfocovid collective and of Doctor Louis Fouché. I did what I know how to do, I opened on my site the neighboring page entitled "Covid-19 paranoia diary" which I feed every day or so. And one thing led to another and here I am.

      The figures of the Resistance, seen from France with some people outside the hexagon. I gather them here after browsing my Neighbouring Covid page where they are quoted in link with articles or videos or tweets. Here they are in alphabetical order with a link to an article dedicated to them, it's a way to travel through this endless Covid crisis that we could have lived in another time (or another country), like the Hong Kong flu (1968/1970), but we were run by psychopaths wanting to control the population... I could have listed Pierre Barniéras, but I haven't seen his films "Hold-up and "Hold-on" (of which I have seen the trailer)... As for the opposing plotters, Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates and others, they are not forgotten on my Covid page, here I don't want to go off topic, but I wanted to pay tribute to these fighters, thank you to these brave ones, regretting of course to have missed many others...

      And there are millions of us who have taken a parallel path, who are excluded, sometimes harassed, and who find ourselves, more or less often, in the Saturday afternoon demonstrations across France, which began on 24 July 2021. They have become "the last living room where we talk", to the sound of the slogans "Liberty ! Resistance !". And from all sides, from the far left, the far right, the centre, the right, the left, Gaullists, ecologists (I am one of them, but not those who refuse GMOs by accepting the unknown risks of messenger RNA), never-voters, we found ourselves exchanging our ideas and building a common front, hoping for better days, the end of Macron, the end of this Republic without checks and balances, etc. A situation that reminds me of 1942 with an amorphous people, media under control, radio London's news castigated, increasingly ferocious collabos, a Resistance that was taking shape and Stalingrad... Thanks in passing to Eric Verhaeghe who was the first, on 26 July 2021, to know that Macron's Stalingrad was coming.

      Saturday afternoon demonstrations, here on 4 September and on the right on 31 July 2021 (in Rennes, photo Ouest-France).
      1: Eyes in the eyes "The health pass will never be a right of access that differentiates the French. It cannot be mandatory to access everyday places, such as restaurants, theaters and cinemas, or to go to friends" Emmanuel Macron, source Le Parisien of 29/04/2021. The word of this government is worth nothing ! 2: Billions for the hospital. Not for the multinationals. Let us eradicate the macronavirus. 3: I am a trader, not a health policeman

      As the last photo above shows, Macronian (brigittian ?) perversity has gone so far as to force some citizens, here shopkeepers, to become collaborators of the regime to impose its constraints. And, with a few exceptions like this one with his sign, the shopkeepers, but also the librarians, the sports and cultural managers and others, submitted to all the vaxxinal doxa of the government of Castex, Véran, Bachelot and other ministers. Of course, they were under the respiratory assistance of state subsidies (to compensate for the loss of income, partial unemployment, etc.), but they submitted, like the trade unions who preferred to outbid each other on health matters, even when the variants had become a kind of cold. How could the mask be put on young (and older) children who were in no danger? And the whole teaching staff complied. And it was the same (but less vicious) in many rich countries, including Israel, which had already experienced discrimination and worse in the 20th century. Camp survivor Velma Sharav recalled that "the Holocaust happened because people looked away" (>>>video>>> of 36 mins and transcript), other survivors joined her in writing that "This is a medical experiment to which the Nuremberg Code must be applied" (link). How could the lessons of history have been forgotten to such an extent ?

  22. The accusatory inversions of the Elysée's perverted couple

      1: With Macron everything is wrong! This is not a Brigitte, it is a Jean-Michel  This is not a vaccine, it is an experimental injection !
      2: Macron, this great sick man and his lies. The ass of a woman. The ass of "his" wife.

      Let's get back to Macron and his Brigitte. In this planetary-synchronised bidding contest (through various intermediaries such as the WHO or the McKinsey firm paid handsomely by the Elysée, link), our "premier de cordée" has stood out as a good pupil of Big Pharma. In particular, he was one of the first to institute the health pass-turned-vaccine, and mandatory vaxxin for healthcare workers and other categories. On 26 December last, on the neighbouring Covid page, with the illustrations above, I explained in the text below (here shortened) how it was appropriate to link the release of Covid and the unveiling of Brigitte's past:

      • With an Orwellian level of organised falsification of the truth at the top of the state, we have well and truly entered a totalitarian type of regime. Laws and liberticidal measures have followed one another until a apartheid has been imposed. Today the number of victims of this segregationist policy is estimated at six million people in France. The Big Pharma puppet dictator who decided this is Emmanuel Macron. It is therefore essential to discredit him in order to push him into a corner, so that he loses his superb position as a teacher and leader and, in the end, falls and stops making our lives miserable for another five years.
      • The deception is far more serious than that of Mitterrand who hid his illegitimate daughter. Here we have before us the glitter and smoke and mirrors of a curious presidential couple from a so-called start-up nation. In a world dominated by image, sex and theatrics, Brigitte has served as a marketing vase since the presidential election. The media sold us an angel who assured the status of First Lady with supreme grace. And today we are discovering the other side of the storytelling images. The angel hides a sex that is not that of the front pages of the celebrity magazines that feature her. Mitterrand hid Mazarine, Macron brandished Brigitte, it is not at all the same level of deception. This is not a matter of "private life", it is a large-scale malpractice against the French and even the world population.
      • This shows that the "caste" of Big Pharma & Co. is capable of anything and especially the worst. Similarly, in the unbelievable and in the logic of the worst since many lives are endangered, the Macron administration has been brazenly deceiving us since the beginning on Covid. The bigger the lie, the better it gets. Opening our eyes to the Macron media couple may help (alas, it is not certain) to open our eyes to the Covid crisis. In the end, there is a great deal of consistency between these two extravagant and extra-ordinary subjects...
      • They who pull the puppet strings used the Brigitte deception to force Macron to impose his provaxx policy with suppression of essential freedoms. They had a means of blackmail.
      • Isn't there reason to question the sanity of a President of the Republic who talks such nonsense by undermining our health ?
      • To complete the picture of the totalitarianism we are undergoing, we must point out the complicity of the major media. Le Canard Enchaîné and Médiapart, which in the last presidential elections lynched Fillon and offered Macron a triumphant second round against Le Pen, have flattened themselves into the president's friendly lapdogs, Médiapart having completely decredibilised itself by censoring the researcher Laurent Mucchielli without any real justification. It's pitiful. To my knowledge, only one article has tried to work out the facts, but it has floundered, without getting anything out. It is going to become even more obvious that the mass media are the hacks of power and share its lies, all its lies, especially the ones about Covid.
      • In 1968, when Georges Pompidou's wife had been the victim of rumours during the Markovic affair, her husband had reacted immediately. Now, two months after the revelation of the facts, it seems that Brigitte is going to file a complaint... And against what? Not even for defamation, but "against transphobic remarks" ! (article). In the face of uncomfortable realities, there is only an inability to face them, a contemptuous ignorance, a willingness to move on by bowing down as if nothing had happened. It's the same when faced with the early treatments of Covid or the side effects of vaxxin.
      • Let's not forget that the perverted teacher Jean-Michel Trogneux, aka Brigitte, abused a 15-year-old, Emmanuel Macron under his authority. For similar acts, some have been thoroughly investigated and are in prison or discredited. There was a double standard, Natacha Rey is right to believe that Jean-Michel's place is in prison. And all the more so as he has great authority over her husband and is therefore part of the criminals who decided the totalitarian Covid policy of France.

      Moreover, while I sometimes sense a lesser combativeness among the Resistance, I think that we have here more than a subject of indignation, we also have a subject of laughter, of mockery, of quips, of sauciness, and we would be wrong not to laugh at the back of those who oppress us. There is no transphobia in laughing at ultra-mentors. What would Pierre Dac have said on Radio London ? Let's not let this opportunity pass, it's a morale booster and allows us to attack 2022 in good spirits with the will to knock down the house.
      In summary of the parallelism and interweaving of the two cases, this formula:
      the bigger the lies, the better they get across

      A simple, mundane reality, with rough edges to make it a legend, is more believable than a complex, twisted reality.

      To the left the scandalous state lie that has been preached for months and months by the government while the lack of protection
      of this vaxxin to be renewed every five months was obvious. Centre and right, demonstration in Paris on 18 December 2021
      of those whom Emmanuel Macron was to declare that he had "wanted to piss them off[...]all the way" on 4 January 2022.
      Posters: 1 "I'll get a shot when Jean-Michel T. is found" 2 "Who do we say thank you to? THANK YOU Manu & Jean-Michel"

      The displayed formula above "All vaccinated, all protected" is characteristic of the inversion of values operated by the psychopathic couple in the Elysée. This vaxxin does not protect against Covid, perhaps reducing serious cases over a fairly short period, but it is dangerous, by its short-term adverse effects (38,000 suspected deaths and 3.4 million injuries reported in Europe according to pharmacovigilance, link) and by its unknown effects in the medium and long term. To protect oneself, it was therefore necessary to use early treatment (like any disease, it is better to be treated as soon as possible) and not to be vaxxed.

      This artifice wielded by communicators who are experts in manipulating the masses is called accusatory inversion. It is thus presented by the essayist Michel Geoffroy in an article of which here are extracts (link) :

      Alongside novlanguage [reference to Orwell and his novel 1984], accusatory inversion has a prominent place in the propaganda tools of the oligarchy. Let's decipher it.

      Accusatory inversion is a well-known defence process in court, which consists of imputing the final cause of a crime not to the guilty party but to the victim. Thus, for example, if a tourist was the victim of a pickpocket, it is because he was careless in displaying his money: in a way he incited the thief to commit the act.

      The accusatory inversion has become a weapon in the hands of the oligarchy, all the more formidable because it relies on media stifling. The oligarchs never cease to accuse their opponents and the European peoples of their own vices.

      An example is conspiracy theory, which is a right-wing extremist disease that sees conspiracies everywhere. But in reality it is the oligarchy that is constantly plotting against the peoples of Europe: against their sovereignty and their identity. The oligarchy is not plotting, but it is negotiating the Transatlantic Treaty in the greatest secrecy. They are not plotting, but they are using every means to draw us into increasing hostility towards Russia. It is not plotting but imposing on the French people, with the Lisbon Treaty, a European treaty that they had rejected by referendum.

      Emmanuel Macron has used this process to the extreme. He thus claimed to be a defender of freedom, democracy and other values that he flouts. So when he says on 4 January 2022 that "the immense moral fault of the antivaxers" is to "undermine what is the solidity of a nation", it is all wrong. Those who have plunged the country into totalitarianism and apartheid claim to be responsible, concerned about our health, supportive, defenders of freedoms, etc. They have such a power of persuasion that many vaxxed people, after receiving their third dose, thought they were free (to go to restaurants, theatres, etc.) when in fact they were shackling themselves and putting their health at risk.

      "The manufacturer is not responsible, the government is not responsible, the vaccinator is not responsible, but if you are not vaccinated, you are irresponsible". "Not a health or political crisis, but an insane criminal enterprise" (link)

      An other process has been used to manipulate crowds: the nudge. This "nudge" in French is intended to provoke targeted behaviour on the part of citizens. This technique, imported from the United States, has gradually conquered the sphere of power in France, which used it extensively during the Covid crisis. To learn more, see this article by Benoït Collombat titled "How nudge has conquered the Macronie".

      I end this chapter with a staggering accusatory inversion, seen at the beginning of Chapter 14: Jean-Michel Trogneux, the one who completely fiddled with his family tree to the point of splitting an individual and transforming a father into a mother, dared to accuse his detractors of changing his tree ! We can see that Brigitte may be superior to Emmanuel Macron in handling accusatory inversions and that she must have suggested their massive use to him.

      To conclude this chapter on accusatory reversals, let's quote these two excerpts from Brigitte Macron's Wikipedia page:
      • "The age difference (of more than twenty-four years) between the two lovers is causing a scandal in the Trogneux family, especially since their relationship could fall under Article 227-27 of the Penal Code, which enshrines the crime of sexual assault on a minor, and which now provides that a teacher who has sexual relations with a minor student over the age of 15 years may face up to three years in prison."
      • "In October 2017, when, in the wake of the Weinstein affair, thousands of harassed women began to publish on Twitter, with the hashtag #balancetonporc, the accounts of sexual assaults of which they claim to have been victims, Brigitte Macron gave her support to the alleged victims in question."

  23. Interrogations about Emmanuel Macron's childhood

      If the publication of this file has left the journalists blind, deaf and dumb, citizens have on the other hand mobilized across France. And valuable information has reached me, by people wishing to remain anonymous, some even turning into investigators. This is not always easy, so much the error is human. The reliability of the information is not always established and I only wish to present hypotheses that seem to me to have a good probability. However, it is not fixed, the knowledge of new elements can lead to modify, even to reject certain hypotheses.

      The first big revelation was that Brigitte Trogneux, wife of Emmanuel Macron, would be born male, Jean-Michel Trogneux. Since Monday, January 17, the beginning of the constitution of this file (which was then supposed to be only a synthesis of the investigations of Xavier Poussard and Natacha Rey), the starting elements have become much stronger, especially with, at the beginning of Chapter 14, the video INA (Institut National de l'Audiovisuel) of the transsexual Véronique and the excellent technical match of Véronique's and Brigitte's voices. In the manner of the scientific police, this now appears to be indubitable. In the opposite direction of the presidential couple and the mass media, there were only denials without any concrete element. The hypothesis appears therefore sure for the attentive readers of this page: Brigitte Macron was born and grew up male, certainly under the name of Jean-Michel Trogneux.

      This chapter was added on Saturday, January 29, 2022, five days after the first finalization on Monday 24. Its title then was "was Emmanuel's mother a man?". What a question! With an immediate, obvious and certain answer: no, Emmanuel's mother was not a man, there is no need to explain why. But, right after, this question was asked a little differently  "did Emmanuel's mother look like a man ?". And, there, the answer might not be the same. This was based on an interpretation of the 1977 Gay Pride photo shown at the end of Chapter 14. Since, later on, the presence of Jean-Michel Trogneux in this photo appeared impossible, the compraison could no longer be valid. It still exposed in Appendix B 15.

      The very expression of this quickly rejected hypothesis had nevertheless brought us a revelation : Emmanuel could have been raised by a woman who lived under the guise of a man, which would explain the opacity of his life as a child.

      If he was raised largely by a man, it can only be a close friend of his mother. Friend or lover? And could this friend or lover be Jean-Michel Trogneux? To the point of even being Emmanuel's father? Internet users, since December have raised this hypothesis, particularly in the tree #1 cited in the caption at the beginning of Chapter 11 (and further in the NBI file at the beginning of chapter 24). Tweets have thus suggested a resemblance between Emmanuel Macron and Jean-Jacques Trogneux, who in this hypothesis could be his half-brother :

      On the right, the Betaface comparison assigns 68% similarity.

      It is not the same person, so it can not be very conclusive, but would there be a family resemblance ? In our team, Hortense Fuschia, that's how Lionel Labosse calls her, then made this comparison, reinforcing the resemblance of potential half-brothers :

      Can this resemblance really lead one to believe that Jean-Jacques and Emmanuel, both born in Amiens, are half-brothers? As they do not have the same mother, they would have the same father, which would be Jean-Michel Trogneux, now Brigitte Trogneux ! Hard to imagine: the father would have slept with the son, when the son was fourteen years old (Appendix A 10). Yet nothing seems to invalidate this hypothesis, which does not mean that it is the only one, nor that it has a significant probability.

      Here are the hypotheses that seem possible to me :
      1. the one where Jean-Michel Macron is Emmanuel's biological father, where the latter would have been raised mainly by his mother and grandmother and where Jean-Michel Trogneux would have only gotten close to Emmanuel at the theater workshop, for a mostly geographical reason : their presence in the same high school in Amiens. This is the hypothesis that conforms to the "legend"...
      2. the one where Emmanuel is raised mainly by a man (in the form of a woman or not), friend or lover of the mother, who is not Jean-Michel Trogneux. Emmanuel's biological father would then be Jean-Michel Macron or a third man.
      3. the one where Emmanuel is raised by Jean-Michel Trogneux, friend or late lover of the mother. This ranges from a friendship that remains platonic to a lover relationship after Emmanuel's birth. This is, moreover, in line with Françoise Noguès's words about her old friendship and complicity with Brigitte (see the next chapter).
      4. the one where Emmanuel is raised by Jean-Michel Trogneux, the mother's lover and Emmanuel's father. Apart from a certain resemblance to Jean-Jacques Trogneux and the absence of a counter-indication, there is little evidence to support this, in my opinion.

      These hypotheses, reduced to three for the biological father, can be visualized thus by resuming the tree of Chapter 11. This provisional tree is now rejected as much as the first one because it considers Catherine Audoy as the mother of the three Auzière children, but the whole right side will be kept in the final version 3.

      Tree version 2, Catherine Audoy mother

      (the existence and date of the marriage Jean-Michel Trogneux - Véronique Dreux are explained in the next chapter)
      Attention : this tree is now rejected regarding Catherine Audoy : it is replaced
      by the tree in Chapter 29 Part 2, in version 3. The assumptions for Emmanuel Macron remain valid.

      Personally, I have a preference for the "Friend" hypothesis on the one hand because it explains the opacity maintained, it was necessary to hide that Emmanuel and Jean-Michel / Brigitte knew each other before the theater workshop, on the other hand because Emmanuel's parents and grandmother (three people) would probably not all have allowed a father-son incest.

      More than the "According to legend" hypothesis, the other three hypotheses are consistent with the following findings by Xavier Poussard, repeated in Chapter 17 :
      • Laurent, Emmanuel's declared brother, and Estelle, his declared sister, apparently born in 1979 and 1984, hardly know Emmanuel. They would be more of a half-brother and half-sister never raised with him.
      • there is a strong distancing between Emmanuel and his official father Jean-Michel Macron.
      . Such suspicion should not have allowed Emmanuel Macron to run for president again. Some, for similar offenses, such as Olivier Duhamel, were dismissed ruthlessly and very quickly. What is the Justice  doing? In the absence of journalists, could lawyers mobilize ? Can an investigation as quick as the one against François Fillon in 2017, for less serious reproaches, be initiated quickly ? A simple blood test, or even DNA, would put an end to these suspicions. They spread since mid-December, the presidential couple is unable to deny them while it should be very easy ...

  24. Does Brigitte Trogneux, Macron bride, have a legal existence ?

    1. February 11, the NBI file. A new dossier has been published, on the occasion of the birthday (77 years) of Jean-Michel who became Brigitte Trogneux, from the secure messenger Telegram. This 55-page document, which we call "NBI file", can be downloaded by clicking on this link-title :

      The Dark Side of Macron (in pdf format, 9 Mo) now in version 2 of April 8, with 91 pages (instead of 54).
      File produced by NBI (No Brain Inside, "a citizen think tank") and The Hermit ZeQeFan, January-February 2022.

      "A little less than 50 pages to dive into the unspeakable, do not hesitate to make known this file, the media must speak about it!"
      "When you have eliminated the impossible, what remains, however improbable, is necessarily the truth", Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
      Page 1 illustration and presentation.

      While Brigitte's youthful male identity now seems to be a given for those in the know, the analysis focuses primarily on the Macrons. As the cover image suggests, this NBI file points in the direction of a paternity link between Jean-Michel and Emmanuel, thus one of the hypotheses here developed in the previous chapter. The authors make a close analysis of the interviews that feed the legend, especially those of Emmanuel's parents, in order to, beyond their astonishing evolution, bring out characteristic elements that allow us to approach the hidden reality. By a different path than the one developed here, relying in particular on astonishing remarks of Françoise Noguès towards Brigitte (page 36 : "the friend like I have no other, we have the same affinities, the same priorities, we tell each other everything"), they demonstrate that Jean-Michel Trogneux and Françoise Noguès have known each other for a long time, probably before Emmanuel's birth.

      So I do not see this as a tangible new element making me abandon my preference for the less "unspeakable" hypothesis of a "Friend" relationship.

      I find that the analysis gives too much importance to an element that is certainly new, but in my opinion fragile : the indication (page 15) in an article that Jean-Michel Macron "is today divorced from Françoise Noguès, the President's mother, with whom he had two children, Laurent and Estelle". The absence of the word "others" in "two other children" appears to me to be an editorial blunder by a journalist who must have only a superficial idea of the situation.

      What is reinforced is the near absence of the official father, Jean-Michel Macron, in Emmanuel's upbringing, raised probably by his grandmother Manette, by Jean-Michel, and a little by his mother Françoise Noguès, apparently more occupied with her official home, with her husband and two other children, Laurent and Estelle, who are virtually unaware of Emmanuel's existence.

      As for the story at the beginning of the file, about an Arthur Macron murdering his fiancée in 1938, it is intriguing, but the relationship to Emmanuel can only be very remote (especially considering the 4 and 52 trees on this page).

      In my opinion, in summary, in continuation of the previous chapter, the "Unrelated before 1992" hypothesis is weakened, the other three hypotheses "biological father", "sponsor" (and close friend of the mother), "biological father and sponsor" are strengthened, with no easy way to separate them. Looking forward to the upcoming release of another case...

    2. The marriage of Jean-Michel Trogneux. The NBI file reveals the existence, dated January 19, 2022, of a certified copy of the birth certificate of Jean-Michel Trogneux :

      And a full copy of Jean-Michel Trogneux's birth certificate (link)

      The marginal note states that between November 24, 1980 and June 17, 1987, Jean-Michel Trogneux, who was therefore not yet Brigitte, was married to Veronique Dreux (information that I add to the tree in the previous chapter). It would be thus between this date of June 17, 1987 and the beginning of the school year of September 1991 that Jean-Michel would have become Brigitte. The 1977 episode of the transsexual Véronique (red box of chapter 22) was therefore only transitory, either punctual or spread over a decade, Brichel, or rather Vérochel, being sometimes Jean-Michel respectable family man, sometimes the sultry Véronique (or another female name, this one having been able to be used only for the story).

      Indirectly, we learn there that Jean-Michel was married only once and that he did not die. The NBI file adds two other judicious and disturbing remarks :
      • On April 15, 2021, the same Amiens city hall had issued Natacha Rey a document stating that Jean-Michel Trogneux was not born in Amiens. By what miracle was the birth certificate then lost and by what miracle did it reappear ?
      • The 2016 law on the "change of first name and modification of the mention of sex in the civil status" in its application document of 2017 provides for a modification of the civil status and therefore of the birth certificate. This has not been done ! Brigitte Trogneux (wife of the head of state !) does not exist legally, only Jean-Michel still exists !... NBI concludes :"There remains to consider the hypothesis - finally the most plausible - that Jean-Michel became Brigitte in a clandestinely at the time and therefore without having a legal existence. This could explain the systematic recourse to the permanent lie and to the production - quite as systematic - of systematic - of forgeries to support it... We would then have to re-evaluate the whole biography of Brigitte taking into account this new parameter... and admit that such a new existence in these conditions is and admit that such a new existence in these conditions is only possible in the long term by benefiting from relations and protections which far beyond what one can expect from even a wealthy and influential family in its region."

      May 13. These February 12 remarks are to be corrected from the Appendix A 37 remarks. Brigitte is certainly a fictional character, but she could have a half-legal existence  that of a usurped little girl who died at age 6. This trick made it possible to avoid the change of sex, to make it invisible to the civil status. This is what also corrects the following point.

    3. The birth of Brigitte Trogneux?. Hey yes, finally, there would be a birth certificate of Brigitte Trogneux in 1953. This was revealed on Twitter by someone named Moadab, who also produced the act shown earlier (see Appendix A 7). Here it is :

      This does appear to be a carbon copy of the Amiens Town Hall, dated December 20, 2021. Looking at the legend of Brigitte, we note the very surprising absence of the first marriage with André-Louis Auzière.

      Given the above and which is not in question, this act can only be falsified. The failure to indicate the 1st marriage which we know is fictitious is not proof of this, but other elements point in that direction.

      First of all, the Town Hall of Amiens has already communicated forgeries. I spoke of the non-birth in Amiens of Jean-Michel Trogneux on a deed of April 15, 2021, there are two other similar deeds, dated March 24 and April 12, 2021. It is therefore from December 2021 (when the Jean-Michel Trogneux affair breaks out) that the Amiens City Hall begins to disseminate the birth certificates of Jean-Michel and Brigitte Trogneux, the first appearing right and the second false, we will now see another reason to consider it as such. With a real and a false document, we find there a way to blur the tracks.

      Xavier Poussard adds  "How to explain the fact that on these two birth certificates, provided by the same administration, relative to two individuals born at the same time, that of Véronique Dreux lists three marriages in the marginal mentions, while that of Brigitte Macron omits her first marriage to André (-Louis) Auzière" [F&D504p04].
      Hypothesis rejected

      May 12. At first we thought this document was a fake. We think now that it is partly right, for the birth itself, partly wrong, for the marriage and an unsaid of the death probably in 1959. This is explained in Appendix A 37.

    4. Questions about Emmanuel and Brigitte's wedding. At the end of Chapter 16, we asked some initial questions about the wedding. Emmanuel Macron and Brigitte Trogneux, born Jean-Michel Trogneux, were married in Touquet-Paris-Plage on October 20, 2007. At that time two people of the same sex could not marry and the change of sex only came into force in 2016/2017. We saw that it was not registered between 2017 and 2022. How on such a basis could marriage be taken into account? Three hypotheses emerge :
      1. the marriage was not registered in the civil registry. We have very little information about this. We know that the social book of Le Touquet did not mention it,
      2. Brigitte's birth certificate was a fake and the marriage was registered in the civil registry on that basis,
      3. Jean-Michel would have had a sister Brigitte who died young (a hypothesis already mentioned in the Chapter 23 and the Chapter 6). It is this Brigitte's birth certificate that would have been shown, stripped of its marginal death notation.

      Hypothesis 1 seems to have to be discarded, especially because of the purchase of real estate by the couple. Hypothesis 3 remains tenuous, notably because it shifts the family photo from 1953/1954 (if it is not faked) to 1954/1955. Hypothesis 2 seems to me the most probable. First, because in 2007, it was not too difficult to produce a falsified birth certificate (and the absence of indication in the social booklet shows that there was a will of discretion not to awaken the attention of a troublemaker). Then, the true copy issued in January 2022 can be explained because we are dealing, since December 2021, with a state secret that must not be disclosed and the Presidency of the Republic has the means to have such a document produced by a service that has already issued false documents, as we have just seen.

      All this seems to confirm that Brigitte Macron has no legal existence. And her marriage should be annulled since it would be based on a false document.

      May 16. Hypothesis 3 above, at first deemed "unfound," is eventually upheld (Appendix A 37). The birth certificate remains illegal, but for another reason  it does not contain the marginal mention of Brigitte's death, which we have positioned around 1959. Let us also point out, shown in Appendix A 30, a copy of February 9, 2022 of the marriage act of André Louis Auzière and Brigitte Trogneux, this time with the marginal mention of divorce. Is it a forgery issued by the Town Hall of Le Touquet? A recent forgery or the resumption of an old forgery ?

  25. Could Joseph Doucé be the biological father of Emmanuel Macron ?

      This page, particularly in its chapter 23, has presented several hypotheses to explain the opacity surrounding Emmanuel Macron's childhood. Some have been rejected, others remain. One of them even appears shocking, that Jean-Michel Trogneux, thus Brigitte, would be the biological father of Emmanuel Macron. I said that I found another hypothesis more likely, that of a "Friend" relationship. The new hypothesis that is presented in this chapter is a more precise variant. The reader will note that it is only a possibility and, if I attribute a preference to it, it is not, at this stage of February 16, an intimate conviction.

      I express this by addressing the assiduous readers of this page who have advanced this investigation in a very sensitive way. First, because two of them have led me on this path, and second, because they are probably the ones most likely to bring new elements, of fragility or reinforcement, or even of confirmation or rejection. I also express this to address the Macron couple and tell them that a DNA analysis proving that Jean-Michel Macron is Emmanuel's biological father would of course lead me to reject this hypothesis, as I have already done for others. The citizens are asking for transparency.

      I am not going back to the story of Pastor Joseph Doucé, who disappeared in 1990, it was exposed in chapter 14. We saw that around 1977, he most likely knew Jean-Michel Trogneux and helped him, between 1977 and 1990 to become Brigitte Trogneux. Let's start with the physical similarities :

      Emmanuel Macron and Joseph Doucé, comparisons made at Betaface

      On the potential hereditary nature of Joseph's dimple and Emmanuel's diastema (splayed teeth), explanations in Appendix B 9.

      We have already seen with the now rejected 1977 gay pride photo that a good facial match can be misleading. It cannot be enough. The fact that Jean-Michel / Brigitte knew the pastor between 1977 and 1990 is a complementary element. But the one I find most compelling is of a different nature.

      At the age of about 12, so in 1989 / 1990, Emmanuel Macron was baptized and it is at that time that photos of his childhood have come to us. Before that, it is opaque. Only an important event could have caused such an upheaval. And 1990 was the year of Pastor Doucé's death. Losing a religious father can provoke a religious impulse, even if one is Protestant, the other Catholic (the college being Catholic...).

      It should be added that in the 1980s, being the son of Joseph Doucé, a well-known and sulphurous character, could not have been easy. In addition to a mother who was not very present, busy with her official home, Emmanuel did not really have a traditional family, hence the obscurity that envelops his childhood. By the way, was it in Amiens near his mother and adoptive father or in Paris near his biological father, or somewhere in between?

      One could even romanticize this by imagining, for example, that following the baptism where he is still male Jean-Michel becomes Brigitte to reassure Emmanuel of a feminine presence that he misses... With perhaps the blessing of Manette, Emmanuel's grandmother of Emmanuel... We also notice that Emmanuel was born in 1977, only one year after the creation of the CCL when the pastor settled in Paris. Moreover, Emmanuel is a first name that means "God is among us", a messianic name that a religious person could give. With that first name and such a childhood, it's no wonder he wanted to force fate...

      I add, third temporal convergence, that 1990/1991 corresponds to the return of Jean-Michel / Brigitte to Amiens. Yes, for Joseph, for Emmanuel and for Brigitte, 1990 was the year of a definitive turning point. More exactly between mid-July 1990, when Joseph disappeared, and the beginning of September 1991, when Brigitte entered the "La Providence" college.

      1990 is the year when everything changes: Joseph Doucé disappears,
      Emmanuel Macron emerges from the shadows, Brigitte Trogneux appears in Amiens.

      Other, more incidental, clues point in this direction. We have already seen the very distant ties between Emmanuel and his official father and the almost non-existent ones with his brother and sister. We have also seen the links between Joseph Doucé and Jean-Michel Trogneux. Even if they are not certain, they constitute a very strong network of concordant clues. I put more explicitly than in the link (in chapter 22), the photo opposite found on the Internet which seems to reunite Véronique/Brigitte and the pastor Doucé, some Internet users having even believed to see Brigitte and Emmanuel there, which reinforces the resemblance.

      I am adding elements recently discovered in the NBI file at the beginning of the previous chapter and in last issue 504 of "Facts & Documents :
      1. Sylvaine Télesfort, president of the Association Maison Intersexualité et Hermaphrodisme Europe (AMIHE) sent a declaration to MPs on October 24, 2018 "As a hermaphrodite" where she says "I met with geneticists who recommended that I have surgery, that I get " fixed ". I asked my congressman to help me, which he did. A chief medical officer of the health insurance fund, Dr. Françoise Macron, helped me put together the file. ". Thus Françoise Noguès married Macron would have helped Sylvain to become Sylvaine in 2007 [F&D504p09]. One wonders if she was trained by Pastor Doucé, at the CCL who helped to accomplish such transformations... And from there to imagine a much stronger connection that led to the birth of Emmanuel...
      2. Joseph Doucé is known to be gay. This was mostly in the 1980s. In 1976 / 1977, he may have had a female affair...
      3. Françoise Noguès was born in 1950 in Poix de Picardie, about 30 km from Amiens, Jean-Michel / Brigitte was born in 1945 / 1953 in Amiens. Françoise studied medicine in Amiens. She married between 1974 and 1976 (we are not sure...) in Amiens with Jean-Michel Macron who specializes in psychiatry and then neurosurgery at the University Hospital of Amiens and made his career there. Françoise has a "first child, a girl, who dies shortly after her birth in 1976. Manu was born on December 21, 1977, followed by Laurent in 1979, then by Estelle in 1982 or 1984 (still according to the same " approximatologues ")..."[NBIp38]
      4. "The Macrons bought a house in 1982 in the upper Gaulthier-de-Rumilly street in the Henriville district of Amiens and Françoise made a career at the CPAM of the same city as a medical consultant. To complete the picture, Manette, at the end of the 1970s, ends her career as director of the Sagebien college in Henriville and moves to rue Delpech very close to Françoise's home, and not much further from Brigitte's..." [NBIp38]. "There is not, as the crow flies, a kilometer (a quarter of an hour on foot) between rue Gaulthier-de-Rumilly and 91 rue Saint-Fuscien, the family residence of the Trogneux where Brigitte and Manu enjoyed the pool..." [NBIp27]
      5. "To the question of whether the Macrons and the Trogneux previously dated, Sylvie Bommel had been told that, despite their geographical proximity, they did not belong to the same world  "On the one hand the doctors and notaries, and on the other the successful shopkeepers". Except that at a closer look, we also find a significant number of doctors side Trogneux, with pell-mell Laurence Auzière (cardiologist), Antoine Choteau (gastroenterologist), Martine Trogneux (general practitioner) or Hecene Abbar (maxillofacial surgeon)" [F&D504p10].
      6. In a article of Télé-Loisirs of August 20, 2021, Chloe Berry takes up words of Gaël Tchakaloff, author of the legend "Tant qu'on est tous les deux" to Flammarion editions, published this same month. In it is a long interview with Françoise Noguès about her relationship with Brigitte. "The two women have known each other forever. They were neighbors in Amiens". It was on this occasion that Françoise Noguès introduced Brigitte as "the friend like I have no other, we have the same affinities, the same priorities, we tell each other everything" [NBIp27].
      7. About this article by Chloe Berry, "Why doesn't Françoise Noguès, who has known Brigitte "forever" provide [...]a simple and irrefutable testimony accrediting the real existence of Brigitte Trogneux ? If we rule out the hypothesis of a "lie in command", it is because she has known Brigitte "since always" ... but under another name and another appearance ..." [NBIp37]. And isn't it unusual to talk about an old friendship in this way without illustrating it, in a magazine with a large circulation, with an old photo ?
      8. "If Françoise claims to have known Brigitte all her life and to be her neighbor, the same must be true of Germaine! The three women living at the time of the hijacking in the same neighborhood of Henriville, a few hundred meters from each other, and - for very different reasons - were closely interested in Manu..." [NBIp37] Germaine / Manette, very close to her daughter Françoise and therefore knowing quite well the friend of her daughter Jean-Michel Trogneux, was able to see in the latter a father / mother surrogate for her grandson in 1990. From there to the fact that this Brigitte becomes a wife, there is obviously a big step to cross... It could be crossed gradually. Manette was caught in a spiral and the happiness of her grandson was her priority... She could also have lacked the courage to oppose this chain of events and resolve to do "against all odds"... As Françoise and Jean-Michel Macron will do much later to be present in 2017 at the investiture of the Elysee...
      9. This agreement of Manette was essential: "" If Manette had not given his assent, nothing would have been possible " between Emmanuel and Brigitte, we learn Anne Fulda. What will confirm moreover the station novelist Gaël Tchakaloff: "If Germaine had not accepted me, I would not have lasted long, told me one day Brigitte.  "" [NBIp45] At this point, it should be realized that Manette's acceptance still had limits (and later those of Françoise and Jean-Michel Macron) : she would have accepted a father-son relationship, as suggested by the NBI file...

      We cannot end without submitting to facial comparison the hypothesis that Jean-Michel Macron would be the biological father of Emmanuel. Carried out by Betaface, it does not allow to separate  63 to 64% for Jean-Michel Macron, 65 to 69% for Joseph Doucé.

      Jean-Michel Macron et Emmanuel Macron, comparisons : 64 to 63 %. Other Betaface comparisons in Appendix B

      Thus, it appears that the trio 1) Jean-Michel Trogneux / Brigitte Trogneux married to Emmanuel Macron son, 2) Joseph Doucé, 3) Françoise Noguès married to Jean-Michel Macron adoptive father knew each other closely since 1976 / 1977, which supports the hypothesis presented here. By exchanging arguments on the "brigittological" scale of the Internet that has been constituted since mid-December, we should continue to shed a little more light on an obscurity that others are trying to maintain. It does not belong to a private life since it has been made public in a deceptively virtuous form. It is a state secret concerning criminal acts at the highest level of the state, which should not continue to be covered. Especially when one considers that this president of the Republic has gone so far as to establish an apartheid in our country and that he has the declared intention to continue to "emmerge thoroughly" the discriminated part of the population.

      Fairly, on March 10, when apart from the dimple no even slight contraindication to the hypothesis here presented appeared, a reader, Maria, testified about points #1 and #6 above :

      I can tell you, as a doctor who has family members who are medical advisors to the CPAM, that there is very little possibility that the person you are talking about, who was suffering from a morphological sexual ambiguity, was referred to Dr. Françoise Noguès by the CPAM. It can only be the intervention of a specialized association and of colleagues also specialized in this field. This shows for sure that Dr Françoise Noguès was very sensitive to this type of situations and close to these associations. This is a point that strongly caught my attention, it struck a chord, because this is not really the daily life of a cashier's doctor. Sensitized by what? This proximity, when compared to the cases of "her lifelong friend" [Jean-Michel / Brigitte Trogneux], and her brother "with troubled youth" [Jean-Michel Noguès, there the relationship is less obvious, cf. Appendix A 13] strongly questions. There are very few medical advisors dealing with this type of problem, and as if by chance, the name of Françoise Noguès pops up. This leaves one wondering.

  26. Questions about the three Auzière children

      This chapter created in mid-February 2022 was initially titled "Were Brigitte's three Auzière children born in the United States ?". On April 12, following the creation of Chapter 29 with the "scenarios Proba", the supposed mother of the three Auzière children, Sebastien, Laurence and Tiphaine, is no longer supposed to be Catherine Audoy but Proba Auzière, leading to a partial rewrite of this chapter.

      In this mid-February, the #brigittegate knew new jolts. While Emmanuel Macron was still postponing his declaration of candidacy for the presidential elections, a lawsuit was launched against Natacha Rey and the person who first interviewed her on December 10, Amandine Roy. Two months after the announcement of a complaint, it finally arrived. There were five complainants, Brigitte Macron née Trogneux, her brother (!) Jean-Michel Trogneux and her three children Sébastien, Laurence and Tiphaine Auzière. We noticed that all were presented with their dates of birth in Amiens :

      Note that the Amiens address given for Jean-Michel Trogneux is a simple mailbox in a building where no one knows this gentleman (see Appendix A 8). Another subject of astonishment  is the content of the complaint. It relieves Natacha Rey (details in Appendix D 7) and even reinforces her investigation (and now that of all brigittologists...). Indeed, he is in no way accused of lying (defamation etc.), but only of intruding into the private lives of the complainants. While they have spread their lying life to the general public, while Natacha Rey only uses public documents (also on this page), without ever having bribed a burglar to get hold of an old photo album... It is hard to see this complaint succeeding, it seems to be more about scaring the newspapers that would take over. And, indeed, brave media outlets seem rare...

      On February 18, the day after the knowledge of this complaint, Natacha Rey reveals the following questionings about the birthplace of the three Auzière children (at the time it was believed that Catherine Audoy was the "probable mother", qualified here as "true mother")  :

      I have long suspected that the Auzière children were born in the United States, more precisely in New York, where former flight attendant and painter Catherine Audoy (the real mother) resided.For the official version, Tiphaine would have been born in Amiens in 1984, while at the time her parents were supposed to live in Strasbourg. She had to obtain a certificate of French nationality before taking the lawyer's exam in 2009, a procedure that is only justified when there is a doubt.

      I'm pretty sure she has dual French-American citizenship, as do her brother and sister. The fact that the nationality of the 3 Auzière children is not mentioned on the court summons, while that of Brigitte Macron and her double Jean-Michel Trogneux is specified, only reinforces my opinion.

      In parallel, Xavier Poussard goes in the same direction [F&D504p10]:

      No one seems to mind:
      • That Sebastien Auzière was born at the same time in Amiens (birth certificate issued on January 13, 2022 by the Amiens City Hall) and in Issy-les-Moulineaux (announcement in the Courrier picard of September 3, 1975). Documents.
      • That Laurence Auzière was born at the same time in Amiens (birth certificate by Amiens City Hall) and in Croix (Courrier picard of April 28, 1977). Documents.
      • That Tiphaine Auzière was born at the same time in Amiens (birth certificate by Amiens City Hall) and in Croix (Courrier picard). Also, it would be necessary to establish the reason for her request for a Certificate of French Nationality recorded in the marginal mentions, the CNF being very uncommon for individuals born in France to two parents of French nationality. Document. [P.S.: upon verification, such an application is not required to become a lawyer].
      Added April 14: this is a misreading of the documents, there is only one birthplace, see Appendix A 25.

      On the side of the geneanet site of, the most richly informed, already consulted in Chapter 7 and in Chapter 17, Sebastien's record is empty, his presence is reported, without even his first name. In contrast, Laurence's fiche is well filled out and Tiphaine's fiche is a rare overabundance. In these last two cases, the precision on the birth goes as far as quoting the act, its number and its marginal mentions:

      Here is something to nail the beak to all those who would dispute these acts ! But damn, why fear in advance such a challenge so rare ? As mentioned before, one can put what one wants on Geneanet, invent acts, their number, their content... Finally, such details feed the doubt rather than remove it.

      However, for Tiphaine, the manipulation is less suspect (or rather less well done ?) since it is written: "Certificate of French nationality issued by the Chief Clerk of the Tribunal d'Instance of Lille (Nord) on October 28, 2009 under the n°CNF 930/2009. Mentioned on November 19, 2009 by I. Lecoeur, Civil Status Officer by delegation". So why give a French nationality certificate to someone born in Amiens of French parents? When, as Natacha Rey says, his parents were supposed to live near Strasbourg ? And why indicate it on Généanet? There, one loses one's Latin there...

      Far from these interrogations, the hypothesis of Natacha Rey appeared coherent in mid-February. It was believed, based on the chapter 10 that Catherine Audoy was probably the biological mother of the three Auzière children. A flight attendant, often in New York, she could have given birth in that megalopolis or in Amiens, perhaps not in the same place for the three children. But which father was declared to the civil status? The biological father Jean-Michel Trogneux, or the probably adoptive father Jean-Louis (under the first name André-Louis ?) Auzière, or an unknown father...

      We realize that the three Auzière children have also had a twisted life, with opaque areas. They therefore maintain the false legend surrounding a psychopathic president of the Republic who brutalizes his people as has not been done for 80 years. They are accomplices. They could rebel like the half-brother of Canadian President Justin Trudeau (see Appendix D 5), they prefer to sink into denial. In the several months since this affair broke, they have done nothing to help clear it up.

      April 12. The probable mother is no longer Catherine Audoy but Proba / Brigitte Auzière, double of André-Louis Auzière, as Brigitte Trogneux is double of Jean-Michel Trogneux. The mother's trips to the USA are much less likely. Perhaps for Tiphaine because of her nationality certificate, but not for the two older children.

      May 14. Even Tiphaine, in the end, seems to have actually been born in Amiens. The question about the births is elsewhere  was the mother Brigitte Auzière, was the father declared ?

  27. Jean-Michel Trogneux and Jean-Louis Auzière, great friends in Algiers?

      On March 29, at the microphone of Amandine Roy, the writer geopolitologist Morad El Hattab told us that in 1963 Jean-Michel Trogneux was a student in Algiers in 1963. This is explained in the Appendix A 22. The citizen's survey was then seizing on this new element. I took it into account with two additions on April 2 and 4, which I now transfer here :

      April 2. A correspondent sends me the photo below, of a Première class in Algiers in 1960/1961 at the Collège-lycée Notre Dame d'Afrique. He wonders about the unidentified student in the second position from the left of the top row.

      With a photo reworked to firm up the features, the comparison Betaface increases from 70% to 72%.

      The comparison at a glance and by Betaface is not very convincing (nor prohibitive). But with someone else from another class? It is possible that Jean-Michel spent several years in Algiers, including in a high school.

      April 4. Here are new photos from the Saint Joseph El-Biar boarding school in Algiers in 1961, with a student who could be Jean-Michel Trogneux (links : 1 2). At this point, not much can be inferred...

      André Salette, the only one named in these two photos was probably born in 1945 in Marseille, the son of an unknown father
      and of a mother born in Algeria (link Geneanet). 1945 is also the year of birth of Jean-Michel Trogneux

      It is April 8 and last night a "profiler" correspondent pointed out to me that the 5 students in the last group photo are in the first :

      The six buddies being dressed alike, the photos were taken on the same day, in 1961.
      to be compared, above, with the presumed Jean-Michel in the 1960/1961 class photo.

      Above all, he pointed to the big buddy of the supposed Jean-Michel Trogneux and thought he recognized Jean-Louis Auzière :

      Perhaps Jean-Michel Trogneux and Jean-Louis Auzière. On the right betaface comparison for Jean-Louis Auzière.

      Comparison of the potential Jean-Michel with the potential transgender Veronique. Two more comparisons for Jean-Louis Auzière.

      These photographic resemblances alone prove nothing, except that there is no dissimilarity. But there is more to it than that... Jean-Louis Auzière was born on 28 February 1943 in Meudon, Jean-Michel Trogneux was born on 11 February 1945 in Amiens. There is thus two years of difference, they are together in a boarding school, perhaps not in the same class. It is consistent.

      We also know that the family of Louis Auzière, Jean-Louis' older brother and eventual father of André-Louis (see Appendix A 18), lived in Algeria from 1943 to 1945, with Hélène Auzière's birth there on November 19, 1945 in Port Gueydon (now Azeffoun).

      In the photo of Brigitte's supposed first marriage, the groom is Jean-Louis Auzière (Chapter 9). In Jean-Louis Auzière's complaint against Natacha Rey (Appendix D 18), Brigitte Macron has diligently sent a bailiff. This means that there is a collusion between Brigitte / Jean-Michel and Jean-Louis Auzière. She has an explanation, they knew each other somewhere, they have a common history. It is possible that it comes from this Algerian friendship.

      April 10. As explained below, Maria doesn't think the Algerian boyfriend is Jean-Louis Auzière.

      The implantation of the nose, a constant skeletal landmark, roughly marked on the bony skeleton (above right) is significantly longer for the young man on the left than for JLA, who has more of a short implantation nose ( I am obviously talking about the bony openings of the nose called choanae). This being skeletal does not change on a subject of this age. This also gives the eye very different physiognomies. The middle stage of the face is thus shorter in JLA.

      Effectively, in the double enlarged photo, for the same nose height of 3 cm on the screen, the head height is 12 cm on the left and 14 cm on the right. On closer inspection, the difference in face height is mainly due to the difference in hair height. At the wedding, JLA went to the hairdresser and had his hair inflated, while in Algiers the boyfriend just got out of the shower and has very flat hair. Taking the top of the eyebrow as a reference, the difference is much less clear: 7 cm and 7.5 cm maybe slightly more... And the remaining 0.5 cm would be due to JLA's smile at her wedding. More generally, in our team, we are not really convinced that it is the same two people, so I think the probability is average. Whereas it is much stronger for Jean-Michel Trogneux.

      May 11. A new photo has reached us, of the Saint Joseph El Biar boarding school in Algiers, circa 1960 (link). Jean-Michel Trogneux seems to be present there in the second row on the left, in a dark sweater :

      The student in the upper left appears to be the one numbered 6 in two photos from the beginning of this chapter.

      This photo would precede the Notre Dame d'Afrique College photo (brush hair) and the 1961  photo of the same boarding school:

      Left: 1960, 1960/1961, 1961. Right Betaface comparison from 74 to 76%.

  28. From Algiers to Truchtersheim, the other boyfriend Jean-Marc Uhrweiller

      As you can see from the screenshot at the top of page above on April 9, Jean-Marc Uhrweiller has been a Twitter enthusiast since his retirement in 2010. Previously, he was a commercial director at the Autonomous Port of Strasbourg. He lives in... Truchtersheim, where Brigitte Macron lived in 1990. And the reader understands why he is here. I would have preferred not to direct the spotlight on him, but his role in this Brigittegate is too important. Also, see his tweet just before the April 10 election, he doesn't like Macron, so he must be sympathetic... But he hasn't responded to our attempts to contact him and I don't see how not quoting him can be credible. So I am relying on the public data that he himself provided.

      Jean-Marc Uhrweiller is cited three times in Sylvie Bommel's book "He had just turned seventeen", first by his first name, then by his surname :

      André [André-Louis Auzière, Brigitte's husband] was transferred to Alsace. [...] In order to find a place for his little family to stay, André leaves first to take up his new position as deputy director of the Banque de France's regional delegation of Foreign Trade (which will later become Natixis). One of his professional relations, Jean-Marc, who works at the Autonomous Port of Strasbourg, praises the merits of his village of Truchtersheim, where his wife runs the nursery school. [...]

      Truchtersheim (don't pronounce the second h, but you can save yourself the trouble and just say Truch as the locals do) is then a village of 2,000 souls that can be reached in half an hour from Strasbourg. [...]
      André and Brigitte rent from a farmer a yellow house leaning against the hill [violins, thanks Maxime Le Forestier. [...]

      At Truchtersheim, Brigitte uses the method of concentric circles to expand her network at record speed. Invited to dinner at the Uhrweiller home, the ones through whom they got to know Truchtersheim, the Auziéres meet other couples there. Whom they invite to dinner. Who then invite them back with new nipples. And so on. [...]

      In 1991, the Auziéres leave Alsace. With the exception of Mrs. Uhrweiller, the former school principal, none of her Alsatian friends will hear from her again, until the day in 2016, when, dumbfounded, they discover her on the cover of Paris-Match on the arm of a very young man, a minister.

      Such is the story of the "legend" Brigitte in 2019. We have seen that false information has been disseminated about this passage in Alsace of Jean-Michel / Brigitte (Chapter 7, Chapter 9, Appendix A 5). There is nonetheless a core of truth to it. In my opinion, Brigitte did stay at Truch, more like one or two years than the three in Sylvie Bommel's account, or even a few months. And she did teach at the "Lucie Berger" high school in Strasbourg, but more as a trainee (apprentice teacher) than as a full teacher.

      So Jean-Marc Uhrweiller knew Brigitte before she moved to Alsace, and, born in 1944, he was a year older than Jean-Michel. On his Twitter page, he acknowledges having lived in Algeria until about 1960, and if, like Jean-Louis Auzière, another long-time friend of the same age, they had met in Algiers? In the same boarding school? And they would be on a photo of the preceding chapter ? And, there, it "matches" :

      This is how the three buddies from Algiers around 1962 found themselves in Strasbourg 25 years later, one of them having transformed into a woman and the other two helping him so that this transformation would go unnoticed.

      Consequently, from now on, if the Justice is brought to deal with the case, either by Natacha Rey in defense or by filing a complaint, for example for fraudulent birth certificate at the wedding of Emmanuel Macron in 2007, Mr. Jean-Marc Uhrweiller could be brought to testify that Jean-Michel Trogneux and Brigitte Trogneux are the same person.

  29. The magic trick of the two Brigitte Auzière

      Didn't the "And at the same time" policy, usually attributed to Emmanuel Macron, come from Brigitte Macron, who first applied it to her personal life ? She is at the same time Jean-Michel Trogneux and Brigitte Trogneux. She had two families, two children born a month apart, she was both father and mother, at the same time teacher in Strasbourg and administrator in Amiens... We will understand in this chapter and the next one that he knew how to make two Brigitte Auzière live, two André Auzière... Seen from afar, the illusion is convincing, except for a few surprises. Wanting to remove them leads to finding the mechanisms underlying a life that has long been fabricated and concealed. Now consolidated, our investigation has been long, the reader can skip the abandoned hypotheses, crossed out in red.

      This chapter has had three titles, the final one dated May 2. As of April 30 the second title was "Are Brigitte Auzière and Jean-Michel Trogneux the parents of the Auzière children ?". It could seem absurd. We know that Jean-Michel Trogneux and Brigitte Trogneux, also named Brigitte Auzière and then Brigitte Macron, are one and the same person. How could she be both biological father and mother? Because it is indeed of biological parents of which this title spoke. There is a magical illusion, the same one that makes people believe that Brigitte Macron is the biological mother of the children. This chapter proposes to explain the mechanism of this sleight of hand, which was revealed to us in two episodes...

      1. Part 1: Is a niece of Jean-Louis the mother of the three Auzière children ?

        This first part, written on April 12, corrected on April 29, bears the first title of this chapter. It starts from a simple observation: since the children are called Auzière, since their father is called Trogneux, it is because their mother is called Auzière. Indeed, when a child is born of unknown father, he takes the name of the mother. We will see later, in the box at the end of Appendix A 44 and in the next Chapter, another hypothesis.

        As developed in the Appendix A 18, Jean-Louis Auzière is the last child, very late, of a family of 4 children. He has two sisters and a brother, Louis, 26 years older, who has six children, including the famous André-Louis, Brigitte's ghostly first husband (Chapter 9"), as shown on this tree of the Auzieres on Geneanet :

        Jean-Louis is of the same generation as his brother Louis' children.
        His nephews and nieces are, for him, like brothers and sisters...

        The Auzière women searched closest to Jean-Louis are therefore his nieces Renee, Helene and Laure. We have searched the Web for information on the family of each of these nieces, but, except for leading a double life with a husband and a lover, none of them seems to be suitable. One of them, however, particularly caught our attention, Laure. Laure Auzière, known as Laurette, born in 1955, married Yves Gheerbrant with whom she had three children. Her school career thus appears on her fiche of the site "Les copains d'Avant" :

        The presence of Laure Auzière in a high school in Amiens in 1972-1973 calls into question. It leads us to formulate two hypotheses, the first being much more likely than the second, based on what we saw in Chapter 27 :
        • Jean-Michel Trogneux (JMT) and Jean-Louis Auzière (JLA) are two great buddies who met in Algiers around 1961 (or even around 1969 in the US). When they came back to France, they met in Amiens where JMT lived, maybe with his parents or not far away. JLA, very close to her nieces, invited them there and Laure settled there for at least the 1972-1973 school year.
        • JMT and JLA do not know each other before this Amiens episode. Laure is brought to study there, Jean-Louis comes to see her and becomes a friend of JMT.

        Since two Auzière probably found themselves in Amiens, a third, the one we are looking for, could have gone there too; But who can she be if she is not one of the nieces Renée, Hélène and Laure ? There is no really close cousin... At this point, one remembers that the genealogy we are presented with may be distorted....Isn't there another niece we are being kept in the dark ?

        It is by asking ourselves these questions that we tried to find a new niece. Looking at the dates of birth of her brothers and sisters, it was not obvious... Except to put her in the place of the ghost André-Louis... And there, tilt, but yes, it is that  as Jean-Michel Trogneux the biological father of the three Auzière children became their mother, their biological mother became their fictive father André-Louis ! A solution finally rather simple...

        Let's call this niece Proba (as probable...), who would therefore have been born in 1951, perhaps in Eséka in Cameroon since her parents were there (Appendix A 18). Proba would have come to Amiens to join her sister Laure, or her young uncle Jean-Louis, and she would have met Jean-Michel Trogneux there...

        About her portraits of the Auzière children on her Facebook account, Catherine Audoy reportedly spoke the truth when she said they are family, but not on her side, - undertone - her husband's side. They are the children of a niece of her husband and also the grandsons of his great friend. As for Jean-Jacques Trogneux, he is the son of the same boyfriend. It is understandable that she painted them, but it was a detail that stimulated the sagacity of Natacha Rey ...

        In the Hypothesis Table that follows, these Proba scenarios (BD, BE) now appear much more likely than the now-rejected original scenario (AF) in which Catherine Audoy was the mother. This scenario, presented in Chapter 10, was largely the result of Natacha Rey's custody, probably triggered by JLA and JMT, after she contacted Catherine Audoy. The goal was not to protect her, as was believed, but her husband Jean-Louis Auzière and also her niece Proba.

        April 28. In their complaint against Natacha Rey (Appendix D 18), Jean-Louis Auzière and Catherine Audoy consider themselves defamed by the fact that Catherine is considered to be the "surrogate mother" of the three Auzière children and that Jean-Louis would have operated falsifications, "tampering and make-up" of the birth certificates of the three children. To address the Justice in this way, it is very likely that they can demonstrate that it is false (note that it was much simpler and honest to explain it directly to Natacha Rey...). A DNA analysis between Catherine Audoy and the three children would be unstoppable. Moreover, she did not have children with her two husbands, so it is likely that she could not have children with another man. The exclusion of Catherine Audoy does not detract from the pivotal role of Jean-Louis Auzière, but it would be of a different nature. Let us not forget that his father Marius and his older brother Louis worked for the secret service (Annex A 31), this may have indirectly helped him...

      2. Part 2: Is this niece Proba Auzière named Brigitte ? or Were there two Brigitte Auzière ?

        As with Part 1, we started with a base that turned out to be wrong but allowed us to better approach reality. Here it is :

        The 1989 election leaflet in Truchtersheim (end of Chapter 7) shows a young woman who is not Brigitte Macron. To explain it, it was believed that this leaflet was faked after the fact. But what if it was printed in 1989? If the Brigitte Auzière of 1989 was not the one of 1990/1991? And this is where Proba Auzière comes in, do you understand?

        This Proba Auzière knows Jean-Michel-Trogneux very well, since they are the parents of the three Auzière children. We even saw that they reversed their roles, the mother Proba Auzière became the father (André-Louis Auzière) and the father became the mother Brigitte Auzière, later Brigitte Macron. Proba is a first name invented because we did not know what to call this niece of Jean-Louis Auzière. The presence of two Brigitte Auzière in Truch shows that her real name is Brigitte! And here is the sleight of hand, the magic illusion: Brigitte Auzière née Auzière is replaced by Brigitte Auzière née Jean-Michel Trogneux !

        In addition one would have a photo of this Brigitte née Auzière, it is on the 1989 leaflet (assuming it was not doctored...) :

        Hypothesis rejected (the photo on the flyer would be of Brigitte becoming Macron)

        We found three denials of this interpretation of the facts:
        1. In Appendix A 34, a notary document from June 1988 proving the existence of Brigitte Trogneux on that date, attests that the transformation of Jean-Michel into Brigitte took place before that date.
        2. The Appendix A 36 shows that Brigitte Trogneux who became Macron, and not Brigitte née Auzière, was indeed a French teacher at the Lycée "Lucie Berger" in Strasbourg from 1985 (more broadly between 1984 and 1987) to 1990.
        3. At the end of this Appendix A36, a new photo comparison proves that Brigitte Auzière of the election leaflet was probably also Brigitte Trogneux who became Macron, contrary to what we had believed above.

        But, except for this chronological correction (made on May 12), the reasoning used remains true and the continuation, below, of this part 2 written on May 1 remains valid. It is developed there "le tour d epasse-passe" rightly glimpsed, but which occurred around 1985 and not around 1989 : Brigitte Auzière née Auzière is replaced by Brigitte Auzière née Jean-Michel Trogneux, the father of the three Auzière children becomes their mother.

        Finally it is not so complicated as that. The children have always been called Auzière, their official mother has always been called Brigitte, the substitution (a game for the children) has been done gently, far from Amiens, neither seen nor known... This scenario is all the more impressive as we first understood it with the niece Proba, before completing it with the Alsatian lighting, as if the pieces of the puzzle were perfectly assembled. Not to the point of understanding everything, some forgeries keep their mystery, but enough to avoid big inconsistencies. Unless a reader can counter-argue? [August 8: there was no counter-argument; on the contrary, this scenario was supported by the "analysis of the 1974 marriage, in Appendix A 44]

        As for the prestidigitator, the deus ex machina who came up with all this, we can assume that it is Jean-Louis dit André Auzière, the uncle of mother Brigitte-Proba and the great friend of father Jean-Michel. With his contacts in the secret services, thanks to his father and brother (Appendix A 31), he imagined and implemented this scenario with some doctored documents. He also made sure that the mother Brigitte-Proba completely disappeared from the radar, exfiltrated (change of identity ?). It is unlikely that any evidence of her existence will be discovered, unless a close witness starts talking. But a pact of silence has been sealed, it stands, despite all the revelations already known... We have here a usurpation of identity skilfully succeeded in a geographically eccentric phase, with the social distance required by the secret transition, known only of the family circle always closely united.

        Here is the new tree, directly following on from the previous :

        Tree version 3, of the two Brigitte Auzière,
        the biological mother (born Brigitte Auzière) and the replacement mother (born Jean-Michel Trogneux)

        The revelation of the existence of two Brigitte Auzière allows us to better apprehend a marriage record that we had rejected, because it seemed false. Its source was dubious, since it was shown, at the beginning of January, by Moadab (Appendix A 7), and it seemed absurd that Brigitte Auzière, believed to be Brigitte Trogneux, was present at the wedding of Jean-Michel Trogneux with Véronique Dreux in 1980. We now understand that it was the first Brigitte, niece of Jean-Louis. Moreover, it is actually marked that she lives in Croix in the department of Nord where she resides then (Annex A 30). Thus, in 1980, Brigitte Auzière, Jean-Michel Trogneux's lover (with whom he had two children and would have a third) is present at his wedding with Véronique (future mother of two more children). It looks like a ménage à trois... And this document provides us with the signatures of the trio, here it is in a version of February 25, a little more complete than the first :

        Right, from top to bottom, the signatures of Véronique Dreux, Jean-Michel Trogneux and Brigitte Auzière.
        The Moadab version from early January indicates that Brigirre Auzière is "not a professional" : 1 2.

        This signature "B. Auzière" appears as a confirmation of the hypothesis first named "Proba Auzière". We have understood the mechanism of the magic trick, the interrogative form can disappear from the title of this chapter. It still remains a hypothesis but, in my opinion, it reaches the intimate conviction...

      At the same time

  30. Conclusion: family secrets, intertwined lives and pacts of silence

      Mid-May 2022, late July 2022 completions. This is six months into this page, with a preliminary in December 2021 on the neighboring page of my Covid newspaper. The relationship between the two subjects: the enormity of institutional lying, political power and the subsidized press. As soon as it came out, the Brigitte dossier was already very solid, well supported and documented on the basis of a long and discreet biographical research work of two independent journalists : Xavier Poussard and Natacha Rey. Thus, as pointed out in the Introduction, I very quickly had the intimate conviction that Jean-Michel Trogneux was transformed into Brigitte Trogneux before seducing and then marrying a young man, Emmanuel Macron, whose father or mother he/she was old enough to be. The transgender nature of the "first lady" was continually reinforced until it became a certainty: Brigitte is the transsexual Veronique of 1977 (red box of Chapter 14). She was therefore born a man. Despite the organization of the lie by the official press around the idyllic presidential couple, a large number of people, several tens of thousands, followed the evolution of the research. Stung to the core by the enormity of the disinformation, citizens became, in turn, "brigittologists" investigators.

      We were advancing on a minefield, we are still there, but, in the face of this state secret, we are now managing to better understand what happened. Some hypotheses have been abandoned, especially the Gallice jewelry store in Toulon and the fact that Catherine Audoy was the mother of the three Auzière children. Numerous other suppositions have emerged and make it possible to construct today, at the beginning of Macron's second term of office, a biography of the president's wife that is very different from the official version assured by the press. Considering only the data and hypotheses that appear most likely to me, relying on the known facts gathered and adding a requirement of consistency, here is the scenario of Jean-Michel Trogneux's career that appears to me the most realistic.

      To understand the springs of this implausible story of Brigitte "first lady" born in male Jean-Michel, it has us project us until the 1950s and point out some critical stages aggravating the unspoken. As for the transformation of Jean-Michel into Brigitte, we believe that everything was carefully orchestrated and planned so that no one could suspect, let alone prove, this change of identity. The mastermind of the sleight of hand would be Jean-Louis Auzière. His father Marius Auzière was an intelligence officer, his older brother Louis too (Appendix A 31). Jean-Louis benefits from some of their contacts and is fascinated by secret lives. He himself goes by André, his middle name. He is a great friend of Jean-Michel Trogneux, whom he probably knew in Algeria (Chapter 27). But before we get to this meeting, around 1961, we need to go back in time even more.

      1. 1945, birth of Jean-Michel Trogneux in Amiens

        As we saw in the Chapter 6, Jean-Michel Henri Trogneux was born on February 11, 1945 in Amiens, into a well-to-do family of chocolate makers, well established in the local bourgeoisie. He has an older brother and three older sisters.

      2. 1953, childhood in Amiens, the birth of Brigitte Trogneux, Jean-Michel's little sister.

        On April 13, 1953, Jean-Michel, 8 years old, has a new sister: Brigitte. The Appendix A 37 explains why we now believe in this birth that we were rejecting at the beginning of this investigation. Brigitte would be the little girl in the family photo that we now date to the fall of 1954 or Christmas 1954 or January 1, 1955. The whole family, both parents and six children, would thus be gathered here.

        In late 1954, the famous family photo would not be faked after all.
        Photomontage of Jean-Michel with his sister Brigitte, a merger in the making.

      3. 1959, the death of the little sister Brigitte, not accepted by her parents.

        The Appendix A 37 also explains that Brigitte probably died around the age of 6 but that this death is hidden and was not reported to the registrar. We do not know the cause. It is not excluded that it was later. It could be linked to an accident or a long illness, which would explain the scarcity of photos of Brigitte (only one has reached us, the photo above of the whole family). At the time of her death, Jean-Michel, a 14 year old teenager, was very touched. This family drama becomes a terrible family secret when the parents decide to hide the death and not to declare it, after having hidden the illness.

      4. 1961, in Algiers, the meeting of Jean-Michel Trogneux and Jean-Louis Auzière

        In the Chapter 27 and in the Appendix A 22, we exposed a certainty  Jean-Michel Trogneux was a student in Algiers. He lived in a hotel pension at 87 boulevard Saint Saëns. It was in 1963, he was there before too. One can estimate that, shortly after the death of his sister Brigitte, perhaps to release him from this drama, his parents brought him to study there, at the college-lycee Notre Dame d'Afrique, whose day school was located at 24 of this same boulevard Saint Saëns. We have several photos that point in this direction, even if we cannot be sure that they represent Jean-Michel. And on two of them, we believe to recognize Jean-Louis Auzière. But it doesn't matter whether they met there, or a little later in the USA (Appendix A 26), or even in Amiens around 1972 because of Laure Auzière, Jean-Louis' niece (Chapter 29 Part 1). Still, this strong friendship will be decisive.

        Perhaps Jean-Michel Trogneux, the little one, and Jean-Louis Auzière, the big one, in 1961 in Algiers at the boarding school Le Courrier Picard" [F&D504p5].

      5. 1974, the Blangy-Tronville episode, the meeting of Brigitte Auzière, the wedding in Le Touquet.

        From 1964 to 1971, we know little about Jean-Michel Trogneux, except that he probably lived in the USA in 1969 (Annex A 26). In 1972-1973, he was back in Amiens and met Laure Auzière, who had come to study there, through his uncle Jean-Louis, the great friend (Chapter 29 Part 1). In 1973, Jean-Michel's parents had a piece of land with a house in the commune of Blangy-Tronville, about ten kilometers from Amiens. They installed Jean-Michel there for a hardware store project, Picardie Métal, with a representative. Jean-Michel is the manager (Annex A 33). We do not know if he had other activities in parallel. It is probably in 1973 that another niece of Jean-Louis, Brigitte Auzière, who came to see her sister Laure, attracts Jean-Michel's attention, first by her first name. A romantic relationship begins (Chapter 29 Part 2).

        Jean-Michel does not want to marry Brigitte Auzière, who, in turn, wants to, fearing that she will find herself, if need be, a daughter-mother. In addition, the Trogneux parents want to show everyone that their daughter Brigitte is alive. To solve all this, Jean-Michel calls on his great friend Jean-Louis Auzière, Brigitte Auzière's young uncle. He is passionate about secret services and double personalities. He has the idea of inventing a fictitious husband named Auzière, named André. André is his own middle name, which he prefers to the first and uses from time to time (end of Appendix A 30). It is enough for Brigitte to say everywhere that she is married to this André Louis Auzière, who will then go and check ? She keeps her name Brigitte Auzière since she is married to an Auzière, so who will go and look for her maiden name ? The only easy verification, within reach of everyone, in addition to the name on the doorbell and the mailbox, is the telephone book. Just open a phone line in the name of André Auzière (end of the Annex A 30) where Brigitte lives, in Issy lès Moulineaux. Easy and cheap. Suffice it to say that the husband works far away and comes back from time to time under the guise of Jean-Michel and the identity of André. As far as the neighborhood is concerned, it's a "normal" family, Mr. and Mrs. Auzière and their child. Moreover, as it may seem inappropriate for an Auzière to be married to an Auzière, the bride will be able to present herself as Brigitte ex-Trogneux, which will satisfy the Trogneux parents.

        To oil the mechanism of this fabricated marriage, the groom must be given thickness. Where does he come from? Since the bride, now Brigitte Trogneux, is no longer the child she was, the groom can replace this child. The groom is therefore supposed to be a child of Louis Auzière, Jean-Louis' brother, it is a simple substitution, a nephew replaces the niece. The mayor of Le Touquet, Léon Deprez, a great tennis friend of Father Jean Trogneux (Appendix A 28), provides his indispensable assistance so that the legality is apparently respected, it is enough not to check the identities. A faked photo of the wedding is published in "Les Echos du Touquet" ostentatiously showing what would have become of the late Brigitte. As explained in Appendix A 43, this wedding is both fake, by the identity of the two grooms as for the doctored photo (Jean-Louis is the groom, Monique, Jean-Michel's sister, is the bride) and real by the ceremony, the announcement, the announcement and the registration in the civil status. Thus the parents perpetuate the illusion of their living daughter and Brigitte Auzière fools her entourage when she claims that the one who comes to see her is her husband.

        How precise is the 1974 mechanism? Jean-Louis and Jean-Michel have designed the essential characteristics of this false husband, André Louis Auzière. In the Auzière family tree, he replaces Brigitte who, by chance, was born in a remote corner of Africa, without a civil status register. This even makes it possible to change the date of birth of the imaginary husband. It will be the year 1951 instead of 1953, so that André is a little older than Brigitte (as in a "normal" family...) and a little closer to Jean-Louis' age. And it will be a February 28 to match Jean-Louis' birthday, born on February 28, 1943.

        The following year, on September 1, 1975, Sébastien Auzière was born in Amiens, the first of three children of Jean-Michel Trogneux and Brigitte Auzière. Little Sébastien was named Auzière, after his fictitious father, if André Louis, the groom of 1974, was the declared father, or after his mother, if the father was not declared. Why was he born in Amiens? To remove the event from the neighborhood of Issy les Moulineaux and to benefit from the help of grandparents Trogneux. These can present the child as the son of their daughter Brigitte supposedly still alive. Brigitte, born Auzière, plays the role of the deceased. Does she say she was born Trogneux? To what extent is the double identity of the parents used? To the point of having, for each of them, two identity cards?

      6. 1977, Jean-Michel becomes Veronique the transsexual.

        The 1974 scenario works well. Brigitte Auzière moved from Issy les Moulineaux to Croix, near Lille, in 1976 or 1977. A second child arrived, still born in Amiens : Laurence, in 1977. In addition, Jean-Michel Trogneux is divided between his two personalities of man and woman (gender dysphoria). When did it start ? When his sister Brigitte disappeared and he sometimes had to make her live again abroad, far from her parents? Probably with the accompaniment, in Paris, of the group of help to the transsexuals created by the pastor Joseph Doucé, he begins to transform himself into woman. On September 27, 1977, he is interviewed, in shaded mode, as Véronique the transsexual. His voice, his "That is" speech tic, his gestures are the same as those of Brigitte Macron in January 2022 (red box of chapter 14).

        As a man, he knows, moreover, another woman, Veronique Dreux, and decides to take the step that he had not wanted to take in 1974 : to marry her. It will be on November 24, 1980 in Blangy-Tronville. Brigitte Auzière is perfectly aware of this and even participates in what becomes a ménage à trois, since she is a witness at the wedding. The "normal family", which is still used as a social façade for Brigitte in Croix, is now very much out of reach. Jean-Michel and Véronique settle in 1981 in Beauvais, Véronique runs a confectionery and haberdashery store called "Tentations" (Appendix A 38)). They have a first child, Jean-Jacques Trogneux, born in November 1982 in Amiens.

      7. 1984, disappearance of Brigitte Auzière, Jean-Michel becomes Brigitte Trogneux married Auzière, beginning of the Alsatian episode

        The year 1984 arrives. Tiphaine Auzière, third child of Brigitte Auzière and Jean-Michel, is born on January 30, in the same conditions as her brother Sébastien and her sister Laurence, in Amiens. Three weeks later, on February 20, Jean-Michel has another child, Valerie Trogneux, daughter of his wife Véronique Dreux and sister of Jean-Jacques.

        We have no documents on this Trogneux/Dreux family of two children, no photos, only the marriage certificate in part (end of Chapter 29) and the dates and place of birth of the children, 1982 and 1984 in Amiens, then the divorce in 1987. The big changes are elsewhere, for the three main protagonists, aged respectively 41, 31 and 39 in 1984 :
        • Jean-Louis Auzière, who in 1981 became managing director of Grès perfumes, was appointed in 1983 as a French foreign trade adviser, a role with unclear contours in the line of jobs of his father Marius and his brother Louis, in the more or less secret service of France. In 1983, he moved to Strasbourg, to 26 rue Lorraine, in the Meinau district. On the telephone directory, he designates himself under the first name of André (Annex A 30). He joins an old friend from Algiers, Jean-Marc Uhrweiller, commercial director of the autonomous port of that city since 1972 (Chapter 28), who lives in the commune of Truchtersheim, in Strasbourg, as part of his work.
        • Brigitte Auzière seems to be evaporating. She disappears from our radar, we can no longer find any trace of her. Until now, she had followed, on the directory, in Issy les Moulineaux and then in Croix, the custodian of the "André Auzière" telephone line. Now, in 1983 and 1984, we find this name  twice: in Croix but also in Strasbourg (end of Appendix A 30). Since Tiphaine was born when her mother was located in Croix, there is no evidence that Brigitte moved to Strasbourg. Did she die? Did she stay in hiding? She could have been a recluse in a psychiatric hospital, as Brigitte claimed in March 2022 about the fictional André (Appendix D 10)... Was she exfiltrated by her uncle, who may have the means to provide her with another identity (if not already done...) ? Later, in the 1990s, the Auzière children went to see, according to Tiphaine, their pseudo-father André(-Louis) in Lille. In reality, it could be that they went to find their real mother... We don't know.
          Very little is known about Brigitte Auzière née Auzière. We have mostly her signature, opposite, at the 1980 wedding as a witness (end of Chapter 29).
        • Jean-Michel Trogneux leaves the management of Picardie Metal, which ceases its activity.

        And it is then, shortly after the concomitant disappearance of Brigitte Auzière and Jean-Michel Trogneux, that appears between 1984 and 1986 a new character : Brigitte Trogneux married Auzière, living Truchtersheim ("Truch")/ As if the bride of 1974 had got rid of the body of Brigitte née Auzière to become what she was fictitiously on the marriage certificate, the deceased Brigitte, sister of Jean-Michel. And this happens in the very town where Jean-Louis Auzière alias André Auzière works and in the very village where his friend Jean-Marc Uhrweiller lives, what extraordinary coincidences! And this lady, according to the official "legend", is supposed to be the future Brigitte Macron. There is reason to believe it, she indeed looks like him...

        The attentive reader will have understood that it is at this moment that Jean-Michel Trogneux took the identity of Brigitte Trogneux, his younger sister deceased 25 years earlier. Who would have the idea of going to check, especially so far, in Alsace? He also takes the identity and the role of the first Brigitte Auzière, the mother of his children. Two disappearances and an apparition, or rather a reincarnation.

        Until then, the life of Jean-Michel Trogneux was excessively complex. He wants, at the threshold of his 40 years, in 1984, more stability: he decides for that to become definitely woman. Was he operated a little before? We don't know... Perhaps of the facial surgery ? Of the Adam's apple ? He decides to separate from Veronique Dreux and their two children. The divorce will be pronounced in 1987. Is the disappearance of Brigitte Auzière born Auzière a cause or a consequence of this choice? We do not know. For a single man, changing his identity is already not easy, but for a father... Jean-Michel wishes to keep the children, but how to do it? Who had the idea to transform Jean-Michel into Brigitte? Jean-Michel or Jean-Louis? Rather Jean-Michel, haunted by his deceased younger sister. Jean-Louis will have helped him the best he could, with his knowledge of the secret services. The pact of the doctored marriage of 1974 had worked well. André, this fictitious husband, is so successful that he is going to become thicker.

        Brigitte Macron, talks about her change from father to mother of her children [on August 18, 2017, end reminder of Chapter 10]: "I know I hurt my kids, and that's the thing I blame myself for the most. But I couldn't not do it, there are times in your life when you make vital choices. And for me, it was."

        And so a new pact was made in 1984 or 1985, transforming the 1974 one. Everyone in Truch and Strasbourg believes in good faith what they are told, namely that a very ordinary young couple settles in this quiet township at 4 rue des poppies. The father is very discreet, often absent because he works so much, his name is André Auzière, there is no doubt about it because his name is written on the mailbox and in Truch's phone book. Jean-Louis, the Strasbourgeois, comes from time to time to play his role. He also plays it by being physically present to sign a document in front of notary, at the sides of his wife Brigitte Auzière born Trogneux. On this occasion, he signs AA (in 1992, Annex A 30). Jean-Louis takes advantage of this proximity and the foreign trade job he holds in Strasbourg to strengthen the curriculum vitae of his double. André Louis would be a banker, deputy director of the Strasbourg branch of the Banque Française du Commerce Extérieur (BFCE).

        Between 1984 and 1986, probably at the start of the 1986 school year, a new teacher, Ms. Brigitte Auzière, started the school year as a French teacher at the private college-lycee "Lucie Berger" in Strasbourg (Annex A 36). The birth name, Trogneux, appears only in the paperwork of the high school, Brigitte is called everywhere else Brigitte Auzière as the previous one. Jean-Michel thus assumes two identities, that of his late sister Brigitte and that of the mother of three of his children, Brigitte Auzière. Fortunately, it seems that they were both born in 1953. As a result, the new Brigitte, a mixture of the two previous ones, must also adopt their age. Thanks to this magical operation, Jean-Michel becomes 8 years younger (Chapter 12). Just as in Blangy we had a seemingly mundane family with a fictional father André Auzière (actually the real father Jean-Michel) and the real mother, we now have in Truch another seemingly mundane family with the same fictional father André Auzière (actually Jean-Louis) and the real father disguised as the mother. This is a step up in the magic trick. Everything seems possible. How far will the process set in motion by the refusal of the death of the sister born in 1953 lead?

        The first three appearances of Brigitte Auzière, née Trogneux, in the "Lucie Berger" faculty photos. On the right, this same Brigitte with Tiphaine, aged about 7, around 1991. In 1984, Sébastien was 9 years old, Laurence 7 years old. We would be curious to know a photo of them with their mother before that age...

        In Truch, the new Brigitte takes her role as an exemplary mother in a normal family very seriously. She is very busy with her three children and her job as a French teacher in Strasbourg. At the time, she has a very small chest and a boyish look, but who could imagine anything else? She remained discreet, in good company, and even accepted to be a candidate on an electoral list in 1989. For it was indeed her, contrary to what we had believed at the beginning of this investigation (it is shown in Appendix A 36).

        For the children and family, who know the past history, the new 1984 pact is trickier to accept. The children (the eldest Sebastian is 9, the youngest Tiphaine is an infant) may have understood it as a kind of game, with the father becoming the mother, perhaps forced to be absent, and whom it was good to replace in daily life. Rather than having only a dad, they could have preferred to have a mom-dad... As for the Trogneux parents, and probably the brothers and sisters, they agree, since it corresponds to their will to continue to make their missing daughter live. We have proof of this with, in 1988, the closing of a notarial transaction begun earlier, concerning both the father Jean Trogneux and his daughter Brigitte, who accompanied him (Appendix A 34). They lived the drama of 1959, they refused the death, they know the tug of Jean-Michel between his masculinity and his femininity, they can only be understanding, they adhere to the pact of 1984, hiding the true identity of the new Brigitte Auzière née Trogneux.

        If, in the previous era 1975-1984, the episode of the transsexual Veronique in 1977 gave consistency to a closeness with the pastor Joseph Doucé, who helped those who wanted to change gender (Chapter 14), the tidy nature of the life of Brigitte Trogneux in Alsace makes it unlikely that she was involved in the life of the Music Hall Adam Meyer close to Truch (Annex A 27). It is in 1991 that this Alsatian life will cease, which, contrary to what we had believed for a while (Appendix A 5), appears quite consistent with the "legend" of Brigitte Macron. However, we still have reservations about the 1984-1986 period for "Lucie Berger." In particular, she could have been a trainee or part-time teacher at the time or only arriving at the end of the 1984-1985 year (end of Appendix A 36)...

      8. 1991, the return to Amiens, then the meeting with Emmanuel Macron

        At the end of the 1990-1991 school year at the "Lucie Berger" high school in Strasbourg, Brigitte Auzière née Trogneux obtained her CAER, equivalent to CAPES (Annex A 32). Here she is ready to return to Amiens, to teach French in the private school "La Providence". She needs to better integrate into the extended Trogneux family, convince those who knew her before 1984. Circumstances were favorable. A little after the start of the school year, the Trogneux parents celebrate their diamond wedding anniversary, at the end of September 1991 (Appendix A 2). With the agreement of her children, her successful Alsatian years, and the agreement of her parents, brother and sisters, Brigitte convinces family members who might have doubts of her new identity. The transition is successful, Brigitte Auzière née Auzière has completely disappeared, Jean-Michel Trogneux has faded away, living only in dots, Brigitte Trogneux married Auzière, so also named Brigitte Auzière, appears for all as if she had always been there since her birth in 1953.

        Late September 1991, Brigitte, her parents Jean and Simone, her brother Jean-Claude, her sisters Annie and Monique.

        Thus the deceased Brigitte was resurrected in three times : a first time, just after her death, by the words of her parents keeping her alive, a second time in 1974, intermittently, by Brigitte née Auzière and by the three children attributed to her, a third time in 1984 by her brother Jean-Michel who gives her body permanently. At each stage the reality of this Brigitte becomes more carnal, as if the tale of the parents was realized. Jean-Michel helped them in their chimera as much as they helped him in his gender dysphoria. This re-actualized false family pact will be shaken by Brigitte's love affair with Emmanuel Macron, who are respectively 46 and 14 years old when they meet in September 1992 at the workshop-theater (Chapter 15, Annex A 10). Everything has been allowed to Jean-Michel and, in this period when affairs of morality are not in the news, he can continue his momentum to outdo in other sexual adventures. With his new feminine gender well established in his large entourage, the forty-year-old can afford a teenager. Even for the time, one has there a sexual attack on minor. The scandal will be hushed up. The marriage of 2007 will consolidate the acceptance of the family. It is especially the entry to the Elysée Palace in 2017 that will solidly weld the family to the point that no one dares, since this event, to break the pact of 1974 updated in 1984.

        Jean-Louis Auzière's script is then proven, Joel Benenson (Appendix A 23) and Mimi Marchand (Appendix D 10 invent a romance of true love. The underage hit becomes a mutual crush, revealing a radiantly fused couple. But those, especially in the United States, who know the couple's weakness use the new president as a puppet (Chapter 20) who overreaches in the Covid crisis (Chapter 21) at the expense of the people's health and their constitutional freedoms.

        After 1984, Jean-Michel Trogneux lived of course under the features and identity of Brigitte, but also, from time to time, under his own, especially for real estate transactions before notary. The last of his interventions dates from January 2022, when he filed a complaint against Natacha Rey and Amandine Roy for invasion of privacy, alongside... Brigitte Trogneux married Macron (Annex D 7). The double life is not only alternative : it can also be, but only on paper, simultaneous !...

      9. The biography of Jean-Michel Trogneux, the father of the three Auzière children

        The Auzière family includes illustrious watchmakers (Chapter 29) and Jean-Louis Auzière designed this script gradually, doggedly, like a timepiece. Almost fifty years later, it is still running smoothly, despite the grains of sand of suspicion that are growing and threatening the entire mechanism, which is maintained by the complicity of the major media. And also by its complexity, because it is not easy to understand and to believe. But it is impossible to cover up everything, to clean up all the archives. Here is the television interview of Veronique the transsexual in 1977, there a photo of class or boarding school, the awkwardness of the falsification of the wedding photo, the words that escape the self-control of Brigitte, so many traces of the hidden life... It is by associating them, by giving them a meaning, that we understand better the workings of this deception having taken frightening dimensions. To complete this state of affairs, according to the current state of our knowledge, here is a biographical table of the main actor of this story, extending the chronology of the story that has just been presented. Another, more developed version is available in pdf document of 2 A4 pages.

        Summary biography of Jean-Michel Trogneux who became Brigitte Macron (* =approximate)
        Date Location Event See
        11/2/1945 Amiens
        1. Birth
        1. Ch. 6, Ch. 24
        1949-1960* Amiens
        1. April 13, 1953, birth of his sister Brigitte
        2. Fall 1954, family photo
        3. Great vagueness about schooling
        4. 1959, death of his sister Brigitte
        1. App. A 37
        2. Ch. 6, App. A 11
        3. App. A 37
        1961*-1963* Alger
        1. Studies
        1. Ch. 27
        1969 United States
        1. Staying in the U.S.
        1. App. A 26
        1972-173 Amiens
        1. In support of Laure Auzière's presence in Amiens
        1. Ch. 29 Part 1
        1973-1979 Blangy-Tronville
        1. Manager of Picardie Métal (and other activity?)
        2. Witness to the 1974 marriage of his late sister Brigitte with the fictitious André-Louis Auzière
        3. Transsexual Veronique interview in 1977, double existence male / female
        4. Eventual acquaintance with Pastor Joseph Doucé
        5. Liaison with Brigitte Auzière and birth of two children, Sébastien and Laurence Auzière, in 1975 and 1977 in Croix
        1. ch. 14
        2. App. A 43
        3. Ch. 11 + Ch. 29
        4. Ch. 24
        5. Ch. 11
        1980-1984 Beauvais
        1. Marriage with Véronique Dreux on November 24, 1980 in the presence of Brigitte Auzière
        2. Installation of the spouses in Beauvais
        3. Birth of Jean-Jacques Trogneux on November 15, 1982 in Amiens
        4. End of the management Picardie Metal
        5. Birth of Tiphaine Auzière in January in Croix
        6. Birth of Valérie Trogneux in February in Beauvais
        1. App. A 33
        2. App. A 38
        3. Ch. 14, App. A 19
        4. App. A 33
        5. Ch. 11
        6. Ch. 11
        1984*-1991 Truch tersheim
        1. Jean-Michel definitely becomes Brigitte; from father, he becomes mother of his three children Auzière.
        2. Brigitte teacher in Strasbourg
        3. Divorce of Jean-Michel with Véronique Dreux on 17/6/1987
        1. Ch. 22, Ch. 29
        2. App. A 36
        3. Ch. 24
        1991-2007 Amiens
        1. Teacher at La Providence
        2. Meeting with Emmanuel Macron in 1991
        3. Family photo on September 26, 1991 with her five children
        4. Fictitious divorce with André-Louis Auzière on January 26, 2006
        1. Ch. 16
        2. App. A 10
        3. App. A 2
        4. Ch. 16
        2007-2015 Paris
        1. Teacher at Saint Louis de Gonzague high school.
        2. Wedding with Emmanuel Macron on 20/10/2007
        1. Ch. 16
        2. Ch. 16
        2017-2022 Paris
        1. "First Lady of France"
        Notes :
        1. The testimony of Nancy Verdier, a so-called classmate, in a article at on December 29, 2021 does not seem credible to me.
        2. On May 9, 2019, the German newspaper "Die Rheinpfalz" published a article (translation) saying that Jean-Michel Trogneux did his military service in Speyer (Germany) as a non-commissioned officer in the 10th Infantry Regiment in 1967/1968. Xavier Poussard made a reprise [F&D501p3]. This regiment does not appear to be positioned there on those dates (link). And other anomalies are spotted by a correspondent. Looks like Mimi Marchand's "paw" has been there...
        3. Assuming JMT was in the 1961 Première B photo in Algiers, it was an "Economic and Social Première", which would be consistent with starting out in a commercial position and running a company, on a family dime. Not adapting to this classical couple life and having started a gender transition, JMT/Brigitte would have made, in 1984 or at the latest in 1990, a brutal break with Amiens to remake her life in Strasbourg and launch a teaching career.
        4. The hypothesis according to which Jean-Michel Trogneux would have had a sister Brigitte born in 1953 and died very young (end of Chapter 8, remark 1) remains compatible with this new hypothesis of the two Brigits (one true and one false), which would then be that of the three Brigits (two true and one false)...

      10. The biography of Brigitte Auzière, the mother of the three Auzière children

        Let's try to put together what we guess about this niece Brigitte Auzière whose person stands out without us having anything certain about her. Everything is therefore to be taken in the conditional. ALA means that the information is taken from the official biography of André(-Louis) Auzière, his fictional double. BT means that the information comes from the "legend" Brigitte Trogneux, the one who succeeded him as mother of the three children. C29 means that the explanation is in the Chapter 29, A25 that it is in the Appendix A 25, A32 in the Appendix A 32.

        Summary biography of Brigitte Auzière
        • 1953. Brigitte Auzière was born in Eséka, Cameroon around 1953 (ALA). Her parents are Louis Auzière and Renee Costes (ALA).
        • 1972/1973. Her sister Laure Auzière, born in 1955, is studying in Amiens, where Jean-Michel Trogneux, the great friend of her uncle Jean-Louis Auzière, lives (C29). Visiting her sister Laure, Brigitte meets Jean-Michel. They have a romantic relationship (C29).
        • 1974. She agrees to be the late Brigitte Trogneux in her marriage to the fictional André Louis Auzière.
        • 1975. She lives separately from Jean-Michel, she in Issy les Moulineaux (A25), he in Blangy-Tronville, where he is manager of Picardie Metal. They have a first child, Sébastien, born in Amiens. Jean-Michel does not recognize the child (or does not want to give him his name Trogneux). Sébastien is therefore called Auzière, like his mother (C29) and like the fictitious husband of the 1974 marriage. Brigitte's home has a telephone assigned in the phone book to this fictitious husband André Auzière, in fact Jean-Michel who is supposed to be working far away, who visits her from time to time (C29).
        • 1977. Birth in the same conditions of the second child, Laurence. She is born in Croix in the North, where Brigitte and Jean-Louis live (A25).
        • 1980. Jean-Michel marries Véronique Dreux in Blangy-Tronville. Surprisingly Brigitte Auzière, who lives in Croix, is witness, as if there was a ménage à trois...
        • 1984. In January, a third child, Tiphaine Auzière, is born, under conditions more or less similar to the first two. The father left the management of Picardie Métal, the mother disappeared, another "mother" appeared in Truchtersheim. The biography of Brigitte Auzière née Auzière ends here...

      11. And on the side of Emmanuel Macron?

        Amiens circa 1991. One of the first official real photos of Brigitte Trogneux (after the
        Alsatian photos). And Emmanuel Macron at the age when he officially met her.

        The mystery Brigitte Trogneux led us to the mystery Emmanuel Macron. Let's skip over his affair with Brigitte (Chapter 15), his homosexuality (Chapter 18), his psychopathy (Chapter 19, his cynicism (Appendix D 20), and his hairpiece (Appendix D 15), to retain that his childhood involves big questions (Chapter 23). We have few answers, which leaves room for multiple suppositions, especially about her biological father. Unlike Jean-Michel Trogneux, for whom we found enough corroborating elements to expose a scenario, I feel that we have too little to do the same. In a moderate belief, I have suggested that Joseph Doucé could be her biological father (Chapter 25), unless it is Jean-Michel Macron, the official father. Others believe that it is Jean-Michel Trogneux, who thus would have married his own son, without my seeing any contraindication, except for the existence of less exceptional hypotheses. With this uncertain childhood, it seems probable that he also had two lives, before and after his baptism around 1990 (still 1990...). It was shortly afterwards, in 1991, at the age of 14 or 15 (Appendix A 10), that he fell under the sway of a 46-year-old man with a tarabiscot life. Forming a close-knit perverted couple, living ceaselessly in the lies of their multiple lives, they took power in France, and served as a conduit for a globalized will to control the people, causing senseless aggression against the population.

      This case is therefore based on four ingredients :
      • a succession of family secrets (1959, 1975, 1984) in a bourgeois milieu,
      • a cover-up skillfully conducted by a friend using secret service techniques,
      • an effective interpretation by theater actors wallowing in lies,
      • a pact of complicit silence by family and friends.
      Against a backdrop of permanent falsification, first private and family, then public, state and media, this secrecy has gradually assumed phenomenal proportions, to the point of becoming a state secret protected by the highest political and media authorities, national and global.

      Beyond that, there are the other contexts, media, health, political, which I discuss in the Appendix D 36, in another conclusion.

      Thank you to all those who helped me develop this page, thank you to those who have spoken elsewhere, especially on Twitter, thank you to Natacha Rey and Xavier Poussard. The media have disappointed us, ostracizing and ignoring us, with journalists who have forgotten what an investigation is and what information is independent of political pressures and money powers. This investigation, we did it without them and it will continue without them. Or, who knows, eventually, with them? I am marking a stage here, I have made my contribution, I am moving on. From now on, I will be satisfied with a bare minimum, note corrections, add at the end of the page links to new sources of information, or even a few short remarks.

  31. Hypothesis Summary Table, Index

      Throughout this large file, in Chapters and Appendices, hypotheses have been formulated, with a status that may have evolved. The reader is likely to get lost in them. The following table summarizes them and ranks them in order of probability. This is my opinion, based on contacts I have had with various brigittologists.

      6 - Certain AA. Brigitte and Veronique the transsexual (operated or not) are the same person, so Brigitte was born and raised male. red box
      from Ch. 14
      AB. The three childhood photos of Brigitte Macron depict three different children. Ch. 9
      AC. The photo of the wedding of André-Louis Auzière and Brigitte Macron is faked. Ch. 7 and
      App. A 18
      AS. Brigitte Macron, under the married name Brigitte Auzière, taught several years in the high school "Lucie Berger" in Strasbourg. App. A 36
      5 - Almost Sure
      (intimate conviction)
      AD. Jean-Michel Trogneux and Brigitte Trogneux married Macron are the same person. Ch. 8
      AE. The 1950s family photo is dated Christmas 1954, give or take a few weeks. End of Ch. 6 and
      App. A 11
      BC. Jean-Marc Uhrweiller and Jean-Michel Trogneux met in Algiers. Ch. 28
      COMIC. Brigitte Auzière, niece (or cousin) of Jean-Louis Auzière is the mother of the three Auzière children. Ch. 29 + App. A 25
      AI. Andre-Louis Auzière is a made-up character. Ch. 9 and App. A 43
      AK+AU. Jean-Michel Trogneux had a younger sister Brigitte who died young, she is the one in the family photo. App. A 37
      BF. The 1974 marriage of André Louis Auzière and Brigitte Trogneux was registered, at the time, in the registry office. App. A 43
      4 - Likely AG. The man sitting next to Pastor Doucé is Jean-Michel Trogneux (for both photos, the color one from "Faites entrer l'accusé" and the black and white one of unknown origin) Ch. 14 and
      Ch. 25
      AH. Emmanuel Macron's biological father is not Jean-Michel Macron but a friend of his mother Françoise Noguès (Joseph Doucé or whatever). Ch. 23 and
      App. A 21
      BA. Jean-Michel Trogneux and Jean-Louis Auzière met in Algiers around 1961 or in the US around 1969. Ch. 27
      AV. Jean-Louis Auzière assumed the identity of André-Louis Auzière intermittently.
      end of App. 18
      3 - Fairly likely AJ. Joseph Doucé is the biological father of Emmanuel Macron. Ch. 25
      AL. Jean-Michel / Brigitte Trogneux is a transsexual (operated). end of Ch. 22
      AM. Jean-Michel / Brigitte Trogneux is a transvestite (non-operated transsexual). end of Ch. 22 + video of Ch. 13 (fly)
      AN. Jean-Michel Macron is the biological father of Emmanuel Macron Ch. 23
      2 - Maybe BB. Jean-Michel Trogneux and Jean-Louis Auzière met in Amiens around 1972. Ch. 29
      1 - Unlikely
      but plausible
      QA. Emmanuel Macron and Jean-Jacques Trogneux have the same father Jean-Michel / Brigitte Trogneux. Ch. 23
      AR. Emmanuel Macron and Jean-Jacques Trogneux have the same grandfather Jean Trogneux. App. A 24
      AO. The 1950s family photo is faked (adding the little girl or adding Jean-Michel). Ch. 3 and
      App. A 11
      AT. The little girl in the 1950s family photo is Nathalie Farcy or Christine Boulogne (both nieces of Jean-Michel) (only in case of fake photo with little girl added).
      Ch. 6 and
      App. A 11
      BE. An Auzière woman, who is not a niece of Jean-Louis, who may be his close or distant relative or unrelated, is the mother of the three Auzière children. Ch. 29 + App. A 25
      0 - Rejected
      AF. Catherine Audoy is the biological mother of the three Auzière children.
      Ch. 10 + Ch. 29
      AW. The 1950s family photo is dated 1958/1959.
      App. A 11
      AX. The little girl in the 1950s family photo is Brigitte Macron as a youngster (contradicted by the certain AA ypothesis).
      red box
      from Ch. 14
      AY. The man in the top hat in the 1977 gay pride photo is Jean-Michel Trogneux.
      Ch. 14
      AZ. Françoise Noguès, mother of Emmanuel Macron, is pictured in the 1977 gay pride photo.
      Ch. 23

      Evolution of this table:
      • April 12. AF moves from level 4 to level 1. BA, BB, BC, BD, BE are added, cause: Ch. 29.
      • April 14. BE moves from level 2 to level 1. Cause: App. A 25.
      • April 30. BD changes wording, Proba becomes Brigitte.
      • May 14. AS goes from level 1 to 6, AV goes from 1 to 4. AO goes from level 2 to 1. AK goes from level 3 to 4, AU goes from level 1 to 4 with AK+AU meeting and new wording.
      • May 25. BD moves from level 4 to level 5, AF moves from level 1 to level 0.
      • July 6. AK+AU moves from level 4 to 5. AN moves from level 2 to 3.
      • July 30. BF Assumptions added. AI moves from level 4 to 5.

      Index of vital records (in full or excerpted) (true or false...)
      Births. 25/4/1852 Marc Trogneux at Lamotte-Buleux (Ch. 3). 15/3/1914 Jean Noguès in Florensac (Ch. 17). 5/10/1916 Germaine Arribet in Tarbes (Ch. 17). 28/2/1943 Jean-Louis Auzière in Meudon (App. A 30). 11/2/1945 Jean-Michel Trogneux in Amiens (extract), Ch. 24). 28/2/1951 André Louis Auzière in Eséka (App. A 30). 13/4/1953 Brigitte Trogneux in Amiens (Ch. 24, App. A 35) (variant, Ch. 20). 26/4/1977 Laurence Auzière in Amiens (Ch. 26). 30/1/1984 Tiphaine Auzière in Amiens (App. A 30).
      Weddings. 22/6/1974 André Louis Auzière & Brigitte Trogneux at Le Touquet-Paris-Plage (Ch. 24, App. A 30). 24/11/1980 (+ 2) (variant: 1 2) Jean-Michel Trogneux & Véronique Dreux in Blangy-Tronville (Ch. 29).
      Death. 24/12/2019 André Louis Auzière in Paris (Annex A 7).

      Index of pdf and video documents
      Pdf documents made for this brief. The full Pressibus folder, the same folder in English. 10 questions/answers (A4, Preamble). Biography of Jean-Michel Trogneux (double A4, Preamble). Excerpts from the Facts & Documents file (Ch. 5). Putin and Macron (App. D 6)
      Pdf documents copied from other sites. The NBI file (Ch. 24). The December 2021 English file (App. A 22). Notarized documents (App. A 30). The articles by Ariane Bilheran ""Psychopatology of Totalitarianism". The book by Robert Kennedy Jr (App. C 14). The Covid report of July 2, 2022 (App. C 16). Excerpts from complaints against Natacha Rey (App. D 18).
      Pdf documents from a nearby page on this site Covid Paranoia Journal from July 2021 to January 2022)
      Video footage made for this file. The voice comparison (Ch. 14). The Ode to Macron Mephisto (App. C 2).
      Video sequences from documentaries. Brigitte sits down (Ch. 13). Veronique the transsexual (Ch. 14), Brigitte Macron on RTL (Ch. 14). Alger 1963 (App. A 22), McKinsey in parliament (App. D 19).
      Songs (mp3). In App. D 11.


    Chapters 1 through 22 were written in an initial order of explanation of the subject matter. Some dated rearrangements have been added. Chapters 23 through 29 were added as research was done, presenting both an overall evolution and sidebars that did not all retain their initial interest. Here too, dated reworking has allowed for adjustments. The concluding chapter 30 presents our understanding at the close of the file in terms of what we discovered or thought we discovered. Chapter 31 of the summary table of assumptions provides a nuance to the options outlined by degree of probability, which the reader can adjust according to his or her perception.

    Then come the appendices presented in four categories (the summary is at the beginning of the file). In each category, they are presented in chronological order of creation. Their sequential reading can therefore be disconcerting, especially for the Annexes A, with the impression of going from one cock to another. As written at the end of the introduction  "This file is both a diary of the investigation and a status report on its progress."

    There are many links to connect roosters and donkeys. Web and pdf formats allow for searches within the text, better than indexes. Illustrations come from all over the place, often from tweets, photographic sources are too sparse. Thanks to the photographers or illustrators who would have liked to be cited, and to others, as the iconography is an attraction of this file.

    This file is in copyleft (Creative Commons by-sa): it can be taken over, recomposed, completed...

  32. Appendices A: supplemental materials

    1. (A) Emmanuel Macron at college in 1990.

      Emmanuel Macron as a child. On the left is a photo of a trombinoscope in the 4th grade, 1990/1991 (coll. Gérard Banc).
      Then two images from the documentary "Macron, the Meteor Strategy"
      (page "Macron president : 10 places in Hauts-de-France that matter to him").
      Apparently around age 12 (1990) and in the school setting, like the other three photos shown in Chapter 17.

      September 1990, during a school outing, photo of teacher Gérard Banc (link).
      Emmanuel starts his fourth grade class, Brigitte's theater workshop will start one year later.

    2. (A) The Trogneux family in 1991.

      This photo found on a tweet is from the German magazine Der Spiegel. It was taken on September 26, 1991 for the diamond wedding anniversary (60 years of marriage) of the couple Jean Trogneux - Simone Pujol. The added captions appear good. "Brigitte Trogneux" is present, but her husband "André-Louis Auzière" and her brother "Jean-Michel Trogneux" are missing. Why is the photo released not the one where everyone is facing the lens ? Perhaps to hide the presence of Véronique Dreux, the mother of Jean-Jacques and Valérie Trogneux?

    3. (A) The Elysee in Macron fashion.

      Tastes and colors, we don't judge, but it's hard to resist a good word : "With such a taste of shit, no wonder he wants to fuck !" As a bonus, the official photo of the Pompadour show on the Elysee website and a article.
      Another 2019 amenity: the Cleopatra Lounge.

    4. (A) Freedom, equality, fraternity...

      "The Republic in action: speech by the President of the Republic on the theme of the fight against separatism".
      The institutor of apartheid, the great separator, the one who trampled on freedom, equality, fraternity.
      Lies, always lies... (from the Elysée website )

    5. (A) Brigittology: fake news from Alsace...

      In Chapter 7, we discussed Brigitte Trogneux's potential stint in Alsace, from 1986 to 1989 according to legend.We expressed doubts about the election flyer and various testimonials (article). At this stage of my critical biographical study, I did not have enough elements to go further in my analysis. At the beginning of February 2022, some other information came to my attention thanks to new Twitter brigittologists. Yes, despite the official censorship -or because of it- the journalists Xavier Poussard and Natacha Rey have made emulators (I am one of them) and a new field of study has appeared: brigittology. It is the science (let's not be afraid of the word...) of uncovering the untruths in the official legend of Brigitte and trying to shed light on the opacities of her life and that of Emmanuel. Our investigators, new fact-checkers of the official infox, compete in efforts and exchanges to, from old articles, make cross-checks, additional research, put forward hypotheses... And restore the real facts of the biography of "Brigitte". More broadly, it means making them known.

      This is a source that I have already used elsewhere in this file. Here is now the criticism of the Alsatian legend. Let's start with this excerpt from article recounting the happy days of the Auzière couple and their three children near the Rhine :

      Brigitte Macron lived for several years in Alsace, in Truchtersheim, with her first husband André-Louis Auzière and their three children.

      [...] Alsace holds a special place in the heart of the first lady, and for good reason. She lived for several years in the town of Truchtersheim with her first husband André-Louis Auzière and their three children, Sébastien, Laurence and Tiphaine, born respectively in 1975, 1977 and 1984. They rented a house in Truchtersheim from 1987 to 1991 and she was a literature teacher at the town's secondary school and then at the Lucie-Berger Protestant secondary school in Strasbourg, a past recounted in the documentary Brigitte Macron, un roman français broadcast on France 3 last June. It is thus with great nostalgia that she returned there in the afternoon of November 5, 2018.

      [...] Happy to return to Truchtersheim, Brigitte Macron asked to see a circle of close friends again , a request honored by Justin Vogel, the mayor of the town. If the interview took place away from the cameras, one of the people authorized to discuss with the first lady confided, and not just anyone, the former nanny of her daughters. "I am very, very moved to find her"...

      Who says middle school says class photos and thus the site "Friends from before" which collects a large number of them. Here are two from the "Lucie Berger" high school in Strasbourg, with French teacher Brigitte Auzière. The analysis of the pictures calls for some comments. A first overall impression is that "Brigitte" appears somewhat undersized, as if she were Lilliputian, compared to the boys and girls around her. Then the questions are about two suspicious elements. For the first photo (left), the character standing on the right with a beige jacket has the stature of a teacher, yet he seems to have a student's head. For the second photo, we can identify the presence of an adult woman, a second potential teacher, she is located on the left in a more classical position than the student Brigitte who could have been added.

      On the left, the teacher could be wearing a student's head, on the right there is definitely an adult on the left.
      Could Brigitte Auzière just be a teacher trainee?5.

      Of course, one can always discuss the presence of such retouching on the available pictures, it is however harder to deny the conclusion of this other case of brigittology :

      [format initial] In other words, the brigittologist (or the) Fiko first noticed that this photo was deposited there in 2017, the year of Macron's election, by a woman named Sarah K with a blurred face. This one had deposited on the site two photos in all, this one and one other with Brigitte). Among the students in the class, the identity of 13 of them was presented and listed in the database. Fiko had the idea to go and look for the information attached to them and discovered with surprise that these former students of the same class had very different ages today, between 33 and 67 years old... Sarah K. should have been in less of a hurry and more cleanly executed her trickery...

      Whatever the case, the presence of a single forged document casts doubt on the others.

      We can therefore imagine the following scenario. Brigitte had some contact in Truchtersheim, at least Simone Uhl main witness (article), she knew the town and Strasbourg. On this basis, perhaps a little broader, falsified documents were circulated and the legend was formulated, probably by the playwright Brigitte Macronella herself, perhaps with the help of the sultry Mimi Marchand, close to the presidential couple. But these biographical clues remain too few with, for some, the presence of some anomalies or oddities. Thus the Alsatian "legend" appears for what it is: a more or less credible storytelling.

      April 25: this "legend" regains some credibility with the information delivered in the Appendix A 32 and, in a parallel story in Appendix A 27.

      April 30. This credibility remains relative. Only the year as a teacher in Strasbourg in 1990/1991 has any consistency. The rest, including a possible presence at the Adam Meyer Music Hall and a professorship that would begin in 1984, appears doubtful. A correspondent writes to me:

      [As noted in this chapter,] there are strong inconsistencies in the official Alsatian narrative. JMT/BM's presence in Truch is disputed on social networks. There is a cluster of elements that seem to say that it was not him who was there but an unidentified woman. In the TV movie "A French Novel", a lot of things seem fake: illustrative images, hesitant testimonies of Thiphaine and the mayor, there is also a visit of BM to Truch and there too the mayor says yes yes yes but doesn't seem to believe in what BM says (video). The meeting sounds artificial with the women they meet.

      In a article in L'Express, Elise Karlin described in 2018 a meeting of BM with former acquaintances and wrote "...the wife of the head of state calls one of her daughters and passes her interlocutor to her, so that she herself asks for news..." Amazing that one of the girls stands behind her phone to catch up if problems...

      Uhrweiller met Auzière in Algiers and probably JMT, I'm not sure what his testimony is worth if out of friendship he covers for his former friends. However, it is his testimony that Bommel reports and that gives a little consistency to the Alsatian story and to the Auzière man who is perhaps non-existent. All the photos from the period are from the BestImage agency so possibly doctored.

      May 12. "An unidentified woman" for two Brigitte Auzière? This idea is indirectly developed in the second part of Chapter 29. But finally, in Appendix A 36, there would be, from 1984 to 1990, real news from Alsace...

    6. (A) February 11, out of her agenda, it's her birthday!

      On the page of the Elysee website dedicated to her, Brigitte Macron has not had an appointment since December. But what happened during December ? Is she afraid that someone will ask her about her brother Jean-Michel? It's time to bring him some...

      By clicking on each month, we realize that Mrs. Macron has built a superb photo album...
      On this page, her professional background indicates that she holds a master's degree in literature
      and a CAPES in modern literature, that she began her career as a teacher
      "in Paris and then in Strasbourg at the Lucie-Berger college", which does not appear to be proven.
      The "transparency charter on the status of the spouse of the head of state" is a little masterpiece of camouflage. The spouse is entitled to a director of cabinet, a chief of cabinet, police protection, operating costs... But, I promise you, he or she does not receive any remuneration, he or she does not have any presentation expenses and he or she does not have his or her own budget! In August 2018, on a page of his blog, Paul Cassiat had drawn up a one-year assessment of this "management of opacity" entering an "Orwellian way of managing public affairs". In 2022, transparency, which was based on this agenda, became very obscure.

      In this month of February, an important event should have been marked on the first lady's calendar: her birthday, Jean-Michel's 77th birthday, today, February 11 ! I am not even the first to wish him, at 7:30 in the morning, Mitrophane Crapoussin preceded me in a article titled "Beautiful birthday to the most famous Jean-Michel !", ending with "Beautiful retirement !". Even if its illustrated table (above) of "Travels and appointments of Brigitte Macron" indicates that the retirement was anticipated and started in December, it has yet to be officially announced. Apparently, it is difficult, the famous candidacy claimed by all the major media and hated by the low people and their convoys of Freedom was scheduled for early February. Come on Brigitte, have courage, end this life of lies and glitter, the time has come to get out of this play that has lasted too long to find the genealogy of his birth and childhood... And writing his biography, "A Life of Lies," what a success...

      On the occasion of this anniversary, the hashtags #JeanMichel77ans and #HappyBirthdayJeanMichel were created. Here are some of the tweets attached to them : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12.

    7. (A) The "counter-inquiry" of Moadab and Blanrue.

      February 14. At the beginning of Chapter 24, I introduced the "NBI case" made by two people who, after investigating a telegram wire, published their findings in a distributable pdf file. The process appears simple and natural. I learn this February 14 that two other people, Paul-Eric Blanrue and Jonathan Moadab also conducted an investigation for about a month and that it ended in a bizarre, fishtail fashion on January 23 with a video document, unrelated to the elements of the investigation (lien). I was aware of some of the elements of this research anyway. I had found them unserious and dismissed them.

      Why are we not shown this Jean-Michel Trogneux alongside his little sister Brigitte?
      These photos were taken during the transfer of power between François Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.

      First photos, like the ones above, allegedly showing Jean-Michel Trogneux (supposedly a "little fatty"), attested by "two independent sources", but not cited and therefore not credible (also by the lack of resemblance with the photo of Jean-Michel 1953, especially the ears)... Then extracts of administrative acts that respondents considered, apparently with reason, falsified, such as these documents and tweets : 1 2 3. Or the page 54 of the NBI file.

      Now, after learning of the civil records in Chapter 24 and the death certificate of André Louis Auzière (typed on a typewriter ?), I learn of a >>>video>>> 8:30 minute long titled "How I screwed up all the way". Jonathan Moadab, in audio mode, claims the opposite of his title, that his investigation with Blanrue was very well done and concluded that Brigitte was born a woman. Finally, Moadab says he "failed" at something else: he was addressing those who believe Brigitte is a man to convince them otherwise. Certainly he failed, but what a strange goal, especially when one claims to be anti-Macron... There one accumulates the oddities with a survey aimed at a very small number knowing how to follow the twists and turns of twitter and youtube, and if there are people to convince, it is first of all the undecideds... That's what I'm trying to do with this page, I'm not going to put forward arguments in a semi-confidential way to convince the Macronian militants of LREM... In short, Moadab may assert his good faith in the video, but the way he does it makes me look at the process with suspicion. Moreover, he blocked people on Twitter who contradicted him, even if the contradiction was made with respect and courtesy.

      This mistrust increases when we see that the two "investigators" managed to obtain from the Amiens town hall last December-January, documents that until then were not accessible (see Chapter 24), and are not accessible to people outside the immediate family. And finally, if some of the acts appear not very credible, one of them seems right, the birth of Jean-Michel Trogneux, as if to confuse the issue.

      Without dismissing the clumsiness of the two authors, this looks like a trial balloon to set up a counteroffensive. The fact that the Macron couple has apparently still not filed a complaint after having promised to do so almost two months ago, shows at the very least a great embarrassment and a strong indecision on the retort to be led. So far, it would only consist of covering up the case by cutting it off from the mainstream media... There is some success, but it is going to be very hard to maintain over time...

      April 2. It appears that a few media outlets continue to rely on investigative material from Moadab and Blanrue, in particular, to estimate that the figure shown above would be Jean-Michel Trogneux. You can see below (link) that, even if the Betaface comparison is quite good, his ears are different, notably less large, from Jean-Michel's in 1953, which are similar to Brigitte 's:

      And to believe that this gentleman who travels to go to the Elysee under the eyes and cameras of dozens of journalists would be impossible to meet and would live cloistered away from everyone does not hold up ...

      May 2. In light of the Chapter 29 differentiating the two Brigitte Auzière, Moadab and Blanrue's "counter-investigation" must be viewed differently. It is a relatively skilful mixture of the true and the false. It is necessary to go back into the context of the time to understand it. Natacha Rey, Xavier Poussard and all the brigittologists were then convinced that Catherine Audoy was the biological mother of the three Auzière children, which now appears probably false. Moadab and Blanrue, remotely controlled by the Elysée, therefore pressed this weak point and showed correct arguments and documents to dismantle it. But there were so many false documents, that relying on a true document, especially the marriage certificate of Jean-Michel Trogneux and Véronique Dreux (at the end of Chapter 29), did not remove the doubts. As long as another hypothesis did not emerge, it was very difficult for us to give up on Catherine Audoy's. Moadab and Blanrue failed because they were unable to propose a credible alternative. Simply because the only credible alternative was reality and it had to be hidden... This "counter-investigation" was finally only an attempt at diversion, presenting some correct elements aiming at provoking trouble to consolidate the invented "legend".

      May 7. It's the inauguration ceremony of Macron's second quinquennium, and the duettists Moadab and Blanrue are entitled to all the entrances to once again present us with tweets with their famous "little fatty" Jean-Michel Trogneux and once again try to put him in the same photo as Brigitte, and they succeeded... This is an opportunity to see his ears better and to see, once again, that they are not those of Jean-Michel. As for the true identity of this "little fatty", it would be a very close relative of the Trogneux family, whose name is circulating (and if it's not him, it could be his brother) but any photo of which has been scrubbed from the Internet so we can't be affirmative.

      Brigitte and her faux-brother, with his ears. On the right, scene of jubilation at the Elysee, joy and optimism radiated on all faces.

    8. (A) The "domicile" of Jean-Michel Trogneux.

      February 18. Natacha Rey and Xavier Poussard have repeatedly referred to this home reported in the complaint against Natacha Rey (in Chapter 26). Xavier Poussard gives details [F&D504p08] :

      Regarding Jean-Michel Trogneux's residence at 14-16, rue des Vergeaux in Amiens (lot VC 26), we have been able to establish that this address corresponds to an apartment located on the second floor of a three-story building. [...] Jean-Michel Trogneux bought this property on March 28, 1996. [...] The research that we have carried out comes up against several anomalies. For example, the mention "nothing" is displayed in the Fichier informatisé des données juridiques immobilières (FIDJI) concerning Jean-Michel Trogneux for the urban building section VC number on plan 26 (co-ownership rue des Vergeaux 14-16 and 9-11 rue des Lombards lots 2, 21 and 251) while his identity is taken into account by Télé@ctes. [...]

      Our team in Amiens interviewed shopkeepers and residents of the neighborhood. All are categorical : "never seen or heard of a Jean-Michel Trogneux". In the building of 14, rue des Vergeaux, the name J-Michel Trogneux, written by hand, is stuck "à l'arrache" on one of the mailboxes placed on two makeshift trestles. The building, its layout and maintenance do not seem to correspond at all to the economic and social level of the Trogneux described during our investigation. In the apartment (1st floor, left), inhabited, the television turns at full speed (one hears it since the street) but nobody answers, neither with the intercom, nor when one knocks at the door. The inhabitant seen through the window is an individual whose physical appearance is totally different from the "little fatty" presented earlier. We contacted one by one the inhabitants of 14, rue des Vergeaux. One person answered us, Mrs. Regond, who, surprised, specified us formally not to know Jean-Michel Trogneux.
      Everything therefore leads us to believe that only the mailbox bears the name "Trogneux J. Michel".

      The front door is recognizable. The proximity of the workshop Jean Trogneux facilitates the survey of the mail [Google Street].

    9. (A) The making of the fake 1974 wedding photo.

      Returning to the 1974 wedding of André Louis Auzière and Brigitte Trogneux. Xavier Poussard had the famous photo (chapter 9) analyzed by a professional graphic artist. Differences in grain, screen, definition attest that it has been heavily retouched. "In conclusion, the analysis suggests that there has been an assemblage between several photographs with essentially the addition of a block featuring Simone and Jean Trogneux," which are on the right side of the photo [F&D504p09].

      Betaface comparison confirming that the bride does not bear a strong resemblance to Brigitte

      For her part, Natacha Rey had also consulted specialists, who also concluded the rigging. She talks about it in a long video from the end of March and in another from April 12 reported at the end of Chapter 28 with these screenshots : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9. Also, on April 20, a correspondent sent me this explainer :

      This photo has two light sources. Orange colored arrows indicate where the light is coming from, those in blue show the presence of shadow. The characters on the left are lit from above but from the right, the characters on the right from above too but from the left. Now, the sun illuminates everyone in the same way, its light is diffused over the whole Earth and casts the same shadows unlike a projector which is omnidirectional. This would indicate that the characters on the left do not come from the same photo as the characters on the right. Another surprising fact is that they do not all look in the same direction. Or not at all. Normally one stares at the photographer.

      So there is no doubt that this photo is faked. The wedding took place on June 22, 1974, the photo appeared in "Les Echos du Touquet" of June 28 and the announcement in the issue of July 12. A correspondent took photos of the two copies at the BNF. Here they are in thumbnails to enlarge with a click (the last two images show full pages, from a non-NFB copy) :

      In the title of the photo, we are surprised by the absence of the first names of the bride and groom, while the caption, including the involvement of the father of the bride in the life of Touquet, appears skillfully done. The announcement is common. How is this local magazine presented? In each issue the 3 or 4 sheets are folded to form double pages, not bound together. The successive issues of about two months are simply stacked, separated, in a large common envelope. The only instruction seems to be to provide only one envelope each time to the reader, to avoid mixing these sheets. It was therefore relatively easy to take these two issues and substitute them with modified facsimiles. This is what we believed at first, estimating that this substitution would have been made in 1984/1985 when Jean-Michel became Brigitte Trogneux :

      It is in the form opposite that appeared in the BNF (Bibibliothèque Nationale de France) copy of the "Echos du Touquet" of June 28, 1974, the doctored photo. How could it have appeared in this newspaper ?

      As this newspaper is probably not digitized or microfilmed, the most likely hypothesis is that the BNF copy was stolen to be replaced by a modified facsimile. This is technically difficult to do: find the same paper, the same ageing, the same font. The State has these means (it is a question of protecting a State secret) and it is within the reach of specialists. Some of them are capable of creating false documents that deceive historians, who are by nature very suspicious... With such technical means, even if the substitution appears more delicate when it comes to large bindings, the trickery being easier to discover, one can also modify a civil status record... The film Les compagnons de la marguerite by Jean-Pierre Mocky (1967) deals with this subject, in a very light-hearted way.

      Hypothesis rejected

      In her book "He had just turned seventeen," Sylvie Bommel recounts in a double page the "legend" of the marriage. In a rather comical way, Jean-Michel Trogneux is best man of the bride, his supposed sister and Jean-Louis Auzière is best man of the groom, his supposed nephew. It was, in May 2019, the first time it was said that Brigitte Macron had a brother Jean-Michel ... We will see later, especially in Chapter 29 and in the conclusion, that this marriage supposedly engendered the three Auzière children is a mirror game with gender inversion. It reflects what would have been a Jean-Michel Trogneux - Brigitte Auzière marriage, the real biological parents of the three Auzière children. We will come back to this photo in Appendix A 18, with Jean-Louis Auzière, and in Appendix A 43 to explain that it did appear (with tricks) in 1974, corresponding to a wedding that would have actually taken place...

    10. (A) When did Brigitte and Emmanuel meet?

      According to the official "legend", as written at the beginning of the Chapter 15, the love meeting of the student Emmanuel Macron with the teacher Brigitte Trogneux - Auzière became Macron dates back to the school year 1992-1993, during a workshop-theater when Emmanuel was in the class of Seconde with Laurence Auzière the daughter of Brigitte.

      Natacha Rey looked closely at the class photo from the previous year, when Emmanuel was in Troisième and was surprised to find Laurence  in it:

      1991/1992 class of Third. Laurence Auzière is wearing her hair the same way as in the photo in Appendix A 2 (#14, Sept. 1991)

      Laurence Auzière, Betaface comparison: 69%.

      In all logic, Natacha Rey then felt that since Laurence and Emmanuel were in the same class a year earlier, the workshop-theater had also taken place a year earlier. She therefore published the attached statement on February 23, 2022, which was taken up here and by all the brigittologists to the point that one of them, in a tweet re-titled Sylvie Bommel's book "He had just turned fourteen" instead of "fifteen" (and another made a song out of it, cf. Appendix D 11) :

      After searching long and hard for a photo that would show Laurence Auzière and Emmanuel Macron, who according to the official version were together in class at the "lycee", that is to say from the second grade. I finally found it again, although it could not be found on Copains d'Avant or Trombi and the press curiously never revealed it to us. I now understand why!

      In truth, they were college buddies and together only in 9th grade. At the beginning of this school year, the year when his affair with his teacher Brigitte Trogneux known as "Auzière" began, the young Emmanuel born in late December was only... 13 years !

      [...] Macron's parents themselves testified that they believed at the time that their son was dating Laurence, his young classmate, before discovering with horror, that he had in truth started an affair with her "mother" !

      In public education, the latter would have been fired on the spot, prosecuted in Justice (prison sentence) and struck off the National Education. The press and media have been lying to you from the beginning [...]. By reducing the age gap and making the "romance" start later, they were trying to make the general public accept the unacceptable. Mass manipulation and lying, as always !

      Hypothesis rejected

      There were certainly still doubts, especially about Laurence's recognition among the students, but it was so consistent with this "legend" that, on multiple occasions, distorted a reality that needed to be hidden...

      Or, on March 16, I am led to reject this hypothesis by discovering the photo below, taken from Paris-Match 3547 of 2017 (see Appendix A 15) :

      Left Emmanuel in the role of scarecrow, right Brigitte among the other teachers in 1992/1993.

      On this program kept by Professor Philippe Robert, the performance date is indicated  : Tuesday, June 15. But June 15, 1992 is a Monday, it is June 15, 1993 which is a Tuesday. We had thus made a mistake.

      Emmanuel was 15 years old and not 14 years old when he met Brigitte. At least publicly. More exactly, Emmanuel was born on December 21, 1977. He was therefore 14 years old at the beginning of the school year in September 1992 until the Christmas vacations, then 15 years old in 1993. He was thus 14 / 15 years old. We can assume that their love relationship was publicly known in 1993 when he was 15. Before that, we don't know...
      Thus, on this point, the "legend" is verified, Laurence and Emmanuel were in the same class for only one year. However, we do not know the class photos of the years before the 3rd grade.

    11. (A) The family photo and the mystery of the niece who died young.

      With an automatic colorization process, the famous photo from Chapter 3.

      This photo has long questioned Brigittologists on two themes  who is the girl and is the photo faked ? Before concluding that the photo is not faked (except incidentally on details such as the lampshade), and that the little girl is Brigitte, Jean-Michel's younger sister who died young, we tried to position ourselves in the present case. Here are the remnants of these rehashes.

      At first we thought this little girl would be Christine Boulogne, the first grandchild, daughter of Anne-Marie and her husband Gerard Boulogne. Strangely enough her existence "has never been incorporated into an official caption", she would be born on March 26, 1957 [F&D501p2]. But then the photo would be dated 1958 or 1959 which would make Jean-Michel 13 or 14 years old, that's not possible. Unless she was born before or it was another niece...

      This made me doubt Christine's date of birth, is she sure? I did a search on the web. I found a Christine Haquin (her husband's name, first name Benoît) born in 1951 living Brégy in Oise (link). She is indeed the one married to Benoît Haquin (link on, living in the same town of Brégy and this 1951 date on an official company declaration document is more reliable than a date from Généanet. Assuming that Christine is 2 years old, we are in 1953, or even 1954, and Jean-Michel, born on February 11, 1945, is 8 years old, which seems the most likely.

      Correction of January 30, 2022. As I indicate at the beginning of Chapter 23, the publication of this page has provoked a citizen emulation, a small technical team has formed, gathering elements found on the Internet and analyzing them. First, yesterday, a message arrived indicating, with supporting documents, that there were two sisters-in-law in Brégy named Christine and married Haquin, one born in 1951, the other in 1957. And the one whose maiden name is Boulogne was born in 1957, as Xavier Poussard thought! The above explanation did not hold anymore and the one of Xavier Poussard, dating the photo from 1959, or even 1958, still did not hold, as explained above. We were thus in a dead end to date this photo.

      Happily, we had accumulated observations on this photo. First, very curiously, it also existed without the lampshade above Jean-Michel, as in this photo. This cleverly done retouching had whetted the curiosity of some Internet users who tried to solve "The mysteries of the lampshade". Thus the two tweets below were issued :

      The explanation for the first tweet does not appear to be conclusive, but the explanation for the second would be when you consider that the mother's right arm is facing backwards. The little girl would therefore be added.
      At the same time the comparison opposite of the young child with another granddaughter, Nathalie Farcy, born in 1959, so another niece of Jean-Michel, was disturbing. Comparison Betaface: 70%.

      So it seems likely that this photo is a careful photomontage between the group photo of 1953, or even 1954 (with Jean-Michel and Monique's ages indicated in the two unbarred parts above), and another photo of 1961, or even 1962 where Nathalie Farcy is 2. Or also Christine Boulogne, the second photo dating from 1959, or even 1960. Or even a little girl unrelated to the Trogneux family...

      We can also add the hypothesis (expressed at the end of Chapter 8) of a Brigitte little sister of Jean-Michel who died very young, in which case there would be no photomontage, assuming that she was born around 1951 to justify the age gap with Jean-Michel. Or an older sister of Christine Boulogne who died young.

      Our specialist Hortense Fuschia (who, however, first made the comparison girl - Nathalie Farcy), is not convinced by this explanation (and the others, see this triple diagram). She explains it to us with the diagram to the right and this explanation  "No overhang, the mother's leg and hand are simply hidden behind the granddaughter's body" The upper arm seems to be very far back though....

      The hypothesis of an older sister of Christine Boulogne having died young for an unadulterated photo from 1953-1954 has more of a preference for me, as Brigitte spoke of the death of a niece, aged 6, of acute appendicitis (link). Everyone will be able to make up their own minds with the evidence here (and why the lampshade ?).

      Rejected Hypotheses

      Kots has studied the Trogneux family at length, including captioning the 1991 photo of the Trogneux family (Appendix A 2). On March 1, in five tweets, he proposed a new hypothesis :

      1. Here is the Trogneux telel family photo as it was originally taken before retouching before adding Jean-Michel Trogneux (JMT). We notice that neither JMT nor Brigitte appear on this photo. JMT is between 13/14 years old at this time... Were they excluded ?
      2. The framing of the official photo is incorrect. JMT is completely glued to the border. A photographer always leaves some margin on each side of a photo, as it is the case with Monique on the right. So the photo has been stretched to add room.
      3. 1. Part added to the lamp 2. Lack of shadow at JMT (JMT is surely from a class photo, upper body only) 4. Black band and back of chair invisible.
      4. (no illustration) The little girl cannot be Brigitte born in '53 (Anne-Marie is over 22 in this photo, married in '55 and we see her wedding ring) and even less so Nathalie Farcy born in '59 and whose mother, Maryvonne, died when Nathalie was only 6 months old.
      5. (illustration opposite) So there is only Christine Boulogne born on 26/03/1957, daughter of Anne-Marie, and who is between 1 and 2 years old on this photo. Here she is during the inauguration of Macron in 2017.
      Hypothesis rejected (because of the dating, see below).

      We now have three major hypotheses  1) the photo is not faked, 2) the girl is added, Jean-Michel is added.

      I believe that the photo can be dated with the age of the three youngest children (the last two in case 3) : Jean-Michel, born in 1945, is an 8/9 year old boy, Monique, born in 1941, is a 12/13 year old girl, and Maryvonne, born in January 1937 is a 17 year old girl. This brings us to 1953/1954, at the very least to 1955, but no more. This is why I do not subscribe to this 1958/1959 hypothesis of Kots. In particular, Monique cannot be 17 years old, she is at the beginning of puberty. And the age differences between Jean-Michel, Monique and Maryvonne being respected, it seems very likely that they are all three on the original photo. This hypothesis of Kots is therefore rejected because of the dating.

      I incidentally add that the technical explanations, although plausible, do not convince me. While I found the girl resembling Nathalie Farcy, this is not the case for the half-face of Christine Boulogne. I discover precise dates of birth, some of them, those of Maryvonne and Monique, previously unknown. Without dwelling on the wedding ring on Anne-Marie's finger, which I cannot distinguish, I am surprised by her wedding date, 1955, more exactly January 21, 1955 (act cited in marginal mention).

      I recall that, at the end of the bottom box of Chapter 6, I presented two hypotheses with my preferences :
      1. retouched photo with the addition of the girl, perhaps Nathalie Farcy,
      2. unretouched photo with Brigitte's niece who died young.

      This last hypothesis is undermined by the dating of Anne-Marie's marriage in 1955. I imagined it to be earlier, around 1951. However Anne-Marie may have had a child before Christine and before her marriage, this mysterious niece who died young. I therefore keep this preference, even weakened.

      Let's dwell on this niece. Her existence is based only on Brigitte Macron's words. In 1960 ("a few months after" the death of her sister Maryvonne in February 1960), Brigitte "lost one of her nieces, only 6 years old. This one died as a result of acute appendicitis" (link). Given that Jean-Michel/Brigitte made herself 8 years younger, she probably made her niece younger. Assuming she was born in 1952/53, she may be the girl in the photo. She would be the first grandchild of Jean and Simone, who would thus be photographed with all their children and their first grandchild. A banal family photo, in short...

      May 7. A solution emerges for this dead niece, who would be more than a niece  she would be his sister Brigitte. And the photo could date from Christmas 1954, or thereabouts. See the end of Chapter 6.

    12. (A) The three Auzière children with Emmanuel in June 1993

      In the documentary "Brigitte Macron, un roman français" by Virginie Linhart published on France 3, already cited, we find (at 23 mn 09) the photo below left, which can also be found on this page where it is attributed to Gérard Banc, a teacher at the Lycée La Providence, and dated June 1993, with the only other indication being the presence of Emmanuel Macron :

      The June 1993 photo. At right zoom in on three excerpts from the 1991 family photo in Appendix A 2

      All indications are that Emmanuel Macron and Laurence Auzière are in the foreground here, as they are in the 1991/1992 class photo. Behind Laurence (#14 on the 1991 family group), the little girl could be Tiphaine. She is n°7 on the 1991 photo, she has the same abundant hair, recognizable by her rictus and her big mouth she is 8 years old. And between the supposed Tiphaine and Emmanuel, the boy could be Sébastien Auzière. Comparing with the family photo of 1991 (n°16), it seems that it is him, at 16 years old, especially because we find the same thin glasses on both pictures. So there would be Laurence, Tiphaine and Sébastien Auzière on the left and Emmanuel in the center.

      The boy on the right of the picture, with the striped sweater, is probably the one sitting behind Emmanuel (who is holding the slate) with his sweater over his shoulder in the 1992/1993  10th grade class picture:

      Sophomore Class,

      In the

      Betaface comparisons with black and white 1991/1992 class photo excerpts in Appendix - A - 10

      Two questions. What is Emmanuel doing in the middle of the Auzière children then? Isn't it Brigitte who is taking the picture ? The answers are not easy. For the second question, the photographer can be Gérard Banc but also Brigitte who would have given him a duplicate photo. For the first, here is the answer of a correspondent, which I agree with:

      Apparently, it was customary at La Providence to have a nature outing every year. So the bucolic photo is a school photo (like all the others of Macron). I have no objection to accepting the June 1993 date, even though I had originally dated it to the summer of 1992.

      Apparently several classes were participating in the outing since Sebastian is present despite being 2 years older (if 1993, he is a senior). If several classes are participating, no oddity to see Laurence on the picture with Emmanuel. Prior to this outing, it is perfectly plausible that Brigitte would have requested and obtained that her youngest daughter participate in this field trip, especially if she was an accompanying teacher.

      1993/1994, Première class, Emmanuel Macron's last year (sitting, center)
      at the Lycée la Providence in Amiens. Laurence Auzière is in another class.

    13. (A) Uncle Jean-Michel Noguès and Aunt Lucette.

      1. Uncle Jean-Michel Noguès. consulted the medical thesis of Françoise Noguès-Macron (under the reference 4-THM-26382), defended in Amiens on June 23, 1980, at the Bibliothèque Nationale de France, and communicated to me some pages. Here are the most interesting ones for our study.

        Recall that previously, doubts were raised about the very existence of this Jean-Michel brother of Françoise Noguès married Macron, mother of Emmanuel. Xavier Poussard had nevertheless found some other information available: "Born in 1940 and died in 2006, Jean-Michel Noguès would have become "only" a general practitioner "because of a troubled youth" (Deux jeunesses françaises)" [F&D500p5]. In the end, these words appear to be accurate. Jean-Michel Noguès obtained his medical degree in Amiens in 1971 (link). he is present (as a reminder?) on the death notice of his mother Germaine / Manette in 2013. And he is present on a Geneanet page with the indication of his wife Lucette Duponchel, born in 1939, and their children Isabel and Florence, born in 1969 and 1971.

        Brigittologist Maria tried to find out more:

        Jean-Michel Noguès's medical thesis shows no dedication, only the names of the thesis director (Pierre Galibert, a neurosurgeon at the C.H.U. in Amiens) and the members of the jury. Its technical content seems clear, methodical, with balanced conclusions that are addressed to neurosurgeons.

        In the Rosenwald Guide (directory of the French medical profession), for 1977-1978 and 1996 (last available at the BnF) : Noguès (Jean-Michel), general medicine, 27 rue Léo Lagrange, Amiens (today still a medical practice in a building bar). In 1977 as in 1996, Pr Pierre Galibert is the neurosurgeon of the Amiens Hospital.

        Jean Michel Macron, for his part, defended a scientific postgraduate thesis. In 1996 he was appointed professor of physiology (option "biological" and not "clinical") in the laboratory of functional explorations of the nervous system.

        So Françoise Noguès had a career as an office doctor, and her husband, Jean-Michel Macron, that of a physiology laboratory doctor (link). So doctors who do not treat patients directly. This may explain why Emmanuel Macron lacked confidence in the medical staff during the Covid epidemic, preferring to rely on Big Pharma.

        She provides an explanation for Manette's remark regretting that her son only became "a general practitioner" :

        There is a kind of generalist-specialist segregation, still tenacious today, as some consider that a doctor is only a generalist because he or she could not access a University Professor specialty. Manette would have liked her son Jean-Michel Noguès to have had such a university career. Her daughter Françoise started a specialty in pediatrics, but did not finish it. She compensated by marrying Jean-Michel Macron, a PU-PH (University Professor - hospital practitioner). Her other daughter Marie-Christine is an ophthalmologist (she is married Bové, apparently Philippe Bové veterinarian in Amiens).

        Of the three children of Manette, it is indeed Jean-Michel "the least graded", at least in the eyes of an ambitious mother, for whom the eldest son necessarily carries all the family hopes, almost the family honor. Ten years apart from her sister, Manette has indeed had time to hope... Personally, I consider the generalist profession to be the most beautiful, but prejudices have a hard skin.

        At the age of 14, Emmanuel Macron is therefore surrounded by three Jean-Michel, his father Macron, his maternal uncle Noguès and, transformed into Brigitte, his future wife Trogneux. As a result, Emmanuel's designated godfather is probably the one designated in the official biographies, Jean-Michel Noguès. The hypothesis once put forward in the chapter 23 that the godfather would be Jean-Michel Trogneux has therefore been abandoned.

        The reading of the acknowledgments in Françoise's thesis suggests a banal family, with husband Jean-Michel Macron, the two children aged 3 and 1, Emmanuel and Laurent, the parents of attentive spouses. Nothing seems to foreshadow then that Emmanuel will be away from his father, his brother and his future sister...

      2. The aunt Lucette Noguès born Duponchel. A page on the site "Les copains d'avant" traces the career of Lucette Duponchel, born in 1939. From age 5 to 9, she attended school in the town of Brombos, in the Oise region 41 km from Amiens. According to a page of the 1936 census, she may be the daughter of Yvonne Deras (death notice in Grandvilliers in 2012) and Lucien Duponchel, son of 'Eugène Duponchel and Odile Desachy (daughter of Julien Albert Brasseur and Marie Estelle Brasseur, married in Sommereux in 1884) . From the age of 9 to 10, she was at the Warabiot school in the neighboring commune of Grandvilliers. From 11 to 17 years, she is college of Poix de Picardie, where Manette teaches. From 24 to 57 years, 1973 to 1996, she teaches at the Delpech elementary school in Amiens, in the street where Manette lives. So from a very young age, she knew Manette and it is no wonder that she married her son.

        Lucette and her students circa 1979. Photos taken from a tweet by brigittologist Isabelle who states.
        "Lucette was a teacher in the school where Macron was in elementary school" but, on "The Buddies of Before,
        Emmanuel is "not found among kids of his age group."

      3. Uncles and aunts in the shadows. Manette and Jean Noguès were of modest origins. Their son Jean-Michel became a doctor and founded a family, with a wife, Lucette, well inserted in society. He had a good career. So why blame him for having been "only" a doctor... And this "disturbed youth", what does it mean ? Is there an inversion there? It is the life of her sister Françoise Noguès that is troubled, to say the least, with a marriage whose date is unknown, a child raised separately from the other two, a divorce, questions about her help to transsexuals...

        Banal also must be the course of the third child of Jean Noguès and Manette, Marie-Christine Noguès, married to Jean-François Leprêtre who does not seem to be mentioned by Françoise or Emmanuel, as if they had not existed... So the life of Jean Noguès and Germaine/Manette Arribet and that of their three children, Jean-Michel born in 1940, Françoise born in 1950 and Marie-Christine born in 1952 only appear troubled for Françoise. So much so that Manette felt obliged to intervene strongly (apparently after 1980) to take care of Emmanuel's education...

        However, we will see, Manette herself, is also out of the ordinary when we consider her relationship with her favorite grandson.

        Previously, let's finish with the aunts and uncles, to point out that Emmanuel has a paternal aunt, Françoise Macron, born around 1955, a pharmacist in Coudun in the Oise, married to Jean-Marie Bacciochini. The paternal grandparents are André Macron (1920-2010) (page Généanet) and Jacquelin eRobertson, of English father and French mother, but it appears that Emmanuel had very little contact with the paternal side yet settled in Amiens and, not far away, in Coudun.

    14. (A) Manette, a strange and dark grandmother...

      No photo of grandparents Jean and Germaine Noguès with their three children has been released, nor even a photo of Emmanuel with his maternal grandparents or any of them. Usually, one is proud to show oneself as a child with the grandparents with whom one has spent a lot of time. If we don't know any illustration of grandfather Jean, two photos, below, of grandmother Manette have been published. And nothing about the paternal grandparents, who are admittedly less close to their grandson.

      In her youth, Germaine Arribet, known as Manette. In 2007, 88 years old, at the wedding of her grandson [Paris-Match 3547].

      If the role of his grandmother Manette is essential in the education of Emmanuel, his grandfather, the Pyrenean Jean Noguès, was also present, as well as his great-aunt Nicole. On May 14, 2017, a article from "La Dépêche" spoke of it thus :

      Germaine Arribet, daughter of an illiterate valet, born in Tarbes in 1915 and became a schoolteacher [then a geography teacher] then a college principal. Before the Second World War, she married Jean Noguès, whose parents were merchants in Bagnères-de-Bigorre. The couple moved to the Nièvre region and then to Amiens. [...] Every school vacation, Manette and Jean Noguès, whom the future president affectionately nicknamed Coulou, returned to Bagnères-de-Bigorre, to the family home, with little "Manu" in their luggage. [...]

      Also his grandmother as well as his great-aunt Nicole are thus hardly surprised when one summer, barely of age, Manu comes to Bagnères to introduce them to Brigitte, his companion, 24 years his senior. "We took her kayaking, hiking," recalls Nicole. She immediately loved Bagnères and the Pyrenees. Brigitte adopted Bigorre and the whole family at the same time. Besides they also came back every winter to ski in La Mongie."

      Manu on vacation in the Pyrenees, late 1990s. Photo that appeared in a article from Paris-Match on May 13, 2017,
      during the election campaign, similar to the one in La Dépèche published the next day. Probably a photo of Brigitte.

      In the Chapter 17, it was stated that the grandfather died in 2002 at age 88, the grandmother in 2013 at age 96, both in Amiens. It was also said how important Manette was in Emmanuel's childhood. Cedric Remia in an article on May 3, 2017 points this out in a article of Télé-Loisirs :

      In his book Revolution, Emmanuel Macron recalls his sweet childhood memories. "My grandmother taught me to work. From the age of 5, once school was over, it was with her that I spent long hours learning grammar, history, geography. And to read." More generally, she raises him at the expense of parents overwhelmed by their professional activities. So much so that at the age of 5, the boy asked his parents if he could go and live with her.

      "As he spends most of his time in the house of his beloved grandmother, why not settle there permanently ?", write journalists Bernard Pascuito and Olivier Biscaye, authors of the book Politicians also have a mother. The parents refuse. "He was built a childhood with Epinal images that sell well. With his grandmother a teacher and his great-grandmother illiterate," said Jean-Michel, Emmanuel Macron's father in the book by journalist Anne Fulda, A young man so perfect. To the great despair of his parents, "Manette" considers Emmanuel to be her "son." And he returns the favor.

      He literally has an unwavering admiration and love for the one who is his preceptress, his compass, in short, his emotional pillar. And for good reason, when Emmanuel Macron, then a teenager, tied a romance with his teacher Brigitte, a married woman 24 years his senior, his grandmother is well the only one to support him.

      We feel some dark sides to what appears to be a kind of monopolization of the grandson. And that's not all, Xavier Poussard implies that Emmanuel might not have gone to elementary school, having been home-schooled by his grandmother (which would explain why we don't find him in the class photos of Aunt Lucette's school, see previous Appendix). And he made other findings [F&D500p2+p4] :

      Although he never lived in her house, Emmanuel Macron sows doubt [in his book "Revolution"] : "So I spent my childhood in books, a little out of the world. It was a still life". "I remember those early mornings when I would go to join her in her room where she would tell her war anecdotes, her friendships. As a child, I would pick up the thread of the interrupted discussion each day and travel through her life like picking up a novel. And the smell of the café au lait that she would sometimes prepare in the middle of the night. And the door of her room open as early as seven in the morning when I had not yet come to join her, exclaiming with feigned concern  "Are you still sleeping ?""

      "According to several witnesses, Manette lived her retirement cloistered at home, among books. She almost never went out, the rooms were plunged into darkness. [...]At Bagnères de Bigorre too, the shutters often remained closed, she was never seen outside" [Deux jeunesses françaises].

      Anne Fulda briefly touched on the possibility that Emmanuel Macron had "nearly been adopted by his grandmother", "goddess of his enchanted world", "Queen of his childhood and even of his adult life" [Such a perfect young man] [...]

      In a relationship akin to family instruction (now violently opposed by the government), one might wonder about the literature Manette would have recommended to her grandson. According to Candice Nedelec and Caroline Derrien, "as a teenager, the young Macron escaped by reading. [...] André Gide or even "Le roi des aulnes" by Michel Tournier are on his bedside table. Authors that his beloved paternal grandmother [...] gave him in sharing". [...]

      Let's skip André Gide ["The concerns of a private life marked by assumed homosexuality and the desire to shake up taboos are at the origin of" some of his texts, according to the introduction to his page Wikipedia] to focus on Le roi des Aulnes, Prix Goncourt 1970, a chemically pure synthesis of the obsessions of the intelligentsia at the time of its publication, in which Michel Tournier pompously manipulates signs and symbols (the concept of "phoria". ..), plays on the ambiguity between Hitler Youth and death camps ("malignant inversion") to rewrite the myth of the ogre and, ultimately, deliver a radically pedophilic work. [...]

      Is the strange mention of this work in Emmanuel Macron's official biography one of those signs he is so fond of ? A key to reading ? Would his official caption be made up of "malignant invertions" ?

      Or would it consist of "accusatory reversions", as seen in Chapter 22 and several other times ?

      What are we to make of this grandmother giving such readings to her grandchild ? Even supposing she wanted to help him accept homosexual inclinations, she could have done so with readings that were not so much for informed adults... And isn't it strange that she accepted that her fifteen year old grandson lives with a transsexual 32 years older than her? While the teen's parents were trying to keep them apart...

      A person who lives like this in the dark probably doesn't like to be photographed, so that's one reason for the lack of photos... The grandson has taken the opposite path of his grandmother, that of the light and the brightest media exposure... But behind the appearances, he continues to live in the darkness desired by Manette...

      [excerpt from a article from Paris-Match on January 5, 2018] [Reuters photo / Philippe Wojazer : Paris Book Fair, March 2017, in the middle of the presidential campaign]
      Emmanuel Macron's book, "Revolution," will be released on Monday in China on the first day of the state visit of the French president and his wife. [...]

      Emmanuel Macron will be in China from January 8, 2018. So will his book. "Revolution", his book , in which he tells his personal story , his inspirations, his vision of France and its future [...]

      The French edition, released in November 2016 at the time of the announcement of his presidential candidacy, has sold more than 200,000 copies. The book is also already available in about 20 countries and translated into a dozen languages. [...]

      The French president is well known to the Chinese... for his love affair and marriage to his wife Brigitte. The age difference between the couple caused a sensation in a country where men tend to marry women significantly younger than them.
      March 2022: learning that Brigitte is a transsexual who grew up under the name of Jean-Michel Trogneux
      is causing a sensation in China and elsewhere (see Appendix D 13).

      Recently, in 2021, a testimony came to shed new light on Manette [article] :

      It was in the 60s, Marie-Claire Stubbe had been received then by Germaine Noguès who occupied the post of principal of the elementary school [in Poix de Picardie]. At the origin of this interview, a terrible fact that Marie-Claire Stubbe would have done well without. "Until she was 6 years old, one of her four children attended school near Poix-de-Picardie. But her teacher was violent towards her. He beat her because she had visible marks on her face. And even, we could see bloodstains in a book."

      So this unbearable and unbearable situation pushed him to find a new school for his daughter. That's when Germaine Noguès stepped in. "I will always remember that meeting. As soon as we told her about the problem, she didn't hesitate to welcome my daughter into the facility. She was very warm. It warmed my heart. I will always be grateful for what she did."

      Again, another reading reveals a dark side. Here's what NBI says in early March 2022 :

      At first glance, the story could only further enhance the luster of the saintly laywoman and "avant-gardiste" halo. On closer inspection, this one may well be tarnished by some awkward shadows. The journalistic narrative is designed to exalt the pious grandson through the uplifting life of his grandmother, and so it focuses on what Manette did...but not on what she didn't do. Faced with the drama of the little martyr, the caring and warm principal took her in without hesitation or delay. And that was it.

      A teacher unabashedly indulges in unspeakable violence against one of his young students. She may not be the only victim, nor the first or the last. And the beating she received could also be a cover for something even worse. Taking in the child in this way can also be interpreted as the easiest way to discreetly cover up the tragedy... and ensure impunity for the perpetrator, allowing him to continue. Nothing in the story indicates that Manette did anything else. Like advising the mother to file a complaint, urgently alerting the school management about the teacher's behavior, reporting it to the rectorate, to the prosecutor... In short, what one would expect from such an open-minded, attentive and forward-thinking teacher in the face of "a terrible fact", "an unbearable and unbearable situation".

      Official portrait of Brigitte Macron,
      by Soazig de la Moissonnière (Elysee website, link)

    15. (A) Family photos of Emmanuel Macron.

      If Xavier Poussard was surprised at the lack of photos of Emmanuel Macron as a child, he also said [F&D500p3], next to reproductions in small size, in black and white here taken in their original appearance :

      Looking hard, we found three other photographs of Emmanuel Macron in the 1980s (still in his family). Diffused only once in the n°3547 of Paris Match, these photos were not diffused on Internet as it is now the custom. Inexplicably they were not incorporated into the authorized biographies produced later.

      The May 10, 2017 issue of Paris-Match 3547 is devoted to the new president of the Republic, just after his election.
      The spotlight is on the family and love life of the newly elected.

      There are also these two photographs, including the only one we know of that brings together Emmanuel, his parents Jean-Michel and Françoise, his sister Estelle and his brother Laurent :

      With family, no date, and on a training course in Nigeria in 2004.

      2017, after the election, Emmanuel Macron between his father and mother. On the right his brother Laurent.

      Betaface comparison of Jean-Michel Macron with his two children Laurent and Emmanuel

    16. (A) The absurd Auzière family

      In Mathematics, I have always enjoyed reasoning by the absurd. They have a taste for adventure. Throughout the thought process, one advances in an improbable space until the final fall where, like Little Nemo, one falls out of bed and returns to reality by relentlessly rejecting the original hypothesis. In everyday life, I also use these demonstrations by the absurd. For example for the initial hypothesis of this file. Assuming that Brigitte was born a woman, what would she do? She would deflate the rumor as quickly as possible by showing up with her brother Jean-Michel or with a blood test under bailiff's control or another method as easy and basic. She didn't do it, it's absurd, so she was born a man. But there are logics in everyday life that are not mathematical. For example Brigitte could be a perverted woman who would love to be mistaken for a man... The Wikipedia page of apagogy (the scholarly name for reasoning by the absurd) explains this well by differentiating its uses "in logic and mathematics" and "in philosophy".

      At the beginning of Chapter 24, I introduced the NBI (No Brain Inside) file as of February 11. That file is evolving on Telegram and a second version is in the works that will be presented here when it is complete. I have already said that I do not favor the hypothesis supported in this file that makes Jean-Michel Trogneux the father of Emmanuel. There is a stronger divergence with the adoption of the Kots hypothesis to date in 1958 a photo that cannot be that late (see Appendix A 11). Nevertheless, the analysis conducted is on many points relevant. And I present here an excerpt that falls under a cleverly conducted reasoning by the absurd :

      According to the official version "Brigitte Auzière" has three children: Sebastien born in 1975, Laurence of 1977 and the same age as Manu since they were in the same third grade class at La Providence, and Tiphaine the youngest born in 1984. The Ministry of Truth asks us to piously swallow the absurd fable that the three Auzière children sided - without delay and without any problem of conscience - with Brigitte and her lover... who was also their schoolmate. Because he was "a madman who knows everything about everything" according to Laurence ? Or because the trio was transfixed by his masterful interpretation of the role of the scarecrow in the legendary theatrical performance that serves as the keystone to the whole shaky propagandist scaffolding? Unless their father - "charming" by the way - did not make their mother happy according to hagiographer Anne Fulda, in her book "Emmanuel Macron, un jeune homme si parfait" and that this brave little Manu was fortunately there to fill her ? Except that the simple chronology already puts the fable to shame.

      Brigitte has known Manu since at least the beginning of the 1991 school year (her daughter Laurence is in the same class as him). Let's even admit that, suffering from visual problems and a failing memory, Brigitte only became aware of the existence of the child, er... of the man in her life at the end of spring 1993. Manu was then 15 and a half, Laurence no more, Sébastien two years older, and Tiphaine at 9 years old was still in elementary school... Let's always admit that Sébastien, a 17-year-old teenager, finds it perfectly normal that a 15-year-old boy sleeps with his mother  that Laurence, out of generational solidarity, finds it very "cool" that Mom's lover is a classmate; and that Tiphaine finds it convenient that between two cuddling sessions with Brigitte on the living room couch Manu kindly helps her with her homework. ..

      Except that, even admitting the most favourable chronology, the most elementary common sense puts even more strain on this beautiful story. It is, moreover, Tiphaine, Brigitte's official spokesperson for all things related to the Auzière family, who unwittingly blasts it in a hagiography whose title is already a confession in itself: "Brigitte Macron, a French novel". In it, she ingenuously admits that, "My daddy worked in Lille, he came back on weekends. During the week, I was with my mother and on weekends with my dad and mom went to see Emmanuel". This irrefutable first-hand testimony completely undermines the official legend that André-Louis Auzière - transferred to Amiens but working all week in Lille - learned of his misfortune through public rumor, which left no tangible trace: "And what was supposed to happen... happened. The rumors whistled in André-Louis Auzière's ears. A crushing blow for the husband, a banker by profession! Disgraced - what shall I say - scorned, he slammed the door! He immediately left the marital home. He also lost the connections, reputation, and money that his marriage to Brigitte offered him', reveals the Daily Mail." Not content to be able to cuckold her banker husband all week with the complicity of her children, on weekends Brigitte ostensibly goes out to find her lover ... and leaves the little one in the care of the scorned husband ... and very complaisant. Who therefore takes all his time to slam the door and divorce only in 2006. The Bank is a mistress, it is not Manu, ex-employee at Rothschild, who will say the opposite.

      [NBI quotes there a article from May 3, 2017 in Télé-Loisirs, reprinting passages from the Daily Mail. Here is another excerpt ]
      "Emmanuel could be seen walking down his street almost every day, taking the first right and ringing the bell at the Auzière's. His incessant comings and goings gave rise to rumors in the neighborhood," the couple's former neighborhood told France Dimanche. Gossip and other persiflages rustle throughout Amiens. It is the scandal: the respectable teacher of the Jesuit high school of Providence of Amiens, married who is more, is the lover of one of his minor students, 24 years his junior.

      After the "death" of his "father", Tiphaine draws a moving portrait of André-Louis Auzière: "I adored him, he was a being apart, a nonconformist who held on to his anonymity more than anything. We must respect him." [article from Paris-Match of October 7, 2020, cover opposite]. Which - at the same time - had not prevented her from shamelessly betraying the anonymous nonconformist she adored to the benefit of her sister's classmate! As Laurence and Sebastien always show - like their "mother" - a modesty bordering on muteness about their relationship with their ghostly father we don't know if they shared their younger sister's curiously contradictory feelings...

      To summarize. The being apart and dignified banker forty years old regularly finds his wife in bed with a teenager, spends his weekends alone with his youngest daughter while his wife cheats on him... takes the first train to Lille and disappears until his death on December 24, 2019, abandoning wife, children, relations, reputation and money... Once again we are confronted with the absurdity of the official story that tries - very clumsily - to hide a frightening reality.

      As it has already been demonstrated before that the marriage Brigitte Trogneux - André-Louis Auzière is fictitious for lack of the existence of the husband, it is necessarily the same for the Auzière family ! But if there is no tangible trace of the real existence of the Phantom of the Bank, it is not the same for the "Auzière" children. They are real and were at once witnesses, accomplices and victims of the actions of their "mother". Before asking the question of their true identity, we must already question what they have suffered. Despite the lack of formal evidence, everything points to Brigitte/Jean-Michel Trogneux as the real father of Emmanuel Macron.

      But also as the author of a sexual attack on a minor of 13 years doubling as an incest according to the unambiguous statements - for once! - of the father/wife and the son/husband. If "Brigitte" was capable of such a crime on her son how could she imagine that she could not also have committed it on her other children, the Auzière  children? Tiphaine admits it moreover : the three "Auzière" children were witnesses to the sexual assault on Manu, found it perfectly normal... and probably participated in it if we judge with what amoral candor a lawyer and politician tells about the sexual life of her "mother" and her very young lover !

      I remain reserved about the conclusions in the last paragraph, which I think are plausible hypoytheses but currently quite unlikely. I also have a small reservation about the whole demonstration because it is a reasoning by the absurd out of Mathematics. But, if it is not implacable, it certainly helps to understand how improbable is the Auzière family that is presented to us. And the spectrum of hypotheses widens.

    17. (A) The Gabrielle Russier alibi

      The Gabrielle Russier case in 1968/1969 had upset many people. Here it is summarized by the introduction to her page Wikipedia :

      Gabrielle Russier, born April 29, 1937 in Paris and died September 1, 1969 in Marseille, was a professor agrégée of literature. Following a love affair with one of her sixteen-year-old students, she was sentenced to a one-year suspended prison term for kidnapping and abduction of a minor. She committed suicide in her apartment in Marseille.

      Her story has inspired many artistic works such as André Cayatte's film, Mourir d'aimer (1971), Serge Reggiani's Gabrielle (1970) [paroles], Anne Sylvestre's Des fleurs pour Gabrielle [1971] [paroles] and Mourir d'aimer by Charles Aznavour (1971) [paroles), or Josée Dayan's TV movie, Mourir d'aimer (2009), which will be criticized by the protagonists of the case.
      Three other vintage items: 1 2 3.

      From a distance, it may seem like there is a parallelism with the Brigitte case: a love affair between a teacher and a high school student. On closer inspection, the differences are very important. At the beginning of the affair, it appears that the young man, Christian, was at least two years older than Emmanuel (at that age, it matters, he was over the age of criminal majority for minors of 16) and that Gabrielle was 16 years younger than Brigitte/Jean-Michel. Brigitte turns out to be a transsexual who conceals his condition and has not experienced rejection, stigma, or incarceration.

      Still, the Brigitte "legend" was created to facilitate a connection with the Russier case. The age of the high school student was increased ("He had just turned seventeen"), that of the teacher was decreased (Brigitte is 8 years younger than Jean-Michel), the transsexuality was hidden. The spotlight has been on the age gap (20 years and then 24 years) and the romance of a great love (as in "dying to love") has been activated. In 2017, and even now for the majority of French people who are unaware of Jean-Michel's reality, this resonance in the subconscious worked.

      This March 17, NBI (The hermit Ze Qe Fan) also mentioned this on his Telegram channel:

      Effectively, we knowingly used the frame of the Gabrielle Russier case to set up from scratch the narrative of the mythical love at first sight of the unusual lovers. One played on the similarity of the situations (however completely fictitious), the tragic character of the Russier affair, its impact in the memory and the collective unconsciousness to impose a gilded legend which has strictly no relationship with the affair of the end of the 1960s.

      The Manu-Brigitte affair was created from scratch to justify the unjustifiable and to focus attention on a very complacent version of which all the elements and testimonies were concocted by the protagonists themselves and intended to conceal a sordid affair of pedocriminality hiding even worse. There has never been a public affair, a complaint, an investigation, a trial, a media debacle... except the one deliberately provoked for political purposes by the Macron couple. Never has young Emmanuel undergone a three-week sleep cure in a psychiatric clinic, nor has he been subsequently committed to a psychiatric asylum, placed in a boarding school hundreds of kilometers away from his family and his lover... And never has Brigitte been the subject of a complaint filing, nor has she spent a minute in police custody, not to mention a detention or any conviction for sexual assault on a minor of 13 years of age by a person with authority!

      If the Russier affair was over-mediatized it is, in part, because of the socio-political context of the time: the events of May 68, the liberation of morals, the resignation of General De Gaulle, the Markovic affair and the election of Pompidou... And when the press has a bone to pick, it only lets go of it when there is nothing left. The media hype has also contributed to the intellectual and cultural hype... involuntarily fanned by the rigid behavior of the self-proclaimed representatives of order and morality. By today's standards, France in the 1960s is a different planet...

      "Brigitte Auzière" French teacher at Lycée La Providence in Amiens circa 1993, class photo with her students.

      This parallel between the two cases is also discussed on this article from, also touching on the Olivier Duhamel case and the MeToo movement The headline is characteristic of the accusatory inversions of the Macron couple : "Macron wants to " criminalize sexual relations between an adult and a minor of 15 years "". Similarly Brigitte fights against harassment at school :

      Gabrielle Russier had been expelled from the National Education. Brigitte Macron is introduced as a teacher by Minister Blanquer on November 18, 2021. We see that students and teachers are muzzled, victims of government harassment.

      Already in September 2020, the pedocriminal dared to pose on the cover of a magazine against child abuse.
      Below: header of a article from Marie Claire from May 2018 (link).

    18. (A) The brothers Jean-Louis and Louis Auzière

      Above, we find the photo, this time colored, supposedly of Brigitte Macron's wedding to her first husband André-Louis Auzière, in 1974. Already seen and studied in Chapter 9 and in Appendix A 9, we know that it is faked. Proceeding mostly by facial resemblance, we estimated that the bride and groom would be Jean-Louis Auzière and his first wife Suzanne Spray, so it would be sometime before 1966. The two persons on the right would have been added and would be Jean Trogneux and Simone Pujol, the parents of Jean-Michel / Brigitte Trogneux. The two people on the left, given their approximate age, are André's parents, Louis Auzière (Jean-Louis' older brother) and Renée Costes, 57 and 54 years old in 1974, 49 and 46 years old if they are photographed around 1966.

      To better understand, let's study the genealogy of Jean-Louis Auzière. He was born in Paris 9th arrondissement on February 28, 1943 (act), the son of Marius Auzière and Germaine Bary who were just mentioned. A extract from the 1936 census of Meudon shows the Auzière family before Jean-Louis was born. In addition to the parents, aged 43 (he is "chief accountant") and 40 (no profession), it was then composed of three children, Louis 19, Suzanne 17, Marcelle 13, grandmother Anna Bary 75 and a cousin Reine Bary 57.

      Marius Auzière (young left) and Germaine Bary probably in 1965 for their 50th wedding anniversary.
      Photos of the fiche of Marius Auzière on the kensi13 Geneanet website.
      Certainly they are not in the wedding photo above.

      From this family, it should be remembered that Jean-Louis arrived very late in 1943, when his parents were 50 and 46, his brother Louis 26, his sisters Suzanne and Marcelle 24 and 20. This means that the famous André-Louis Auzière is hardly a new child of Marius and Germaine. He is rather a grandson and it is indeed what the "legend" of Brigitte claims, he would be a child of Louis, therefore a nephew of Jean-Louis.

      We are thus led to be interested in the life of Louis, the big brother of Jean-Louis. Louis Alexandre Michel Auzière (1917-1985), company administrator, married Renée Costes (1920-2014) in Montpellier in 1939. They are next to the groom in the wedding photo. Here is the fiche of Louis on the kensi13  Geneanet site:

      (sisters and daughters are listed with their husband's name)

      The positioning of André-Louis (actually André Louis) in the list of his 5 siblings appears quite natural here. In her already cited 2019 book "He had just turned seventeen," Sylvie Bommel describes in one page the itinerary across Africa of this French civil servant during the decolonization era. The UPC (Union des Populations du Cameroun) considers that he rigged an election in 1954 (documents  1, 2). We have seen that André-Louis is supposed to be born on February 28, 1951 in Eséka, a small commune in Cameroon created in 1954, and doubts have arisen as to the validity of this birthplace. However, the following document (from the local annals of Eséka), dated January 1, 1952, shows, on the contrary, that it appears likely:

      As a tentative conclusion, we still have no proof of the existence of André Louis Auzière, but his existence as told in the Brigitte "legend" appears very plausible. This André-Louis may have been born in Eséka in 1951. If this is the case, did he live for a long time? Did he meet the Trogneux family? The trickery of the photo does not go in this direction, but there is a background of truth and we do not know how far it goes ...

      April 4. I discovered an interesting hypothesis, even if I don't believe it very much, which consists in considering that Jean-Louis and André-Louis Auzière are the same person. The fact that Jean-Louis has for middle name André and that he signs André (and not Jean-Louis) is particularly disturbing. In this case the marriage André-Louis - Brigitte could have existed, except that Brigitte was still Jean-Michel in 1974... One can imagine an intermittent identity or a posteriori... Here's how Webcraft talks about it on February 14 (link) :

      In 1984, according to "legend", André-Louis Auzière became deputy director of the Banque Française du Commerce Extérieur (page Wikipedia) in Strasbourg and moved to Truchtersheim, in the affluent district le Hoeft. This bank closed in 1996 and no trace of activity of this sub-manager seems to remain.

      It was in December 2020 that Closer announced the death of André-Louis Auzière, one year earlier (article)
      (photography Stéphane Lemouton). It is the prenominal André-Louis that is used.

      As a tentative conclusion, we still have no proof of the existence of André Louis Auzière, but his existence as told in the Brigitte "legend" appears very plausible. This André-Louis may have been born in Eséka in 1951. If this is the case, did he live for a long time? Did he meet the Trogneux family? The fact that it was necessary to fabricate a fake wedding photo does not support this, but there is a basis of truth and we do not know, at this stage, how far it goes ...

      April 4. I discover an explanation that consists in considering that Jean-Louis and André-Louis Auzière are the same person. The fact that Jean-Louis' middle name is André and that he sometimes signs André (and not Jean-Louis) is particularly troubling. In this case, the marriage André-Louis - Brigitte could have existed, except that Brigitte, in 1974, date of this supposed marriage, was still Jean-Michel... One can imagine an intermittent or a posteriori identity... Here is how Webcraft talks about it on February 14 (link) :

      When Jean-Louis Auzière goes by the name André.
      Another extraordinary character is her husband ALA [André-Louis Auzière]. This one corresponds to the second administrative identity created in 1951 for JLA [Jean-Louis Auzière] born in 1943. This one was declared as their child by his grand parents. His administrative mother in fact his grandmother was 46 years old at his birth. She already had three other children born in 1917, 1919 and 1923. JLA was always called by his middle name André. It is him who under the identity ALA married Baphomet [Jean-Michel / Brigitte] in 1974. ALA, born abroad, never asked for a SS [Social Security] number, contrary to JLA who obtained it automatically, being born in France. It is thus under JLA's SS number that ALA's career was made at the BFCE and Natexis. However, he signed AA [André Auzière] as many documents attest. The JLA identity was used to take shares in companies. These company documents show that the AA signature is assured and consistent over several years, whereas JLA's signature over the same period is very inconsistent and therefore changing. Indeed JLA has always called himself Andre.

      Some of the witnesses to JLA's existence are sincere. Notably the witness mentioned in the book "He had just turned seventeen by Sylvie Bommel". This witness, a former commercial director of the Autonomous Port of Strasbourg [Jean-Marc Uhrweiller, Chapter 28] knew JLA as a child in Algeria and always called him André. It is therefore possible that JLA served as a cover for Baphomet during his stay in Alsace. ALA on the other hand inherited from his parents at their death and therefore had a tax number. In 2003, ALA sold a property in joint ownership on rue du Faubourg Saint Honoré in Paris. JLA certainly transferred funds from ALA's bank account to access the proceeds of the sale. JMT [Jean-Michel Trogneux] also inherited from his parents and owns a property in joint ownership with Baphomet in Le Touquet. Finally, JMT was a witness at Baphomet's [fake] wedding with ALA and Baphomet [no, the 1st Brigitte Auzière, cf. Chapter 29] was a witness at JMT's wedding in 1980 [with Véronique Dreux]. The facts are statute-barred and most of the accomplices are dead. The crime was almost perfect.

      April 14. This intermittent and after-the-fact dual identity is confirmed with the new Proba / Brigitte Auzière hypothesis, niece of JLA and mother of the three Auzière children (Chapter 29, Appendix A 25). It appears that Jean-Louis was going by the name André in documents that did not require an ID, such as phone books. So in hindsight, it could be believed that it was André-Louis. And if Proba was not (officially, seemingly, and probably) his uncle's spouse, she lived in his reported apartment (at least in the phone book) briefly in Issy les Moulineaux and more extensively in Croix (see end of Appendix A 30 for phone books). This led one to believe that the father was André(-Louis) when in fact it was Jean-Michel Trogneux, Jean-Louis' great friend.

    19. (A) Brigitte when she was transgender Veronique

      As noted in the disclaimer at the beginning of the file, the comparison of audio voice curves between Brigitte Macron and Veronique the transsexual interviewed in 1977 proves scientifically that the two bearers of these first names are one person (see red box in Chapter 22). Added to this is a common speech tic, a common gesture. It's been more than two months since this comparison has been online, more than ten thousand Internet users on this site alone have listened to it, and no one, neither here nor elsewhere, has brought the slightest element of doubt about this common identity. And since December, the Macron couple has taken refuge in denial without showing the slightest new element, and so have the major media. Only Le Canard Enchaîné, Médiapart and a few others have not dared to deny and have remained silent. Such is the situation on this March 27.

      Véronique / Brigitte Macron was thus born a man. And very probably, under the name of Jean-Michel Trogneux so much is solid the beam of collected indices. We are now numerous to have the intimate conviction of it. Since this similarity is acquired, it is interesting to exploit as well as possible the information collected on Véronique. However, the video interview of the INA is truncated. By consulting the Inathèque, which is only accessible in research libraries, Xavier Poussard obtained the entire interview and communicated it in writing [F&D504p11].

      First, here is the transcript of the first part, the video interview available :

      Francois Desplats (FD) - I can just assure you of the authenticity of Veronique's testimony. Veronique, I would like to know if, at the time you had this operation, which is the one you had, it was a difficult moment for you or it was just a culmination of something that had happened before ?
      Veronique (V) - I believe that in fact there is not transformation because the psyche is already feminine and the individual, in this case me, is already prepared to this kind of mutation by necessity in the sense that one feels woman and one regularizes a situation without more. There is no mutation, there is regularization
      FD - You are completely female so you were operated on how long ago ?

      V - I don't really like the word become completely female. That is, we become a kind of woman who can copulate but cannot procreate. Hence the legal problems that we will talk about later. That is to say that the integration is done without problem on the individual level. They only exist on a social level;

      Remember that, for not answering the last question, Veronique does not explicitly say that she is transsexual, with operation. We have reason to believe that this operation, if it took place, was done in the late 1980s. And it is possible that it did not exist. We do not know therefore if Jean-Michel / Brigitte is a transsexual become woman or a transvestite making pass for a woman. We can say that he is a transsexual in the broad sense, to simplify. Here is now the unpublished part, absent from the video made public on the site INA :

      FD - You have a job that we're not going to reveal here, let's just say it's a public facing job
      V - That's right, I'm a craftsman. I have regular contact with the public. I'm around customers. I don't have any problems. I used to have some, because I had a phenotypic gender, meaning an ambiguous appearance. I was taken for what I was not, that is to say for a homosexual, which was not the case, neither in my behavior, nor in my way of thinking. But unfortunately, this image resulted in a non-integration. And I regularized a situation for my integration. And I live very legally and very honorably. For the civil status, it is possible to change your first name for an ambiguous one. This is very important because it allows insertion, or pseudo social insertion. In the sense that there are always problems but that the problems are soluble at the administrative level, that is to say, by mutual agreement. But legally, there is no solution unlike all foreign legislation except for Belgian legislation which is modelled on ours.
      FD - Do you feel that you are now completely yourself? Do you no longer have any problem identifying yourself since you were of yourself since you had the operation?
      V - To tell the truth I only had identification problems with third parties, I didn't have any with myself. I considered myself as what I was as what I was, that is to say as a woman having a body which did not belong to her. It is very difficult to conceive for someone who is well in her skin. I use the term "comfortable in her skin" because it's the typical image because I didn't have any problems but people created them for me. Now I don't have a problem. To tell you the truth, this surgery, that is, this removal of an organ that is useless in our case because it is both unusable and unused...
      FD - Do you live alone?
      V - I am not with someone but I lived with a woman. And conceived this union in the style of George Sand and Chopin. Chopin was most likely a transsexual [Note by Xavier Poussard: we had not heard of this transphobic conspiracy theory...]. His melody, his way of playing, indicates it quite clearly. [...] I think the image that has been given of the Rimbaud/Verlaine union is a distorted, caricatured image that does not correspond in any way...[FD stops the conversation]

      On the basis of these words, Xavier Poussard lists new similar elements between Brigitte and Veronique :
      1. Veronique likes Chopin a lot. Yet, in the "legend", Emmanuel only plays Chopin on the piano one-on-one with Brigitte.
      2. Veronique has a certain fascination for the Rimbaud/Verlaine couple, who were cited to enter the Pantheon, on presidential will, probably on Brigitte's impulse. This one says, in an article of January 27, 2022: "In poetry, my favorites are Baudelaire and Rimbaud, an overwhelming, absolute genius".
      3. Veronique appears admiring of the platonic love George Sand / Frederic Chopin, Brigitte devoted a university thesis to courtly love.

      For this too, although it is less certain than the comparison of voices, Veronique and Brigitte are the same person. Some of Veronique's other words could be exploited. Assuming she is telling the truth, she worked in a craft trade and had both a male and female first name from 1977 to 1989. We know almost nothing about these years, except for her marriage in 1980, as a man, and the birth of her five children from 1975 to 1984, there is still much to discover, especially for the married couple Jean-Michel Trogneux - Véronique Dreux.

      So it could be that Jean-Michel in 1977 took on a dual identity for his three lives. With the first name Jean-Michel as a man for his two family lives. With a mixed first name (like Dominique, Camille...) as a woman for his third life, his job, we do not know where. Then, from about 1989, he systematically called himself Brigitte. The first name Véronique was probably only used for this television interview.

      April 26. I am advised that the full video is available at this link.

    20. (A) The false trail of the Gallice jewelry store in Toulon

      This Appendix, created on March 28, was first titled "Jean-Michel Trogneux and the Gallice jewelry store in Toulon". We were then sure of the following information.

      Let's go back to a question that has just been asked: what craft may have been practiced by Jean-Michel Trogneux, aka Véronique, in 1977 and in the 1980s ? Chocolatier ? Perhaps, but rather a jeweler, since it is established that he owned a jewelry store in Toulon (where he married in 1980 with Véronique Dreux, as we have seen). Here is what Xavier Poussard says [F&D501p3] :

      We find no trace of marriage, nor address of Jean-Michel Trogneux in the "Bulletin officiel des annonces civiles et commerciales" of June 12, 1973 where a "Jean-Michel Henri Trogneux" acquires the jewelry store "Gallice" located at 25, rue des Boucheries in Toulon (Var), an address that takes the place of his home.

      [opposite 25 rue des Boucheries in Toulon, currently a nail bar]
      [until 2019, there was a Gallice jewelry store in Lavandou, in the Var, created on 1/1/1973, with a new agent in 2004, link]
      Rejected information

      How could they have been so wrong and how, on April 26, did they realize the mistake ? That's what's told here :

      Even though Xavier Poussard specifically stated his source of information, we wanted to verify it. Here is that source :

      Document A

      So by one had to query the "bulletin des annonces civiles et commerciales" from 1973. But this search engine no longer worked the same way. Depending on whether one searched by "Gallice" (link) or "Trogneux" (link), one would get, each time on the same page 13.133 the following extracts :

      Document B

      Document C

      By concatenating a morcau from "document B" with another piece of "document C", an "extended document A" similar to "document A" with additional information  was obtained:

      Expanded Document A

      We could have stopped there and confirmed the Gallice information. Fortunately, there were several of us and one of us asked the right questions. Do these two fragments of ads, automatically assembled a few months ago, manually assembled with the new version of Google Books, reconstitute the ad ? Or do they belong to different ads? The wider knowledge of the ads and a careful reading of the "extended document A" gave the answer. Is Jean-Michel Trogneux the buyer or the manager? Can a jewelry store transform "materials, especially iron" ? Is it not rather the neighboring company, Picardie-Métal that processes iron ? And it is based in Blangy-Tronville, where Jean-Michel Trogneux married Véronique Dreux in 1980...

      At this point, we could only notice that there had been a confusion: the first part of "A" and "A étendu" corresponds to the Gallice jewelry store in Toulon, while the second part, the one concerning Jean-Michel Trogneux, corresponds to Métal-Picardie. The final proof was brought by a second assembly, of a "document D", which reconstitutes the integral announcement of Picardie-Métal :

      Document D (larger)

      However, the Gallice jewelry store was firmly anchored in the history of Jean-Michel Trogneux. It seemed to be linked to the remarriage of Véronique Dreux in Toulon, although this marriage took place in this city only by pure coincidence. It was especially confirmed by contacts of Natacha and Xavier Poussard. This one explains himself as follows [F&D503p5] :

      It so happens that, by chance of common relations, we were able to get in touch with a friend of Jean-Jacques Trogneux [son of Jean-Michel, see three chapters before]. A relatively close friend since he was even his roommate for several years, in the early 2000s. By contacting this individual, we thought we could finally validate or invalidate our working hypothesis as simply as definitively. However, during the first telephone exchange (December 13 at 11 am), our correspondent certified to us that he had never physically seen Jean-Jacques Trogneux's father, had never seen photographs of him, and that Jean-Jacques Trogneux had never spoken to him about his father.

      When we submitted our working hypothesis to him, the individual remained pensive before remembering that at the time, Jean-Jacques Trogneux often spoke of a young politician who was going to break the mold and that it was probably Emmanuel Macron.

      Three hours later, we were contacted again by the same individual who, in a completely different tone, affirmed that the current existence of Jean-Michel Trogneux was proven, that he had been a jeweler in Toulon, that he lived at 14, rue des Vergeaux, that Jean-Jacques Trogneux organized parties at the home of this father who simply did not wish to appear because of a failed curriculum and an unattractive physique ("a little fatty").

      Furthermore, we needed to contact a third person who would tell us more. This third party did not respond to our solicitations.

      This briefed witness brings out a Jean-Michel Trogneux with the "physical ungrateful" type of "little fatty", which will be taken up by the Elysian agents Moadab and Blanrue (Appendix A 7) to the point of giving it substance. This illustrates to what extent the entourage of the Trogneuxes and the Macrons tried, discreetly, to stem the tide of revelation.

      Similarly, the fiche geneanet of Jean-Michel Trogneux on the famous base, which is suspected of being remotely controlled by the Elysée, insists on the Gallice  jewelry store:

      Thus ends the story of the Gallice jewelry store in Toulon, thus begins the story of the Metal-Picardy company in Blangy-Tronville, which continues in Appendix A 33.

      So there is evidence here that the Elysée is following very closely the progress of the investigation into Jean-Michel Trogneux and is doing its best to cover its tracks, even by supporting a false information fortuitously triggered. The whole "counter-investigation of Moadab and Blanrue" goes in this direction (Appendix A 7). And one may wonder about the Elysian appropriateness of unveiling Emmanuel Macron's preparatory class photo (Appendix A 29). Or to inform that André-Louis Auzière was "reclined in a psychiatric clinic" while having it denied by Tiphaine Auzière (Annex D 10). May 15. A correspondent thus presents the Elysée's strategy for maintaining state secrecy :

      We are faced with three levels of disinformation :
      1. The first level is the celebrity press, which represents a veritable inundation of mushy lies, intended to drown the most virtuous of researchers. It even spills over into the political press (Le Monde, Le Figaro...). And it is not expensive: it works by itself thanks to a very developed collaborationism in our country, the one that our friend Lionel Labosse considers under the scatological angle...
      2. The second level is the frontal denial, which we suffered this winter following the breakthrough operated by these ladies (Natacha Rey - Amandine Roy), the "conspiracy news", there too relayed with very good grace by the merdiatic world.
      3. The 3rd level is already more professional, and no longer plays on this sounding board effect: it directly addresses the hard core of brigittology. It's Blanrue and Moadab [Appendix A 7], probably also this Kots with his falsely faked and falsely dated photo [Appendix A 11], others surely. Even to the point of exploiting our mistakes as with the Gallice jewelry store.

      Along with disinformation (including "trolling" on the Internet), there is, symmetrically, censorship. It can be useful to the researcher in pointing out the right leads...

      However, none of this is as effective as the very upstream and sophisticated editing done by Jean-Louis Auzière. I think he's really strong.

    21. (A) Emmanuel Macron's big sister, stillborn

      If we are to believe the "legend" told in the people magazines, Emmanuel Macron would have had a stillborn older sister. This is so told in a article from France-Dimanche of February 25, 2017 :

      Emmanuel Macron: The drama that haunted his childhood!

      The energetic and charismatic presidential candidate, Emmanuel Macron, hides deep inside a family tragedy that occurred shortly before his birth. [...]

      When you read the biography of the Picard, you discover that he is the eldest of a sibling group of three children. This is not entirely accurate. Indeed, ten months before bringing Emmanuel into the world, Jean-Michel and Françoise experienced the cruelest of trials: losing their baby. A stillborn baby girl. Could the couple have avoided this terrible accident? It is possible that being both doctors, he at the city hospital and she at the Social Security, this question haunted them. Even though just two months after the tragedy, Françoise was pregnant again.

      Is it to implore divine protection on their unborn boy that they named him Emmanuel, which means "God is with us" ? In any case, it was a gift from heaven that fell to them on December 21, 1977, four days before Christmas. But if life takes over, death is still lurking. As Claude Askolovitch writes in Vanity Fair: "Françoise carries the wound. Every February, the pain is throbbing. Retired today, she exhales a suspended suffering that I feel the day I meet her because she wants to talk to me about her son." How does a child who succeeds a dead baby build himself? [...]

      Here is this child's record in the almost official genealogy of the geneanet  database:

      While in the same database the dates of marriage (circa 1976) and divorce (circa 2010) of the couple Jean-Michel Macron / Françoise Noguès are approximate (Chapter 17), we have for this stillborn child an unusual luxury of details for a child without a first name who did not live. He was female, born and died on February 22, 1976 at 6:10 a.m. at St. Antoine Hospital in Paris 12ème, recorded at the registry office under the act number 530.

      First problem: the baby would not have been born 10 months before Emmanuel but one year and 10 months before. One also wonders why he would have been born in Paris. The maternity hospital St. Antoine, closed in 2012, was not particularly known for difficult births. There's a lot more embarrassing...

      There are files of the deceased in France for public use. A brigittologist with a good grasp of how to access this data searched for the stillborn children Noguès and Macron (even with spelling approximations). He found only two references  "Macron, Philippe Marc Michel born in Croix on 20/09/1970 and died the same day in Lille", "Noguès, Sophie Joëlle Marie born in Rennes on 01/07/1974 and died the same day in Rennes". He then extended his search to children who died before their second birthday. Then he had a particular attention on Paris 12th in 1976: he found 4 girls and 14 boys whose names and first names do not allow any connection. Finally on February 22, 1976 on all France : there were only two babies (boys) born and died this day, one in the Meuse, the other in Lyon.

      There is still one record without a first name, even if it is rare. There are only 3 children without a first name who died on the day of their birth in France in the 70's (which have nothing to do with our case). There would be the even rarer case of a stillborn child not declared or not received and processed by the INSEE, which says that there may be gaps.

      So this child seems to be fictitious, but why? What are we trying to hide? Adding the approximate date of marriage "around 1976" and the fact that Emmanuel knows very little about his brother and sister, the most likely hypothesis is that he would have been born out of wedlock, on December 21, 1977, with Françoise Noguès for mother and with an undeclared father. Jean-Michel Macron would have adopted him at the time of the marriage, perhaps in 1978, probably before 1979, year of birth of the brother Laurent. Here is what Sylvie Bommel says in 2019, in her book "He had just turned seventeen", about the intensity of Emmanuel 's family ties:

      In 2017, in his book "Revolution, he devoted five pages to his grandmother Manette. Against barely one to his parents. And two lines to his brother Laurent, and his sister, Estelle, just enough time to mention that they are radiologist and nephrologist and that he was therefore the only one in the family not to participate in medical discussions that lasted hours. No mention either of his half-brother Gabriel, born in 2005 from his father's second marriage, and even less of his father's partner, Hélène, a psychiatrist in a hospital in Amiens (and a doctor to boot!). On the other hand, he takes care to mention the first names of the three children of Brigitte and their spouses and those of his grandchildren [...].
      So there is not a word about the stillborn big sister who would have "hated his childhood"...

      The stillborn child allows to accredit that the couple of Emmanuel's official parents would have been constituted well before his birth, which is reassuring for the public and avoids indiscreet searches. Emmanuel's middle name is Jean-Michel, the name of Françoise's older brother, a doctor, who would have helped his sister during this difficult period. Manette, Françoise's mother, would also have provided valuable assistance, which explains her attachment to the child. This would mean that, at a young age, Emmanuel Macron was called Emmanuel Noguès... There remain, in my opinion less likely, the other hypotheses where Jean-Michel Macron would have recognized Emmanuel from birth, whether he was the biological father or not.

      In a very recent article, of March 15, 2022, Jean-Michel Macron, states that, on the personal life of his son, "too much nonsense has been told. There are some in the bundle of hypotheses presented on this page, but it has been more than five years that nonsense, presented as certainties, is expressed by the Macron couple and that his own parents, brothers, sisters, cousins let say and sometimes support. This can only get worse as the lies, the denials, the silences grow and become more and more known, generating and multiplying new nonsense. This will become more and more unbearable for the close family that the Macron couple has chosen to sacrifice on the altar of their notoriety.

      Let's go back to the stillborn child. What Françoise Noguès (probably briefed by her great friend Brigitte...) told Vanity Fair, taken up in several newspapers, would therefore be a tale to make the chaumières cry, invented by Mimi Marchand and Brigitte Macron. At that time, February 2017, it was necessary to tenderize the electorate and invite them to vote for a candidate "pudique about his childhood", as written in the article of France Dimanche, having overcome this terrible ordeal, so trustworthy... Today, we know that around Macron there are lies everywhere, no trust is possible...

    22. (A) Alger 1963

      On March 29 Amandine Roy interviewed during a >>>video>>> of 2 h 2 min (censored by Youtube) the geopolitical writer Morad El Hattab, whom Richard Boutry had hosted for France-Soir in January 2021 (interview).

      As with the interviews with Natacha Rey, this is far too long and hard to follow. Sure, there are (near the middle) some additional revelations about Moadab and Blanrue's "counter-investigation" (Appendix A 7) that we already knew were bogus. Most importantly, there are two really new revelations (at timings 1:19:45 and 1:44:26), here they are put together very briefly in one:
      >>>video>>> of 2 min 14
      Let's start with the second revelation. In his interview, Morad El Hattab states that, according to the census prior to military service in 1963, Jean-Michel Trogneux was then living in Algiers at 87 Boulevard Camille Saint Saens in Algiers (now Bd Mohamed V) where he was a student. He was then 18 years old.

      Excerpt from the census. The notation "Confectioner" could mean that JMT lived at the confectioner's at this address,
      maybe a friend of his parents...

      Now, precisely, Brigitte said that she studied in Algiers :

      Article from December 1, 2017 on (another article).
      Brigitte, the wife of the French president, Emmanuel Macron, will visit, the Central Faculty of Algiers (Benyoucef Benkhedda University) where she would have memories. Indeed, Emmanuel Macron will make an official visit to Algeria on December 6 as part of his tour in Africa. According to our information, the Algerian authorities have been informed of the desire of the first lady of France to visit the Fac Centrale d'Alger, where she would have studied. Currently, we have noticed all the same work of beautification of the university in question. According to our information, the work targets more particularly a room that Brigitte Macron would like to visit.

      Finally Brigitte Macron did not make the trip and the presidential visit to the faculty was canceled in extremis (article). Do you think there will be a denial proving that she too was studying in Algiers, but much later, since she was 10 years old in 1963 ? We will not have one and those who say that Brigitte is not Jean-Michel or that it is a rumor will keep silent or will lie again. One can also be surprised by such studies one year after the difficult peace of Evian...

      Let's remember that in the memories of Brigitte's youth, there is also her presence in the United States during the moon landing of 1969. At 16, she was supposed to study in Amiens, it is certainly, once again, Jean-Michel who, at 24, was then studying in the USA...

      The rest is in the Chapter 27.

    23. (A) The Obama precedent

      The first of Morad El Hattab's two revelations (video in the previous Appendix) is in my opinion the most important. It allows us to better understand the Brigitte "legend" and the denial operated by the Macron couple.

      When I started to study the file, last December, I found a documentation in English of 66 pages on Brigitte. And I had been surprised to learn there that Michelle Obama was also born a man. At the time, I did a quick search and since nothing seemed obvious and safe, I had dismissed this information.

      To the left Mickael Robinson, with his friend Barack Obama (disputed photo, comparison with variant or original more feminine, the retoucher is good...). On the right Michelle Obama, née Robinson, with her husband, presidentvof the United States from 2009 to 2017. Is this the same person  ? Yes for this article, no for this one.

      It came back to my mind when it became certain that Emmanuel Macron would run for president again. How is it possible to believe that for 5 years the media and the population will continue to consider Brigitte as a woman? The only really convincing answer that came to my mind is this: because there was the Obama precedent. Since the Obama couple succeeded in hiding, with the complicity of the media, that Michelle was born a man, the Macron couple must also succeed. Forgetting that Brigitte is a pedocriminal. This term is used by Morad El Hattab, who cites Article 227-22 paragraph 1 (here), in correspondence with Wikipedia, we have seen. This is not the case for Michelle Obama, the difference is key.

      I don't know if Michelle Obama was born a man and I don't care, she lives in her corner with no impact on us. By the quick overview I did (and I don't want to go beyond that), I find it troubling that she was unable to provide a denial (that's easy, dna, blood test...) and it seems to me that there are less factual elements than for Brigitte (it would be less clear cut for physical appearance too). Conversely, I know what it is for Brigitte Macron and we are millions to be concerned by her pedocriminality and the misdeeds of her spouse. We need to get out of a governance based on their lies of all kinds. It has led us to a poorly treated disease, to a generalized piquet with uncontrolled effects, to an apartheid and to the despair of too many caregivers. And the debt etc. And this perverted couple wants to screw us for 5 more years "until the end" !

      This precedent is a big plus for Macron. A few articles, like this one, are already finding an argument in it. Those who advise him probably relied on this and more specifically a very special adviser, this is what Morad El Hattab just revealed. He did not think that Mimi Marchand (see Appendix D 10) could have imagined everything so much and he looked elsewhere. Here's what he found (slightly transposed remarks) :

      I was looking, in this scenario, who might have prepared this before. I thought, this can't be right, there's an American in the loop. But I found a trace in an article in the newspaper Le Monde from 2019 of a man named Joel Benenson. He comes to Bercy [Paris, Ministry of the Economy] in 2015 when Macron is a minister to advise the Macrons on their communication. So who is Joel Benenson? He is the one who handled the construction of the Obama couple.

      Xavier Poussard also talks about this visit [F&D498p6] :

      Reputed member of the Grand Orient de France [Challenges, February 23, 2019], it is with a fairly extensive address book that Ismaël Emelien joined Emmanuel Macron at Bercy in 2014. The one for whom he has been working behind the scenes for at least two years will even introduce him as his "closest collaborator" to the influential "spin doctor" Joel Benenson during his visit to Bercy, in November 2015. Introduced by the Sarkozist Julien Vaulpré via the networks of the French American Foundation, Joel Benenson arrives haloed by his success in the 2008 and 2012 American presidential elections, having developed the strategy of selling the Obama couple rather than a program.

      Let us note here that the more than substantiated suspicions about a transsexuality of Michelle Obama (cf. F&D 487] are today worth to Barack Obama's wife to be listed in the register of "famous transgenders and transvestites" established by the very informed website on the issue [site in French].

      On the left, in February 2014, Emmanuel Macron, accompanying François Hollande to Washington, had dinner with Joel Benenson [article with guest list, photo by Mark Wilson, Getty Images]. At right, Joel Benenson, referred to as "Obama's Guru" in a article in Challenge, was in Paris in July 2019 [photo AFP].

      "Selling a couple rather than a program": this is indeed what happened in 2017, we have had the illustration of it multiple times in this file. The Macron strategy was copied from the Obama strategy. Joel Benenson conceived it, Brigitte Macron and Mimi Marchand implemented it, that's what appears now.

      Joel Benenson was the chief strategy officer in Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign (article). She had lost.

    24. (A) Possible link between Emmanuel Macron and J.-J. Trogneux

      Numerous are the families with biological fathers who are not the declared fathers, so much so that French legislation prohibits DNA comparisons, except in exceptional cases. In families with an obscure past, such as the Trogneux and Macron families, it is therefore legitimate to ask questions about biological filiation. They are not unknown to the families, at least to the progenitors, and are kept as heavy secrets more or less shared, with estrangement or friendships kept but shaky. Many Internet users have been struck by a strong resemblance between Emmanuel Macron husband of Jean-Michel / Brigitte and Jean-Jacques Trogneux son of Jean-Michel (Chapter 11)) to the point that some, many also, consider that they are half-brothers by their father, which means that Emmanuel would be the son of Jean-Michel / Brigitte his wife. This is notably the thesis of the NBI file (at the beginning of chapter 24). It seems plausible to me, but I don't believe it. The present hypothesis, suggested by a correspondent, Maria, gives another explanation for the physical resemblance : they would be first cousins (or half, one common grandparent and not two).

      Manette [Germaine Arribet, married Noguès, Emmanuel's grandmother] was able to have a relationship with Jean Trogneux [father of Jean-Michel / Brigitte], and thus give birth to Françoise [Noguès, Emmanuel's mother]. She could, unlike others, be certain of this because of the absence of relations with her husband during this period. Françoise would then have had a special place. Through her biological father Jean Trogneux, with whom her mother Manette would have kept some links, she would have known very young her half-brother Jean-Michel /Brigitte. This explains both their long friendship, the resemblance between Manu and Jean-Jacques and the attitude of Manette during the liaison Brigitte-Manu. Somewhere, the fruits of his great love transient ...

      Hypothesis of cousinship explaining the resemblance between Emmanuel Macron and Jean-Jacques Trogneux

      Could Jean Trogneux be the biological father of Françoise Noguès?

      As for the half-brothers hypothesis, this first cousin hypothesis, although possible, seems to me unlikely for two reasons. First the physical resemblance between Jean Trogneux and Françoise is fair (confirmed by Betaface above), secondly we have no clue that Jean Trogneux, living in Amiens, and Germaine / Manette Arribet, living 30 km away, in Poix de Picardie (where Françoise was born) knew each other in 1950 (Françoise was born on December 8th 1950). Oh yes: when Manette went to buy macaroons in Amiens! Or an associative relationship, such as Rotary Club... This shows that the physical resemblance can be explained otherwise than by siblings. And I remind you that this notion of resemblance is subjective and easily leads to mistakes, we had an example with the photo of the gay pride 1977.

      May 15. Did Germaine Arribet, who had obtained her baccalaureate in 1935 (cut from the press, link) and who had married Jean Gabriel Noguès in 1939 (Chapter 17) go to teach in Algeria ? Is she this "Mrs. Noguès" from Algiers appointed in the village of isly as assistant teacher" ? This is indicated by a press clipping, opposite, from the Alger Républicain of September 15, 1945 (link). Thus, a meeting with Louis Auzière is possible, then through him with Jean Trogneux. There is certainly no strong indication of such a double meeting between Louis and Jean as well as between Louis and Germaine, but if Jean brought his son Jean-Michel to Algiers around 1960, it is probably because he knew people there...

    25. (A) The places where the Auzière children were born and lived.

      On April 12, Chloe Frammery (end of Chapter 28), in addition to her revelation about the Royal Palace communicated, without formal proof, the following information, delivered by a Social Security retiree from :
      • there is no record of André (or André-Louis) Auzière at Social Security, which confirms that he is a phantom character,
      • there is no record of Jean-Michel Trogneux's health card for the past 20 years, confirming that he has changed his identity,
      • Catherine Audoy worked in New York and Los Angeles in the 1980s, which we already knew about New York.
      • Two of the three Auzière children have an annotation in the margin of their vital records, without knowing more. This means that they were adopted or had their names changed, but it can be estimated that any other, less frequent, cause is possible. Logically, the two children in question would be the eldest Sebastien and Laurence born in 1975 and 1977, in similar family conditions, Tiphaine being born later in 1984.

      Parallel to this a correspondent sent us the following documents, already reported by Sylvie Bommel:
      • André Auzière is on the Croix directory, from 1977 to 1983.
      • An Auzière (probably André) is on the Issy-les-Moulineaux directory in 1975.

      Telephone boots from Issy les Moulineaux 1975 and Croix 1977. And extract from the one in Croix 1983.

      In Chapter 26, we echoed Xavier Poussard's [F&D504p10] statement that, according to the documents, the Auzière children had two birthplaces ('Sébastien, Laurence, Tiphaine). However, this reading appears to be erroneous. Let's take the case of Laurence :

      On one side (civil status) she was born in Amiens. On the other side, in the Amiens newspaper, she was born at 1 bis rue Gloriette, which is the address of a maternity hospital in Amiens, for parents living "Croix (Nord), residence Flandre, rue Holden, 91". So there is no contradiction, the place of birth is indeed Amiens. This is in fact what is marked on the convocation of the complaint against Natacha Rey. And, for the location, it matches what is marked in the directories.

      But this raises another question: why living in the suburbs of Paris (Issy-les-Moulineaux) or Lille (Croix), did the mother come to give birth in Amiens ? What answer can be given according to the two main scenarios selected :

      • Case 1 (hyp. AF): the mother of the three children is Catherine Audoy (end of Chapter 22 and Chapter 23). This would mean that Jean-Louis would have at the time 1975-1983 endorsed the paternity of Sebastien and Laurence (annotation in their marital status record). His role would thus go well beyond his presence on the photograph of marriage: he would have assumed the role of father of the three children (or of two of the three?), or at least he lived with them and their mother. Jean Louis Auzière would then have had a rather complicated double life between his official family (Susan Spray and the two children) and the one, hidden, with his lover Catherine Audoy and her three children. The two eldest could have been born under the name Audoy and recognized by (Jean-Louis) André later, Tiphaine having been recognized at birth. Catherine Audoy had her first husband, Francis Bayrou in 1966, who had remarried in 1974 [F&D504p8]. Chronologically, it is therefore possible. But why give birth in Amiens? Because of the presence of Jean-Michel Trogneux, Jean-Louis André's (JLA) great friend? But can we believe that JLA lived with his lover Catherine during several years, that he would not have made her any child but that he would have but that he would have accepted those that Jean-Michel regularly made for him? Unless we imagine that JLA, now sterile, solicits Jean-Michel for this purpose, and that he no longer wants to keep the children...

      • Case 2 (hyp. BD): the mother of the three children is Proba Auzière (Chapter 29). She would live with her uncle Jean-Louis André, while the father of her children was running Picardie Métal in Blangy-Tronville. And it is because of the father, also anchored in Amiens and appreciating the quality of the maternity hospital, that she would have come to give birth. It is certainly surprising, but when one arrives in a new commune (Issy or Croix), one prefers a solution where one is better surrounded. It is less surprising when this place is that of the spouse than when it is that of the friend of the uncle, in Case 1. Did Jean-louis Auzière, preferring his middle name André (as was common in the 19th century), live at that time in Issy les Moulineaux and then in Croix with his wife Susan Spray and their children Pascal and Marc, in a house big enough to accommodate his niece Proba? Or would he live elsewhere, while taking care of his niece's house? But why would two of the children have had a change of marital status? Hypothesis : the two elder would have been able to be born under the names Trogneux before becoming Auzière, their father Jean-Michel Trogneux having disavowed their paternity, in the objective of his change of sex.

      • Case 3 (hyp. BE), variant of Case 2: an Auzière woman, who is not a niece of Jean-Louis, who may be his close or distant relative or unrelated, is the mother of the three Auzière children. One would be close to Case 2 if it is a close relative of JLA. But we know that her closest relatives are her nieces and that those other than Proba have a family with children and certainly do not have a relationship with Jean-Michel Trogneux. It would be necessary to find an ecousine ...

      So we remain divided between the three types of scenarios. But there again, that of Proba appears simpler and more likely than the scenario of Catherine. The latter appears more artificial, as if it had been created to confuse the issue... It would have been set up a little before Emmanuel Macron's 2007 wedding, possibly conceived as early as 1984 at Typhaine's birth, before Jean-Michel left for Truchtersheim. Evidence could have been fabricated in 2007, then around 2017 and even after with the means of the state. And the use of the two first names of the great friend Jean-Louis André Auzière was a godsend (see also the end of the Appendix A 18) to invent a phantom character... As for the variant of Proba (Case 3), only a link of cousinship seems to be appropriate and it would be necessary to find this cousin, currently rather unlikely...

    26. (A) Jean-Michel Trogneux in the US in 1969

      We saw this at the end of Chapter 8 : "In her third video, Natacha Rey reports that Brigitte recalled living alone in the United States during Neil Armstrong's 1969 moon landing (link). She would have been 16 at the time, what was she doing there alone at that age? Jean-Michel, on the other hand, was 24 years old and this stay then appears much more likely."
      This April 14, a correspondent brigittologist sends me three photos with this message :

      I think we need to dig into the Stonewall Inn in 1969 and also the first gay pride in 70. Brigitte Macron said she was in the US when Armstrong walked on the moon.... And only one month later.... Anyway here are some pictures of the event in Greenwich village at the Stonewall Inn. It deserves in my opinion further research...

      Indeed, this is a line of research that can be explored. The face of Jean-Michel Trogneux does not appear on these three photos, but a brigittologist could find it on others... The page on the Stonewall riots in New York provides details of events that created the first militant gay support groups, before the first Pride March in 1970.

      Two more photos: Stonewall Inn in 1969 (link) and the first gay pride in 1970 in New York (link).

      "Snoopy's lunar questions...", Facial.Cupping tweet from April 3, 2022.

    27. (A) Jean-Michel Trogneux and Adam Meyer Music Hall

      This appendix follows the last paragraph of Chapter 28 which reports that Jean-Michel Trogneux, worked from 1984 to 1989 in the cabaret "Royal Palace" of the commune of Kirrwiller in Alsace. The History" page of the "Royal Palace" website brings us the following :

      In 1980, Pierre Meyer decided to create a small show stage in the room of the family restaurant he had just taken over with his wife Cathy. At first, he presented shows by seven artists, recruited in Paris, once a month, then very quickly every weekend. In 1989, he invested the equivalent of 1.5 million euros in the construction of a 200 m2 stage [...] In 1996, the establishment was renovated. A new complex of 800 m2, renamed the Royal Palace, was built [...]

      This postcard shows us the "seven artists, recruited in Paris". None of them bear a marked resemblance to Jean-Michel / Brigitte Trogneux (Betaface comparisons: 1 2 3 4).

      May 13. It turns out that by this time Jean-Michel's hectic life of the 1970s had been replaced by a wise life in Truchtersheim as a mother of three and a French teacher (Appendix A 36). It therefore appears very unlikely that Jean-Michel played in this Music Hall. Moreover, we have found no new evidence to suggest this. Is this another false lead cleverly suggested or put together?

    28. (A) The Trogneux family, tennis and Algeria

      Jean (Georges) Trogneux, Jean-Michel's father, was president of the Tennis Club of Amiens, president of the Tennis League of Picardy from 1964 to 1976 (link)and, from 1971 to 1978 (he was 62 to 69 years old), founding president of the CROS (Regional Olympic and Sports Committee) of Picardy, whose headquarters was first located in Amiens (link). Sports journalist Lionel Herbet paints a portrait of him, featured on a page on the  website:

      In the wake [of the creation of the sports region of Picardy], will be created the Regional Olympic and Sports Committee of Picardy. The first president is a great gentleman, from a very well known family in the regional capital: Jean Trogneux who is also the president of the Picardy Tennis League. We knew this man of a great courtesy, always smiling. He embodied a certain style that has now disappeared.

      Jean Trogneux was not a man of the field. Rather, he was a person made to evolve at a higher level in rather political spheres. Jean Trogneux remained in office until December 1978. He had decided to resign two years before his mandate expired, before the Moscow Games. Games that were marked by the forfeiture of some nations like the United States.

      Thus, contrary to what says (this day April 18) the page of Wikipedia on the company Jean Trogneux (extract), it is not the son Jean-Claude who held this role, even if he was also president of the club of 'Amiens, taking up the torch, involving himself in the public life of Amiens, unlike his brother Jean-Michel. This is their father Jean, whose middle name is Georges. His involvement in tennis is very old. He himself was a tennis player. He played doubles tournaments with Léonce Deprez, who was the cadet tennis champion of Flanders before becoming mayor of Le Touquet from 1969 to 1995 and from 2001 to 2008, and who married in 2007 Emmanuel Macron (link) (not surprisingly, he wasn't very particular about the birth certificate of the bride...).

      To the left, Le Figaro of August 31, 1938 (link). On the right, Le Touquet center court before the Second War (link).

      Jean Trogneux also became president of the Le Touquet tennis club in March 1974. This passion for tennis has spread to the Trogneux family. A daughter Trogneux has indeed participated in competitions in Amiens and Algiers, at least from 1947 to 1950 :

      "Alger Républicain", September 7, 1947 (French championship at Roland Garros),
      September 19, 1948, August 20, 1950 (Gallica) and September 17, 1950 (link). Also, for the latter date,
      in "The Moroccan Vigil" for the French championship at Roland Garros (link, extract)

      So who is this Miss Trogneux? The initials "A M" leave little doubt: this is Anne-Marie, Jean's daughter, born on July 9, 1932. She was 14 years old in 1947 and 17 in 1950, which is compatible with the cadet (14-15) and junior (16-17) categories. Although followed in an Algerian newspaper in 1950, she is only assigned to Algiers in the first cut of 1947.

      So we can consider that Anne-Marie Trogneux was resident in Algiers at least in 1947, probably with her father or a close relative, given her young age. And we saw that Jean-Michel is there at least from 1961 (if he is really on the class photo at the beginning of Chapter 27) to 1963 (according to the date of the military census). This raises many questions. For example: was there a pastry shop in Algiers associated with Jean Trogneux  s establishment in Amiens?

      I searched on Geneanet for a brother or cousin of Jean (Georges) Trogneux who went to Algeria. He had a first cousin (same grandfather Marc Trogneux), Ernest Trogneux, born in 1878, who was a pastry cook (link). In 1905, when he married, he worked in the pastry shop of his half-brother Jean (Arthur) Trogneux, the father of Jean (Georges) (announcement). He had a daughter Renée, born in Amiens in 1906, died in Salouël, in the Oise, in 1993, married in Amiens in 1935 to Maurice Philippe (link). Did they live in Algiers?

      Additional newspaper clippings with tennis competitors named Trogneux (Jean and Anne-Marie) : 1 (1929) 2 (1931) 3 (1933) 4 (1934) 5 (1934, photo at right) 6 (1935) 7 (1936) 8 (1936) 9 (1937) 10 (1938) 11 (1938) 11 (1939) 13 (1939) 14 (1939) 15 (1940) 16 (1942) 17 (1942) 18 (1943) 19 (1943) 20 (1947) 21 (1948) 22 (1950). Jean (Arthur) Trogneux, the father of Jean the tennis champion was a champion of the iron ball game (clippings : 1 (1934) 2 (1934) 3 (1935) 4) (1936). Jean-Claude Trogneux, The tennis player's eldest son, Jean-Michel's brother, was into cycling (article).

      All this leads to other questions. Were the Trogneux children sent to Algiers to escape the consequences of the war ? Amiens was destroyed in 1940, at the Liberation in 1944, everything had to be rebuilt in the city center... Did the family have relations in the aristocratic-colonial milieu in Algiers? In particular, did Jean Trogneux know Louis Auzière, who stayed there from 1943 to 1945 (cf. Appendix A 18) ? We know that Jean-Michel had a niece who died young (Appendix A 11). Could she be a daughter of Anne-Marie born in Algiers ?

      April 20. A correspondent brings us details of the years of the Second World War in Amiens :

      Was Jean-Michel Trogneux conceived under the American bombing ? If we go back 9 months before his birth, we get May 1944. And it is precisely at this period that the Americans bombed the city, which had already been bombed in 1940. This page tells about the bombing of Amiens on May 27, 1944 by the Americans, 4000 houses had been destroyed.
      We notice that the Trogneux establishments remained open during the German occupation (ads : 1 (1940) 2 (1943) 3 (1943) 4 (1944) 5 (1944)) (18 rue Duméril is currently 12 place notre Dame). And Jean Trogneux was still competing in tennis. However, there had been the battle of Amiens from May 20 to June 8, 1940. From May 20, 1940 to August 31, 1944, Amiens had suffered four years of occupation by the Wehrmacht with its attendant humiliations, shortages, restrictions, despoilment, stigmatization, repression, deportation and extermination. It was liberated by the British and the FFI on August 31, 1944. 25% of the city was destroyed, including 60% of the city center. With the population fleeing the city, only about 5,000 inhabitants remained out of a population of 95,000 in 1939 (page Wikipedia). Had the Trogneux family, in part, fled this hell ? Perhaps to Algiers ?

      Let us emphasize, however, that only one press clipping, from 1947, attests to a Trogneux presence in Algiers in these 1940s.

    29. (A) Emmanuel Macron in elementary school

      Jean-Michel Macron opens the door to the house where his son Emmanuel grew up.
      Does the presence of two adults and the large number of students mean that there are two classes together ?
      Emmanuel Macron, bottom right, in cours préparatoire (1983/1984) at the Delpech school in Amiens.

      This April 19, the newspaper "L'Alsace" published a article about Jean-Michel Macron, Emmanuel's father. The latter shared a class photo of his son in preparatory class. While it was surprising that he had no school photo before the fifth grade, this is an element that could go against the hypothesis, expressed in Appendix A 14, according to which "Emmanuel may not have been in elementary school, having been home-schooled by his grandmother."

      However, even if this photo appears very likely, the doubt does not appear to be removed. A correspondent points out to me that "At the time Germaine Arribet [his grandmother Manette]was 67 years old and I think that after that year of first grade, he was home schooled and raised by the matriarch". He says that Gerard Banc, a former teacher at the Providence Middle and High School in Amiens, produced the 150-year album of the Providence Alumni Association, dated May 26, 2018, from which the photos of Emmanuel in the 5th grade are taken (Chapter 17). "This one took all the class photos from 1974 to 2014. Curiously this album does not contain any 6th, 5th, and 4th grade photos that feature Emmanuel." one can answer that the class photo may not have been purchased every year by the parents and the student may have been absent the day it was taken. Between 1st grade and 3rd grade (photo in Appendix A 10), there are six years, six class photos. In my opinion, if there is any doubt about his presence in primary classes, the photos in the 5th grade class hardly allow us to extend this supposed absence to middle school.

      The questions raised by Xavier Poussard are therefore still relevant. In addition to what has already been taken up in the chapter and the two appendices cited above, let us add :

      [F&D500p4] This relationship [between Emmanuel and his grandmother] is akin to family instruction, now violently opposed by the government.

      [F&D499p10] In "Les Macron" [Fayard 2017], it is stated that Emmanuel Macron was schooled at the elementary school in his neighborhood, the Delpech school. No class photo from these elementary school years is known [now we know one]. Then, when he entered middle school, the child would have been schooled at La Providence where he would have immediately bonded with Renaud Dartevelle [link], the main witness of these "green years" who however evokes a "quite superficial relationship", while specifying to Hervé Algalarrondo to have been received "at his parents' house". About these years of college, it was reported that Macron did his internship at the end of the third year in Paris, in publishing, at Bordas. And it was on the occasion of the delivery of his internship report that he would have caught the eye of "Brigitte"...

      But the most surprising, exceptional even, is elsewhere  no photo of Emmanuel with a family member is known before adulthood. Why? Given the photos where he is younger (Appendix A 15), a correspondent wonders if at his young age he was not considered a girl. The answer seems to me to be more in his close relationship with his grandmother Manette (Appendix A 14).

    30. (A) What role did Jean-Louis André Auzière  play?

      As this case progressed, the person Jean-Louis Auzière, André for his middle name, became more important. His probable presence in Algiers around 1962 with Jean-Michel Trogneux, his presence as a groom on the faked photo of the fictitious first marriage of "Brigitte" Trogneux, the questions about his nephew André(-Louis), his complaint for defamation against Natacha Rey, with the help of "Brigitte's" lawyer, make him an active and essential accomplice in the "Brigitte Macron" deception.

      Jean-Louis André Auzière, possibly in Algeria around 1962, surely at his 1st wedding in 1966, and recently.
      To the right a full copy of his birth certificate with in marginal mentions the 1st marriage in 1966 to Susan Spray,
      the divorce in 1996, the 2nd marriage with Catherine Audoy in 2003.

      Jean-Louis André Roger Auzière was born in Meudon on February 28, 1943. His father was Marius Alexandre Auzière born in Paris 9th on February 17, 1893, aged just over 50 years), his mother was Germaine Marie Bary born in Paris 18th on April 4, 1896, aged almost 47 years. As seen in Appendix A 18, the newborn then has as siblings Louis 26 years, Suzanne 24 years and Marcelle 20 years.

      The age of the mother, pregnant at 46, questions. At 46, after a year of trying, around 10% of women have a child (source). This opens up the possibility of a biological mother who refused the child, or even a biological father who is closely related to the adoptive parents. Still, Jean-Louis was very close to the children of his brother Louis, who graduated as a major from the Ecole Coloniale in 1935 (clipping from the press), having followed a plan of career through Africa from 1940 to 1963. Among Louis' six children is the famous André(-Louis), first husband of "Brigitte," who is supposed to have been born in Eséka, Cameroon, on the same February 28 as Jean Louis, but from 1951. We suspect that he substituted for a daughter we named Proba in Chapter 29. There we considered that Jean-Louis often went by his middle name, André, which explains the confusion. We will come back to this. Before that, let us follow with Xavier Poussard the professional careers of this more or less fictitious André and of Jean-Louis.

      André Louis Auzière (or André-Louis) [F&D501p6]
      Her first husband was a bank executive at the Crédit du Nord in Lille, then director of the Banque française du commerce extérieur in Strasbourg. ("As if he had not existed," see Chapter 9).

      Jean-Louis André Roger Auzière [F&D501p9] :
      In contrast to André, there is no shortage of sources for writing the biography of Jean-Louis, André, who was born on February 28, 1943 in Meudon (Hauts-de-Seine), the same day - a February 28 - as André, Louis. After studying law and foreign languages, Jean-Louis Auzière made a career in the luxury goods industry where he successively held the positions of sales and marketing director at Fabergé (1972-1978) and Revlon (1978-1981) before joining Parfums Grès as General Manager (1981-1987). Still in the same sector, he launched and chaired Indipar in Jouy-en-Josas (Yvelines), while also joining various professional organizations, having served as General Secretary of the Federation of Crystal and Mixed Glass Works and of the Table Arts Committee. He has been a French Foreign Trade Advisor (1983 and 1996), Knight of the Order of Merit (2012), and was sworn in before the Court of Appeal of Caen in February 2021, thus becoming a judicial conciliator in the jurisdiction of Lisieux (Calvados).

      I have been sent various documents concerning André(-Louis) Auzière, here they are:
      • 1951, a extract of André's birth certificate.
      • 1974, a extract of André's marriage certificate to Brigitte Macron. Also in extract from decennial tables (in 2 pages, groom and bride).
      • 1984, a extract of Tiphaine Auzière's birth certificate.
      • 1992, a document of 20 pages with the signature of André, "depositary of the funds paid" in page 20 (link).
      • 2001, a 33-page document with the signature of André, "deputy regional director of Natexis Banques Populaires" in page 6 (link).
      • 2003, a 7-page document on a post-inheritance sale of an apartment, without a signature, listing Andre Louis and his date of birth in page 4.
      • 2004, a document of 17 pages of Information for Health Professionals with André's signature, representing Natexis Banques Populaires, in page 14 (link).
      • 2012, a document of articles of incorporation for an SCI with the quote from Andre and "Brigitte," former owners, without signatures in page 41 (link).

      And also a 14-page document from 1996 with Jean-Louis' signature, "previous" on page 7 (link), which allows for a comparison of André's and Jean-Louis' signatures :

      We are almost certain that André Auzière does not exist, especially because of the faked photo of the wedding, the fact that "Brigitte" was born a man, that we have no photo of him, if not a faked one with the lawn mower etc. Among the documents presented above, those of the birth and the marriage could have been the object of a recent falsification with the means of the State. This appears to be much more difficult to accomplish for the next five documents from 1992 to 2014.

      We saw in Chapter 29, particularly for the phone book, that Jean-Louis went by his middle name André. This might be an illusion for the 1992, 2003, 2014 documents, perhaps with a fake birth certificate. But the documents from 2001 and 2004 still raise questions, showing the existence of a banker André Auzière in the exercise of his work. Like a secret agent with two professional identities, could Jean-Louis have, from time to time, with the support of his hierarchy, worked for a bank? One exceeds there the framework of our case and one has reason to wonder about the goal poursuvi. This professional career is, however, as ghostly as the role of husband of "Brigitte" and father of the three Auzière children, as Xavier Poussard points out [F&D501p7]:

      In the archives of the banking sector, André Auzière has left even fewer traces than in memories. Not a report, not a conference, nothing that makes him exist [except, now, these two documents from 2001 and 2004][...] Apart from the episode with the lawnmower previously recounted, the memories are blank. It's like an episode of Black Mirror where the President's offices have found a way to get into the brains of his former acquaintances to erase everything.

      More than a "ghost", André-Louis or André, would Louis Auzière be a fictional character? No, however, concludes Sylvie Bommel, who refers to a document (not reproduced), a marriage certificate that "specifies that André is a stagiaire hors cadre (a status which, in banking jargon, corresponds to junior executive) [...]".Was this document created a posteriori and opportunely placed on Sylvie Bommel's route?

      Yes, there would have been documents created a posteriori, especially for the family setting, but others in the professional setting question a double professional life in slight dots... The character of André Louis Auzière, with his profession as a banker, was probably created around 1988 (cf. Chapter 29), it was necessary to give him a minimum of consistency... And the Trogneux and Auzière families have strong support.

      The above, with the notion of secret agent, has caused a correspondent to react who brings us this light :

      I'm leaning towards something secret service related for a one-time mission that matches the reversal of first name order. Sometimes they also use deleting a letter in the name or replacing one letter with another. Also keep the birthday. It's not a "legend" per se, but it avoids cross-referencing and if the cover falls, it allows the mistake or the name of use to be invoked without embarrassment.

      The fact that Jean-louis Auzière was a French Foreign Trade Advisor (1983 and 1996) could correspond to functions held in parallel "under cover" and "a minima" at the BFCE i.e. Natixis, under a slightly modified identity.

      May 8. The route through France of Jean-Louis Auzière and his double André Auzière can be traced through the telephone directories. Here are the collected statements.

      André Auzière in the telephone directories
      Years Person - City - Street
      1975 1977 Auzière A - Issy les Moulineaux - 1 rue Claude Matrat
      1977-1984 1985 Auzière André - Croix - 5 resid. Flanders
      1982 1983-1985 1986 Auzière André - Strasbourg - 26 rue Lorraine Meinau
      1983 1984-1990 1991 Auzière André - Truchtersheim - 4 rue des coquelicots
      1990 1991-2002 Auzière André and Brigitte- Amiens - 17 rue St Simon
      2003-2004 2005 Auzière André and Brigitte- Amiens - 66 bis rue Boucher de Perthes

      The double presence of André(-Louis) Auzière in Croix and Strasbourg in 1983-1984 and in Truchtersheim and Strasbourg in 1984-1985 (thus triple in 1984) catches the attention. This is the time when he is supposed to work at the BFCE bank (Banque Française du Commerce Extérieur, to be compared with Jean-Louis, foreign trade advisor) in Strasbourg, a job that appears to be real (for Jean-Louis...). There is also a parallel between the career paths of Jean-Louis André Auzière and that of his niece Brigitte Auzière, who, at the time of the birth of her children in Amiens, lived in 1975 in Issy les Moulineaux, for Sébastien, in 1977 and 1984 in Croix, for Laurence and Tiphaine. A first-degree reading of the directories thus leads one to believe that André Auzière and his wife Brigitte continuously lived together from 1975 to 2004, except that there are two confusions, that of Jean-Louis with André, that of the niece Brigitte Auzière with the other Brigitte who would become Brigitte Macron, as explained in the Conclusion Chapter 30.

      May 15. Jean-Louis Auzière has a taste for beautiful objects and arts, it appears likely that he made, for the wishes of the year 1969 a small original book his artist name André Auzière :

      To the left, a recent book by Odette Ducarre, published by Robert Morel, featuring the book by André Auzière (link). At right, two pages from this book. It was part of the "Collection O" : "Round books, created by Odette Ducarre, 96 pages, 6 cm in diameter, bound by a 3 cm diameter brass ring, patent pending for all countries" (link).

      The multiplicity of countries treated, with above a particularly precise knowledge of Cameroon, point to the son of Marius and grandbrother of Louis, who traveled through Africa. This would show that already in 1969, Jean-Louis was called André Auzière.

    31. (A) Father Auzière was an intelligence officer in Tunisia

      We are not done with the Auzieres and Algeria. After mentioning in the previous Appendix the possibility that Jean-Louis Auzière, Jean-Michel Trogneux's great friend, had been a secret agent, we were surprised to discover that his father Marius Auzière, had been a "interpreter and cipher officer", thus a military intelligence and secret service officer in Bizerte in Tunisia :

      On the left, Journal Officiel de la République française of July 2, 1937 (link).
      Center, 1933 and 1939 Navy directories. La présence est continue de 1927 à 1939 (lien).
      Right, Germaine Bary and her husband Marius Auzière (link generatedanet)

      On Généanet and in the 1936 census, Marius is noted as a chartered accountant, another way to love numbers, one not preventing the other. Agathe Couderc in a article entitled "Technical intelligence and military secrecy: the French Cipher during the first months of the Great War" explains  "The Cipher service is responsible for protecting Allied messages from any enemy reading. It also has the mission of breaking the enemy codes and making readable the encrypted messages intercepted by the wiretapping and TSF services.", with the conclusion  "the culture of secrecy, specific to intelligence activities in general, has passed into the mores of the Cipher".

      Marius Alexandre Auzière (1893-1975) had married Germaine Marie Bary (1896-1979), a seamstress, in the midst of the First World War, on April 20, 1915, in Paris 11ème. Germaine Bary's mother, Willhelmine Anna Steuer, had been born in Germany and married Achille Bary in 1885 in Paris (link). Does this imply that Marius had a knowledge of the German language ? We saw in Appendix 18 that Marius and Germaine's family lived in Meudon in 1936, where Jean-Louis was born in 1943.

      Bizerte is about 780 km from Algiers by road and Marius had no reason to travel there before the Second World War. This one turned upside down all the organization in place. Marius Auzière's activity at the "Chiffre" was highly sensitive. He may have been in contact with the American allies and therefore the American secret services. Moreover, Algiers was in 1944 the place where the Provisional Government of the French Republic was established (link). Intelligence-related activities and ties to the American allies must have been very intense at this time. Marius, who was 50 years old, was able to settle in Algiers, joined by his son Louis from 1943 to 1945, as seen in his career plan. The latter had settled in Algiers (probably at 12 rue Mulhouse, a small maid search ad, link) as an assistant utility administrator (cut of press, link). Father and son were able to work together, sharing intelligence contacts. With some remains for the last born Jean-Louis...

      Louis Auzière, his career plan.

      His appointment in the Official Journal of French Equatorial Africa of November 15, 1947 (link)

      Louis Auzière, eldest son of Marius and older brother of Jean-Louis was a "special agent" of France for his colonialist dirty tricks, especially against the UPC in Cameroon when it rigged elections, as seen in the Annex A 18. Would the Auzieres be secret agents from father to son? From Marius to Louis ? And why not from Marius and Louis to Jean-Louis ?

    32. (A) 1991, did Brigitte Macron obtain her CAPES in Strasbourg?

      On April 25, I was sent documents that shed light on the passage of Brigitte Macron, then named Brigitte Auzière, in Strasbourg at the Lycée Lucie Berger. The subject has already been dealt with in Appendix A 5, with falsified documents that cast doubt on the "legend" that Brigitte Auzière was for several years a teacher of literature in this establishment, although she lived in the commune of Truchtersheim.

      An extract from a "Bulletin des anciennes élèves et des amis du collège Lucie Berger", dated March 1992, tells us that at the end of the 1990/1991 school year, Brigitte Auzière obtained her CAPES ("Certificat d'aptitude au professorat de l'enseignement du second degré") in Modern Letters. The doubt we had about this is thus removed.

      This means that Brigitte Auzière had probably passed the written and oral tests of the CAPES in June/July 1990. The following school year 1990/1991, she was a trainee teacher. The photo below shows her with her colleagues, also trainees if we are to believe their age:

      More surprisingly, a list of former teachers tells us that Brigitte Auzière would have taught at "Lucie Berger" from 1984 to 1991. In what capacity ? To do some replacements ? The official "legend" had it start only in 1986. The doubts expressed in Appendix A 5, do not allow us, at present, to believe that she was a full-time teacher for so many years.

      It was then at the beginning of the school year in September 1991 that, having been granted tenure, Brigitte Auzière née Trogneux began teaching in Amiens, at "La Providence" (Chapter 15 and Appendix A 10).

      There remains, however, one area of puzzlement about this CAPES: it is in modern letters when it was supposed to be in classical letters, as indicated in a 2018 article written by Olivier Pichon for, questioning even more :

      After studying classical letters and a master's degree in these subjects (thesis on "L'amour courtois"), she brilliantly passed her CAPES in classical letters, which allowed her to teach French at the prestigious Lycée La Providence in Amiens. [...] In detail, there are several minor variations. [...] One of the media writes: "Brigitte Macron's qualifications: agrégée de Lettres Classiques".

      1) The blurring of dates
      No matter how hard we look:
      • Nowhere can we find the date on which Brigitte Macron was recruited at La Providence, nor the precise date on which she ceased her duties there ;
      • Nowhere do we find the date on which she would have obtained the CAPES in Classics ;
      • Nowhere do we find the date on which she would have obtained the title of agrégée de Lettres classiques.

      [...] By searching exhaustively on the internet, one learns for sure that Brigitte Trogneux is not a holder of the CAPES, but of the CAFEP. [...] However, the CAFEP [Certificat d'Aptitude au Professorat de l'Enseignement Privé] exam was only created in 1995.

      In this jumble of information, one comes to wonder if the March 1992 bulletin is really reliable... Certainly, the research mentioned was about the CAPES of classical letters when it was that of modern letters... We saw, moreover, in Appendix A 6 that the Elysée website indicates a CAPES in modern literature (extract). It even says that "she began her career in Paris and then Strasbourg". Ah, Paris ?

      Once admitted to the (written-oral) CAPES exam in July 1990, Brigitte should have joined the public teaching corps and done her internship in a public school. The collège Lucie Berger is private. The photo, however, questions and leads one to believe that these are indeed trainee teachers. In fact, it does appear that Brigitte Auzière obtained a CAFEP, also known as CAFEP-CAPES (link), or rather a pre-1995 equivalent, as it is confirmed that it did not exist before 1995 ( link). The March 1992 newsletter would have used the acronym CAPES because it is better known to the public and because it would be an equivalent. But strictly speaking, Brigitte Macron would not have the CAPES in modern literature. And even for the CAFEP, there are still big doubts because of the date and according to Sylvie Bommel (link video at 3 min 55)

      April 27. A correspondent probably brings me the solution, Brigitte would have a CAER (Concours d'Accès aux Echelles de Rémunérations) according to this extract from a article by Yves Verneuil entitled "Private teacher training since the Debré Law - the professional and the confessional -". Thus, there is neither CAPES nor CAPEF but a CAER erected, without saying so, as a CAPES equivalent by the March 1992 bulletin. Brigitte Macron's CV on the Elysée website therefore appears false. As for the Maîtrise de lettres on "L'amour courtois", no trace of it has been found so far.

    33. (A) 1973-1984, Jean-Michel Trogneux manager of Picardie Metal

      We saw at the end of Appendix A 20 how we learned that Jean-Michel Trogneux had become manager of the Picardie-Métal company "from June 12, 1973" on this advertisement from the "bulletin des annonces civiles et commerciales" of 1973 :

      Other announcement. 1976 Yearbook. Other yearbook from 1979.

      Blangy-Tronville is a commune in the Somme region located 10 km from Amiens. The dossier of on the company Picardie Métal is almost empty, the creation date in 1973 is even ignored (and replaced by 1900). The essential being indicated in the extract below :

      Blangy-Tronville, Mail Street (Street View 2017, link)

      Thus, from 1973 to 1984, Jean-Michel Trogneux would have sold hardware. such would be the craft, having "regular contact with the public," that transsexual Véronique claimed in 1977 (Appendix A 19). It's less surprising when you consider that Anne-Marie Trogneux, the tennis champion, Jean-Michel's older sister, married Gérard Boulogne, a merchant in materials and various equipment (link). And also when you know the owner of the Picardie-Metal warehouse land:

      The Blangy property belonged to Jean (Georges) Trogneux and his wife Simone Pujol, as indicated in A directory from before 1973, "Trogneux J confis av Mail", the subscriber's trade being confectioner, they were indeed Jean-Michel's parents, the Amiens pastry cooks. They lived there occasionally, in a villa on a vast 3,142 m2 plot of land with a warehouse. In 1973, the couple installed their youngest son Jean-Michel, aged 28, perhaps returning from the USA, who set up, or was offered, a hardware business project, which we can assume corresponded to a previously acquired qualification (Chapter 27). Housed at goodwill by daddy-mommy in Blangy during the first year, a lease was established in May 1974 for 15 years in favor of Picardie Métal.

      Picardy Metal lease with Jean Trogneux, extract from the mortgages

      The domain, is subdivided into smaller plots in 1983, proof of the stop of the company Picardie Metal at this date (it is dissolved the following year). This subdivision looks like a subdivision company, to sell or rent to several third parties. The warehouse (parcels 139 and 142) is sold to SCI Blangy-Tronville as early as 1983.

      To the left is the Picardie Metal warehouse. On the right, the land register, at the end of Rue du Mail, with the 1983 division (link) (this is the total of the surfaces of these parcels, which makes 3,142 m2) + view by Google Map (link).

      What if this stewardship was a cover ? During its 10 years of existence, this company seems to have had a concrete activity since the directory of 1976 reports (opposite) a "J. Delarue" representative of Picardie Métal. Apparently Jean Delarue died in Amiens in 1993 (link).

      The marriage of Jean-Michel Trogneux with Véronique Dreux on November 24, 1980 in Blangy-Tronville is a confirmation of its establishment in this township. In the same way the closing of this company in 1984 is very coherent with the birth of the last children of Jean-Michel in January and February 1984 and with the beginnings of professor Brigitte Auzière. Finally, with also the proximity of Amiens, the episode Picardie Métal is thus integrated in a coherent way in the biography of Jean-Bri

    34. (A) In 1988, Jean-Michel had already become Brigitte...

      The above document, the scope of which we did not grasp until May 9, 2022, is excerpted from page 41 of 62 of the 2012 document in Appendix A 30. It shows that on June 4, 1988, Jean-Michel Trogneux had already become his sister Brigitte Trogneux and that her father Jean Georges knew this.

      Or we were placing this substitution at the later date of summer 1990, between the 1989 election leaflet with photo of Brigitte Auzière, the first Brigitte, and the September 1990 school start with the second Brigitte Auzière née Trogneux. How to reconcile these contradictory information? Considering that this information, written in a document of 2012, would be false appeared very unlikely, so much it would be then very cleverly realized. There remained then two hypotheses :
      1. consider that Brigitte Trogneux would be pictured on the 1989 leaflet and that she would have started teaching at the high school "Lucie Berger" in Strasbourg before 1990, as the "legend" wants. In this case the double transformation of Jean-Michel into Brigitte and of Brigitte Auzière into Brigitte Trogneux would have taken place in early 1984, between the birth of Tiphaine and the start of the school year in 1990,
      2. consider that Brigitte Auzière and Brigitte Trogneux lived together for some time at Truch and that Jean-Michel's transformation into Brigitte preceded Brigitte Auzière's transformation into Brigitte Trogneux in high school.

      Option 2 is tricky because it does not seem possible, from one year to the next, to have the teacher Brigitte née Auzière replaced by the teacher Brigitte Auzière née Trogneux in a high school. However, it is possible if the "Lucie Berger" high school has associated establishments united in the same structure and there is a passage from one to the other or if there are several years between the presences of the two Brigitte Auzière.

      It is with these two options in mind that we are going to analyze more precisely the 1989 leaflet and the presence of one or both Brigitte Auzière at "Lucie Berger".

    35. (A) Jean-Michel and Brigitte, one person, two identities

      How does a person live when they have two identities, in this case one male and the other female ? Brigitte has imprisoned Jean-Michel in a corner of her brain and she lives ignoring him. Yet he is there, since he is not dead... And there is his memory, the traces he left behind... and this allows comparisons, the discovery of extraordinary similarities, both physical and biographical. If in facade a person can have two identities, they can only be extraordinarily close, to the point of breaking the Law. Here are some new characteristics.

      1. Voter IDs

        On the site online public service, one can find these two voter registration certificates, evidence of fraud :

      2. Social Security numbers

        Jean-Michel has a Social Security (SS) number assigned at birth. But Brigitte? SS If this SS number exists, it should be compared with the number on her birth certificate to verify the consistency of the two numbers match.

        The birth certificate for Brigitte Marie Claude Trogneux (already seen in Chapter 24 part 3) shows a record number of 640 which means that 640 children were born in this commune between January 1, 1953 and April 13, 1953. So there were about 180 births per month that year in Amiens and his order number in April 1953 should be around 80. This monthly birth order number is present in the SS number, of the form "2 53 04 80021 xxx", these are the three digits xxx (80021 corresponding to Amiens the commune of birth, see page Wikipedia) (the last two digits don't count, it's to check, link).

        Brigitte's SS number must exist, otherwise it would be illegal. Her xxx number must be greater than 80 so as not to create a duplicate. Or we would have to take a male number and replace the first digit 1 (male) with 2 (female). In this case, it would be necessary to check that the number obtained by putting 1 in the first position is not already assigned.

        April 23 supplement. Following the publication of the above, it appears that Brigitte Macron's SS number meets the two criteria of consistency and non-duplication presented above.

        May 24. The validity of this social security number and birth certificate number (and the copy of the certificate seen in Chapter 24 Part 2) appears to be an actual validity, confirming the new hypothesis that Jean-Michel had a younger sister Brigitte in 1953. The undeclared (or erased...) death would have allowed the reactivation of this identity. The same person, whose role is essential at the highest level of the French state, thus has two social security records, two voting rights...

      3. Jean-Michel and Brigitte file a complaint together against Natacha Rey

        At the beginning of Chapter 28, we saw the document that informs Natacha Rey that she is being sued by five people who are only four since Jean-Michel and Brigitte are named. Assuming that this summons is processed, will the French Justice accept such deception or will it establish the truth to launch a new procedure to judge the fraudster ?

    36. (A) The real news from Alsace and the 1989 flyer

      This Appendix is a counterbalance to the Appendix A 5 where some Alsatian news appeared to be false and cast doubt on what the "legend" says, which, from 1984 to 1990, had the future Brigitte Macron living in Truchtersheim and teaching French at the "Lucie Berger" high school in Strasbourg.

      Let's recall below the March 1989 leaflet and extrapolated photo already shown in Chapter 7. We estimated in Chapter 29 that this person is Brigitte Auzière, the niece of Jean-Louis Auzière. But would it not rather be Brigitte née Trogneux ? The document of 1988 shown in the previous Annex goes in this direction. The Betaface comparison below, of 75% and 74%, shows that it could also be attributed to the second Brigitte :

      There is another version of this flyer, which appeared in the FR 3 doumentary "Brigitte Macron, un roman français". The photo there is of better quality and the Betaface comparison with the same two photos go from 75 to 86% and from 74 to 79% :

      It is surprising that in the site FR3 version, tract and list mention the occupations while in the FR3 TV movie, tract and list don't mention them. The documents in the TV movie seem triturated, perhaps to anonymize. And let's not forget that the flyer appears to exist in only one copy, with an editable photo....

      In addition, we have tried to reconstruct the years of presence of the French teacher Brigitte Auzière at "Lucie Berger", using photos of the teaching staff in the years 1984-1990. We have undated images from the FR3 TV movie "Brigitte Macron, a French Novel" and dated photos published in two newsletters of the "Ancients and Friends of Lucie Berger," the page 8 out of 40 of the 2018 bulletin (link), with the year 1984-1985 and the page 33 of the 2021 bulletin (link), with the years 1983-1984, 1984-85, 1985-86 and 1990-1991. Now the two photos from 1984-1985 are not the same, the first without Brigitte Auzière, the second with. The TV movie brought us another undated photo, which we know is dated 1989-1990 (photo whole with date). Shifting photos 2 and 3 in the 2021 newsletter by one year, to avoid the duplicate photo, we get, with doubts about the dating of the three central photos :

      1983-1984, 1984-1985, 1985-1986

      1986-1987, 1987-1988 unknown, 1988-1989 unknown, 1989-1990, 1990-1991

      Brigitte Auzière is absent from the first two photos and present in the following ones. If we can still have doubts about the year 1984-1985, it now appears proven that she taught at Lucie Berger from 1985 to 1990. And it is indeed Brigitte Auzière née Trogneux. As the coexistence of the two Brigitte Auzière appears very unlikely, it would be Brigitte Trogneux who would be on the 1989 leaflet.

      This led us to significantly correct the Chapter 29 Part 2. It was not in 1990 that Jean-Michel became Brigitte, it was between February 1984 (birth of Tiphaine on January 30) and August 1985 (start of school in early September 1985). This date of August 1985 can be advanced to August 1984 (according to the dating of the 2021 bulletin) or moved back to August 1987 (because of the two missing photos, 1987-1988 and 1988-1989).

      Such a backward date would be consistent with the Brigitte Macron "legend" that she only began teaching in 1986 (according to Wikipedia, among others). Sylvie Bommel in her book "Il venait d'avoir 17 ans" goes in the same direction, with a gradual entry into the profession :

      She learns that the college of Truchtersheim is looking to replace a French teacher who must be absent for a few weeks, neither one, nor two, Brigitte is gone. She had never given a private lesson before, but discovered that she loved teaching and, even better, that she was gifted. The students love her. Brigitte has found both an audience and a profession.

      Without a CAPES, however, it was impossible to land a tenured position in a public school. Luckily, private schools abound in the land of the Concordat and the storks. Brigitte was recruited by the Protestant college Lucie Berger, located in Petite France, a charming district of the Alsatian capital along the Ill River.

      Thus, this account, the two photos noted 1984-1985 and the two missing photos cast serious doubt on a beginning at "Lucie Berger" as early as 1984. Not everything in the Alsatian "legend" is wrong, but not everything is right either. Finally, let's remember that the Elysée website presents another version (the third...) : "she began her career in Paris and then Strasbourg" (extract).

    37. (A) Did Jean-Michel have a sister-niece Brigitte who died young ?

      In Appendix A 11, we raised the "mystery of the niece who died young". Let us combine it with two other mysteries, that of the little girl present in the 1953/1954 photo (dealt with in this same Appendix and previously in Chapter 6) and that of Brigitte Trogneux's April 13, 1953, birth certificate in Amiens, seen in Chapter 24 (Part 3). We will take up these three queries together.

      Let's start with the birth. Here is the birth announcement in Le Courrier Picard of April 15, 1953 and, again, the copy of the birth certificate of December 2021 :

      So far we have considered these two documents to be forgeries. Still, they are very different in nature from each other. We have also learned that Brigitte Trogneux's Social Security number appears prima facie correct and not forged (Appendix A 35 Part 2). There is still the voter registration card that appears correct (Appendix A 35 Part 1). Let's assume that this birth is true. And let's return to the niece who died young. Could she be this sister Brigitte ? Here is how a article from talks about it, on December 8, 2021 :

      Emmanuel Macron's wife has never made a mystery about what she thinks of her teenage years. It was one of the most painful periods of her life. When she was 8 years old, while she was still mourning the death of her older sister in a car accident, she faced another tragedy. A few months later, she lost one of her nieces, only 6 years old. The latter died as a result of acute appendicitis.

      First, let's note an inconsistency: 8 years old + "a few months later" does not make a teenager, it is Jean-Michel who was then a teenager. Could this niece who died at the age of 6, which we have not found, be the sister Brigitte, who would then die in 1959 ? Jean-Michel was then 14 years old, he was indeed a teenager. And he would be very touched. To the point of wanting to become his own sister? To, in a way, make her come back to life ?

      This does not explain that according to the birth certificate of 2021, this sister would have married Emmanuel Macron. Let's not be so naive as to believe that all these documents are correct. If it appears very difficult to falsify both the 1953 announcement, the social security number and the 2021 act, it is easier to imagine that only the latter was falsified with regard to the mention of the marriage and the non-mention of the death.

      Imagine indeed that the death of the younger sister was not reported or was erased... The Wikipedia page on the "National Directory of Identification of Natural Persons" shows that this is relatively common :

      In 2019, Senator Nathalie Goulet in the context of a fact-finding mission on social fraud and its impact on public finances noted that the RNIPP file has many inconsistencies. For example, according to the senator, of the 110 million people registered, 84.2 million are "reputed to be alive," according to the INSEE formulation. 3.1 million people are also registered in the RNIPP as being over 100 years old and "reputed to be alive," half of whom were born abroad (for comparison, Insee estimated that there were 21,000 centenarians in France in 2016). Nathalie Goulet recommends that the file be urgently updated this one conditioning the payment of social benefits.

      Without ruling out that the death was erased, it is therefore also possible to imagine that it was not declared. Especially if the fatal illness of the girl was trying and hidden, becoming a family secret. In this case, the birth certificate would not be falsified. And then the family photo would include all the children, including the last two Jean-Michel and Brigitte.

      So, more than the creation ex nihilo of the identity of Brigitte Trogneux, a usurpation of this identity by Jean-Michel Trogneux appears possible, with the help of Jean-Louis Auzière knowing the methods of the secret services.

      Let's add another possibility. When Brigitte was born, Simone was 40 years old and her eldest daughter Annie (Anne Marie) was 21 years old. This one could be the biological mother, the father being unknown (except maybe in the secret of the family). The state of being an unmarried mother was frowned upon at the time, so it was Annie's parents who would have assumed the birth. This was quite common. Brigitte would then be a biological niece of Jean-Michel, which goes in the direction of a sister-niece confusion. Let us note a parallelism with the case of Jean-Louis Auzière, born when his mother was 46 years old, with two older sisters in the siblings as well. This could explain the strong solidarity of Jean-Louis for Jean-Michel.

    38. (A) Jean-Michel Trogneux in Beauvais

      "In Le Courrier Picard, on November 15, 1982, is announced the birth of Jean-Jacques Trogneux, son of Jean-Michel Trogneux and Madame, née Véronique Dreux. Two addresses are mentioned: 1, rue Delambre in Amiens (stronghold of the Trogneux family) and 17, rue Saint-Pierre in Beauvais where Véronique Dreux ran the "Tentations" store between 1981 and 1987" [F&D503p4]. Another announcement (below) will be published in Le Courrier Picard to announce the birth of a sister of Jean-Jacques, Valerie Trogneux, born on February 20, 1984 in Amiens, with the mention of the same two addresses.

      1981, birth of the company "Tentations", 1982 phone book, 1984 birth announcement

      In 1982, Jean-Michel Trogneux is listed in the Beauvais phone book at the address 4, rue St Pierre, across the street from his wife Véronique Dreux's "Tentations" confectionery and haberdashery store at number 17. It is therefore likely that after the marriage of November 24, 1980 in Blangy-Tronville, the couple moved in 1981 to Beauvais, rue St Pierre, at number 4 for the home and number 17 for the store created in May 1981. This will last until 1984 at the latest for Jean-Michel, and until 1987 at the latest (closure of the establishment, link) for Véronique, with the divorce on June 17 and the closure of the store. Véronique moved to Amiens during 1985, as we find the name of Véronique Trogneux on the Somme telephone directory in 1986 and 1987 (not before), at the address 14, rue André Chénier, Amiens. From 1984 to 1986, she was a journalist at "Influences Picardie" (link).

      Beauvais, the prefecture of Oise, is 66 km south of Amiens, halfway to Paris [Google Maps].
      In March 1984, Jean-Michel lived in Beauvais with his wife Véronique Dreux and their two children Jean-Jacques and Valérie Trogneux. His three other children, Sébastien, Laurence and Tiphaine Auzière live in Croix, near Lille, with their mother Brigitte Auzière. During 1984, or a little later, Jean-Michel moved to Truchtersheim, near Strasbourg, with his three Auzière children, and from then on passed himself off as their mother...

      As we did in Appendix A 30 for André Auzière, here is a table that shows our knowledge of Jean-Michel Trogneux's listings in telephone directories :

      Jean-Michel Trogneux in the telephone directories
      Years Person - City - Street
      1970 1971 Trogneux J. confis - Blangy-Tronville - Av Mail
      (this is Jean, Jean-Michel's father)
      1972-1978 1979 Trogneux J-M. confis - Blangy-Tronville - Av Mail
      1980 1982 1983 Trogneux Jean-Michel - Beauvais - 4 r Saint Pierre
      (1981 could not be accessed)

      [AFP photo, Ludovic Marin]

    39. (A) 2007, Jean-Michel signs Brigitte Trogneux, a blunder?

      Following is a "B Trogneux" signature of Brigitte Trogneux dated May 25, 2007. It is made by the same hand as a namuscrite note and a signature of Brigitte Macron in 2017, the analysis of the handwriting testifies :

      So far, everything appears normal since "Brigitte Trogneux" is supposed to be the maiden name of "Brigitte Macron" and, since May 25, 2007, after her divorce with André-Louis Auzière and before her remarriage to Emmanuel Macron, she is indeed Brigitte Trogneux.

      The first signature, however, turns out to be exceptional because it appears on a document or Brigitte Trogneux is not signatory ! It is the original report (filed at Infogreffe) of the extraordinary general meeting of May 25, 2007 of the "Société d'Exploitation des Etablissements Arasse", with the signature of two tellers, Jean-Michel Trogneux (2) and Jean-Alexandre Trogneux (1). Below in A, we do have their two signatures (1, 2) but just before it appears that of Brigitte Trogneux (0) yet never mentioned in the document. There is a second copy, the report duplicate also submitted to the signing session. And, there, everything goes back to normal with two signatures for the two tellers, below in B.

      Jean-Michel Trogneux's signature "2" is shortened. Here it is in its entirety, on the 1980 marriage certificate.
      We notice that the J and the M entwined form a B, which is heavy with meaning...

      We looked for an explanation, this one seems the most likely :

      This general meeting of the Arasse company, a family business, takes place in its headquarters, in a room in the rue des Vergeaux in Amiens. It is May 25, the vacations are approaching, the atmosphere is relaxed. The participants, members of the Trogneux family, know each other very well, nobody is embarrassed by the fact that Jean-Michel is present under the aspect of Brigitte. We are in 2007, it has been about 25 years that the whole family is aware. The meeting goes smoothly, all the right decisions are made without conflict, and we gradually move into pre-apéro mode, gags and jokes beginning to colonize the seriousness of the notary.

      The moment of the signatures comes in the midst of an aperitif transition. A pen is slipped into Brigitte's right hand, and she keeps her glass of sparkling wine in her left hand. She signs, as she is so used to doing as a teacher. It is then that the treasurer, who has remained on his first glass, realizes that Jean-Michel has taken the wrong side and has inadvertently affixed his female signature.

      Sapristi! What to do? We quickly decide to limit ourselves to asking the clumsy teller to add, while momentarily recovering his momentarily regain his senses, his old Jean-Michel claw. There is little space left, so much the worse if it overflows in margin. And for the duplicate, no more blunders, we stay on two signatures... Nobody will pay attention to this detail, we think then.

      That those who do not believe that Brigitte and Jean-Michel are the same person provide a more plausible explanation than this one...

    40. (A) Emmanuel Macron's mother, mostly false leads...

      The following hypothesis was proposed at the beginning of Chapter 23. It was based on the presence of Jean-Michel Trogneux in the 1977 Gay Pride photo. When this presence turned out to be false, this hypothesis could only be rejected. Here it is for the record.

      On the left photo, the fly, proudly put forward, appears padded, the Adam's apple is not very apparent, there is no trace of beard and on the right photo the chest appeared discreet. Above all, the resemblance between the photo on the left and the one in the center appears striking enough to raise the question of the confusion of identity of the two people.

      Then a thought process began that led to the opening of this new hypothesis.

      Hypothesis rejected (after rejecting the 1977 photo).
      This comparison of photos remained 2 or 3 days without really catching on. In particular, I didn't publish it in the Appendix, it seemed to me to be absurd. And then, Lionel Labosse published it on January 28 on his page titled "#brigittegate : analysis and comparison documents". Lionel was cautious  "Personally I don't have too many opinions on these documents, or if I do I wish not to influence the reader by expressing them. Some are convincing until proven otherwise, others probably less so...". Following the remark of an Internet user, an exchange began exploring the consequences of the same identity of person. The absurd then became plausible... And Lionel added on his page that this comparison could be "a bomb, or a damp squib".

      In fact, supposing that Emmanuel Macron's mother, Françoise Noguès, is this gay pride person, implies that :
      • Jean-Michel Trogneux and Françoise Noguès have known each other for a very long time, at least 1977, the date of this photo,
      • disturbing coincidence, Emmanuel was precisely born in 1977, a year when, as a result, his mother was pregnant,
      • the person in the photo does not appear to be pregnant, or would be in the early stages of pregnancy or after it. What is the reality ? The photo is dated June 25, 1977, Emmanuel was born on December 21, 1977. His mother would therefore be three months pregnant. It is possible...
      • a child raised by a mother who thinks she is a man may not have a family photo, no photo with his mother-father, and this is the case of Emmanuel, we saw it in Chapter 17 where it was a strong questioning.

      I found this last point particularly compelling. Indeed the mystery of Brigitte's opaque youth had been solved by the question "If it's a man ?" [F&D501p9] resulting from the meeting of Xavier Poussard and Nathasha Rey. There, in symmetry, the mystery of Emmanuel's opaque childhood would be solved by the question "If his mother acted like a man ?".

      We then asked ourselves, "what obstacle is there to this hypothesis of a mother looking like a man ?" On the spur of the moment, our little citizen team answered none, hence the first title. Two days later, on January 31 (actually the night before), we found this obstacle :

      Françoise Noguès appears shorter than the 1977 protester. The potential use of heels or a slope of the street does not allow to be sure. Another clue is that Françoise Noguès' chest is less "discreet" than estimated in the previous comparative photo. It is therefore likely that she is not in the 1977 photo and that the resemblance of the faces is coincidental.

      A little further on, in the same Chapter 23, another hypothesis had been stated, without much conviction. It also concerned Emmanuel Macron's mother and the photo of Gay Pride 1977. For the same reason as the previous hypothesis, it was quickly rejected. So here it is, too, for the record.

      After the previous addition on January 29, here is the one for February 6, with these photo comparisons :

      The woman with the tambourine from 1977 and Françoise Noguès, Emmanuel Macron's mother in 2017. Similarities, including the same pout in the left and right photos, and also potential differences such as the earlobe, smaller waist in 1977.

      Here we come to compare Emmanuel Macron's mother with a participant of the 1977 Gay Pride other than the one at the beginning of this chapter. If the comparison appears better, it remains uncertain. The reader will be able to judge this, as he will be able to judge the complementary elements brought on February 12 in the following chapter.

      Hypothesis rejected (after rejecting the 1977 photo)

      Two photos ( 1 2 2 bis) of the 1977 gay pride, already reported in Chapter 14.

      It does not seem useless to recall these two rejected hypotheses, because they tried to highlight the role of Françoise Noguès. Indeed, it appears that Emmanuel Macron's mother has known Jean-Michel Trogneux for a long time and that she probably knew Pastor Doucé, as was explained in Chapter 25. But beyond a few clues and another hypothesis developed in the Appendix A 25, we have found nothing really conclusive.

    41. (A) The five Brigitte Trogneux and Auzière, one then four

      The careful reading of the hypotheses adopted in this file shows that there would have been, in the sense of civil status and spoken language, two Brigitte Auzière and three Brigitte Trogneux and that they were embodied by four people, one of them, the famous Jean-Michel Trogneux, of male birth, having embodied two. As it is easy to mix the Brigitte, the following reminder can be welcome. It also makes it possible to detect links between them that have not been made explicit. Beware, however, that the reader may get dizzy.

      At the very beginning, it is simple, there are only two Brigitte, both born in 1953, for sure for the first, probably for the second :
      1. 1953-1959 (?). Brigitte Trogneux born in Amiens, Jean-Michel Trogneux's younger sister, died around 1959.
      2. 1953-1984 (?). Brigitte Auzière, probably born in Eséka, Cameroon, niece of Jean-Louis Auzière, had three children with Jean-Michel Trogneux from 1975 to 1984, then disappeared under unknown circumstances.

      We can consider that Brigitte No. 2 appears because of the No. 1. Around 1973. Jean-Michel Trogneux indeed remains affected by the death of his younger sister to the point of being very attracted to the Brigitte. This first name is a criterion of choice, among others, since he will marry later a Véronique. He did not want to marry this Brigitte n° 2, Auzière, who thus did not become Mrs. Brigitte Trogneux. Another consequence, the children Sébastien, Laurence and Tiphaine are called Auzière, after their mother.

      This becomes more complicated for Brigitte n°1 as soon as she dies: her family keeps her alive artificially. As long as it is by word of mouth, or even by false writings, it can still go. But it gets tougher in 1974 when a subterfuge allows her to be officially married to an imaginary husband, André Louis Auzière (Annex A 43). Brigitte n°2 participates in this artifice and even sometimes assumes the personality of Brigitte n°1. This allows the Trogneux parents to pretend that the children of Brigitte n°2 are those of Brigitte n°1. You follow? Attention, we attack the hardest.

      Jean-Michel Trogneux is so haunted by his sister Brigitte n°1, deceased but family alive, that, around 1985, he will take her identity and reincarnate her, while taking, at the same time, that of Brigitte n°2 :
      1. 1985-now. Jean-Michel, becomes a woman under the identity of his sister Brigitte Trogneux. This civil status name (of "young girl"), however, is only commonly used in 2006-2007, because of the primacy of the name of "married woman".
      2. 1985-2006. At the same time Jean-Michel, father of her three children Auzière, becomes their mother, married to the fictitious husband André Louis Auzière, invented for the 1974 wedding. Her commonly used name is her married name, Brigitte Auzière. This makes the Auzière name of the three children much more believable. It feels like a "normal" family where the mom and kids are named after the dad, even if the dad is absent, far away.

      With these Brigitte n°3 and n°4, we are in full excitement: they are not even women and it is the same person under two different identities. Worse: this man is neither the groom of his marriage certificate, nor the bride! And he incarnates at the same time his deceased sister and the disappeared mother of his children: Brigitte n°3 and n°4 are the continuations of Brigitte n°1 and n°2. Only the close members of the Trogneux family who knew Brigitte n°1 know it. And they keep it quiet.

      Brigitte n°4 disappears in 2006 at the date of the fictitious divorce with the fictitious husband. She merges with Brigitte n°3. The latter then takes as her usual name Brigitte Trogneux, for about a year, before she is more called Brigitte Macron, after her marriage to Emmanuel Macron, in 2007. Of the first four Brigitte, there remains only the n°3, prolonging the n°1. The n°2 and n°4 are forgotten, as if erased.

      Let's finish, resting our brains, with the case of Brigitte n°5, simple and banal. It is a third Brigitte Trogneux :
      1. 1990-now. Brigitte Poillion marries Jean-Claude Trogneux, Jean-Michel's older brother, and becomes Mrs. Brigitte Trogneux.

      As with Brigitte No. 2, we can say that No. 5 is also related to No. 1. Jean-Claude could, him also, be very marked by the death of his little sister Brigitte n°1. He too may have been attracted to women with this name, again with restraint since his first wife was named Danièle.

      We thus realize that the first of these five Brigits may have brought the other four into this story.

      The signatures of Brigitte numbered 2, 3 (in 2007), 4 (in 2017, failing a notebook signature...) and 5.

    42. (A) Honfleur, meeting place of the Auzière and Macron couples?

      Article from Le Parisien dated November 1, 2018:

      The presidential couple is in Honfleur (Calvados) where the head of state has offered a small crowd bath after having lunch at the Bistro des Artistes in the old town. Questioned by reporters to know if he was tired as implied by several of his relatives, Emmanuel Macron brushed aside any decline in form. "I'm not letting go of anything, I'm just like all our fellow citizens I'm attached to the balance of my family and the habits we have, he explained at the microphone of BFMTV. It's been more than 20 years that I come to this same café and I will continue to do so. I was there when I was campaigning, I was there last year, I will continue to be."

      [photos from October 31, 2019, above left and below: Laurent Salmon, KCS Presse, link]

      So it would be since at least 1997 that Emmanuel and Brigitte meet in Honfleur. For what reason? What is going on in Honfleur? Why are they so attached to it? In 1997, Emmanuel was 20 years old, it is rather Brigitte who brought him there. She must have had an old attachment there? Which one? If we can't find out about Brigitte, let's ask the question differently  who comes to see Jean-Michel Trogneux every year at All Saints' Day ? The person, outside his family, who is the most important to him... Here, you burn  it is his big friend Jean-Louis Auzière !

      Jean-Louis Auzière runs the company TOSCA, whose headquarters are in Honfleur (links : 1 2 3). His wife Catherine Audoy is a member of the "Contre-Courant" association of artist-plasticians in Honfleur (link). They live in Touques, 10 miles from Honfleur.

      We have no evidence of these meetings, but do you believe that there is, there, a coincidence ? If you do not believe it, you will agree that this new clue adds to those showing the veracity of what this file tells.

      To the left, the Auzière couple at their home in Touques on the Honfleur Coast (end of Annex D 18).

    43. (A) Fictions and realities of the 1974 marriage

      July 29, 2022. I was informed of the existence of copies of the "Echos du Touquet" dealing with the marriage, on June 22, 1974, of André Louis Auzière and Brigitte Trogneux, different from those in the BNF, coming from an "official" source, in my opinion the municipal library of Le Touquet : page of June 28 and page of July 12, with a photo of another wedding, treated differently from the one we are concerned with. At the time I figured that the assumption of faking the two copies, as stated in Appendix A 9, was valid for all official filings. A member of the Secret Service would not do the job by halves... So there was no reason to question the scenario, which was based on a substitution by facsimiles a decade later, when Jean-Michel became Brigitte.

      However, it did allow me to put the focus back on the 1974 marriage record extract and its entry in the decennial tables (Appendix A 30). I had considered it to be a fake, but what if it was true ? If this wedding had actually taken place in 1974 ? The photo trickery would date from that time and "Les Echoes du Touquet" would have been published that way, for all its copies, official and private... This would contradict a key element of the scenario so far adopted : the marriage imagined retrospectively in 1984. It would have been imagined in 1974 and could even have been really celebrated and registered. Was such a scenario, whose contours remain to be defined, possible? It seems so, and I present it here to the readers of this file, submitting it to their sagacity. If it generates serious inconsistencies, I will correct it.

      I begin by saying that this will not upset and question essential achievements: Brigitte Macron remains born Jean-Michel Trogneux, father of the Auzière children, Brigitte born Auzière remains their mother. Also, the wedding photo opposite, from the "Echos du Touquet", with in red the anomalies presented by Natacha Rey in one of her videos, remains effectively faked, the evidence is multiple, we saw them in Appendix A 9.
      Let's call BT53 Brigitte Trogneux born in 1953, JMT her brother Jean-Michel Trogneux, BT45 Brigitte Trogneux born in 1945 (i.e. JMT and Brigitte Macron), JLA Jean-Louis Auzière, JMT's great friend, BA Brigitte Auzière, JLA's niece, ALA André Louis Auzière, BA's fictitious husband (in 1974) and then BT45's husband (in 1984/1985), JLA's so-called nephew (cf. genealogical tree seen earlier).

      BT53 died around 1959 as understood in Appendix A 37. Her parents and siblings did not accept her death and did not report it. For the relatives, they invented a tale according to which she would be alive, gone to study abroad (Algeria, USA ? BT53 would be supposed to accompany JMT?). As time passed, they needed to show strong evidence of her existence.

      That's where JLA comes in. He has his niece BA who has, for some time, been in a relationship with JMT and would like to marry him and have children. With his knowledge of the secret service (Appendix A 31), he devises a rocky marriage that would satisfy both his niece and the Trogneux parents. BA will be the bride, serving as BT53's clone for this wedding ostentatiously shown to the small world of Touquet, which has had the opportunity to know neither BA nor BT53 and cannot notice the substitution. And JLA will play the role of the groom, holding the role of the groom ALA and, by delegation, that of the real partner of² BA, that is to say JMT. The latter is present at the ceremony as the declared brother of the bride and her witness. The Trogneux parents are satisfied: their youngest daughter is "resuscitated" and the future children of the fictitious couple ALA-BT53, in reality those of JMT-BA, will be their grandchildren. They will be able to continue to make believe in the existence of their daughter BT53, nobody will go to check since she lives far away, in Croix in the suburbs of Lille. But, from time to time, the grandchildren will be shown. BA is also happy: she will not be a single mother, she has, socially, a husband, her children will have, socially, a father, nobody will go to check her maiden name, nor will they suspect that JMT, who shares her bed from time to time, is not ALA.

      This solution, twisted and hardly imaginable, but finally, in its own way, brilliant, is accepted. The mayor of Le Touquet, Léonce Deprez, does everything to satisfy his great tennis buddy Jean Trogneux (Appendix A 28). The photo is faked with the means of the time. And the arrival, from the following year, of the first of the couple's grandchildren consolidates the subterfuge. Friends and acquaintances, even brothers and sons-in-law of the parents Trogneux, believe ...

      Did the marriage really take place? Probably, in a discreet way, with registration in the registry office, the mayor being, in this particular case, not looking... The extract of the marriage certificate would therefore be authentic. The late divorce of ALA and BT45 in 2006 also fits into the scenario. Léonce Deprez was mayor of Le Touquet from 1969 to 1995, then again from 2001 to 2008. Between 1995 and 2001, he could not pronounce the divorce. Before he finished his last mandate he was the (best) accomplice, indispensable, to ecter the divorce of the union of 19744 before declaring, in 2006, the marriage of Emmanuel and Brigitte. As for the death of ALA in 2019, the means of the State allowed to invent it and to register it in the civil status to complete the manipulations of the parents and the mayor.

      Finally, it was not JMT who first wanted to resurrect BT53, it was his parents, with the undeclared death and marriage of 1974. JMT only supported them from 1959 to 1984. In 1984/1985, with the disappearance of BA, he succeeded in conferring, in addition to his administrative existence, a real body to his sister, fulfilling at the same time the will of his parents and his own desire to change sex... In this new scenario, the role of the Trogneux parents becomes the driving force. The complicity of the mayor of Le Touquet is essential : he covers both the marriage, divorce and remarriage, allowing for falsifications, or more precisely, non-verifications of identity.

      One question remains. Who is the bride in the 1974 photo? BA or Susan Spray (JLA's first wife)? The latter probably would not have agreed and, reviewing the Appendix A 9 (especially, at the end, the drop shadow analysis), the bride's image would not be from the same photo as the groom. Is it then BA, of whom we would finally have a photo? It seems rather that it is a photo of a third person, probably Monique Trogneux, sister of Jean Michel (strong Betaface resemblance of 82%, opposite), coming from his wedding in 1963. She accepted. This photo is intended to bluff, its legend too. There is reason to believe that the mention of the religious marriage is also a bluff (unless the priest is also complicit). And the wedding did not take place with as much pomp as the article suggests. The late publication, 6 days after the ceremony, erased the landmarks, the absence of the first names too. Bluff.

      As for the strange absence of the first names in the title of the photo, it could be explained as follows: it is above all a Trogneux-Auzière marriage, because it is both that of ALA with BT53 and that of JMT with BA. It is enough, by a game of photocopies, to reverse "Auzière" and "Trogneux"... Another meaning: those are JLA and Monique Trogneux in the photo. And again: it would be a coded message for future brigittologists !

    44. (A) The logic of the present scenario Jean-Michel - Brigitte

      The scenario presented in this file, especially in its Conclusion, is a sight to behold. By skimming it, a contrarian may consider it to be ramblings without real evidence. No proof of the death of the child Brigitte Trogneux around 1959, no proof of the disappearance of Brigitte Auzière around 1984, nor even of her existence. It is true, but it is precisely the knot of this affair: all was made so that these proofs do not exist. This cover-up has been effective for several decades. The few people who know about it remain walled up in the silence of their complicity.

      However, unless one is indignant about not believing in the official rosewater version, as former minister Roselyne Bachelot does ("It's foul", opposite photo by Stéphane Lemouton, article), very real facts are there to prove the existence of deep flaws in the biographies of Jean-Michel and Brigitte Trogneux and in that of André Louis Auzière. Let us recall them :
      • We know almost nothing about Brigitte Trogneux's youth. The three photos we were shown are of different children (Chapter 7). We only have definite traces of his life from 1984. His presence in the 1950s family photo is not even assured.
      • We know almost nothing about Jean-Michel Trogneux since 1984. We know little more than the presence of his signature on a few documents or his name on directories. Or the ridiculous presence of a "little fatty" to whom the Elysée does not even dare to give a name (Annex A 7). This disappearance of Jean-Michel in 1984-1985 when Brigitte appears has no official explanation.
      • Almost nothing is known about Brigitte's first husband, André Louis Auzière. The three photos officially attributed to him are of three other people who have been recognized (Chapter 9). And the photo of his wedding is faked, several photo experts attest (Appendix A 9).

      Roselyne Bachelot brushes all this aside, but there are many who refute the official farbia to rely on a scenario that explains the reality of the facts, even if it means not being entirely sure. And the Table of Assumptions withheld shows that we are not. Our judgment is nuanced and is likely to evolve, as it did during the first seven months of 2022.

      With these initial observations, Natacha Rey and Xavier Poussard deduced, in 2021, that Jean-Michel had turned into Brigitte. And all those who had doubts and questions followed them. And this started to make some noise. The lack of official reaction, if not an obtuse denial in early January 2021, confirmed the deductions. There also came, in mid-January, a confirmation proved by a technical analysis of comparing vocal spectra : Brigitte Macron and the transsexual Veronique, interviewed in 1977, are the same person (red box).

      We had then, at the beginning of this file, in January 2022, a solid foundation of facts considered safe : Jean-Michel became Brigitte, André-Louis did not exist, the wedding photo of 1974 is bogus. But around this base, we had other hypotheses to confirm : the people present in the family photo of the 1950s (Chapter 6, Appendix 11), the mother of the three Auzière children (Chapter 10), the Gallice jewelry store in Toulon (Appendix A 20), Brigitte's presence in a high school in Strasbourg (Appendix A 5). ..

      In this same month of January 2021, the Elysee indirectly showed some new pieces, civil status acts (Annex A 7, Annex A 30). At first, guessing the provenance, we thought they were fakes. As time passed, we realized that we were wrong to dispute certain documents. Xavier Poussard was right when he said that the difficulty was to distinguish the real from the fake. From May to July 2022, our perception evolved by attributing more reality to documents from the Elysée. Here are the main ones:
      • The family photo from the 1950s is true, showing the parents and their six children. This means that Brigitte Trogneux as a child did exist as a daughter, that Brigitte Macron, born Jean-Michel Trogneux, usurped her identity. And that this little girl probably died young in a dramatic way, Brigitte Macron herself declaring it, under cover of a niece (Appendix A 37).
      • The marriage certificate in 1974 is true. It was indeed recorded in the registry office at the time. And, as odd as it may seem, it is consistent with the non-existence of the groom and the masculinity of the bride (Appendix A 43). This means that the Trogneux parents were consenting and therefore made it appear that their daughter Brigitte was still alive.
      • The birth records of the three Auzière children, which we do not know precisely, are probably correct. Since their last name is not Trogneux but Auzière, this may mean that Auzière is the mother's name.
      • Brigitte Trogneux, née Jean-Michel, married to André Louis, was indeed a teacher in Strasbourg (Annex A 36).

      The most delicate point, in this early August 2022, remains the mother of the three Auzière children. She exists, of course, and it is not Brigitte Macron who was born a man. In the Chapter 29, we show that she is certainly Brigitte Auzière, a niece of Jean-Louis Auzière, the one who helped his friend Jean-Michel Trogneux.

      The official veracity of the 1974 marriage suggests another hypothesis for the mother of the three Auzière children. She could be a person named neither Auzière nor Trogneux. The marriage of 1974 could have allowed to register the children as having for parents the married couple. With a complicity in the town hall to remove any embarrassing verification. And that is why the children were born in Amiens...
      This cannot be dismissed. But Jean-Louis Auzière is still extremely involved in the whole process. He can only be so involved because his own family is concerned... And there is the signature "B Auzière". We therefore remain firmly convinced that the mother is Brigitte Auzière, without ruling out the possibility that new clues will change our minds.

      As in a police investigation, we have incorporated all the known facts into our concluding scenario. It is certainly complicated, but it is consistent. We don't know of any other as complete, and we doubt that there could be another one very different. Unless Roseline Bachelot can show better logic...

    45. (A) The Elysee's fluctuating defense of stubborn realities

      The accusations made against Brigitte Macron since 2021, particularly that of identity theft, are very serious and implicate the complicity of the president of the Republic himself, as well as that of the Trogneux parents, siblings still living, and that of the three Auzière children. Faced with such accusations, if they were unfounded, anyone would file a complaint for defamation. No: neither Brigitte Macron nor anyone from her very close family has done so so far. Only the Auzière couple has gone, as far as they are concerned directly (Appendix D 18). The only complaint filed by Brigitte, her children and her brother Jean-Michel, was for invasion of privacy (Appendix D 7). It is a blustery, by the fragility of the motive (a private life so public) and by the double involvement of Jean-Michel and Brigitte.

      The only official reactions are two television interviews with Brigitte Macron, dating back to mid-January 2022 (Chapter 14). In front of complacent interviewers, she played the card of victimization and outraged innocence, going so far as to compare herself to a teenager being bullied at school. She mocked what we guess are sulphurous and conspiratorial comments. As for Covid, one should not inform oneself, go on the Internet and look for the truth... We have just seen, in the previous Appendix, that the friend Roselyne Bachelot plays on the same register ("It's vile"), like all the celebrity press and well beyond (Libération in Introduction or Le Monde in Annex D 19). By naming two horrible shrews, Natacha Rey and Amandine Roy, as the only ones responsible for this nauseating rumor, Brigitte Macron has deceived her audience into believing that there's nothing serious going on and that it's only about the die-hards of social networks. The major media also minimize the impact of the revelations (14,000 tweets for Le Monde, that's all), although some go a little further, citing Faits & Documents. Mentioning a paid magazine that is meant to be confidential, by classifying it as extreme droute, is less embarrassing than, for example, giving the web address, accessible to all, of a genealogist's site.

      As surprising as it may seem, such primary denial has, so far, pretty much worked. The echo of these revelations, even if it is very important and has touched a good part of the French population, and a part of the world population as well, remains in the unwritten and the media non-talk, as far as the substance of the case is concerned. Even highly critical sites, such as France-Soir or Le Courrier des Stratèges (hesitantly, Appendix D 26) remain silent, as if the apocalypse would be unleashed against them if they broke the omerta. More than the Elysian denial, it is the media silence that hides the truths. The troubles encountered by Natacha Rey (both complaints) and Xavier Poussard (Chapter 5) are frightening to those who put up with the lies.

      February 18, 2022, a regional newspaper, Le Midi Libre (link). The assignment mentions neither transsexuality (transidentity for Wikipedia),
      nor does it refer to transphobia, which for Wikipedia is an "aversion toward transgender people." It's okay to have an aversion to lying...

      As we saw in Appendix A 7 (Moadab and Blanrue) and at the end of Appendix A 20 (Gallice Jewelry), the Elysee has activated another, more indirect level of defense. Its aim, especially with brigittologists, is to muddy the waters, to imagine falsified documents or troubling similarities, so that contradictory versions are created... In short, to sow doubt, to complicate and weaken the file.

      As we enter August 2022, we realize that changes have been made to the base of Geneanet. As explained in its Wikipedia entry and, less clearly, in its site named "The People's House," The Fraternal is an association of Freemasons. As already pointed out, this base seems to us to be more or less teleguided by the Elysée, the fiche of Brigitte Macron being particularly dithyrambic. We read that "In France, her appearances trigger enthusiastic " Brigiiiiiiiitte ""... Not a word about her potential masculinity, it is even written twice that she is "of female gender". So the Fraternity is "brigittolous" and it is curious to follow the evolution of this base. Precisely, the fiche of Jean-Michel Trogneux, already presented in Appendix A 20, has just been modified in June or July 2022. It is much more fleshed out...

      Below is the sheet before modification and, opposite, after.
      Strangely, everything revolves around the question "Is Jean Michel Trogneux really untraceable?" and the text even takes information from Facts & Documents by managing to evade that Jean-Michel would have turned into Brigitte ! With the conclusion "Jean Michel Trogneux was therefore alive in 2007. ... ", forgetting that in 2022 he has, as a matter of public record, filed a complaint against Natacha Rey (mentioning it, it would be necessary to explain the reason ...). In addition to the Gallice jewelry that is still there, blatant untruths are asserted : Généanet would be "fed by any user who has subscribed to a premium offer" (premium or not, anyone can open and manage a database, without touching that of others) and "any premium user can modify a page", leading one to believe that Natacha Rey would have hacked the site of La Fraternelle ! Moreover, it is embarrassing for a genealogical page, Jean-Michel would not have been married and would not have had children...

      So we have here a new strategy, which consists in answering the only question "Where is Jean-Michel Trogneux ?", by erasing that this one became Brigitte (but sparing us anyway the "little fatty" of Moadab...). This shows, to say the least, that the affair continues to spread and that the Elysée is forced to back off a little... until, under popular or foreign pressure, the media dam finally breaks...

  33. Appendices B: additional comparisons

      Here are some graphic comparisons for everyone to judge. Some miscellaneous themes are also addressed.

    1. (B) Jean-Michel and Brigitte.

      Comparison Betaface: 64% (not sure if it's Jean-Michel on the left, see Chapter 14)

    2. (B) Brigitte's childhood photos and photos of her daughters.

      It's more obvious to Tiphaine than to Laurence...

    3. (B) Brigitte and her children.

      Betaface comparison between Jean-Michel/Brigitte and her children: between 77% and 66%.

    4. (B) Françoise Noguès (Emmanuel's mother) and his mother Manette.

      Comparison Betaface between Germaine (Manette) and her daughter Françoise Noguès: 65 to 66 percent.
      This is a kind of calibration for a true parent-child bond.

    5. (B) Veronique the transsexual and Brigitte.

      Apparently, cosmetic surgery on the nose (rhinoplasty)...
      It is also possible to reduce the jaws, cheekbones... INA Article with video.

      (and still the accusatory reversal...)

    6. (B) André-Louis and Jean-Louis Auzière.

    7. (B) Rejected likenesses

      Betaface comparison between Brigitte and her near lookalike from the 1977 gay pride: 68%.
      Betaface comparison between Françoise Noguès and her two vague doppelgangers of the 1977 gay pride: 69% and 66%
      (and Françoise Noguès' pupillary distance is wider).

    8. (B) Jean-Michel Macron , Emmanuel Macron and Joseph Doucé.

      Jean-Michel Macron / Emmanuel Macron / Joseph Doucé

    9. (B) Dimple and diastema (Joseph Doucé and Emmanuel Macron). In chapter 24, Joseph Doucé's facial comparison with Emmanuel Macron questions the former's dimpled chin and the latter's diastema (splayed gums), features often considered hereditary, found in one and not the other.

      Page Wikipedia on dimple : "Often parents with dimples will pass it on to their children". Page Wikipedia on diastema ("spacing between two teeth") : "It can be congenital or acquired". Like other inherited characteristics described on this page, transmission from parents to children is not systematic : "It is possible for parents with dimples to have children without dimples and parents without dimples to have children with dimples". For the value of the paternity hypothesis presented, one can still regret that Emmanuel has no dimples and Joseph has no diastema...

      A brigittologist tells us, "Macron's diastema is not evident in his photos, at age twelve. He had to wear braces, and the result was a general widening of the jaw. Besides, I have doubts about the heredity of this character: my husband had incisors very wide apart, like no one in his ancestry, and strangely enough they have narrowed with age. Our children have no diastema". So the diastema was less significant than the dimple and, with the frequent interventions of dentists, its hereditary significance has greatly diminished...

    10. (B) Backstage

      March 4 tweet comment:"What I love most about the Macron-Trogneux,
      is their naturalness and spontaneity. Simple and true people, without calculation.

      April 20 tweet. "On the left is the photo released to the French press by the Bestimage agency
      of Mimi Marchand. On the right the photo taken by a foreign photographer.

    11. (B) Sexual twirls

      Tweets from March and February 2022

      Tweets from March 2022

    12. (B) Brigitte, her close shave and other masculinities

      The Chapter 13 shows the many masculine characteristics of Brigitte Macron. Some of them, at the very beginning of this chapter are only briefly mentioned. I present them here again, in a more developed way. The illustrations and remarks come from tweets (except 2).

      1. Knee outward

        Although this view is apparently quite common, I have not found confirmation of it on the web.

      2. Lower face developed

        The face can be divided into 3 parts , the upper tier or third to the eyes, the middle third to the base of the nose, the lower tier to the tip of the chin (link). In women the lower stage is much less developed than in men , as can be perfectly seen on a skeleton . The lower jaw is much more developed in men, which makes the square jaw effect typical of comic characters Buck Danny, Blueberry, Bob Morane, Thorgal ... etc.  in contrast to the heroines Laureline in Valerian, Aaricia in Thorgal, Yoko Tsuno, Natacha the stewardess ...

        Except in the case of a woman with a particularly elongated face, this is constant. Even if there is a surgery to break the angle of the lower jaw and/or decrease the relief of the chin, the length of the lower tier remains unchanged, more or less. This is what gives Brigitte Macron that strange look, and the reason for the wigs (not extensions) that go to the shoulders.

        This is, in my opinion [that of the brigittologist Maria, speaking], the simplest way to recognize whether a skull is that of a man or a woman , by simple proportion.

        Thickness of the face, high neck...

        Sacred jaw!!!

      3. Finger length, Manning's index

        The Manning index" (or 2D:4D index or digital ratio) is given by calculating the ratio of the length of the index finger to the length of the ring finger of the right hand laid flat. The ratio between these two fingers would present a sexual dimorphism: although the absolute length of the index finger is on average shorter in women, the difference in length between index and ring finger is on average greater in men than in women. The Manning index is a way to differentiate a man from a woman in a quick first approach, to be confirmed by other methods.

      4. Pilosity

        These photos (enlarge by clicking on them) and others show that Brigitte Macron is still clean-shaven... It's clear, too, in this AFP photo in a article from Marianne on November 12, 2021 :

      5. Incision marks from an Adam's apple surgery

        This is not visible in all of the photos, but some are disturbing...

        Tweet from April 1, 2022.

      To conclude, in line with the introduction to Chapter 13, let us conclude thus : taken in isolation, these masculine characteristics are not enough to say that Brigitte is a woman. But taking them all together (those of Chapter 13 and of this Appendix), if she had been born a woman (we have seen that this is not the case), she would be an extremely rare phenomenon ! It is understandable that Natacha Rey began by relying on these very surprising findings.

    13. (B) Grapefruits, oranges and lemons

      Left, from Edika, cover of Fluide Glacial #302, August 2001.

      May 19. The famous Yellow Wigs (also in Appendices D 4 and D 11) have just completed the 4th episode of their series "In the Land of Jean-Briche," in >>>video>> of 15:51. Performed by Coccyx Crane and Mimi Makrell, title "Oranges & Grapefruits," pictured above.

    14. (B) And the little bird?

      Jean-Michel Trogneux is a pretext to learn in these times when the word "iel" is added to the dictionary and transgender people can participate in the Miss France contest. A "first lady of France" transgender claimed, proud of it, could have served the cause around the world. But there, it's missed, we are in full shameful and offended denial, transphobic even, under cover of state lies and vile media complacency. It is true that the sexual attack on a minor does not help the picture. In short, beyond this messed up stunt, we have to adapt and educate ourselves to better understand. Precisely, this May 20, a tweet came to enlighten us, knowing that it may not apply to iel (or ielle, heck, how do you choose ?), as we don't know his degree of transformation :

      "Brigitte and her little bird who points his "nose""

      We learn a new word, "tucking". Let's continue to educate ourselves with the introduction to the Wikipedia page dedicated to it (without illustration) :

      Tucking is a technique where an individual hides the shape of their penis so that it cannot be seen through their clothing. This practice is often used by transgender women, as well as cisgender men in drag. There are fertility-related side effects caused by tucking, such as reduced sperm count. Some types of clothing are specifically designed to conceal the penis, such as gaffs or boxers.

      Then it gets complicated, you have to go to "cisgender" and then "drag"... but that's beside the point, Brigitte Macron is neither cis nor drag, that's for sure...

    15. (B) Brigitte Macron as seen by Olivier Probst

      Olivier Probst's site is featured in Appendix C 1. This June 1, 2022, I discover that its author has made additions concerning Brigitte Macron, on his page entitled "1984 at the best of the foul". Here are some excerpts.

      Without counting on the 62,400 euros per year incurred on the public purse in hairdresser and makeup artist costs to ensure the facelift that is required, a smooth skin and a shiny scalp to the presidential couple. That is to say, the equivalent of 4 smics per month for Brigitte's styling. Because after all, Bel Ami, You and your cougar with the hairpiece elegance, your pimbic who parades in Prada, your "peroxide cagole", to use the qualifiers of the "Financial Times", are worth it !

      We can say that it is really the bouquet, especially since your Brigitte plays us to the good Samaritans, with an ostentatious charity absolutely dripping with hypocrisy, in a poor play of boulevard theater, via its operation of com of the "yellow coins". Thus, she does not hesitate to appeal to the solidarity and national generosity of the vile populace, so that it contributes by its miserable obole to restore your tarnished image at little cost, to maintain as well as possible in place your stature, to perpetuate all your imposture.

      The union of this strong dubious duo, which we were portrayed as a beautiful romance, a touching and exceptional fusional idyll, a heartbreaking hymn to difference, a shattering love story in the water of roses, as passionate as unabashed, where the love defies the conveniences, whereas it is only a summit of indecency out of any propriety, was indeed according to the point of view, as precocious as late and should have in all logic, fallen under the blow of the law... But of law, it would not know how to be question of it for these good people above any suspicion! However, it is not a minor fault, when at the bend of a very bad play, in a combination of circumstances more than aggravating, we let ourselves be tempted by providence and that we suddenly feel an irresistible as well as frightful attraction for the young scarecrow who declaims his text on the boards, that we see ourselves struck by a flash of lightning for our youthful Jupiter. No decidedly, it is not a commonplace thing when one makes the court instead of dispensing its courses and that one surprises oneself to seduce behind the scenes, behind the curtains, one of its pupils, a young youth still virgin of 14 years, to welcome this cuistre between its thighs, whereas one is oneself in the flower of the age, that to be its mom of 39 years and that a gap of 25 years of age separates us !

  34. Appendices C: Macron and Covid

    These Appendices C are a continuation of the adjacent page on Covid and Chapter 21.

    1. (C) Vaxxination, the perfect crime

      "Hold on, we'll get these assholes" SMS from Emmanuel Macron to Olivier Véran revealed by "Le Point", January 2021.
      French Republic - Health pass required to enter this facility

      I belatedly discovered Olivier Probst's site, which I find remarkable. So I dedicate the seventh part of this appendix to him. It illustrates what I wrote in chapter 21  "From all sides, [...] we found ourselves [...] building a common front," acquiring a common culture. We, the 74 people thumbnailed in Chapter 14, Olivier Probst, Lionel Labosse, me, the Saturday demonstrators, and millions of others in France and many more around the world, now constitute a new and very resolute force that will, in a more or less long term, put down the plotters. "Vaccination COVID-1984, The Perfect Crime" is the title of a 552 page book, reprinted in a >>>video>>> of 2h 42 on a text said by a synthetic female voice and taken over a very long page, of which here are some extracts :

      Operation COVID was launched as a lightning psychological Blitzkrieg, as a brutal media war to create an initial shock, followed in the wake of an immediate containment, the confinement of populations. The instigators of this pandemic have an advanced knowledge of the human psyche, of the mechanisms of psycho-trauma and of the overactivation of the limbic system thanks to an unprecedented media hype coupled with an unprecedented censorship. [...] "Fear and anxiety, coupled with human isolation psychologically decompensate individuals and they have a breakdown... They are no longer capable of rational thought. A global psychosis is underway and people will then turn to any false promises that will reduce the emotional pain they feel because of fear. So you can dangle a false vaccine in front of them and they will believe it, because they don't want to feel the pain anymore. If you challenge that narrative, they become aggressive, because you are taking them back to that emotional state of pain that they don't want to be in. They've literally lost their minds, and the people who came up with this are absolutely evil, but also very bright !" - Dr. Zelenko.

      "Containment is a weapon of mass destruction." - Jean-Francois Toussaint, Director of the Institute for Biomedical Research and Epidemiology of Sport. [...] Prof. Jean-Francois Toussaint, guest of Cnews, speaking about these iniquitous measures undertaken by the Government, including the implementation of a reinforced curfew, did not hesitate to speak of mass sacrifice: "We are more on measures that resemble those that the Incas took in the face of the solstice and in the face of major climatic disasters, sacrificing their most beautiful teenagers ! " The image of sacrifice is not here outrageous or out of place, since all these measures are actually based on no real scientific basis and are contrary to all reason. They are voluntary political measures, whose instigators are fully aware of what they are implementing. The sedentary lifestyle and the psychological degradation linked to isolation actually contribute to the collapse of the immune system. One can legitimately wonder if during the first confinement, the fact of having locked up in the greatest promiscuity the contaminated sick people, with those who are healthy, was not in fact the best way to create new contagion hearths within the families themselves and to increase the transmission of the virus within the population...

      Also, why didn't they just requisition all those clinics, with 115. 000 beds available ? Why didn't we use reserve doctors and graduate students to avoid having to block the whole country? Indeed, in times of war, if there is a war, as the puppet who serves us as President did not cease to chant it in a martial tone six times : We Requisition ! Finally, why did we not resort to ambulatory medicine in order to avoid any saturation effect of the hospital system? Moreover, why not have concentrated all efforts on those most exposed to the virus in society, namely, the most fragile and the elderly, instead of scuttling in a suicidal, even methodical way the whole country ?

      By the way, for those who know how to read, it is even written in all letters by the manufacturers on their mask boxes that they are not medical devices and that they do not protect in any way against viral attacks! Legally, the mask manufacturers certainly do not want to be held responsible in case of contamination with Covid-19... It is a guarantee for them not to be condemned in justice in case of complaints. In this world, money doesn't lie. "No study proves any usefulness of the mask to prevent viral respiratory diseases, whether indoors or outdoors. Period !" - Prof. Denis Rancourt There are at least a dozen scientific studies that have shown that masks have no value in stopping the spread of respiratory viruses. A meta-analysis published by the CDC in May 2020 found "no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks." Another study of more than 8,000 subjects found that masks "did not appear to be effective against laboratory-confirmed viral respiratory infections or clinical respiratory infections." Worse than that, worn for several hours, masks get dirty and become veritable walking petri dishes, culture broths and bacterial nests, microbial cesspools, they make us breathe our own miasma in a closed circuit and quickly become a breeding ground for microorganisms. In addition, they deplete the amount of oxygen that the blood distributes to the tissues and the brain, which increases the risk of developing hypoxia with possible serious physiological sequelae later on. Masks also involve a risk of self-contamination, as they are close to the mucous membranes of the eyes and mouth and are often mishandled by potentially contaminated hands. They are the source of headaches and breathing difficulties. Masks were never designed to be worn in such conditions.

      But, the most extravagant thing about these RT-PCR tests is that their sensitivity has been greatly amplified, making them much more easily positive. They behave like zooms that become more and more blurred as they are amplified. In France, they go up to 50 cycles. However, all specialists agree that at 60 cycles, absolutely everyone would have the coronavirus. All RT-PCR tests performed with a CT amplification threshold of 33 cycles or more are therefore invalid and all the so-called "positive cases" confirmed and recorded in the databases during the last 14 months would therefore be erroneous. These tests are also so sensitive that they detect inactive virus particles! According to many virologists, it would be impossible to detect live virus beyond 33 cycles. [...] Dr. Michael Yeadon, the former vice president and chief scientific officer of "Pfizer," says of this, "This idea that you can be sick, even if you don't have any symptoms, and that you can be a respiratory viral threat to someone else, even if you don't have any symptoms. That was also invented in 2020, it's just unheard of and it defies common sense as well."So why terrorize everyone on this basis in the media, if not to plunge the entire population into a form of acute paranoia, postulating that everyone would be a threat and a potential danger to their health...

      As reported by professor and epidemiologist Laurent Toubiana, who has prepared an entire expert report for the courts on the gaping anomalies of this epidemic, the communication has been essentially focused on a cumulative number of cases, which has never been a determining factor in judging the severity and ensuring the proper monitoring of an epidemic. All the more so if the so-called "positive" supposed cases, are cumulated with the very real cases in the count of the disease as the CDC site clearly states. It is not representative, it is a number that is only increasing, even if in the meantime, many infected with the virus have come out of the disease. We should only count the new cases of illness, take into account the incidence rate and the speed of spread of the virus. Also, when we went from one year to the next, they added up the number of sick people from both years instead of starting from zero by resetting the count. So everything was done to inflate the reported numbers outrageously. In addition, it should be noted that according to the work of Laurent Toubiana, at the worst of the crisis, we had a maximum of 140 sick people per 100,000 inhabitants over one week in March 2020 and since then this figure has only dropped with 31 sick people in August 2021 during the 5ᵉ wave ! He also said that for seasonal flu (which by the way has disappeared) the peak could reach 600 /100,000 inhabitants. Look for the error !

      As for "Ivermectin", it would be in early treatment, 85% effective in reducing the mortality rate of this virus and what is more, it is a widely known molecule, on which we have all the necessary hindsight. This drug would eliminate the coronavirus at 99%, as it has been confirmed during studies of microorganisms. What more could one ask for? In India, where the government decided to ignore the recommendations of the "World Health Organization" not to use "Ivermectin", the results against the Indian variant were immediate, with a spectacular drop in the number of cases and deaths. More than 20 countries are using "Ivermectin" with great success.

      Let's also keep in mind that the appalling mortality figures originally prognosticated by the official authorities turned out to be perfectly false, with 500,000 deaths brandished for the first wave, which turned out to be only 35,000... As for the 400,000 deaths announced for the second wave, they ended up with 25. 000 ! It is very easy to brandish such astronomical figures to stupefy the minds in order to justify exceptional sanitary measures and to affirm afterwards that the measures taken were effective, because they would have avoided the hecatomb so much announced. Olivier Véran is not to be outdone in this campaign of fear, with his shock formula: "the Covid-19 is, a patient every two seconds, a hospitalization every thirty seconds, a death every 4 minutes. " If we are to believe the seedy lies of this miserable bogeyman of junk, if this were true then, a sick person every two seconds would amount to 1,296,000 sick people per month, while a hospitalization every 30 seconds would amount to 86,000 hospitalizations per month and finally a death every 4 minutes would amount to 10,800 deaths per month ! The shameless lie is a mode of governance for this government. Clearly, we are facing a terrorist power, which governs and imposes its measures through fear. However, a study by researchers in Oslo shows that in reality, there was not even a notable excess of mortality in 2020 as a result of Covid-19, which is in stark contrast to the prevailing discourse of fear. Under these conditions, can we still reasonably speak of a pandemic?

      As the singer Jacques Higelin would say, "Those who are afraid to die are often afraid to live. They breathe cautiously while waiting for the end." What exactly is the meaning of a life cut off from everything that makes it valuable, from what makes it so precious, unique and authentic, namely: emotions, laughter and smiles, carelessness, love, sharing, encounters, escape, discoveries, leisure? From now on, we are immersed in a program of death, led by these psychopathic elites, so-called philanthropists in an ultra-controlled, artificial, sanitized and dehumanized society, more and more deprived of love and authentic human relationships. In fact, what they fear most is love, because it allows for a world that is beyond their control.

      "Should we forbid ourselves to live in order not to die"

    2. (C) Ode to Macron Mephisto.
      I am now moved to present this >>>video>>> of 18:03 (90 Mo) entitled "Ode to Macron Mephisto" // copy-paste pdf: //. It is breathtaking. Olivier Probst is the complete author, with text and illustrations that you can find in full on this page. Jean-Michel Trogneux is not present, but you can feel him in the background behind his creature... Have a look and let others discover it. Below, the beginning and some extracts.

      MACRON, YOU who speak of "moral fault" for the uninjected... This is probably the most beautiful tribute that vice could pay to virtue. YOU who, since the beginning of your five-year term, have been methodically destroying the country by carving it up to deliver it at a discount to the vultures and scavengers of high finance, YOU who are stripping us of our history, when it is not to insult it... YOU who, from felony to betrayal, have deprived us of our finest industrial flagships, of our national strategic sectors such as Alstom or the Saint-Nazaire naval shipyards.

      YOU who, moreover, have blocked the many effective, potentially risk-free and inexpensive early treatments, such as Ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine, in order to impose on us by force, whatever the cost and despite common sense, this hazardous injection that is abusively called "vaccine" for the purposes of manipulation and deception, this obscure chemical soup concocted in a hurry in the cauldrons of Big Pharma, with potentially devastating side effects and which has already caused a number of deaths unheard of in the history of vaccines; It is clear that the only antibodies that we should urgently develop to protect our social body are those aimed at protecting and immunising us from the endemic corruption of this system, which is obviously rotten to the core!

      Yes, it is YOU, this shameless perjurer who has neither face nor honour, this puppet president, this vile puppet of high finance who by his incessant denials would make the puppet Pinocchio blush with shame, who throughout this crisis has not stopped betraying us and manipulating us to the last degree... It is you who have set up lying as a mode of Governance and raised hypocrisy to the rank of art. It is clear that from one variant to another, the only thing that remains unchanged about you is your innate propensity for blatant lies. You are the undisputed champion of double talk, of double ethics with variable geometry and of paradoxical injunction. The height of audacity, YOU have set yourself up as the head of the Ministry of Truth, to fight against "Fake News", even though you are its undisputed king.

      Do YOU seriously think that the exponential myriad of cuckolds of vaccination, who do not see the fulfilment of any of the beautiful promises that were made to them, but sometimes suffering in the depths of their flesh from devastating side effects, or seeing around them the sudden disappearance of loved ones, will continue eternally to swallow McKinsey's snakes and boas constrictors of Big Pharma's shameless lies? One can legitimately doubt it, hypnosis has its limits and the awakening after the hangover is likely to be violent.

      YOU are by far the most destructive virus to ever enter our lives.

      [photo BelgaImage]

    3. (C) Omicron less dangerous than vaxxin in youth. February 6. In France, the Covid in its so terrrible Omicron variant that it provoked the quasi-mandatory vaccine pass, the epidemic peak is behind us and look how nice it was and how appallingly craignos [sucky] was the Elysian lie that made it a pretext :

      "For the first time in human history, people are dreaming of contracting a virus to escape its « cure »"
      Covid-Omicron is benign and vaxxin is dangerous, causing heart problems in particular, even in young people.
      As a result, many try to contract the disease to escape worse.
      + article from February 14 by Laurent Toubiana showing the disinformation of Le Monde and AFP on this graph.

    4. (C) Luc Montagnier, a Nobel Prize-winning whistleblower.

      July 27, 2022. It seems that Luc Montagnier was right about the human origin of Covid and its link to AIDS, China proves him right. This is explained in a article where we read these two astonishing sentences  "The denial of the link between Covid and AIDS will eventually fall" and "Covid was created for vaccines, not vaccines for Covid". How could our medical and political authorities so disdain this great scientist ?

      February 10. It was reported yesterday in the early afternoon that Professor Luc Montagnier, winner of the 2008 Nobel Prize for Medicine, died on 8 February at the age of 90. This information should not be mentioned here. It is here, however, because it is glossed over in all the major media, which, before ignoring the old man, had repeatedly scorned him ("paria" for Le Monde, "their wreck" for Le Figaro, "false statements" for this extract from Wikipedia). They don't want the French to know that one of their greatest scientists has repeatedly called (including in his appeal of August 7, 2021) for an end to mass vaxxination. They are still pretending that there is unanimity among scientists to inject everyone. In his book "Vaccination COVID-1984, Le crime parfait", Olivier Probst talks about this prominent whistleblower :

      The great scientist Luc Montagnier exposes the dangers of this vaccination which makes people believe that it fights the pandemic. However, it is precisely the opposite, it feeds it! Moreover, the variant virus is resistant to vaccination:"The new variants are created by the selection of antibodies produced by vaccination." He also stated that the variants are generated by vaccinations:"This is a huge mistake, it's a scientific error and an inexplicable medical error, history will take stock of it all one day, because it is indeed vaccination that created the variant."

      On my journal Covid, I wrote this on November 17 and December 12/13, 2021. I remember being touched by the solicitude of the Nobel Prize in taking an interest in the case of Mauricette, Marc Doyer's wife, a victim of the terrible Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (or "mad cow"), which had virtually disappeared and is now reappearing. It is a prion disease, a consequence of vaxxination predicted by several scientists (article of 14 September 2021).

      17 November. Professor Luc Montagnier, Nobel Prize winner for medicine, sounds the alarm once again. "The first phase is the side effects that are quite common but don't last very long but are already resulting in deaths," he explains. "Then you have the cardiovascular effects," the biologist continues. "And now you have the prion effect," Professor Luc Montagnier explains. "These are other deaths that are happening, and these people died of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease," Professor Luc Montagnier explains to André Bercoff. "This disease is very rare, normally, when it is sporadic, it is one case in a million," he explains. "Here, it is a group of seven people independent of each other with different doctors who have this disease. The common factor is that they were vaccinated with two doses of Pfizer vaccine." This ties in with what I wrote on 12 November - 1, except that we have now gone from 6 to 7 deaths from mad cow disease in France. Article, video of 48 mins.

      December 12 - 1. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease cases seem to be forgotten. I went and read Marc Doyer's tweets. It's still increasing in France, we're now up to about ten confirmed cases. And also a case in Belgium, one in Israel, "The scandal will soon go beyond the borders of France". A very hushed-up scandal in France... P.-S. of December 13 : Marc Doyer and Pr Luc Montagnier spoke together on Radio Courtoisie (article with 24 mn video). Eight cases are proven, Prof. Montagnier believes that it is "a time bomb" and calls, once again, to stop vaccinating.

      Photo from February 22, 2022 at the funeral of Luc Montagnier. The whistleblowers may exaggerate or the facts may prove them wrong, and that is to be hoped for. But it was necessary to alert so that it does not go further...

      Tributes (from the excluded) as of yesterday: tweet from Marc Doyer, video of 2 mn 23 from Ricardo / Richard Boutry and article from France-Soir. And a article from April 9, 2021, which acknowledges that it "had to wait a year, twelve long months, for an ignominiously conspiracy-minded thesis [first promoted by Luc Montagnier]to be deemed credible today." A new article, by Alexander Doyle, asks  "Have AFP and the mass media been ordered to erase Professor Montagnier from history ?" Segregation is still active in the mass media, which believes that science delivers a single truth that should never be questioned.

      P.-S. of the same February 10 : Le Monde (followed by AFP and other newspapers) decided to publish an article at 5:12 pm anyway. Unsurprisingly, for the recent positions of the deceased, only the criticisms against him are noted, as if he were the only scientist not to follow the vaxxinal doxa. Recall that in early December 2021, more than 60,000 scientists worldwide called loudly for an end to mass vaxxination (article), in agreement with Luc Montagnier, and that the mainstream medias kept it quiet.

    5. (C) The end of the vaxxinal pass: a hard-fought victory.

      On March 3, the end of the health pass turned vaxxinal, announced on July 12, 2021, was announced for March 14. Almost eight months of apartheid for a pretext that we knew was false, we finally get out of it... For what reasons? In my opinion, these :
      • Parades every Saturday afternoon in the major cities of France, peaceful, sympathetic gatherings of people from all walks of life sharing the same refusal of a totalitarianism with democratic overtones. And the pride of having refused irradiated the rest of the population who understood that our denunciations of the exaggerated seriousness of the disease, of the insane obstinacy of the government and of the media stupidity were justified.
      • This same refusal was found everywhere in other countries obeying Big Pharma, discarding early treatments, thus accumulating unnecessary deaths from a poorly treated Covid disease.
      • This was coupled with the beginning of recognition of vaxxin victims, far more numerous than for regular vaccines (latest potential victim Jean-Pierre Pernaut, article).
      • And, after months and months, this led the population to refuse the dangerous injections. While 79% of the French had been injected twice from December 2020 to September 2021, only from October 2021 to February 2022 did 53% of them accept the third dose, and only about 5% of parents agreed to have their children aged 5 to 11 vaccinated.
      • And all countries have removed the constraints, France is at one of the very last to do so, it was necessary to follow the others ...

      So it was no longer tenable for the government and for a president of the Republic who wanted to run for re-election. Emmanuel Macron was forced, at least temporarily to stop annoying the unvaccinated, although he is ready to start again.

      Forced vaxxination in France, from CovidTracker

      Big Pharma, the WHO, and the rulers of most wealthy countries were willing to force the entire world to get a flu-like illness shot. Resistance fighters across the planet, from Canada to Italy, from Australia to Brazil eventually won, but with difficulty and in a way that is not really clear to this day.

      For the victory is not yet complete, far from it. First, in France, caregivers are still subject to the vaxxinal pass and we must demand the reinstatement of suspended staff, this is reason enough to continue to demonstrate.

      Hopefully the other locks will fall, the benefits of early treatment and the harms of vaxxin will be fully recognized. And that we draw the consequences of this two-year global crisis by refusing the masks of enslavement, the QR Code controls and all apartheid, by moving towards a return to freedom and diversity of expression, towards a medicine freed from financial stakes, an independent Justice...

      Other opinions:
      • article by Pierrick Tillet "A victory of resistance", ending with "A war is also won by attrition".
      • article by Eric Verhaeghe titled "From Covid to Ukraine: the ingredients change, the globalist strings remain" with the introduction : "Brutally, Ukraine seems to have replaced Covid in the majority concern... [...] As the military danger takes shape, the ruling caste intends to make a narrative on the same basis as COVID, in order to obtain the same benefits: obedience of the people, extension of elite power, restriction of freedoms. But will it have the means of its ambitions ?". Then : "As the military danger takes shape, the caste in power intends to make a narrative on the same basis as the COVID, to obtain the same benefits: obedience of the peoples, extension of elite power, restriction of freedoms. But will it have the means to achieve its ambitions? Chic! a new reason to impose emergency measures and a government of exception! Chic, a threat to stage to continue the hypnosis session through which the father of the Nation flatters his frightened bourgeois electorate and justifies the increase of his powers.".

      Yes, Mr. Tillet, Mr. Verhaeghe and others, Macron keeps his noxious power and it is also your fault for refusing to denounce all the lies of a perverted Elysian couple that continues to chloroform the population with an exaggeratedly invented and insufficiently stale legend.

      May 11. As we learn that masks will - at last - no longer be mandatory in public transport from May 16, while they remain mandatory for the very elderly and their families in specialized homes (how far will the harassment go ?), I point out that I have developed in Appendix D 26, the statement made in early March in the previous sentence to draw a conclusion on the Covid crisis.

    6. (C) Emmanuel Macron's hatred of the non-vaxxed.

      The President of the Republic's hatred of the non-vaxxed is deeply rooted in him. We saw in chapter 19 that he had expressed it in writing on January 4, 2022 his willingness to fuck them over. I learn belatedly, this March 7, that a little before, the Canard Enchaîné of December 29 had revealed these presidential remarks of December 27 before the Health Defense Council : "As soon as we take measures that affect the vaccinated, we move away from our strategy and the line we have followed since the beginning : putting the constraints on the non-vaccinated remains our absolute compass"

      Is it possible that 30% of French people want to vote in the first round of the presidential elections in April for such a segregationist ? Who uses a sanitary pretext to satisfy his impulses ? 30% of voters would so support the apartheid that is only suspended this March 14, 2022 and will likely return if Macron is re-elected ? And after the non-vaxxed, what other category of the population will be excluded according to the moods of this psychopath?

      "The non-vaccinated according to Olivier Véran: "far from everything", "suspicious" in a "delirium", or "indifferent""
      On December 29, 2021, Health Minister Olivier Véran was implementing the instructions given two days earlier by Macron (article)
      It was on July 12, 2021, that the apartheid had been established and launched "The Hunt for the Unvaccinated"
      (article from the Swiss newspaper "Le Temps").

    7. (C) Refusal to treat and willingness to risk poisoning

      "Facts & Documents" issues 482-489, published from May to October 2020, discuss "The Real Timeline of the Coronavirus" through June 2020. I excerpt some of the material here and add some of what I said on my neighboring (PV) Covid page (July 2021 to January 2022).

      1. October 19, 2019 [PV November 1 - 5]. "It appears that as early as October 2019, the all-powerful Anthony Fauci was in the starting blocks to rush out messenger RNA vaccines without the need for years of testing. With Bill Gates and others, he was waiting for the right moment. Even helping it pop up ?" I was referring to a article by journalist Guy Boulianne headlined "In 2019, Anthony Fauci proposed bypassing clinical trials of mRNA vaccines and, with the help of a disruptive crisis, bringing them to market without needing ten years of testing". This article featured a transcript of the October 29, 2019 "Universal Flu Vaccine" conference hosted by the independent economic think tank, Milken Institute, at the 2019 Future of Health Summit in Washington, DC. There was already a willingness there to massively administer an experimental vaccine whose medium- and long-term effects were unknown. With the risk of poisoning an entire population.

        October 19, 2019. Anthony Fauci is third from left.

      2. January 13, 2020[F&D482p3]. "Over the counter for decades, recommended since at least 2004 in China against the coronavirus, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), marketed under the name "Plaquenil", is strangely classified by the Minister of Health Agnes Buzyn and by the Director General of Health Jerome Salomon among the "poisonous substances", that is to say, available only by prescription. While it was known since January 4 that an epidemic was starting in China, the French government thus forbade citizens to treat themselves with a drug that has proven to be very effective where it has not been banned from use (Senegal etc.). The same was true of ivermectin later on, even after it had proven effective in India (see beginning of Chapter 21).

      3. January 29, 2020 [F&D482p12]. "In its guidelines, the WHO states that, "Masks are not required" for people without respiratory symptoms "because there is no evidence that masks protect people who are not ill.""It is governments that have pushed for the mass use of masks (even in the open air !) as if to impose a visible sign of submission. However, whatever some misguided scientists say, the widespread use of masks is more harmful, in terms of health and environment, than beneficial. Numerous studies prove this, 79 counted in October 2021 (article), 167 in January 2022 (article).

      4. February 12, 2020 [F&D483p5]. "President of the National Consultative Ethics Committee and future president of the Scientific Council of the Elysée, Jean-François Delfraissy speaks in the Matinale of RMC about the coronavirus  "We are without treatment, we are without a vaccine and we will not have a vaccine for another year." No one understands at this moment that he has just defined the strategy of management of the epidemic in France for the months to come". Indeed, the media propaganda will not stop denying the existence of treatments and make people believe that the only solution comes from a vaccine accepted in a hurry...

      5. March 12, 2020 [F&D484p10]. "A confidential memo predicts that France would have half a million deaths from coronavirus. This note, a "modeling", emanates from the imperial College of London and the services of the epidemiologist Neil Ferguson, whose right-hand man, Simon Cauchemez, director of the modeling unit of the Pasteur Institute also pushes for containment from the scientific council of the Elysee that he joined. [...]Problem, Neil Ferguson is best known for always being wrong. The "master of disaster" as his peers call him had thus convinced in 2001 the Prime Minister Tony Blair to slaughter 6 million cattle to stop the epidemic of foot-and-mouth disease, a decision which, with a cost of ten billion pounds, is today considered aberrant" (follows a list of predictions as wrong ...). We find here a mechanism activated at several stages of the Covid crisis, with especially the bogus predictions of the Pasteur Institute : to scare in order to impose strong restrictions of liberties, up to apartheid against the non-obedient. Each time the political power relied on the most catastrophic predictions knowing that they were bogus. "Lila Bouadma, a member of the Scientific Council, a frightened scarecrow under her mask, declared on BFMTV on August 27, 2021 that, at the beginning of the school year, "there will be 50,000 contaminations of children per day" (article)" [PV September 23 - 1].

      6. March 16, 2020 [F&D484p11+485p3]. "While local quarantine is a classic measure, never in medical history has a healthy population been fully confined". "Emmanuel Macron announces the total containment of the country. During his too-long speech, he repeats six times that "we are at war" with the coronavirus, while taking a serious air to affirm  "The day after, when we have won, it will not be a return to the day before."" One senses that he has the Great Reset in mind...

        March 16, 2020. Sideline and confine. Don't treat and wait until it's serious to go to the hospital.

      7. Late March 2020 [PV September 24 - 3]. While the incubation period is about ten days, the lockdown will last eight weeks. The country is at a standstill, the debt is mounting to the sound of presidential "Whatever it takes". The inhabitants are cloistered, if they catch the coronavirus (which becomes Covid), they are recommended to take doliprane, which worsens the disease. It is pretended that there is no treatment by provoking false studies (by applying a badly dosed treatment or an early treatment to seriously affected patients...). This has amplified the epidemic, which could have been managed like the 1969 Hong Kong flu. Like any disease, it is necessary to treat as early as possible, but we did the opposite. Doctors did not intervene much, private clinics hardly ever did, hospitals refused to admit patients who were not seriously enough ill, which led to the indictment of Agnès Buzyn in September 2021. Proposals of a lawyer for the civil party : "Since when, when you call the Samu or when you go to the emergency room and explain that you have 41, 42 fever, that you vomit and have diarrhea, we refuse people? Since when in France do we refuse to treat people when they are sick ?"

      8. March 28, 2020. [F&D486p5]. "By decree, is authorized the "prescription outside AMM in the context of Covid-19" of rivotril, a drug usually administered sparingly in extreme cases of agony, which therefore amounts to a temporary legalization of euthanasia. After the circular of March 19 depriving the elderly of resuscitation, and then the blocking of the Raoult protocol, the government is taking a new step in what looks like a strategy of exploding the number of dead."

      There have been plotters, and in France, Global Young Leader Emmanuel Macron, an expert in lies, manipulations and smoke and mirrors, is one of them.

    8. (C) The muffled revelations of Alexandra Henrion-Caude.

      In Appendix C 4, I introduced Luc Montagnier, a great French scientist who had the courage to face the media vindictiveness. He is not the only leading scientist in France to oppose the official doxa, the best known are Didier Raoult, Christian Perrone, Christian Velot, Laurent Toubiana and some others, including Alexandra Henrion-Caude. This internationally recognized geneticist is the victim of many attacks repeated on her page of the encyclopedia, Wikipedia, guardian of the bien-pensance. Everything passes through without nuance: "fundamentalist Catholicism", "far right", "complotist", "false information", "sectarian", "anti-sanitary pass", "covido-skeptic". Yet she was right when she claimed that vaxxins were dangerous, which pharmacovigilance and targeted statistics, especially on cardiac accidents, confirm. What Wikipedia still refuses to admit (accomplice of conspirators, pro-sanitary pass, pro-vaxxins, pro-Macron, pro Big Pharma, false information until claiming without any doubt that Brigitte Macron was born a woman, etc.). Similarly she denounced the scandal of the ban on early treatment, still denied by Wikipedia while in the United States there is an "ivermectin scandal" and a trial is approaching (article of March 13). French Dominique Costagliola is suspected of being involved in this criminal act.

      She has been involved in citizen protests. Even those who don't share her views on abortion
      or on religion make her a reference, as much for her scientific qualities as for her human ones.

      In his column presented in Appendix C 1, Olivier Probst talks about Alexandra Henrion-Caude several times, especially when she raises the debate to the level of how we live :

      "Men must be warned that they are in danger of death, science becomes criminal." - Albert Einstein in 1946
      "Because I know the full potential of RNA, administering it to healthy individuals seems to me to be on the order of madness." - Alexandra Henrion Caude, geneticist and RNA specialist.
      "The cutoff for stopping a vaccination program is 20 to 25 deaths, and today, in May 2021, we have more than 4,000 deaths" - Prof. Mc Cullough

      As the geneticist Alexandra Henrion-Caude aptly puts it, in an extraordinary reversal, we are all presumed sick and contagious, we have lost our right to be presumed healthy automatically. We would all be potential sick people who ignore themselves, like in the classic play "Knock or the Triumph of Medicine" by Jules Romains. A bit like if in justice, the presumption of innocence was definitively banished and that we would be automatically considered as potential criminals... What society can still function on such a postulate? Wearing a mask means accepting to be presumed sick. Paradox of paradoxes in this pseudo-pandemic, if on the one hand we assume that everyone is sick even healthy people, on the other hand, we refuse to treat the real sick!

      At the INSERM retreat, the researcher relays the latest findings. Accompanied by two interview videos, a article from March 14, 2022 headlines "A Moderna-patented sequence found in SARS-CoV-2 RNA ! Alexandra Henrion-Caude's analysis". Excerpts :

      Recently, it was an international study in Frontiers in Virology that caught his attention, published by several scientists who were surprised by the presence of the PRRA sequence in SARS-CoV-2 RNA and questioned why it was inserted. The scientists in the study did a blast. That is, they "looked for homology with all kinds of sequences that exist," in other words, similarity to other publicly available sequences in public databases. They then discovered that the PRRA sequence matched the sequence ID11652 patented in 2017 by Moderna, under US 958 7003. Among the 13 inventors was Stéphane Bancel, CEO of Moderna, a pharmaceutical company that, remember, supplies Covid-19 vaccines internationally...

      Those who are accustomed to using the term "conspiracy theorists" at every turn should be reassured. This information has been circulating among mainstream media such as the American newspaper Daily Mail. On February 24, 2022, Stéphane Bancel replied to a Fox News reporter who asked him why a sequence patented by his pharmaceutical company had been found in the RNA of SARS-CoV-2 that "scientists are analyzing whether these data are real or not". He did not rule out "the hypothesis of laboratory leakage by accident" and the virus having escaped from the Wuhan laboratory in China during research on gains in function. If he had uttered these words at the beginning of the Covid crisis, would he have been censored as Alexandra Henrion-Caude was?...

      In any case, it is surprising that such information, if not killed, does not make the headlines...

    9. (C) Fighting the techno-sanitary monster.

      March 15. Yesterday the mandatory mask requirement in the stores finally fell. After two years of absence, I went back to a newsagent to browse the latest magazines and bought three. They are below: Nexus, Métal Hurlant, La Décroissance, with a reminder of last September's issue to stay in line with Macron and the title of this appendix.

      In 1974, I was voting for the first time and it was for René Dumont, the first environmentalist candidate in the presidential elections, garnering 1.32% of the vote. The work of the Club of Rome and the first nuclear power plants illuminated the future with a very dark veil, we had to get out of our infinite growth in a finite world as soon as possible. Fifty years later, fifty years lost to overconsumption at the expense of future generations, the situation remains the same, only more pressing. If some ecologists, notably with the journal La Décroissance remain in line with René Dumont and a journal like La Gueule ouverte (covers), others have drifted completely, adapting to a sustainable development, even going so far as to accept mRNA injections, while claiming to refuse GMOs (article "Covid vaccines alter human DNA"). And, at the same time, Macron and Europe want nuclear power to become green energy... As for young people, for the most part, they are clueless, they march for the climate and accept the overconsumption of electricity (after the heating, the cars !) and the controls by QR Code. They are in Macron's "at the same time" which consists in continuing on the momentum while watching Formula 1 races on TV (yes, these relics of the 20th century still exist...).

      In the latest Nexus (the link is from Wikipedia, which doesn't like this review, which is a good sign...) (the site, copious, is regularly updated), which is indignant about the scandalous refusal of ivermectin (essential to understand these two years of Covid, see the beginning of Chapter 21), I read in "The chronicle of fertile disobedience" : "I must confess that the last two years have particularly affected me and upset my appreciation for many humans. I did not imagine that the population would be so docile in the face of such a considerable restriction of freedom. I did not realize how much our society fears death and disease. We run from death like we run from the plague, and the mere mention of it would be sacrilegious. I didn't realize how ingrained the transhumanist promise was in people's minds." This observation by Jonathan Attias is one made by all anti-pass resistance fighters.

      Transhumanism was a recurring theme in the science fiction comic book magazine Métal Hurlant (the covers), which was founded in 1975 and whose new issue does a retrospective of the first issues, with memories of its mythical editor Jean-Pierre Dionnet.

      The debut of a young cartoonist, François Schuiten, in Métal Hurlant #13 (January 1977): he takes off the mask (album Carapaces).
      Dionnet: "This is a prophetic tale that tells us what the Covid is all about, pitting the forces of life against those of death."
      Then, more than stories about humans, Schuiten will tell legends of Dark Cities (Covers).

      In Métal Hurlant, Chantal Montellier went further than George Orwell's 1984, arriving at a 1996 not so far from our 2022. Philippe Druillet (on the cover of the retrospective issue) was swimming in metallic transhumanism. Cobalt 60 (a resistance fighter turned mutant) by American Vaughn Bodé (in #4) and Marseille (now Marseil) by Michel Crespin (in #30) took us into a post-atomic world (which cannot be forgotten, Macron and Putin remind us). The future was dark, dehumanized. Just wanting to do a "Ballade" (the already classic Paul Gillon, at #82 bis) ended with a hunt down of the "techno-impérator" (worse than Macron's 135 euro fine...). However, there could be a flinch as in the "Crux Universalis Eternity Road" (at #6) by the young Enki Bilal "and it was serious, very serious for the reigning authority". Yes, there were still a few, more or less evanescent, escape routes, like The Green Hand by Nicole Claveloux. The fears of the 1975-1980s reason gloomily in these years 2020-2022 : will the non-vaxxed and anti-passivated have to step aside from those who submit to the digital and transhumanist controls of the techno-sanitary monster supposedly working for the good of all ? "All vaccinated, all protected"...

      Nicole Claveloux, "The Green Hand" in Metal Hurlant #9, 1976. Two non-vaxxinated...

      Last issue of "La décroissance": after sanitation, the Macron & Co. are able to instrumentalize ecology to this extent...

    10. (C) Socrates, Plato and Proctor against the sophists of Covid

      I have long been reminded of the role of the media in the Covid crisis by the allegory of the cave of Platon (-428 - -347). But I'm a scientist, not a literary scholar or philosopher, and I didn't know how to handle the subject. And here is the opportunity given to me by the argument between two philosophers, Mehdi Belhaj Kacem and his master Alain Badiou. In a 38-page letter (pdf format) featured in a article in France-Soir of this 18th of March 2022, the student, who is a member of the resistance, reproaches the master for his belief in the official Covid doctrine. And there he speaks of Plato, of the media hypnosis of the shadows of the cave. With a slight modification of his text, in order to address the readers and not Badiou, I take up his words below. You will understand that there is no doubt, Plato would have accompanied us in the Saturday demonstrations...

      Illustrations and caption from the article by Jean-Pierre Marongiu "The state lie or the allegory of the cave : Macron or Plato?"
      When Brigitte Macron is waving on the screen, is it not in reality Jean-Michel Trogneux?

      Everyone has at least heard of the famous "mythe of the cave" by the Greek philosopher Plato. Let's summarize it in broad strokes: human beings are chained in the depths of a cave. They represent, metaphorically, the ignorance in which the common man is immersed. They have never seen the sun, from which they only receive very weak rays. very weakened rays. A fire at their backs casts shadows on the walls of the cave, both of themselves and of the surrounding objects, which they take to be reality itself; they wiggle their bonnets like debilitated people, following the movements of these shadows. They thus represent, according to Plato, the state of cognitive daze in which the overwhelming majority of humanity is immersed.

      What is, on this good basis, the job of the philosopher? It is to undo these prisoners of their chains, and to guide them towards the sun of the true Knowledge, metaphorized by the Sun; and which is, in reality, the intelligible Ideas of Philosophy, armed in particular with Mathematics. Which is called, incidentally: freedom.

      Of course, such an approach is risky. The prisoner may, at first, not be able to bear the liberation, i.e. the dazzling of the Truth. He may prefer to return to his former condition, and thus have wasted the time of the Philosopher in charge of the Awakening of Consciousness. Worse, he may take it out on the one who, claiming to liberate him, will have violated him in his obscurantist superstitions. But the thing can also happen very well, and the prisoner can free himself for real; illuminated by the adequate Ideas of the Sun of the authentic Knowledge, he can return in the cave with the aim of freeing more than in his turn his fellow men. Nothing is, in short, a foregone conclusion. But finally, it is at one's own risk that one embarks on the task of awakening the captive prisoners of cognitive mirages, main vocation of philosophy.

      What would be the modern, timely version of the prisoner of the cave? Wouldn't it be, for example, as we say in French, the figure of the beauf slumped in his couch after a day of thankless work, to consume without interruption, the eye riveted to his giant flat screen television "the chronic torrent of uninformed information" ? Answer: yes, we do have a modern version of the good old prisoner of the cave. [...]

      The truth is that we have been living, for the last two years, in the most gigantic hoax that has ever been perpetrated against humanity: in the most crude simulacrum that has ever darkened the view of our fellow human beings. This simulacrum has a name, "pandemic," and a trademark, "Covid 19." I've been putting the word "pandemic" in quotation marks for over a year. And, for many months now, I've not even called it a "pandemic", but an IQ test  again the most constraining that has ever been put to the cognitive abilities of homo sapiens. The good news is that this test is profoundly "egalitarian" and that I have met peasants from Correze understand perfectly what the situation we have been living for the last two years was all about, and Bac+12 get it all wrong on the same subject.

      The allegory (a better word than myth) of the cave had already been introduced by Socrates (-470 - -399 ) in order to make his interlocutors understand the nature of the Idea of Good. It "functions on an opposition between the subterranean dwelling (without light) and the "world above," the one where natural light shines. The first place is that of confinement, ignorance and appearances, when the second is that of freedom, knowledge, reality" [Wikipedia]. This allegory is linked to the political and ethical context of the Athenian Republic, then in decline (corruption, injustice, deprivation of freedoms ...). A situation close to ours...

      The American Robert Proctor [photo opposite], a historian of science, has developed the study of this "cultural production of ignorance" a new form of disinformation and systematic censorship of truth involving eminent scientists appointed by industry. To describe it, he coined the word agnotology (articles : 1 2). It is "a discipline on the borders of philosophy, sociology, and the history of science whose object is the study of the means used to produce, preserve, and propagate ignorance, but also the study of ignorance itself." With respect to Covid, it can be used to describe the refusal to adopt early treatment and for the refusal to acknowledge the effects of vaxxin recorded in pharmacovigilance.

      A correspondent compares the visions of Plato and Proctor and adapts the allegory of the cave to current realities :

      In the allegory of the cave the world of culture and philosophy is completely separated from the world of beliefs and superstitions; there is no relationship or filiation between the sphere of enlightenment and rational knowledge and the obscurantist sphere of the irrational. At the bottom of the cave, men chained from head to toe since their childhood elaborate alone their false ideas about the shadows. While in "The Cultural Production of Ignorance" for the contemporary world, the misconceptions propagated by the media to the masses are elaborated by people with high level of study and quite often by scientific luminaries. In reference to ancient Greece, Plato and Socrates [opposite, painting by David, 1787] the sophists, ("persons using sophisms, specious arguments or reasoning to deceive or delude"), we have for the sophists of today, invited on TV sets, eminent scientists, doctors and experts of all kinds barded with titles and diplomas.

      As Mehdi Belhaj Kacem deplores about the intellectuals of his rank, we must make the sad observation that they have put themselves en masse at the service of Big Pharma and finance to impose the "pandemic" sham and vaccine coercion with an ineffective and dangerous biotechnological product. The number of lucid, courageous and critical scientists and intellectuals has unfortunately remained too sparse. If knowledge has spontaneously been put at the service of the economic power, the political power has not hesitated to brandish administrative threats to ensure at least the silence or neutrality of many academics. In spite of the awareness of the imposture, the mass of graduate sophists remained compact and overwhelming to stir up in the caves the great historical fears of contagion and the specter of death, thus allowing the prolongation and extension of the vaccination campaign, even when its inefficiency became more and more evident. Mobilized on the TV sets, they stigmatized the non-vaxxed as the cause of the contagion and tried to impose experimental mRNA injections to all, even to infants...

      Mehdi Belhaj Kacem (interview >>>video>> of 45 mn 33) and Alain Badiou

      For the rest, Mehdi Belhaj Kacem addresses Badiou as one addresses a close friend under the influence of the shadows of the cave. Excerpts :

      Didn't you, even for a minute, begin to find it suspicious, to say the least, that 24 hours a day the media is only telling us about "Covid 19," which was killing no more than a seasonal flu, and rather less? Didn't you find it somewhat strange that the very Agnès Buyzin (now on Bill Gates' payroll) banned hydroxychloroquine in January 2020, the second most widely used drug in the world for the past 70 years, especially in Africa? Then the banning of Azithromycin, Ivermectin, and even, recently, of vitamin D (on the pretext that it would be an "endocrine disruptor")? That, for the first time in the history of medicine, doctors are forbidden both to treat and to prescribe? That we continue, in the midst of the worst "pandemic" that ever was, to close hospital beds by the thousands (more than 17,500 under the Macron era) ? That our president, in the midst of a "pandemic" ravaging on all sides, does not allocate one more cent to the public hospital, but nearly 3 billion euros to the mass media, including 500 million just recently? And so many other "details", more and more dubious, more and more anti-scientific, more and more irrational; and in which you will have given, head completely down. [...]

      By calling for mandatory vaccination, your responsibility is this time directly engaged. It is also so that you, as well as all the other intellectuals who have supported the absurd governmental measures of the last two years, may bear this responsibility with full knowledge of the facts, that I am writing this open letter. None of you will be able to say, "I didn't know" anymore. None.

      I did not know Mehdi Belhaj Kacem and I am delighted to have made his acquaintance with this text and a letter he wrote to the mayor of his Correzian commune. Far from the philosophers who have sunk in this crisis of Covid (Badiou is alas not the only one), he is surely a worthy successor of Plato, he is a voice that deserves to be listened to, let's remember his name...

    11. (C) Wikipedia complicit with conspirators and conspiracist

      Nexus, in its latest issue featured above in Appendix C 9 has a third page cover headline "Wikipedia wants to kill me" (reprinted in this article) :

      "Wikipedia wants to kill me". "I, Nexus French edition, am not Australian but French. I have my own identity and my own content, which Wikipedia denies me with a consummate art of amalgam. I was born in 1999 and gradually freed myself from the Australian edition by building my own editorial team. Since 2009, I have had complete freedom to choose my subjects. It happened that, in the 1980s, the Australian Nexus published authors who could be criticized because of a lack of discernment, not because of ideology."

      The magazine explains that it filed a complaint in 2017 for defamation against X and the Wikimedia Foundation, that a dismissal was made, confirmed on appeal, but it was overturned by the Court of Cassation in 2018 and the complaint is under investigation.

      Everyone knows Wikipedia, a collaborative encyclopedia that has taken over the world on the Internet. Many, many contributors have done a remarkable job. I myself refer to it very often. However, this must be done with caution. For example, I referred in Chapter 5 to the encyclopedia's disdain for the "Facts & Documents" journal, believing it to be the establishment's viewpoint. The same goes for the Appendices related to Luc Montagnier and Alexandra Henrion-Caude. I also pointed out how Wikipedia took the "legend" of Brigitte Macron as a firm truth, based on people magazines. And for Nexus, without having yet learned of this dispute, I had written, in parentheses, "Wikipedia doesn't like this magazine, which is a good sign...".

      The lobbies have got their hands on this encyclopedia. Just look at the references on which the articles are based. A newspaper like "Le Monde" only tells truths. Any information to the contrary can only be false. So rather than admit that there are two potential explanations of the same fact, Wikipedia believes that the one from the mainstream media is right and the other is wrong. And since that might not be enough, add to that the accusations or amalgams of conspiracy, extreme druid, anti-vax etc.

      The example of the introduction to the page Nexus is characteristic in this respect : "Nexus is an Australian bimonthly magazine devoted to pseudoscience, geopolitics, unconventional medicine, conspiracy theories and historical revisionism among other things. [...] The magazine is accused by various intellectuals of practicing disinformation by promoting, among other things, pseudosciences and conspiracy theories as well as, in its English-language version, anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial." The last sentence is appalling: it is enough that 3 or 4 intellectuals have made these accusations... The confusion between the French and Australian editions is general, the so-called "negative" comments are numerous. Moreover, it's getting funny, the two so-called "positive" comments are actually negative because one is stated by a "reconverted to conspiracism", wham, and the other is the director (New Zealand !) of a "conspiracist magazine", wham ! At this level, it's no longer an encyclopedia, it's an opinion article going as far as defamation. The filing of a complaint is justified. And it would be in many other cases, but it is very difficult to go down that road (articles : 1 2)...

      Wikipedia goes so far as to consider the site "Conspiracy Watch" (its Wikipedia page is complimentary, of course) run by pseudo-journalist Rudy Reichstadt to be the holder of the truth. He went so far as to imagine that there would be a "complosphere" (Wikipedia directs this term to the page "Conspiracy Theory") and that anything that does not conform to the doxa is part of it... So someone, like me, outside the collective, who forges his opinions alone from various sources of information would be a member of this "complosphere". Rudy Reichstadt has thus invented a great global conspiracy, validated by the media and Wikipedia, he is paradoxically the first of the conspiracists. Here is a article on this "anti conspiracy conspiracy". For "Le Monde", William Audureau (a great ReinfoCovid basher) is of the same ilk, as explained in a article from France-Soir, an obviously conspiracy-minded newspaper, it says in the introduction to its page Wikipedia.

      This encyclopedia hands out good and bad points, thus orienting the opinion of its readers. It has become a propagator of the doxa of Western rulers. This has not only disadvantages, it is easier to understand, the reader has less need to think. I was educated by the encyclopédie Bordas, the only encyclopedia of the 20th century created by one man, Roger Caratini (1924-2009). It was also a biased work, but the author made no secret of it, unlike Wikipedia.

      Let's go back to Covid and the health doxa supported by Big Pharma and the World Health Organization, WHO (largely funded by Bill Gates, article, opinion by Didier Raoult). See this article title from October 26, 2020, Wikipedia collaborates with WHO :

      Left: "Coronavirus: Wikipedia partners with WHO to spread reliable information about the pandemic".
      Right: "In addition to masks, WHO recommends you wear a blindfold, so the truth doesn't jump out at you!"
      Right image from a March 19 tweet. In early 2020, the WHO was opposed to the general public wearing masks.
      Under pressure from Big Pharma & Co. it changed its mind (article).

      As a result, we find in the encyclopedia lenient pages on Big Pharma or Pfizer, another more critical one, surprisingly, on the OMS. All that's there for Pfizer is the presence of two small "controversies" and the indication of legal wrangling, "a total of $6.171 billion in fines." Granted, a court judgment is inescapable, but all of these convictions are treated more briefly than the charges against Nexus...

      You can search for a "Big Pharma malfeasance" page, you won't find it, but Wikipedia publishes a page squarely titled "Big Pharma conspiracy theory". It's pretty careful, the Covid is not covered, but the mere fact that there is "a conspiracy theory" (it's not even plural) is telling, as is the opening sentence "This theory notably encourages people to avoid vaccination". So if you refuse a vaccine (whatever it is...) you become a follower of the Big Pharma conspiracy theory (a variant of the "complosphere"...). Like Wikipedia also invents a conspiracy and is conspiratorial... Everyone in the end is a conspirator and an accomplice of conspirators. Especially since conspiracies exist... Is it better then to denounce a conspiracy and be a conspiracist or to keep quiet or deny it and be an accomplice of the conspirators ? Isn't a whistleblower (page very positive) inherently a conspiracy monger (giving on the page very negative "Conspiracy Theory" and not on a "Conspiracy Whistleblower" page that doesn't exist) ?

      In the other direction, you can look up the much repeated famous state lie "All vaccinated, all protected", it is not even cited in Wikipedia. For this organ of opinion, it is impossible for a Macronian government to utter such a huge "fake news"... There are plenty of such unspoken words.

      The page on ivermectin is distressing. Its dangers are emphasized and extensively elaborated upon, its benefits are downplayed and quickly addressed, often in the conditional. The successes of this drug against Covid, notably in India or Japan, are ignored. Only the opinion of the WHO prevails with a page on the "controversy", systematically minimizing the positive studies and not even showing the very convincing statistical results in the many countries that have used it, which, at the end, are nevertheless, quickly cited. It is not easy to act against the WHO's advice. One wonders why so many countries have adopted such a bad treatment! By taking such a position against ivermectin, Wikipedia, like the WHO, like Macron, like the mainstream media, has indirectly caused the deaths of people who believed that there is no treatment. And it is not being conspiratorial to say so, it is only referring to the facts transcribed in the Covid death statistics as presented at the beginning of Chapter 21.

      April 21. Publication of a article titled "German secret service makes 17,000 changes to Wikipedia." Article from May 30, 2022 : "Is Wikipedia an open encyclopedia or a secret disinformation operation?"

    12. (C) Vaxxins Covid and variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease

      On November 1, 2021, in my Covid journal I wrote this :

      In France, Professors Montagnier, Vélot, Henrion-Caude, and many others abroad had predicted : the Spike protein, activatable by vaccines, turns out to be toxic for the body. But, much more seriously, scientists have become concerned about the possible role of tampered messenger RNA strands in creating prions (infectious proteins) (article with professors Stephanie Seneff and Joseph Mercola). The first cases have appeared recently. One of them has received some media attention in France, it is Mauricette, Marc Doyer's wife, who testified on Cnews, France-Soir and elsewhere (articles : 1 2 3 4). After she was vaccinated, she got Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, commonly known as "mad cow disease." And there are other cases, apparently very rare but extremely worrisome. The more injections there are, the more there will be...

      On November 12, I know that what I'm going to write there will be my most important column, and for that reason I'm writing it in red. Indeed, I feel that we are at a turning point where it becomes essential to stop the vaxxination as soon as possible. I explain it this way:

      In France, the omerta is finally broken on a TV channel, CNews, with the host Pascal Praud. "He decided to give the floor, every Friday, to those who are confronted with side effects directly or indirectly. The host confesses to receiving thousands of calls from French people wanting to testify. Here is the poignant testimony of Eric Lefèvre, whose wife Stéphanie, 48 years old, died after being vaccinated. She was in very good health, without any comorbidity. At the end of August 2021, she was vaccinated with the two Pfizer doses. Following the injections, she experienced symptoms: dizziness, loss of balance ... Specialists will put a name on these symptoms: Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) which will take this mother of two children in less than a month. She died on November 10, 2021.". Her husband : "There are very few cases in France and there we see, since we meet with a collective, that in a few days we have identified five cases. We had seen one on November 1. Article. The last case of vCJD (form of Creutzfeldt-Jakob) was in 2019... There had been one case in 2013 and another in 2014... Then you have to go back to 2009 with 2 cases (report).

      It's 9pm on this November 12 and I decide to give special importance to what I wrote this afternoon. I feel this information is momentous, more so than any of the above. "Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) is a degeneration of the central nervous system characterized by the accumulation of a prion (an abnormal form of a protein that can transmit the disease). The incubation period can be years or even decades before balance and sensitivity problems appear, followed by dementia. The outcome is consistently fatal within approximately one year." (page wikipedia). The authorities have been prevaricating for months to claim that there would be no proven deaths from the "vaccines" Covid, only coincidences, even though there have been thousands of suspicious deaths (reported or not) in France (see Nov. 1 - 6). There is no doubt about it, the fact that this disease is almost non-existent in France and that there have been at least six patients in a short period of time following Pfizer injections shows that Pfizer's product is definitely responsible. All the more so as other cases have been detected, notably in the USA. And the victims are young people without comorbidity, in good health. So rather than continue to promote the 3rd dose and cause willingly new deaths for this and other causes, the urgency is to stop everything. Never has it been more blatantly obvious that these injections are poisons and those who refuse to stop them when they have the power to do so can only be considered criminals. Unless this information from the six cases can be proven wrong.

      Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease of humans is the equivalent of trembling disease of sheep and bovine spongiform encephalopathy or mad cow disease of cattle, with a pattern of transmission described opposite.

      Appearing in 1986 in English cattle herds, it peaked at 37,280 cattle in 1992 in that country, spreading to Europe and some other countries. Transmission to humans is discovered in 1996, 232 cases will be diagnosed worldwide [article].

      These cases are similar to recent cases detected after mRNA injection, except that the incubation period is much shorter.

      For me, the statistics had spoken, the number of cases identified ruled out chance, there could only be a common cause and the only plausible one was vaxxination. The public authorities had to draw the consequences. Supported by scientific sophists won over by agnotology (see Appendix 10), they preferred to persist in denial. Four months later, the cases have multiplied, no other plausible cause has emerged, and the denial remains, increasingly unfounded. A lengthy article provides an update on this scandal. Here is the summary with chapter titles and subtitles :

      Postvaccine Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, an epidemic within an epidemic?
      • The medical profession's response: are we listening to the right people?
        • "There is obviously a common issue globally."
        • A cluster of evidence for a possible link
        • What do health authorities and the medical profession respond?
      • Epidemiology of the disease: is it too early to worry?
        • More suspected cases found in a few weeks than in 27 years
        • What if it's not random?
        • "We're not questioning vaccination."
      • Excluding the role of the vaccine: on what basis did the ANSM rely?
        • A theoretical risk but considered minimal by the European Medicines Agency
        • Was the precautionary principle respected?
        • The exclusion of the vaccine was based on a single criterion: the time of onset of the disease
        • No alternative cause is advanced by the ANSM.
        • Epidemiologic surveillance of the disease in question.
        • The ANSM excluded two major criteria, semiologic and bibliographic
        • The ANSM does not know, so it formally excludes the role of the vaccine
      • Mechanism of action of the injections: scientists have been warning for more than a year about this risk
        • Toxicity of lipid nanoparticles
        • Disruption of the blood-brain barrier
        • Identification of a "prion-like" region in the Spike protein
        • Codon enhancement and alteration of protein conformation
        • Messenger RNA quantity and quality
        • Persistence of the Spike protein in the body
      • Health authorities chose: sacrificing the French rather than the vaccine
        • Lies of omission: can we talk about endangering the lives of others?
        • Legal liability of laboratories: who will compensate the French tomorrow?
        • Is the precautionary principle respected today?
        • Vaccinate, vaccinate, vaccinate, whatever it takes
      • Conclusion

      Following is a disclaimer and a note:

      A study published in preprint since the writing of this article, co-authored by the neurologist C. Moret Chalmin, Pr L. Montagnier and the mathematician J.-C. Pérez confirms the hypothesis that we support here: "Towards the emergence of a new form of neurodegenerative Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: Sixteen cases of CJD reported a few days after a COVID-19 "vaccine". The findings of this study will be presented at the 16th World Congress of Controversies in Neurology (CONy) to be held virtually in London on March 24-27, 2022.

      It will be recalled that Luc Montagnier and Alexandra Henrion-Caude had announced that they had discovered, during the sequencing of the SARS-CoV2 genome carried out shortly after its release : for the former, HIV and malaria sequences; for the latter, a sequence present at the furin cleavage site, found identically in a patent filed by Moderna in 2016, as confirmed in an article published on February 21, 2022 in the journal Frontiers of Virology, which demonstrates that the probability of a natural origin of the virus containing such a patented sequence is statistically zero.

      In its page on the big cow crisis, Wikipedia recalls the enormous media, also ethical and philosophical, political staff-involved commotion of that crisis in 1996. And now, while the number of detected cases appears to be of the same order, in more geographically sparse, nothing or almost nothing.

      This crisis had led to a strong decision: banning animal meal to cattle. Logically, if there was a measure to be taken in the current situation, given the exclusion of early treatment, it would be... simply to apply the Law. Because it has not been enforced. I wrote this in the introduction to my Covid page on July 26, 2021 :

      And then, at the same time [early April 2020], I realized that inexpensive treatments (Prof. Raoult's hydroxychloroquine/azithromycin, ivermectin...) were being banned in incomprehensible ways. I understood much later that it was to put on the market vaccines in test phase. Before getting their "authorization to market" (AMM), they were granted a "temporary authorization to use" (ATU) for "a limited period of time" on the condition that there was "absence of other appropriate treatment" (source). This is why Big Pharma (and thus WHO, and this is true for other countries) used extreme pressure to have no early treatment recognized.

      On this topic, this March 25, 2022, brigittologist (yes Brigitte and vaxxinx Covid it is the same fight against state lies) Maria provides clarification (I remind you that it is because this vetting process was not followed that I spell vaxxins the "vaccines" Covid) :

      For the vaccines, they did not have a UTA, but they did get a conditional MA, which as the name suggests had been issued with conditions :
      1. to provide the numerous missing data ( children, pregnant women, people over 65 years old), and numerous other data including their genotoxicity, oncogenicity, among others.
      2. that there is no other treatment for covid
      3. for a duration of 1 year renewable.
      We now know that the conditional renewal has gone out the window, that the trials on children are ongoing and only started a few months ago, ditto for pregnant women who were started to be vaccinated well before the official studies, which are still ongoing.Similarly for comorbidities that were not included in the initial trials, as these vaccines were tested on healthy subjects....and the missing data is still missing for the most part...

      So conditional MA + the vaccines distributed in the West are all in experimental phase, in phase 3 more exactly (3 out of 4). Normally, the development of a drug is carried out by the manufacturer's laboratory, at its own expense, and above all, the patients are seriously monitored (and are not released into the wild 1/4 hour after the injection). The current pharmacovigilance is almost non-existent. The follow-up of the vaccinated subjects = nothing, whereas normally there should be a regular follow-up to be able to pass in phase 4. None of the usual rules for the development of a drug (or a vaccine) have been respected. It is a total opacity. For prion diseases, we obviously cannot exclude anything since pharmacovigilance has not been carried out. Professor Montagnier spoke about this and he is not the only one. The information must go back up, and in France as in many countries, autopsies are not performed, which would give vital information. Here is a quick summary of the facts (this is not an opinion)

    13. (C) The McKinsey boy Macron facing McKinseyGate

      Several times in this issue, the American strategy consulting firm McKinsey has been mentioned, especially at the beginning of Chapter 22. With Young Global Leaders at the helm (see Appendix D 5), the role of this multinational organization has been essential in spreading Covid paranoia across the planet. A hellish game of one-upmanship among the conspiring countries helped to build this "pandemic" into a disaster beyond the health framework. The other countries, those that did not play this Big Pharma game, were largely spared the disease, as seen in the statistics presented at the beginning of Chapter 21.

      On McKinsey, for once, the page Wikipedia is quite critical with a chapter on the "Opioid Health Scandal" (not from Covid, come on, scandals used to be...), one on "fund embezzlement in Belgium", another on "Racketeering lawsuits/falsification of documents". In 2020, the firm has 33,000 employees, including 18,000 consultants. Nearly 140 nationalities are present within the group. In France, McKinsey has 470 consultants in 2019, from the top French schools.

      Another chapter focuses on "Accusations of tax evasion in France"  "In March 2022, the Senate commission of inquiry into consulting firms noted that "McKinsey has paid no corporate taxes in France for the past ten years." In addition, the associate director and head of the public sector at McKinsey, Karim Tadjeddine, is suspected of having provided false testimony, during a hearing under oath on January 18, 2022. This accusation follows similar facts in Norway."Thus was born what is called McKinseyGate.

      To read the article in Le Monde on March 25 entitled "Macron says he is "shocked" by the tax optimization practiced by the McKinsey firm, Attal calls on the administration to use the advice "sparingly"", one can laugh. In fact, that's what does with a article thus illustrated :

      Center Macron at a conference organized by the Montaigne Institute and the McKinsey Global Institute on June 23, 2016. (MAXPPP)

      France Info published a slightly more biting article (pictured above center) headlined "Covid-19: we sum up the controversy around McKinsey, the firm advising the government on vaccine strategy". But there is a tremolo : "She's not the only one to weigh in". And sympathetic testimonials "You have a crisis, a lockdown, plus the vaccine to manage.... Obviously we need outside help", "In general, I'm not too shocked by the use of consulting firms". Even when it's a multinational octopus spreading a global crisis for the interests of Big Pharma ?

      Son: "Victor Fabius, associate director of the consulting firm McKinsey,
      a firm that the state paid tens of millions of euros to set up its "vaccine strategy"
      Father: "Laurent Fabius, president of the Constitutional Council, charged with ruling
      on the constitutionality of the "vaccine strategy" sold to the state by the firm headed by his son

      A article in France-Soir, while quite wise, still speaks of "progressiveputsch", "the stranglehold of the American consulting firm McKinsey on the implementation of vaccine policy in France", and raises the question of a "peril for the sovereignty and security of France ?"

      You have to go elsewhere to measure the extent of the damage. For example, on the site, a article titled "McKinsey Gate & Macron: Fillon's suits were a joke..." to make it clear that this scandal is more important than the one that removed François Fillon from the 2017 presidential election. It is recalled the role played by McKinsey in this campaign of 2017 so that his foal is elected. Its president is, moreover, a close associate of Macron, it was he who lied before the Senate's commission of inquiry...

      This affair will perhaps awaken a few sleeping consciences, but as long as the Covid scandal is not recognized, the mainstream media can only put the lid back on a mishap that remains manageable... The McKinseyGate is all the more controlled since a year ago, we already knew that taxes were not paid, as Xavier Poussard pointed out [F&D496p9] of April 2021, citing an article in Le Monde. And he added other information which, even today, remains suppressed:

      The shadow of this multinational consulting firm that is as opaque as it is sprawling looms over Emmanuel Macron's career path from the Attali Commission to the organization of the vaccination campaign (as revealed by Politiuco, January 6, 2021), through the sale of Alstom, but also that of Technip, without forgetting the 2017 presidential election, the high point of this collaboration. In the MacronLeaks, we indeed identify "a score of very active employees of the firm. Partners ("associates") seasoned as well as young enthusiasts. To write the candidate's program as well as to manage the stewardship" (McKinsey, a firm in Macron's footsteps, February 6, 2021 [link]). [...]

      From an operational standpoint, Emmanuel Macron's candidacy can, to some extent, be seen as a product delivered in kit form by McKinsey & Company.

      [collage by Camille Durand for the aforementioned Le Monde article]

      And in 2022, is McKinsey still writing the Macron puppet program?

      May 13. McKinseygate is no longer news, yet the revelations continue, about the McKinsey firm's role in the WHO's global vaxxination campaign (article) and its guidance in France on the health ministry, with financial ties to Pfizer (article).

    14. (C) Misinformation right into the booksellers.

      After two years of hardship, we can finally go back to the booksellers unmasked. Those have not been brilliant during the crisis, slavishly applying government constraints. Assuming they had no choice, they could now present the works of the whistle-blowers. In a provincial town, I went to the largest bookstore. I looked for the Covid section, I couldn't find it... Then I went next door, to the FNAC... I looked and looked... in vain. Having difficulty to believe it I went to the salesman, a young man in good health. I asked him why he was wearing a mask. He stammered something about recommendations, he didn't seem to know much. I asked him if there was a virus in the air. Silence. Maybe the Covid? Silence. "That's just what I came to ask you, do you have a Covid  shelf?". He then directed me to a corner pointing to this half shelf where there were only two books on the famous coronavirus, one on the "Covid long how to get out of it" (without the vaxxin...), the other one, further on, on "The messenger RNA revolution" (before or after Covid ?) and that's it!

      To the right, Robert Kennedy Jr's book that describes the methods of the Big Pharma conspirators for those who don't
      believe or those who want to know more... (analysis, large excerpts, pdf of 154 illustrated pages)

      So we had two years of an so-called extremely dangerous disease to the point of making vaxxination almost mandatory for everyone and there are hardly any books about it. Even today, we are still bothered with masks, caregivers are deprived of their jobs for a disease that in bookstores hardly exists...

      I was looking for Robert Kennedy Jr's book, at least to flip through it... It's a big hit in the US, but it's not well known in France. I could have argued for the bookseller to display some. But this profession seems so muzzled to me... At the cash registers, the staff was not, phew...

      That the booksellers, who, to their great detriment, have walled themselves up in the covidist rituals for two years do not put on sale the numerous works released on this subject (Perronne, Raoult, Kennedy, Fouché etc.) is perplexing! Contrary to the me(r)dias of the high road, they are not however directly financed by the billionaires. This is apparently a phenomenon of self-censorship, of great significance for the uncertain future of the industry. It is a little-noticed aspect of the West's ongoing cultural suicide...

      May 20. I went back to the biggest bookstore in my city (before the Fnac). Not finding there again a book on Covid, I asked for assistance. There were two books. One was titled on the long Covid, apparently forgetting that it only exists because of the absence of early treatments (cf. interview of Prof. Raoult). The other is Laurent Toubiana's "Covid 19, Another View of the Epidemic," which I bought. Based on a rigorous study of official figures, the author repositions the severity of Covid at a level far below the flu 2014-2015, in terms of number of sick. It is the inadequate way of treating the disease that has caused the excess deaths (95,000 in France from March 2020 to December 2021, link INSEE), compared to the official 148,000 deaths (so 50% =of excess). On the end, he questions :

      In mathematics, chaos theory studies the behavior of dynamical systems that are highly sensitive to sine conditions, a phenomenon generally illustrated for the general public, by "the butterfly effect". For such systems, minute differences in initial conditions lead to completely different results, generally making any long-term prediction impossible. Thus the illusory idea that it was possible to predict the number of deaths in a population by simulating frustrating models, based on parameters estimated in approximate ways, was considered by somewhat serious scientists to be a vast joke. After all, as Milan Kundera  wondered: "But what is "serious" ? Is serious the one who believes in what he makes others believe". This is indeed the drama that we have experienced during this Covid crisis, because the authorities wanted to believe people who made them believe chimeras. Thus we had the disaster and chaos.

      The author does not go beyond this critical point, but one can, of course, only wonder about those, men of influence, entrepreneurs, politicians, scientists, journalists, who manipulated the chimeras of chaos and how they coordinated their actions. Now they are trying to erase them, even in the shelves of bookstores.

    15. (C) Workers, lawyers, population subjected to state terrorism.

      The Macronian state has terrorized its population by imposing unnecessary health constraints, as we have seen, with its caregivers particularly targeted, the non-vaxxed as well. But the spectre of state violence is also exercised on certain other categories of the population. Artists, shopkeepers, entrepreneurs forced to stop working under penalty of strong financial sanctions, previously the yellow vests had been fought by oversized means. Journalists too are particularly constrained, the major newspapers being put under artificial respiration of state subsidies (list). Justice is also brought to heel, beware of lawyers who take issue with the state's unjust measures.

      For this, the custody of the lawyer Virginie de Araujo-Recchia has a very strong symbolic significance. In a statement (article), she recounts how on March 22 she was awakened by hooded police officers who kidnapped her in front of her children. France-Soir posted this distressing message at the time :

      Communiqué. We inform you that the lawyer Virginie de Araujo-Recchia was arrested this morning and placed in police custody. We have no idea on what basis such a measure was ordered and what she was accused of. Since this morning we are trying to find out where she was taken. All our efforts in this regard remain in vain. Thank you for running this press release without changing a single word. We will keep you informed as soon as possible. The lawyers who are working with her.

      Six other people were treated the same way, including yellow vest Sylvain Baron (interview). Finally, after 60 hours, she was released, like Sylvain Baron. Nothing was held against them, which was to be expected if there had been a prior study. The pretext to intimidate them? The plot that Rémy Daillet, an original who gave himself an importance he never had (article). Virginie was his lawyer on a case, Sylvain had lunch with him... This resembles the Tarnac affair which had made a big flop. The state is conspiratorial and looking for conspirators blindly...

      Among other actions (list), Virginie de Araujo forwarded a report to the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights in November 2020 entitled "Dictatorship 2020 Report, State Terrorism, Infringement of Fundamental Interests and Crimes against Humanity". It seems that for the Macronian state, this deserved a sanction, a vexation to intimidate her and the profession for a better submission to the power in place. Excerpts from the communiqué :

      There has been a significant increase in the number of police custody in the recent period against lawyers or journalists. In the absence of serious or sufficient evidence, the State tends to intimidate these two professions, which are one of the foundations of any democracy. [...]

      The interviewer asked me to outline my "ideology". To which I replied that it was not ideology but proven and justified facts that I have been meticulously cataloguing for two years. All the hearings of the International Court of Public Opinion/Grand Jury have allowed me to hear the testimonies of some of the world's greatest experts in scientific and medical matters, in psychopathology and psychology, in history, economics, geostrategy as well as the testimonies of victims from the present and the past. I have personally collected testimonies from victims' parents, caregivers and French firemen in order to present them to the Grand Jury. It is about expertise, professionals, witnesses, victims. It is not about ideology. The only goal here is to find the truth. [...]

      Some media outlets have reported a "terrorist dossier" and, with my name being cited as "lawyer representing various figures in conspiracy circles" or even "extremist groupings", the defamatory nature of this amalgam will not have escaped anyone. I will not leave it at that because it is pure defamation and intent to harm but I will request a right of reply.

      April 5. On Friday, April 1, Me Virginie de Araujo-Recchia filed a complaint against the association La République en Marche (Emmanuel Macron's political party) on behalf of the citizen associations and AIMSIB (The International Association for Independent and Benevolent Scientific Medicine). The plaintiffs accuse Emmanuel Macron's political party of "sectarian abuses," involving facts of "fraudulent abuse of the state of ignorance and situation of weakness," as well as "complicity in poisoning and genocide." To argue this, the associations and the lawyer rely mainly on the last two years of crisis management, including liberticidal measures, control of information and "collective hypnosis". Article. Was the lawyer's custody intended to delay the filing of this complaint ?

    16. (C) Consequences of Covid "vaccines": the dead and disabled.

      Governments that have forced their people to be vaxxed hide the sometimes disastrous consequences of the injections on healthy people who would have had nothing to fear from Covid if they had been treated with outrageously banned early treatments. The word pharmacovigilance is practically absent from the mainstream media, the terrible damage of a criminal health policy is hidden.

      Page 11 of the number of France-Soir of April 1 presents the Covid assessment with the hidden figures of pharmacovigilance in Europe, followed by the testimony of American cardiologist Peter McCullough :

      Since the beginning of the epidemic, the official narrative has been that the response to the crisis has been similar around the world. In other words, there are no early treatments, containment measures and mask wearing are necessary measures, and finally, vaccines are the only solution. As a cardiologist specializing in internal medicine and a world-renowned expert on the Covid-19 pandemic, I can say that nothing could be further from the truth, that this is propaganda, and that there are early treatments. [...]

      Regarding vaccination, not only is its effectiveness still to be proven, but it has caused many side effects (still not taken into account in most countries). [...] On July 12, 2021, President Macron's peremptory assertions had nothing scientific about them (I have everything at hand to prove it), but yet prompted many French people to get vaccinated. We got the same message in the United States: two vaccines and you get your freedom back. To discuss all these issues, not to mention confinements and different vaccine passports, I proposed to be heard by the French Parliament. My proposal was not accepted, although I testified at U.S. Senate hearings in 2020 and 2022.

      Today, when nearly 65% of the population is vaccinated and case curves still oscillate, we can say with certainty that this monolithic strategy is wrong. Reason why it will have to be examined by the justice system in the next few years.

      In France, a report from the ANSM (Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament) indicates, as of January 27, 2022, 86,831 cases of side effects identified, 26% of which were serious, or about 22,600 serious cases. These are validated cases; there are all the others that are not validated because they are attributed randomly or because the people affected do not know how to relate them to the injections. The statistical data will allow a better perception, for example the number of cardiac incidents, strokes... Graphs from this report:

      We note how much the non-elderly healthy population, unaffected by this disease that hardly affects them (when treated with early treatments), has been a victim of this vaxxination : 73% of severe cases involve people under 65 years old. In other words, according to these underestimated official figures, 16,500 (of the 22,600) people under 65 years of age have had serious sequelae, even though they risked practically nothing from Covid. And among those, there are deaths. According to this older report from the ANSM (hard to find...), there were 1,167 in France as of November 11, 2021, for Pfizer vaxxin alone (page 6).

      As the first of the charts above shows, women are particularly affected by serious side effects, at 71%. A roundtable discussion was held recently to provide an update. Excerpts from this >>>video>>> of 1 hr 28 mins (soon to be 400. 000 views) : some women will "have painful periods throughout their lives, very intense pain, disability for a few days a month", "There are little 13-year-old girls who are told they may no longer be fertile, who following vaccination no longer have periods and have breast atrophy"... Because they wanted to play sports or travel, Macron and his health pass ruined their lives... Complaints are being filed against the state, more than 1,000 people currently. The almost complete silence of the mainstream media is also criminal. If the public had been warned from the beginning, if they had not been pushed to be injected with dangerous substances, we would not be in this situation...

      God I am glad to see this show!!! I have been prone since my 1st pfizer injection to spasmophilia attacks, or something close to it. The 1st one was extremely violent, 3 hours of convulsion starting 5 minutes after the injection. I was at the vaccinodrome of Lille Grand Palais and left without having been admitted to the emergency room. Without any proof of what had happened to me other than the photo of the liaison sheet of the Sdis doctor that I had demanded to take. I then fought thanks to my doctor so that the pharmacovigilance accepts to take into account the incident. 4 other crises since July, a strong weight gain. My doctor wrote me a prescription for a contraindication to the vaccine recall... without effect and I found myself classified as antivax and without a health pass on February 15. And the medical profession as a whole explains to me that it is psychological and that there can be no link with the vaccine. Mind boggling.

      The medical checkups don't show anything specific so I'm told I need to do the booster with a little relaxation. General blindness. Fear has taken the place of a rational attitude. I am angry and worried about what the aftermath might be for my health. My spouse is traumatized by the successive crises she has witnessed. She is therefore not vaccinated. And so we are suspect in the eyes of the majority, convinced that we are conspiracy theorists. I am going to get closer to these groups. I am 50 years old and had never had this type of health problem. I have never doubted our political and governmental authorities and I have never doubted our health care system. Now I do. And the media brainwashing for 2 years has been surreal. It has sown fear and done far more harm than the virus. I want to join these people and fight to stop this blindness.

      And, as time goes on, more and more serious cases are revealed. In Appendix C 12, we saw cases of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, an English study shows the increased "risk of blood clots and venous thrombosis up to three months after infection, pulmonary embolism up to six months after, and a hemorrhagic event up to two months after" (article). A U.S. study shows that "Fetal deaths have increased by nearly 2,000% since vaccine deployment began" (article)... And still in this month of April 2022, in France, Macron's government continues to ban early treatment and push the population to get vaxxed... It is a voluntary endangerment. And the best caregivers, those who realized this catastrophe and refused to be accomplices, are still suspended...

      May 7: publication of a article entitled "Vaccines: '8 out of 1,000 vaccinated suffer serious side effects', according to a German study." July 23 : the German ministry reduces this figure to 1 in 5000 for reported cases and launches an alert (article), while in France Minister Véran announced, in January 2021, 1 in 138,000 mild adverse reactions (article) !

      May 20. INSEE statistics for 2021 have just been released  "From August to December 2021, the gap between observed and expected deaths became greater than Covid-19-related deaths, however" (link). Just after the period of mass vaxxination. INSEE obviously supposes other causes, valid at other times, but the statistical figures confirm those of pharmacovigilance : vaxxins caused a surplus of mortality in France. A article from May 21 specifies that this increase is in those under 55, graph opposite. And article "Pfizer and safety testing. Scientific fraud ?". June 11: article titled "At least 77,000 deaths and 7.3 million adverse event reports following COVID vaccination in the US, Europe, UK and Australia." June 21 : tribune "Camouflaged side effects" indicating "approximately 30,000 deaths in Europe," "1,788% increase in menstrual cycle disorders, 732% increase in strokes, with more than 60% of these serious adverse events occurring on the same day of vaccination." Again based on official pharmacovigilance figures...

      As a complement to the graph at the beginning of Chapter 21: a 31-page pdf file establishing a global Covid situation report as of July 2, 2022, by General Dominique Delawarde, which shows how the most vaccinated countries, without early treatment, are the ones that had the highest mortality, with the glaring case of Singapore (page 5) (link). And other articles : 1 2 3 4 ("adverse reactions are 20 times greater in less than two years than in 50 years of statistics on all other vaccines combined").

    17. (C) An epidemic of coincidences.

      16 years old, 60 years old, 70 years old, two heart attacks, one heart attack death among people I know, that's a lot, but it's not vaxxin, it's coincidence, whew... It is a coincidence if they were injected, besides it is not declared to the pharmacovigilance... We have been hearing this for months and months and yet the statistics speak for themselves. Here are two of them.

      The first graphic is from a article on the Hashtable website titled "An Epidemic of Coincidences." Soccer authorities have long listed players who have died on the field. The average in recent years was about 5 per year. And now, all of a sudden, in the first 11 months of 2021, 25 deaths. And that would be the chance! Already in mid-August it was blatant with three Belgian cyclists (article) and a article in the Marianne newspaper dared to write "not enough data", "In the current state there are no elements to make a recommendation", "As for the cost-risk benefit, it still very clearly leans in favor of the vaccine", well let's see certainly not for healthy young people  ! The editors of this magazine were putting their readers at risk by saying that they should not listen to Belgian doctors who advised against high-intensity sports for a week after the injection...

      Let's move on to the second graph. We are now in mid-April 2022, the American pharmacovigilance statistics referencing cardiac accidents (myocarditis and pericarditis) following vaccination are exploding in 2021 and 2022 (article from France-Soir). And you have a criminal journalist (endangering people, inciting to take a dangerous drug for the health of healthy young people...) from FranceInfo, his name is Thomas Pontillon, who tells that "all this does not constitute proof. Most often, there is another explanation.". And strangely, in France, unlike the USA, it would be fine: "according to health authorities, these few cases of myocarditis do not call into question the benefit-risk ratio of vaccines, which remains very largely favorable". The same speech as Marianne's ten months earlier.

      All right the journalists take refuge behind "the health authorities" who are more criminal than they are. But they have a brain, their job is also to investigate, it is not to harp on what the Macronian AFP tells. And it should give guarantee to all this enterprise of disinformation for five years more ?

    18. (C) A very large-scale Milgram experiment.

      I hope the planetary Covid crisis is over, except probably in a few countries, like China and Australia, stuck in their absurd "Zero Covid" policy. We saw with the graph in Chapter 21 that many countries, especially in Africa, escaped it with early treatments early on and others, especially in Asia, greatly limited the effects, adopting ivermectin around September 2021. This simple observation of a disease whose effects differ according to national health policies means that it is not a pandemic in the classical sense, with similar effects everywhere. In some countries, including France, it has come to the point of overriding the Nuremberg Code by conducting forced and dangerous experimental drug trials on millions of human beings.

      To achieve this, the leaders of these countries operated a stupefying operation among the inhabitants so that they could accept the unthinkable. These were the confinement, the aggravation of the disease through the prohibition of early treatment, the compulsory mask, the stigmatization of the resisters, the apartheid... "Sheep ! Sheep ! Gentle sheep ! In order to shear you we must scare you ! Two months ago we told you that you were too stupid to wear a mask... Now they make you pay very high fines if you don't wear the masks imposed by your nice shepherds... Masks that cost you a lot of money! And you keep quiet !" exclaimed Jean-Claude Meyer on June 1, 2020 on a page of his blog titled "The acceptance of Covid19 containment falls under the Milgram syndrome !".

      This way of conditioning a population and making them dependent on bona fide sadists was formalized in 1963 by a Milgram experiment, by American psychologist Stanley Milgram. "This experiment evaluates the degree of obedience of a resident of the United States in the very early 1960s in the face of an authority that he considers legitimate and makes it possible to analyze the process of submission to authority, particularly when it induces actions that pose problems of conscience for the subject."

      Cecily de Villepoy, in "La Revue Dessinée" #32, Winter 2018

      On September 8, 2021, in a article on his Yetiblog, Pierrick Tillet wrote :

      In reality, very few manage to escape the hierarchical grid of submission to the established order. In his famous experiment to test the degree of obedience of citizens, Professor Milgram succeeded in getting his (paid) human guinea pigs to inflict punishment in the form of electric shocks on designated culprits. In reality, the experimenters and the "culprits" were actors and no electric shocks were delivered. But the guinea pigs were unaware of this and eventually obeyed the inane orders given to them.

      Only 15% of them refused to obey. Look closely, this is about the percentage of French people who still resist the first dose of vaccine.

      When the winds have shifted, when the old established order has totally collapsed (which is bound to happen), it is they, the resisters, who will impose the new order, which the relieved masses will rally around. The only important task for the resistance fighters is to prepare this new world, calmly, quietly, patiently. Their time is coming.

      The problem with Pierrick Tillet, and many others, is that when the time came for the resisters to put down the old order and rally the relieved masses, he preferred to give in to the established order and abstain from voting against Macron (article). He made this April 24, 2022 what he himself calls, for having wanted it, a "day of shame" (article). Le Pen would not have had a majority in the assembly, Macron probably will. And for some sanitary, ecological or warlike reason considered catastrophic by the servile media, he will reinstate nose muzzles and a QR Code apartheid. This is already being prepared for next fall (article).

      Whatever the case, it appears that slowly an awareness is building. Statistical data, McKinseygate and other revelations point in that direction. It is too slow, but the truth can only come out, even too late. For Brigittegate too.

    19. (C) Masks for all have made the health crisis worse.

      I've said it many times in this issue, mandating masks for the entire population is without any conclusive health effect. A surgical mask lets through particles of 800 nanometers, those of Covid are less than 140 nanometers (article), no need to go further to understand, but I had still indicated links to many, many studies pointing in the same direction. With in addition the ecological disaster of billions of waste. The misinformation is such that the French, for the most part, still believe in the sanitary utility of what is only a means of submission. We are beginning to have some hindsight and, finally, I was too moderate in my remarks, because the countries that imposed the mask have worsened the crisis, as shown by statistical data in the United States and on several European countries (article). One study even shows that "masks are responsible for more Covid deaths, study finds" (article). But even in the face of such compelling evidence, the Macronian sheep, like the submissives in Milgram's experiment or those in Plato's cave or those in Orwell's totalitarianism, are so hypnotized that they won't believe it...

      In black the countries, including France, where the mask was mandatory, in red those where it was not. And a tweet from Sivano Trotta recalling the unnecessary health constraints of May 2021 when in May 2022 there are twice as many Covid cases and no constraints...

      Ban early treatment, muzzle, force injections experimental injections, confine, prohibit movement, discriminate, they're willing to invent another crisis to start over.

      "Vaccinating children with a vaccine that does not prevent transmission to protect people who are already vaccinated will go down in the annals of medical stupidity." Laurent Taubiana, epidemiologist.

    20. (C) Early treatments and the involvement of the Elysian couple.

      For me, as for almost all Covid antivaxxers, there was from 2020 to 2022 a "crime against humanity" on the scale of many governments that agreed, under pressure from WHO, Big Pharma, Great Reset etc., to ban early treatments and force vaxxination. This resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths.

      Yet, it would have been enough to simply enforce the law. Covid vaxxins (which are experimental treatments, not vaccines) were not entitled to conditional Marketing Authorization (MA). I explained in the introduction of my neighboring page Covid, July 26, 2021 and ,this March 25, 2022, brigittologist Maria (yes Brigitte and vaxxinx Covid it's the same fight against state lies) provides clarification  :

      The vaccines were granted, at the European level, a conditional MA, which as its name suggests was issued with conditions :
      1. to provide the many missing data (children, pregnant women, people over 65 years old), and many other data including their genotoxicity, oncogenicity, among others.
      2. that there are no alternative treatments for covid ("the drug addresses unmet medical needs").
      3. for a renewable term of 1 year.
      We now know that the conditional renewal has gone out the window, that the trials on children are ongoing and only started a few months ago, ditto for pregnant women who were started to be vaccinated well before the official studies, which are still ongoing.Similarly for comorbidities that had not been included in the initial trials, these vaccines having been tested on healthy subjects....and the missing data is still missing for the most part...
      So conditional MA + the vaccines distributed in the West are all in experimental phase, in phase 3 more exactly (3 out of 4). Normally, the development of a drug is carried out by the manufacturer's laboratory, at its own expense, and above all, the patients are subject to serious surveillance (and are not released into the wild 1/4 hour after the injection). The current pharmaco-vigilance is almost non-existent. The follow-up of the vaccinated subjects = nothing, whereas normally there should be a regular follow-up to be able to pass in phase 4. None of the usual rules for the development of a drug (or a vaccine) have been respected. It is a total opacity. For prion diseases, nothing can obviously be excluded since pharmacovigilance has not been carried out. Professor Montagnier spoke about this and he is not the only one. The information must go back up, and in France as in many countries, autopsies are not performed, which would give vital information. Here is a quick summary of the facts (this is not an opinion)

      Many studies show that ivermectin's efficacy in early treatment of Covid is better than vaxxins, and this is supported by statistics, especially in India (source). But no study has said that it is a miracle treatment, whereas it has been said to be for vaxxins ("All vaccinated, all protected"). On the right, questioning the July 8, 2022, assassination of Shinzo Abe, the former Japanese prime minister (July 12 tweet opposite, article from July 29).

      On April 9, 2020, in a great media spectacle, Emmanuel Macron had visited in Marseille to Professor Didier Raoult, who challenged the government health policy and advocated the use of early treatment, based on hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin. Behind the polite formulas, it was a kind of "bais de la mort", the government having continued its mortifying policy and Prof. Raoult having softened his criticism. Under a catchy title, the following excerpts from the article show Brigitte Macron's involvement :

      Brigitte Macron returns to her relationship with Professor Didier Raoult and takes the opportunity to bend the neck of certain rumors. After specifying that neither she nor her husband have been tested, as they have no symptoms, the President's wife says she has not "taken her daughter to be treated in Marseille by Professor Raoult nor asked the President to go there to meet him." Now that is clear! Then, she confides that she did indeed receive a call from the scientist. "He treated several of my friends and one of them gave him my number". She tells our confreres that he reassured about the health of these friends in question and that he discussed with her this famous treatment with chloroquine. However, Brigitte Macron is careful not to give an opinion on its effectiveness. "No treatment to date works," she concluded.

      Admire the conclusion : she "doesn't care to give an opinion" and she gives an emphatic opinion ! An erroneous opinion, since Prof. Raoult's treatment has proven to be effective, notably in Senegal (to the point of being decorated, in gratitude, tweet) and in Côte d'Ivoire, as we saw in Chapter 21. Based on these remarks, there is reason to believe that Macron's refusal to use early treatment and his roundabouts with Raoult were primarily those of the "first lady."

      Also, from the beginning, ivermectin had been banned (article) :

      In France the problem has been solved upstream: there are no studies on ivermectin, they have been banned so we don't know. Despite almost 100% results, both in prophylaxis and curative in 2 Ehpads in the Paris region at the very beginning of the epidemic (Bernigaud and Loué), in the middle of the hecatomb in Ehpads, Inserm refused the proposed studies, when it was so easy for them, with millions of cases, to do a quick, transparent study to show that it does not work! They didn't do it because they didn't need to know. Why?

      Two years later, tongues are tentatively starting to wag. In a article from France-Soir on May 31, 2022, physician Claude Escarguel speaks out :

      January 9, 2021. We received three phone calls from the First Lady of France, who expressed interest with one of our members to [find out] the treatment...
      April 20, 2021. We have evidence of phone records and text messages illustrating that he [President Macron] as well as Mrs. Brigitte Macron tried to get things moving but came up against the medical "system" and its potential "grip" on a lost population but also on city doctors tetanized by the threats looming in case of "treatment" other than Doliprane.
      January 26, 2022. We have text messages from Macron. Doctors in our group have contacted Macron's ministers. Doctors in our group have contacted Madame Macron and have been in direct and constant contact with [her]. And Macron at one point sent us a text message, [via] a former minister who rebroadcast it to us, so we have this text message, "Yes I totally agree. I think the early outpatient track is a good track. But the system is opposite. I'm following this closely."
      April 23, 2022. [Macron] replied to his minister. [In] a text message that we have at [your] disposal:"Yes I agree with this way of thinking. Unfortunately the system is against it. I'll take care of it"...
      May 5, 2022. Doctor Alain Branchereau...told the President of the Republic: "I treated [with] azithromycin/zinc, and I had no deaths" At that time, we had sent through a doctor, who was treating one of his ministers, all of our work to Mr. Macron... It is known that in February 2021, we were able to count among the conspiracists a famous person who was the President of the Republic! I am going to read you the answer, mail of the president of the Republic to his minister. It is an email that is in our hand, we reserve it in case France Inter has fun saying that it is [a] fake news: "Formidable. I have believed in this for a long time. But the "system" believes in it too little it's crazy. I'm seizing on it. Thank you. I embrace you."[At the same time] one of our doctors who was in direct contact with Madame Brigitte Macron, testified that she too had many people around her who were treated with early outpatient treatment and who had been pleased with the results.

      France-Soir concludes these remarks by arguing that Macron would have been "complotist." Another reading is in order: in complete knowledge of the facts, as a perfect two-headed puppet of the "system" (Big Pharma & Co.), of which they are an integral part, the presidential couple blindly obeyed and participated in the Covid crime against humanity.

      June 21. Again on France-Soir, in a article with video, Tess Lawrie (opposite), an English researcher deplores "the enormous impact that the WHO ban on ivermevtine has had. "She speculates that there "might not even be a pandemic" with the approval of early treatments," joining many other researchers. She calls for "a new WHO." Before being the failure of the French government and other rich countries under the control of Big Pharma, this Covid crisis was first of all a disaster caused by a World Health Organization that we will now have to strongly distrust. Even the doctors who surround us, who have often failed....

    21. (C) Are the 2022 provaxxins becoming deniers?

      In December 2020, when the Covid vaxxins arrived, the citizens were divided into antivax and provax. The former held to the precautionary principle in the face of an unproven remedy they feared would have adverse effects. The latter had confidence in the pharmaceutical laboratories using the "messenger RNA" technology and in the governments and media that assured their non-hazardousness, or at least promised their immediate discontinuation if a proven dangerousness was detected. At this stage, already, the antivaxers could only be right for young and healthy people who had very little to fear from Covid. For people at risk, including the elderly, antivax opinions were divided between those who were agnostic, who let it happen, and those who were more radical, who refused it while waiting to be sure of the experiment's success.

      Only time would tell then whether the radical provax and antivax were right or wrong. There was for that a "supreme judge" : the statistics of hospitalization and death, of type INSEE. We are in 2022, we know these statistics, in France and at the world level for each country that has vaxxed a lot or a little (see graph of Chapter 21 and previous appendices C), and the judgment is very clear, without appeal: the provaxes were wrong and the antivaxes, agnostics and radicals, were right. The slogan "Tous vaccinés, tous protégés" became the vivid manifestation of what the French governmental lie was.

      The countries that have vaxxed the most are those that are still struggling with Covid. Among our most vaxxed relatives and friends are those who have recently caught Covid (example in Australia). Several riders in the Tour de France, up to date with their three or four injections, have had to drop out, affected by Covid symptoms. Everyone knows, the failure of this remedy, presented as miraculous (95% success rate !, article), is spectacular. Its effect is temporary, it does not prevent contamination. It is still said that it would prevent severe forms, which seems to be caused more by the lower lethality of the new variants. At the same time, early treatments such as azithromycin and ivermectin, still forbidden in France, have shown their effectiveness in very large populations. And pharmacovigilance, so forgotten by the media, teaches us the seriousness and the multitude of adverse effects. It is certainly not a hecatomb, but it is detectable in the statistics of mortality and certain serious diseases. These data, however, managed by governments often provax, have spoken, they are categorical: the provax were wrong, the antivax were right. We know that now.

      So the debate should be settled. It isn't. Certainly, in the population, many provaxes recognize, to say the least, that these vaxxins have been nothing more than window dressing. And slowly but surely, their opinion has changed, they even understand the role of McKinsey. Some media are timidly starting to question. But among the media, medical authorities and political staff, almost everyone continues to advocate all-vaxxin. French senators, in particular, are turning a deaf ear (article), while quietly and hypocritically questioning themselves (article). Xavier Azalbert is pessimistic in a article from July 22, 2022, excerpts of which follow :

      The guests have all their vaccines up to date, are happy and proud to be vaccinated, because "it saved them from a severe form"; a severe form of a Covid-19 they have not failed to contract on two or three occasions, nevertheless, this despite the flagship slogan of the Ministry of Health accepted without question: "All vaccinated, all protected"
      So, no doubt about it either. Not the slightest question about the government's evolving if not changing communication. Nothing about the fact that the health policy in the unique form of a vaccination solution has in no way proven that it has stopped the contamination or the transmission of the virus. [...]
      These are indeed real lies that are used to cover the false truths of some who control the bien-pensance.

      The director of France-Soir should have presented his opponents with some graphs and data. The demonstrations of statistician Pierre Chaillot are very convincing (article on Agoravox, with relevant comments). Those who are still provax seem to sink into a "denial of historical facts, despite the presence of flagrant evidence reported by historians, and this for political purposes" : this is being negationist. Paradoxically, one of their best defenders could be Pierre Chaillot who finds the official figures of deaths in France very exaggerated... But how could a provax admit it ?

      In this end of July 2022, Macron visits Cameroon, Benin and Guinea Bissau. What media will say that there were 30 to 180 times fewer Covid deaths there than in France, per million inhabitants ? (curves). And that Macron is primarily responsible for this excess of French deaths... Who will ask the French medical authorities to take example on these countries ?

      The succession of these first three Charlie Hebdo covers could have shown a gradual awareness. It is nothing of the sort, their dates, successively July 28, 2021, July 14, 2021, August 4, 2021, show a great confusion and a lack of awareness. This media, which so mocked the wife of Georges Pompidou, remained wise to Brigitte Macron : only the right cover made controversy (link). From 2017 to 2022, she changed her meaning...

  35. Appendices D: developments, the #brigittegate

    1. (D) From the media and transphobia.

      January 18, 2022. As mentioned at the end of the introduction, Lionel Labosse is involved in this issue (along with other carers who prefer to remain anonymous). On his website, in addition to his daily chronicle (after March 1 here), he has added a page featuring illustrations here, and others, with a text of which here is the introduction and an extract :

      My first article on #brigittegate entitled "Brigitte Macron: "What if she were a man?" was quite successful, having been for about 50 days the only one on the Internet to relay the investigation of Faits & Documents (more than 230,000 views to date on Profession gendarme for both versions combined). The affair finally exploded with the first interview of Natacha Rey broadcast on December 10, 2021. The watchdogs of state journalism published some rebuttals falling under what I call "fact-shaking", which I addressed in a 2nd article entitled "Journalism on its knees in front of the "first lady man of France"". The creature of the Élysée ended up speaking pitifully about the affair to journalists worthy of Pravda. The journalists continue to either remain silent or publish pathetic denials. The worst is the overwhelming silence of the journalists of the so-called free press, as well as the stars of anti-Covidism. The very life of Natacha Rey being threatened, Richard Boutry also being persecuted by procedures worthy of a macron republic just for having considered interviewing her, the fact of not treating the affair is, in my humble opinion, non-assistance to a person in danger. The attitude of "journalists" towards whistle-blowers is getting worse and worse, but that doesn't tell us anything; we had already noticed it in their lack of reaction during the Julian Assange affair. No one is being asked to headline "Brigitte is a man", just to mention the investigation, which is information in itself, with its assumptions and certainties.

      [...] Alain Beyrand got to work, as an amateur genealogist seized in his intimate conviction, and provided a synthesis that will be a landmark in this citizen investigation against the media-political system. My interest for this investigation comes from converging coincidences. On the one hand, I am an anti-communist from the beginning. I started at the beginning of March 2020 the series of now 11 articles chronicling national-covidism; secondly, I am a subscriber to Faits & Documents, so I didn't waste any time wondering if it was a serious journal; thirdly, I am an altersexual (a word of my own invention), so this investigation was particularly relevant to me, and I was a relative expert in this field, and able to distinguish between what falls under the heading of transphobia and homophobia, and what falls under the heading of public interest.

    2. (D) Emmanuel Macron in withdrawal mode.

      • RT France. Emmanuel Macron at the European Parliament: a press conference without questions... from the press?
        According to several sources including France Info, it would appear that after Emmanuel Macron's speech to the European Parliament, he did not wish to answer journalists' questions, while inviting them to a press briefing.
      • Huffpost. For the 2022 presidential election, will we see a debate with Macron before the first round?
        Macron is sceptical about the value of a debate before April 10, which displeases the incumbent's opponents. No predecessor of Emmanuel Macron has done so.
      • The Strategists' Courier. Emmanuel Macron at the European Parliament: a press conference without questions... from the press?
        According to several sources including France Info, it would appear that after Emmanuel Macron's speech to the European Parliament, he did not wish to answer journalists' questions, while inviting them to a press briefing.
      • France-Soir. "Duties come before rights": politicians and intellectuals accuse the government of "fascism"
        An umpteenth statement from the government is causing controversy. During an interview in Le Parisien, Gabriel Attal explained that Emmanuel Macron, if re-elected, plans to "pursue the redefinition of our social contract". For the government spokesman, reviewing the political foundation of the country, its social contract, involves the implementation of "duties that come before rights, from respect for authority to social benefits". In the context of the vaccine pass, these words have provoked strong reactions from part of the French political and intellectual class. "A reactionary thought that has not been formulated in this way since Vichy".
        In Le Courrier des Stratèges [The Strategists' Courier], the historian and former director general of ESCP Europe, Edouard Husson, considered that "the government spokesman openly claims to be a reactionary thinker who has not been heard of since Vichy. For this specialist of the Nazi period, the political project of Macronism is a "grey fascism", which he defines by "a new authoritarianism, which relies on the "grey power", the oldest part of the population". According to him, this therefore makes Emmanuel Macron "the most dangerous candidate for democracy, the one who puts down republican institutions whose raison d'être is the defence of individual and collective freedoms."
        These words echo the thoughts of the essayist Idriss Aberkane, who said on Twitter: "It is the principle of a fascist dictatorship to destroy the Constitution with the cry 'duties come before rights'.

      February 1. The Macron couple seems to be paralyzed by the brigittesque revelations and their increasingly wide dissemination in public opinion since December 10. The anti-vax / anti-pass were the first to discover the file on the suspicious sex of the first lady, then, gradually, the information begins to spread more widely in the general public. At first, Macron continued as if nothing had happened. Did he even know? What was (is) the extent of the filtering carried out by Brigitte and her entourage? Brigitte was hiding. Then she made media outings around January 10 - 15, including the one indicated in Chapter 22. But on the substance of the case, she did not deliver any answers that could put an end to the questions raised by the investigation. In front of a complacent press she only indulged in gesticulations to complain about being harassed. Then silence again. For his part, Emmanuel, who is in the pre-presidential campaign, changed his behavior somewhat during the second half of January, as if he were afraid of being asked where Jean-Michel Trogneux had gone. He refused to answer journalists' questions at a press conference in the European Parliament [article from RT France of January 19]. This is apparently a big first that has offended European journalists. The French, on the other hand, know that press conferences have long since disappeared in Macronia. And now, also a big first, his Majesty would like to refuse any debate with his 1st round opponents [article by Anthony Berthelier in Huffpost]. Certainly, he will continue to boast about his spirit of dialogue in front of selected groupie activists, protected by numerous police officers to keep away a crowd that might shout "Where did Jean-Mimi ?"...

      As for the media, they no longer dare to say that it is a rumor and seem petrified. For lack of order from their Elysian tutelage, they persevere in the omerta  we have, at the head of the State, a couple psychopathic-mythomaniac perverse and criminal (the deaths of vaxxins and prohibition of early treatment), but hush, for the security of the State we must not disturb his private life and reveal his lies and falsifications on his biography ...

      For a long time, it was planned that Macron would run for president in early February. Apparently, while pollsters place him largely in the lead, he is delaying his decision... But why?

      At the same time, the propaganda continues to be in full swing. the accusatory inversion remains a leitmotiv : Macron would be anti-system [article from the Stratèges mail, January 31, by Eric Verhaeghe]. And it shows his intention to worsen the submissive state he has put in place, with duties to take precedence over rights, no less... [article from the editorial staff of France-Soir on February 1].

      Additional relief for the "En Marche" frontrunner, the French have stopped following and are beginning to sulk about his compulsory and generalized vaxxination. That of the children could not engage according to the wishes of the health defense council and the doubts about the effectiveness of vaccines make the imperative of the third dose unconvincing. As if they were beginning to realize more widely that all this official, politico-media masquerade is not only useless on the epidemic level but has rapidly proved to be dangerous, costly without any real benefit on the public health level. That the Elysian Jupiter could soon jump...

    3. (D) Always the flabbergasting and journalistic omerta

      When will we get out of this? I learn this day February 3 that on January 28, , on 28 January, the supplement "Madame Figaro" of the newspaper "Le Figaro" (Dassault group) published an article typical of the women's fashion press, blissfully raving about Brichel. I don't know the exact content, other than this
      excerpt. On the same day, the site "Riposte laïque", classified on the right of the right, published a article by Daphne Rigobert giving the following account of the subject matter here :

      Silence rather than yet another lie?

      Nor did she take advantage of her two recent interviews on TF1 and RTL to finally clarify the situation, saying how unpleasant it was for her to be denied since she was equated with her brother. Mademoiselle (?) Trogneux has again deliberately chosen to remain silent, a choice that will not interrupt the countless questions and investigations underway, as this subject is of such great interest to many French people and millions of others, and she does not forgive her husband for having said that he wanted to "piss off to the end" the non-vaccinated and for having declared them non-citizens.

      There are definitely a lot of people out there looking for Jean-Michel... who might invite himself into the campaign.
      "Exclusive: Brigitte Macron a committed woman. Her struggles, her priorities, her philosophy of life & her master class in Roubaix"

      I take the following from this :
      • The questioning of Brigitte Macron's true sexual nature is now widely publicized and the file known. There are certainly still those who believe in a rumor, but those who know about the existence of the file are probably much more numerous than the media silence might lead one to believe. What could be more eloquent than this strange silence in the face of an affair of state? What have journalists been reduced to? What happened to their claim of "counter-power" ? Do they now consider themselves to be accomplices of Macron, his close guard? This petrified press is probably a first in the history of the Fifth Republic... Why? Fear of reprisals from the power and the big bosses? However, the first journalists to emerge from this torpor would be proud of it... The question also concerns a fringe of these journalists and relays who could express themselves, such as the sites France-Soir, Le Courrier des Stratèges, Le Yeti's blog, Le Libre Penseur, Réseau Internationnal, Résistances Mondiale. What are they waiting for? Only the sites Profession Gendarme (on several occasions, reprinting articles by Lionel Labosse), Marcel D (on 15 December here), Qactus (on 16 December, 6 and 11 January) and Geopolintel (on 30 December here) had the courage to expose the case. And the journalists of the "Canard enchaîné", are they going to continue for a long time to bury their heads in the sand, shaming their predecessors who were so courageous during the first two world wars ? Will we have to wait for the foreign press to get hold of #brigittegate before it finally breaks in France ?
      • I find that the strategy of Riposte Laïque (which has already published an article, an extract of which is included at the end of chapter 12) is quite fine and could serve as an example to some of the sites mentioned above. It consists in doing the one who is exasperated by recurrent rumours while lining up elements that show their relevance, so that the reader understands what is going on and seeks to go deeper. The risk is indeed that this dossier on the true sexual identity of the "first lady" will be classified as "far right" or "complotist" or even "antivax". Francis Lalanne had the bravery to speak out in December and found himself even more excluded than before. Martine Wonner, Florian Philippot and others probably fear the same effect. They could ask for an end to this bad joke of a male first lady and for evidence, a blood test, old photos or anything else that puts an end to this far too long masquerade !
      • And also vary the questions, don't stay on "Is she a man ?"  "Is she her brother ?", "Is her brother Jean-Michel still alive ?" "Why don't we recognise her on the photo of her first marriage ? Can she communicate another ?", etc. This dossier allows us to ask a ton of them, precise, vague, circuitous...
      • The information also needs to circulate more, talk about it around you, show photo comparisons, the voice comparison video, make it a topic of conversation (without forcing persuasion, the revelation can be gradual, say that it's really disturbing, that it's weird that no reverse evidence is shown . ...), broaden the topic to unbearable lies, contempt for the excluded, accusatory inversions, the analysis of the Italian psychologist... give the address of this page, distribute the pdf (less than 6 Mb, it goes by mail...)...

    4. (D) Craignos, the yellow wigs!

      February 6. At the beginning of Chapter 22, I recalled that on December 26 I wrote  "we also have something to laugh about, to mock, to quip about, to gripe about, and we would be wrong not to laugh at the backs of those who oppress us." And some don't shy away from it. From Lionel Labosse's
      Daily Chronicle, here are some illustrations :

      Operation Yellow Wigs / Everyone with your wigs on Saturday!!! /
      #jeanmicheltrogneux 68 years old according to the police, 76 years old according to the protesters,
      Stop omerta, for a parliamentary commission of inquiry. Dedicated page.
      As a bonus, on March 14, the >>>song-clip>>> "The Twin Sisters" with music by Michel Legrand.

      Behind this amusing Craignos side, a very dark craignos side is being stirred up on Twitter, following the incarceration at the end of January of Jérémie Ladreit de Lacharrière, son of businessman Marc Ladreit de Lacharrière, for a recidivist child pornography case, despite the support of Mimi Marchand. The latter two people are close to the Macron couple, here are some tweets dealing with this topic : 1 2 3 4 5 6.

      April 2. The Yellow Wigs are still going strong. For those who enjoy Hara-Kiri style humor and those who want to check it out, here's a >>>video>>> 54-second piece titled "Exclusive: Jean-Brichèle Trognon distributes Emmanuel Macron's election platform."

    5. (D) Freedom Convoys and Young Global Leaders.

      February 7. Most countries have gotten rid of the Covid pretexted constraints or are in the process of doing so. A handful of them cling to this totalitarian hold on the people. Italy, France, Austria, New Zealand, Australia, the United States, Canada... It is in the latter country that the popular reaction is currently strongest, with a "Freedom Convoy" occupying the capital Ottawa (
      article). Prime Minister Justin Trudeau even appears to have been on the run for several days. Listening to an interview with his half-brother, Kyle Kemper, I thought that someone very close to Emmanuel Macron might have said the same thing. Here's a transcript of an excerpt from that interview, reprinting a >>>video>>> of 3:31 minutes from the site "The Freethinker".

      Kyle Kemper (KK) - Look at what Toole [Erin O'Toole, Trudeau's political opponent] is doing compared to what Justin is doing. They're both pushing vaccination right now. And I don't even call it a vaccine, it's a fake vaccine. It doesn't provide immunity, it doesn't stop transmission, therefore it's not a vaccine. It is an experimental biotechnology, magnetic nanotechnology. I am not interested.

      Journalist (J) - Well it's interesting that you bring that up because I've been, sort of, following you on Twitter and I saw some of the responses that you were giving, not just to your brother Justin Trudeau, but to people who tweeted about him. I saw a tweet where you said... Your hashtag "fake vaccine" and your response "Investigate the vaccine, follow the money." This is way beyond Justin. So, having said that..., my question for you is  are you implying that your brother, our Prime Minister, is some kind of pawn ? Are you saying that he is controlled. What are your thoughts through this tweet ?

      KK - The Covid scam is a globally orchestrated phenomenon to... consolidate power and generate huge profits, facilitate more wealth transitions from countries to corporations. I don't know how anyone can deny that. Canada has spent over a trillion dollars, more money than the most unfathomable amounts of money!

      J - And so you think Justin Trudeau would support that. Do you think he would support it if he totally knew what the agenda was ?

      KK - I think in my heart of hearts, it goes back to the hypnosis condition. I really believe that he believes that what he's doing is a good thing even though he knows it's the World Economic Forum [WEF] agenda. He believes it's the right thing to do. He believes the WEF, you know, the Great Reset [Great Reset], the 4th industrial revolution agenda. You'll own nothing and be happy and we're bringing in a universal basic income. We impose central bank digital currencies on people. We are putting social credit systems on the people. These are incredible... hysterical-tyrannical dreams. And in my opinion, they have been slowly implementing them. And it takes more than governments, governments are just an arm of that. Look at Big Tech, the media, Big Pharma, all working together in this giant, gigantic farce. There is farce in everything we see now.

      Left Kyle Kemper during his interview. On the right, even in Canada, Jean-Michel is being sought...
      A "Freedom Convoy" is being prepared in France to Paris (article) and in Europe to Brussels (article).

      Let's go back to the World Economic Forum, led by Klaus Schwab, and his enforcers, the Young Global Leaders. When the Covid epidemic broke out, more than 30 of these plotters were world leaders. Including Justin Trudeau (photo with Bill Gates, Global Leader of Tomorrow). Add the vice president of Pfizer, the CEO of Moderna (Frenchman Stéphane Bancel, in 2009) and several McKinsey alumni (to whom Trudeau appealed, article). Of the ten most vaxxinous countries in Europe, five are led by Young Global Leaders (article). Of course, Emmanuel Macron is one of them (class of 2012), Valérie Pécresse too (class of 2002) (list), the latter having probably been chosen to succeed the former as France's leader. Complement.

    6. (D) Brigolades, Putin knows about Jean-Michel...

      February 8. After brigittology (Appendix A 5), brigolades? Will the presidential couple be the talk of the world for long? The image of France...

      Informed by #brigitttegate, Putin practices physical distancing. According to tweets brigolos.
      Article from 11 January on the impact of brigittegate in Russia. Article from 9 February on the length of the table.
      And a great effort to try and close the distance on this photo from the Elysée website...
      Macron was presented with a choice: either he accepted a PCR test by Russian authorities and was allowed to get closer to Putin, or he refused and had to submit to a stricter social distancing. "We knew very well that this meant no handshake and that long table. But we couldn't accept that they would get their hands on the president's DNA" one of the sources told Reuters. [...] On Thursday, three days after the meeting between Macron and Putin, the Russian leader received Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev. The two men shook hands and sat next to each other, separated only by a small coffee table. [article from February 11]
      I conclude, in the first degree, that Macron is forcing the French into drastic constraints
      but that he refuses them when he goes to a foreign country.

      When Macron was in Russia, Putin had Macron escorted out by a man in a skirt. A way of telling him "My boy, I know your wife is a transsexual, I don't argue with gays, go away." [February 11 tweet] (>>>video>>> of 19 seconds)
      The failure of negotiations was complete, war broke out on February 24.

      April 16. I found more tweets about this long table on a Russian site. As a result I made this pdf file which contains about 30 images.

    7. (D) Jean-Michel and Brigitte file a complaint together...

      February 17. Yesterday, Natacha Rey and Amandine Roy (who interviewed Natacha on December 10) received a writ from a bailiff announcing that a complaint has been filed against them by Brigitte Macron, her brother Jean-Michel (!) and her three children, as indicated in
      chapter 26. Natacha Rey presents it to us this way on her facebook account :


      I am announcing that the complaint that had been filed against me for "defamation" by Brigitte Macron's office has been requalified in the end to : "infringement of privacy" and "infringement of image rights". Yes, you are not dreaming! What a satisfaction to see my investigation finally recognized at its true value, extremely serious work, supported by numerous proofs and indemonstrable arguments, and to see me thus cleared of accusations of "fake news", "lies", "false rumor", "calumnies" and other "false theory".

      Apparently, Brigitte Macron advised by the inenarrable Jean Ennochi (the fake news hunter who lies faster than his shadow !) gave up the idea of suing me on the first ground, knowing that she was sure to lose it, in view of all the elements I have (some of which have not yet been revealed) and all the legitimate questions they are quite incapable of answering, in order to dismantle my thesis... or rather the TRUTH.

      A bailiff came to my home yesterday and left a notice in my mailbox, in my absence, so that I could pick up some documents at his office, in this case a summons before the 17th chamber of the Paris Court. 30 double-sided pages. I thought it was a joke or a delirium tremens when I discovered the content. In spite of the intolerable pressures and judicial persecutions that I continue to undergo (seriously affecting my state of health), I could not help but burst out laughing - like all those who read it - so much the accusations are grotesque and come under the heading of the grand guignol.

      There is absolutely no longer any question of "transsexuality", "gender reassignment", "imposture", "dissimulations", "state secret", "fabricated biography", "imaginary ex-husband", "fake photos" or that turn out not to represent the right people as on those of the communion, the campaign leaflet or the wedding... but of distribution of photos (belonging to the public domain, that I did not take without their knowledge), of enlargement, colorization, comparisons with the help of a software of restoration or facial recognition. . without their authorization! YES, you read that right!

      That's not all....! If I am not reproached for having demonstrated that Jean-Michel was Brigitte and vice versa (the most important point of my investigation however ! ), I am accused of having spied on him, of having been intrusive, by trying to get in touch with him, by questioning his neighborhood, the shopkeepers or the people of the district, in order to know if they knew him and if he lived well in this building of the 14 rue des Vergeaux in Amiens, where NOBODY has ever crossed him and knows him (I can reaffirm it to you, since it is the strict truth !) to have claimed that Tiphaine Auzière, Laurence Auzière and Sébastien Auzière were not Brigitte Macron's children, whereas I have NEVER claimed that, on the contrary, having never questioned Brigitte's paternity, so much her children resemble her ! Voluntary misunderstanding in order to play on words and distort my words! This is anyway my freedom of expression and opinion.

      No mention of the fact that I suspect another woman to be the real mother of the children, on the other hand, her name not appearing anywhere. Master Pinocchio included Jean-Michel (who now only exists virtually) in the plaintiffs, at the request of B-M/J-M who has been illegally surfing the two identities for a long time, as a transsexual cannot erase all administrative traces of his past. When one checks more closely, one realizes certain things... I won't say more at this time, but know that more records will be coming out before June.

      To close this great farce, we learn that Libération, Le Monde, Le Figaro, Public, Closer, Ici Paris and France Dimanche are also being sued for "infringement of privacy and right to image" by having relayed what for them was only a "fake news" and damages are claimed from them (they have the means !) as well as the obligation to make their condemnation appear in large print on the 4th cover. The watering can be done! It is true that all these titles and many others (TV channels, radio stations, pseudo-journalists or philosophers) did me a great service by talking about me (even badly) and contributed to the propagation of the Truth, everyone or almost everyone being well aware that if the merdias claim in unison that it is false... it is because it is true !

      All in all, the Trogneux/Auzière are asking me for more than 50.000 € in damages for having shown their public photos on the YouTube channel of a medium, who is also summoned to court at the same time as me for the same reasons ! You will judge for yourselves.

      Natacha Rey can indeed be reassured and I wouldn't be surprised if the complaint is withdrawn after the election (the hearing is scheduled for June 15). There are precedents  1 2. I believe that ultimately it is directed at other people, the journalists who would like to deal with the case. Even if the newspapers cited are not directly the object of a complaint, they must understand that the Auzière family is united around this notion of a private life that would be untouchable, even when it is deceptively public. After the election, another strategy could replace the one that has been invariable for two months: denial, denial, denial...

      Since then a second complaint has been filed which will be processed before this one, see in Appendix D18.

    8. (D) The polich secret.

      February 21. In issue 504 of "Facts & Documents", Xavier Poussard reports on the response to the disclosures about Brigitte Macron :

      While after four days the #JeanMichelTrogneux was "deleted from trends by Twitter moderation" [there was] an amplification of the "rumour" internationally from 20 December with the Daily Mail followed, two days later, by Reuters agency for a dispatch picked up worldwide. It may be pointed out here that from an external point of view, there is no "rumeur" (a woman suspected or accused of being her brother) easier to "debunk". It would have sufficed, to immediately extinguish the fire, for a snapshot of Brigitte Macron next to Jean-Michel Trogneux, alone or with their children (on the occasion of a Christmas Eve, for example) was published by the Élysée via an anonymous account, and taken up, under the #JeanMichelTrogneux, by all the accounts linked to La République en marche. It is also surprising that Tiphaine Auzière did not take up the cause, as she systematically does when Brigitte Macron is mocked for her appearance [example].

      [...] While the Reuters dispatch (22 December 2021) was picked up by almost all the international press, the While the Reuters report (22 December 2021) was picked up by almost all the international press, Turkey's leading news channel a Haber (21 December 2021) devoted a story to the case, as did the Russian state news channel Rossiya 24 (formerly Vesti).

      [...] Since then, the "Jean-Michel Trogneux affair" has fuelled dinner parties, especially in gay Tout-Paris, on the theme of "his crooked wig", "a contraption like that", etc. The tip of the iceberg, the general burst of laughter on Laurent Ruquier's set (On est en direct, 15 January 2022), during the passage of Spanish actress Victoria Abril who came to promote the play "Drôle de genre", the story of a leading politician who discovers that his wife is transsexual : "No relation to the polemic of the moment" laughs Laurent Ruquier, joined in a burst of frank laughter by Léa Salamé and, under his breath, by Stéphane Guillon and by Philippe Besson. It is surprising that the latter, a hagiographer of the Macron couple ("Un Personnage de roman", Julliard, 2017), rewarded with an appointment to the French Consulate General in Los Angeles (an appointment retracted by the Council of State), was not outraged by the mocking echo given in a flagship programme of the public service to a rumour as odious as it is violent.

      Thus, #brigittegate has become a polich secret that is only exchanged between trusted people, without sharing it openly in public. Comedians are having a field day ("Emmanuel Macron, his wife is Patrick Juvet", Laurent Gerra on 3 January on RTL), all over France and abroad, people are laughing at the strange Madame Macron and the couple's stubbornness in denying what is now obvious to those who know...

      And, in all seriousness, the media news is going on as if nothing had happened. They serve us a Macron who is the great favourite in the presidential election, a super president, wowing everyone in France and abroad. "By dint of being postponed, Emmanuel Macron's declaration of candidacy resembles a mirage: we think we see it, but it evaporates when we get close" (article). Far from such lowly contingencies, he has made it his mission to prevent Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The setbacks inflicted on him by Putin do not stop him, his priority remains to safeguard peace in Europe...

      "Presiding "until the last quarter of the hour": Emmanuel Macron, who is multiplying consultations on Ukraine, should push back the question of his candidacy as close as possible to the deadline set by the Constitutional Council on March 4, 2022, a deadline that worries several of his competitors." (article). "But the president of the Republic has no use for competing whining. [... He is letting]the contenders for his office fight it out a little more to get to the second round when he, himself, is confirmed in his position by all the polls with about 25% of the vote in the first round and around 55% of the vote in the second" (article).

      Candidate or not, Emmanuel Macron is guaranteed to fall from his artificial cloud and lug around quite a pot... Is Edouard Philippe's time coming ?

    9. (D) From one election campaign to another...

      February 26. In 2017, Emmanuel Macron's election campaign relied heavily on his love affair with Brigitte. "How the media manufactured candidate Macron," is the title of a
      article, of which this is the lead illustration and excerpts.

      The dailies Libération, l'Obs, le Monde and l'Express total more than 8,000 articles mentioning Emmanuel Macron from January 2015 to January 2017; by comparison, the total number of articles mentioning Jean-Luc Mélenchon, Arnaud Montebourg and Benoît Hamon in the same dailies and over the same period of time amounts to only 7,400." [...]

      Macron the romantic. Notice to the suckers and the ambitious among the high school students: sleeping with your French teacher seems to be a good way to make the headlines for several weeks. At least that's what one might think, considering the number of covers and articles dedicated to the minister's love life. The celebrity press is not the only one to have focused on the sentimental life of the minister. The case of Brigitte Macron has become a hotly debated issue in the political press. The romance of the Macron couple, reminiscent of a form of courtly love to the French? This is what Le Monde and Le Figaro suggest, according to which the relationship between Brigitte and Emmanuel Macron helps explain the success of the Minister of the Economy among the female electorate.

      Le Figaro Madame : "Brigitte Trogneux has thus become the "great romantic" and "ideal son-in-law" guarantee of the candidate. Far from the classic image of the "political seducer" who flirts with the artistic milieu. Closer, therefore, to the French and the female electorate".
      Le Monde Politique: "A 16-year-old first-grader, winner of the general French competition, he fell in love with his teacher, Brigitte Trogneux, mother of three children and twenty years his senior. All of France now knows the romance that so appeals to the female electorate."
      Liberation: "The reversal of ages within the presidential couple in swimsuits is both a sign of egalitarian progress and a tradition maintained."

      In 2022, the macronist magazine covers are much less numerous, the couple is no longer highlighted, Brigitte appears worried, she is discreet, "in the shade"... She who had been seduced by a 16-year-old high school student in first grade became a sex offender who hijacked a 15 year old teenager (Appendix A 10). The age gap, which was 20 years old has grown to 32, and there are still large dark areas to be discovered about each of the 2007 bride and groom... With or without the incumbent president, who is still delaying his decision, the electoral campaign is now very much blurred by an unforeseen news: the invasion of Ukraine by Russia. Does Macron find there the opportunity to be a candidate without campaigning or debating, by posing as a unifier, above the fray? In the meantime, Covid is stopped as a disease, not as a pretext, the vaccine pass continues, the mask obsessives are still there.Does Macron find there the opportunity to be a candidate without campaigning or debating, by posing as a unifier, above the fray? In the meantime, Covid is stopped as a disease, not as a pretext, the vaccine pass continues, the mask obsessives are still there.

    10. (D) André-Louis Auzière: to talk about him makes he exists?

      This Thursday, March 3, the end of the vaccine pass is announced for March 14 (
      article) and Emmanuel Macron declares his candidacy for the presidential election (article). What a coincidence... It is the same day that two articles on the "first lady" appear in Paris-Match and Gala. The article in Gala, sticks to the now usual unargued denunciation of "transphobic rumor." The Paris-Match article, signed by Sophie des Déserts (actually the paparazzi Sébastien Valiéla under the control of his agency director Mimi Marchand), on the same thread, delivers some unpublished information :

      [Speaking of the Figaro Madame" article] Nothing about the exercise of power, nothing about the foul rumor saying she was a transsexual that inflamed social networks and dumbfounded the foreign press. She still reacted on RTL, pointing to the damage in her family, before relativizing : "I took five and a half days to make these rumors disappear with a lawyer experienced in the exercise. So you can imagine for the others..."

      Brigitte Macron, always impeccable. First Lady haute couture, apricot complexion, golden helmet finely woven from her extensions which she speaks so naturally, as well as her false lashes that hem her azure eyes. [...]

      [Speaking of Mimi Marchand] "Mimi" did so many favors - including keeping the paparazzi, the tabloid snoopers, from approaching her former husband, André-Louis Auzière... He had become depressed, recluse in psychiatric clinic. The communicant cleaned up his trail on the Internet, set up, with Alexandre Benalla a surveillance system at the doors of his room until his death at Christmas 2019.

      "Mimi" has always been loyal, respectful of the photo archives of the presidential couple, early digitized by her care, generous with their grandchildren that she covers with gifts. You don't let go of a friend like that.

      With Mimi Marchand, in the BFM TV documentary "Brigitte Macron l'influente" (>>>vidéo>>> de 52 mn 11).
      With Alexandre Benalla, to whom she sent text messages (photo Ludovic Marin / AFP).

      Thus, Brigitte finds it degrading to wear a wig, preferring to pretend "extensions" (see end of chapter 12) (Natacha Rey's opinion, March 5 tweet), and she finds it rewarding to ask two thugs sentenced by the Justice to prison terms, Mimi Marchand and Alexandre Benalla, to take care of her family's private affairs at taxpayers' expense (at least for Benalla). Isn't there reason, there, to open a judicial investigation for use of public funds for private purposes ?

      Wikipedia on Mimi Marchand : "At the head of several paparazzi companies, she has worked since the early 1990s for many press titles including Gala, Paris Match, Public, Closer and Voici. Her personality, her professional methods and her legal troubles have earned her a sulphurous reputation". It is to her that Brigitte asks for protection against the paparazzi and it is to her that she entrusts her photos. She even lets her sympathize with her grandchildren. Jean-Michel is definitely very twisted...

      André-Louis Auzière "depressive, recluse in a psychiatric clinic": Brigitte delivers a scoop here... Which, apparently, does not please his daughter Tiphaine Auzière. She has just published this tweet : "Can't accept that my father's memory is being harmed. The information of @ParisMatch today is wrong. My father was never "recluse in a psychiatric clinic" monitored by a security device."

      We shall see whether this difference is erased or accentuated, but the important thing is elsewhere: did André-Louis Auzière exist ? To this question, in the present state of our knowledge, we answer no. And neither Brigitte nor Tiphaine provide the slightest information to the contrary. They talk as if he had existed. In their play (the "legend"...), yes, but in real life ?

      There have been almost three months that this affair has been making a lot of noise on the french Internet (very little abroad), but the readers of Paris-Match are reassured, the super-lawyer has made the rumors disappear after five and a half days of intense work...

    11. (D) Brigolade: song "He had just turned 14".

      March 5. Dalida's song "Il venait d'avoir 18 ans", with music by Pascal Auriat and Jean Bouchéty, was a big hit in 1973. Here it is reinvented by Coccyx Grue on lyrics and Marie-Line Weber on vocals, under the title "Il venait d'avoir 14 ans" (knowing that it would be more like 15 years old, cf. Appendix A 10) :
      >>>song>>> 2:53 mp3.
      // copy and paste pdf : //
      Posted online March 18: the >>>clip>>>, hang on!...

      Marie-Line Weber: "Life is a joke to cry with laughter and the passing years make me want to laugh more and more, to perhaps dry the tears of the past. From laughter to tears it's just a step."
      And don't miss his >>>song/clip>>> "We're Singing" of 4 mn 02 with lots of Saturday demonstrators (directed by Martin Loizillon, actor and coordinator of ReinfoCovid Ile de France)...
      He had just turned 14.

      He had just turned fourteen
      He was as handsome as a young fawn
      A line that is erased
      It was winter of course
      And I counted as I ogled him
      My pheromones
      I tidied up my wig
      On my tits I put stucco
      He got scared
      When I looked at his face
      I felt my superego quivering
      For that minor
      He had just turned fourteen
      It was the most beautiful argument
      To force him
      We didn't talk about love
      He knew nothing about love
      He was trying hard
      I made him see at the cinema
      My best film in large format
      Some people like it hot
      In the hollow of a premeditated bed
      I tasted, titillated
      This artichoke
      He had just turned fourteen
      But he wasn't innocent
      Little scoundrel
      And while he was getting dressed
      Looking at his back, I laughed
      Without a qualm.
      I did everything I could to pervert him
      How could I refuse to invest
      So much wealth
      He told me "It didn't hurt me."
      This will go down in our annals
      One drunken night.
      I tidied up my wig
      A little bromide on my thing
      By imposture
      I was proud as I seduced him
      For I was three times fourteen years old

      April 1. A new song by Coccyx Grue, this time with music by Michel Berger, inspired by Luc Plamondon's lyrics, "La chanson de Ziggy" becomes "Jean-Bri, une prof pas comme les autres". Here is Marie-Line Weber's interpretation, while waiting for the video  :

      Jean-Bri, a teacher like no other >>>song>>> 2:58 mp3. And, from April 4, the >>>clip>>> !
      Jean-Bri iel's name is Jean-Bri
      I'm crazy about iel
      She was a teacher like no other
      We like money, it's not our fault
      Even though I know
      You'll never love us

      Jean-Bri iel's name is Jean-Bri
      This is my seventh heaven
      Iel set my first trap
      He's the one who set me up in high school
      He only told me
      He only told me that I was envious of him
      It was four in the afternoon
      I was skipping alone on a problem
      I was alone on a Latin problem
      He said to me, "Come and have some kosher"
      And he told me about Michou
      I laughed and he cried

      (But) Jean-Bri iel's name is Jean-Bri
      This is my only home
      On his head there's surgery
      I'm selling France for Attali
      We did the great reset
      I'm not gonna let that happen.
      Every night we're having parties
      I've been in a place where the chicks
      Have silicone breasts
      Yes I know we like money
      You'll have to make up your mind
      Don't try to forget me... but

      Jean-Bri iel's name is Jean-Bri
      That's my main thing
      She was a teacher like no other
      We like money, it's not our fault
      Even though I know
      You'll never love us

      This is a Yellow Wigs production (Appendix D 4) (page).

      May 14. Here's another one of those productions. Coccyx Grue's new song is a cover of "Comme d'habitude" (= "My way", Frank Sinatra) created in 1967 by Claude François, with music by Jacques Revaux and Claude François, using lyrics by Gilles Thibaut and Claude François. It is renamed "Encore cinq ans". Marie-Line Weber is still, happily, singing :

      Five more years >>>song>>> 4 min 11 mp3. And the >>>clip>>>.
      I get up
      I take my pills
      You look straight ahead
      As usual
      On you and whatever it takes
      I glue your hairpiece back on
      As usual
      Your hand caresses my wig
      And you put it on me
      As usual
      But you turn your back on me
      As usual
      And then I dress up quickly
      I come out of the room
      As usual
      I take my shot all by myself
      I swallow my mixture
      As usual
      Without a sound I leave the Elysium
      All is blue outside
      As usual
      I'm cold, I straighten my back
      As usual
      Five more years
      All day long
      I'll play pretend
      Five more years
      I'll smile
      Yes Another five years
      I'll "that is."
      Five more years
      Receiving roses
      Five more years
      And then old age will come
      With its arthritis
      You will have played
      At the council of defense
      As usual
      Alone I will go to the clinic
      Sewing up my relics
      As usual
      My tears I will hide
      As usual
      But five more years
      Even at night
      I'll play pretend
      Five more years
      You will reign
      Yes, five more years
      I'll pretend
      Five more years
      You'll fuck up
      Yes, five more years
      Five more years
      You'll take my makeup off
      Five more years
      You'll go to bed...
      Five years to go
      In front of the moguls
      Five more years
      Five years to go
      We'll pretend
      Yes, five more years
      Playing the game
      Yes, five more years
      We'll pretend
      Five more years...

      Lionel Labosse has opened a page on his site about "anticovidist songs," including several others by Marie-Line Weber.

    12. (D) Emmanuel present at the deliveries, what a family!

      The information made noise on social networks in late January. It was not denied in the article of Paris-Match of March 3. Here it is presented on February 2 by the comments of Njama on Agoravox:

      New explosive revelation! After Brigitte's "vapors" (the "mental load" after the birth of her 3rd child...) : "Question: are there any of you fathers or stepfathers who attended the birth of your daughter(s) ? This is just to see if I missed anything..." [tweet from Maryline Maubois]

      This question follows a January 24, 2022 publication of a article in the people magazine Gala: "Brigitte Macron : when my daughters had their children Emmanuel was with me in the delivery room". No but how is it possible !!! what a family ! Is the crazy lady of the castle still in her full faculties ? Excess of hormones? Cocaine?

      And this is not a fake since this quote is taken from the latest book by Laurence Benhamou "Le solitaire du palais" published by Robert Laffont on January 22, 2022, AFP journalist, one of the two accredited by the Élysée, a book that traces the five-year term of E. Macron that she follows everywhere since 2017.

      Who can believe for one second that a "beau-père" Emmanuel - lover of his (supposed) mother, of the age of his daughter Laurence - could have attended the births of Brigitte's daughters, Laurence and Tiphaine having had 2 children each, as alongside his daughter-in-law wife of Sebastien Auzière their brother who also had 2 (?) !!!

      From customary sources in each family we know that for simply a few decades "ONLY ONE person" can accompany a woman giving birth, a person who is most often the husband, or the cohabitant, but who could be the mother in case of defection of the latter, or even another person "expressly designated by the parturient", provided that she herself would be consenting... any midwife or obstetrician could testify to this.

      How could "iel" have forgotten these very basic maternity admission requirements? And / or how could the 2 sons-in-law or daughter-in-law have "agreed" to such a rape of a *** most extreme moment of marital intimacy*** with all shame... to share it with a stepfather, patch !!!!!!!!!

      This assertion "when my daughters had their children Emmanuel was with me in the delivery room" is one of the most grand-guignoles of this dossier ! It falls under psychiatry !

      On many other levels, Macron's attitude is psychaitry. His very solitary mode of governance, as shown in this book review of the quinquennium (it will be ultra-solitary, with only his Macronella if he is re-elected), has caused serious drifts guided by his unreasoned hatred towards certain categories of the population. We saw this with his exclusion of the non-vaxxed (Appendix C 6) and before that with the ultra-violent way he fought the yellow vests (article). Not to mention the most catastrophic record of any president of the Fifth Republic....

      Nothing stops Jean-Michel: he even gives details about his
      first delivery in a article from "Actu People" on September 13, 2020.

    13. (D) Jean-Michel Trogneux to conquer the world.

      Tweets from the morning of March 8 with excerpts from television programs in Greece and Lebanon

      Italy, Albania, Russia, Lebanon, Brazil, Turkey, Greece, Portugal, Spain, China... The whole world is gone to know that Brigitte Macron was born Jean-Michel Trogneux and that she is lying head-on to cover it up ... It was predictable but the infernal couple does not care and still believes it can represent France... As for the French, for the most part, chloroformed by their propagandist media, they do not know or believe a rumor...

      Tweets from the evening of March 8

    14. (D) The notion of truth is fundamentally foreign to him.

      January 4, 2022 reminder: "The unvaccinated, I really want to fuck with them. And so we're going to keep doing it, all the way.
      That's the strategy
      ". Signed Emmanuel Macron.

      As expected, the accusatory inversion is at the center of the election campaign of the student of Macronella. He who started to rot the lives of children wants to continue, he who forbade us to decide for ourselves, he who instituted segregation claims to want to unite... This resonates with these words of Xavier Poussard in December 2020 [F&D492p3] :

      It is extremely painful to (re)immerse oneself in Emmanuel Macron's biography, not because he sometimes lies, but because the very notion of truth is fundamentally alien to him. Indeed, his lies are not "ordinary" little arrangements with the truth, exaggerations or lies by omission. In his case, they are indeed those big lies that a child normally stops telling when he enters college. On February 1, 2017 on TF1, thus in front of all of France, Emmanuel Macron thus refers to Amiens by speaking of "his" constituency. Now everyone knows and can easily verify that he has never been elected and that he has never deigned to run in any election until then.

      Until 2012, the whole of Paris believed him to be a "normalien", and he is presented as such in the first portraits devoted to him. After verification, it was established that this was not the case and that he had failed the competitive examination twice. We could also talk about his philosophy thesis on "the general interest" [sic], directed by Etienne Balibar. This thesis obviously does not exist and Louis Althuser's disciple told "Marianne" (October 10, 2014) "have strictly no recollection of it."

      In "President Burglar" (Fayard 2020), Corinne Lhaïk praises his "chutzpah," a Hebrew term for impudence. But she forgets to mention that Emmanuel Macron's lies would have socially disqualified him from the beginning without the protection of his omnipotent sponsors.

      And another anecdote [F&D495p11]:

      Emmanuel Macron told everywhere that he was cueed cold during his velo ride at Le Touquet (with "Brigitte") by François Hollande's phone call on August 26, 2014 announcing the news of his appointment as Minister of Economy. The day before, however, he was answering questions from journalists of the "Point" (published on August 28) for what will become his first interview given to the press as a minister...

    15. (D) Macron's hairpiece.

      To the left the evolution of Emmanuel Macron "s hair (left photo: 1 2]. On the right some netizens are messing with his head (tweet).
      To the hashtags #Macron Liar, #MacronWePrendForCons, #JeanMichelTrogneux was added #MacrouteLaMoumoute.
      Not to mention #MacronEstUnPsychopate, #MacronLeFou, #MacronDegage, #MacronDehors and of course #Brigittegate.
      And still #MacronBadPresident #MacronDestitution, #MacronDictator, #MacronTheMytho...

      Advised by Brigitte, expert in wigs and extensions (end of Chapter 12), dreading to become like the bald Alain Juppé or the half-bleached Edouard Philippe (who, themselves, assume their change of physique), Emmanuel swallowed his facade in order to better get reelected. Details came to us via the blog of Etienne Duhamel. After gracing Brigitte's husband with articles headlined "Loi Avia: Macron installs Internet censorship in France worthy of China", "After 5 years of Macron, France on the verge of bankruptcy", "Macron is not from the right. He is a totalitarian communist", he published this March 8, 2022, a noticed article titled "Emmanuel Macron wears a wig". Here it is in full :

      After investigation, we are able to confirm that Emmanuel Macron has been wearing a wig since 2019.

      Specifically, a gold-priced hairpiece of blond or brown human hair, depending on the season, which he sticks on the top of his head and is changed every month.

      The hairpiece turn was made in 2019 when his baldness became untenable in relation to the image of dynamic, young and modern man he wanted to give.

      Very soon, we will pepper this article with visual evidence of this sad reality.

      The question of financing these Macron wigs is open as the hair complements he uses are custom-cut on human heads to not stain and pretty much match his previous hair situation, even though the gain in volume is obvious, as well as the disappearance of extremely hollowed gulfs.

      Macron was careful not to tell us about this well-kept secret, as well as his photographer "Soizig de la Moissonnière" (paid a fortune just to photograph him), who is trying to make us believe that we have James Dean at the Elysee when without artifices, we are closer to Sim or Alain Juppe.

      To return to our hypotheses about Emmanuel Macron's biological father (Chapter 25), baldness being often hereditary, Jean-Michel Macron was bald, Joseph Doucé too, to a lesser degree.

      A reader points out to me that after Louis XI, who wore a headdress, the kings of France have all resorted to wearing a wig, which a president of the Fifth Republic has never done. It is certainly accessory, but there is a new symbol which shows that our Republic is dying...

      From the back as well as the front, even without a tie...

      [March 15 tweet]
      They're finally taking charge! The new hair order is on the march, Manu and Jean-mi explain everything in their new book...

      March 15. The aforementioned article by Etienne Duhamel has just been censored by Médiapart in the name of freedom of expression.
      It was a crime of lèse-majesté, a contempt of the King... Médiapart has become a guardian of the power in place.
      The censorship of an article by Laurent Mucchielli on the adverse effects of vaxxin had provoked indignation in 2021. Now it is laughable...

      On March 17, a article from Libération explained the causes of the censorship, according to Médiapart  "Because we were busy with other subjects, such as texts on the war in Ukraine, we decided not to spend much time verifying if it was real hair," "we chose to unpublish it for fake news." In addition we are taken for fools who would believe that everything published by Médiapart would be verified and who would find that the comparison of photos from 2018 and 2022 would not show the addition of hair. If it's not a hairpiece it's implants (and it would surely have been seen...), it doesn't change much... How could Médiapart fall so low?

    16. (D) Tweets, brigolades, malice and hypocrisy....

      Three Brigolo (=funny) tweets from March 2022. In the center is the singer's lookalike Patrick Juvet.
      Right: "The whole world knows about it except the French".
      Right photo retouched, the original photo, from AFP / Mandel Ngan of June 6, 2019, is repeated in part below.

      Even though it's getting harder to post a tweet dedicated to #jeanmicheltrogneux (tweet), this hashtag is still widely popular and there are some gems, especially in the humorous genre.

      In the political and media class, chilliness remains the order of the day, one especially does not risk using this sacrilegious hashtag. We know but we keep quiet, sometimes letting a smile, an innuendo, a touch of malice or a marked hypocrisy show through. On March 18, Anne Hidalgo, mayor of Paris and socialist candidate for the presidency of the Republic, tried her hand at a dig at Brigitte, which was not very disturbing in substance since she is still considered a woman... In an interview with Closer, she talked about her couple with Jean-Marc Germain, their age difference of 7 years, and took the opportunity to tackle the "wife" of the candidate Macron  "I don't feel like a cougar", "Contrary to others, I could never have fallen in love with a teenager".

      This sentence provoked strong reactions. Socialist Julien Dray won the award for best watchdog by tweeting "Inadmissible and intolerable. The Socialist Party cannot accept and defend such a statement by Madame Hidalgo !", and so much the worse if, in doing so, he considers admissible and tolerable the crime of sexual assault on a minor. The columnist Kevin Bossuet was the most ridiculous by speaking of an "insult towards Brigitte Macron who is a respectable woman" (tweet), where there is neither woman nor respectability. The most vicious (like Jerome Godefroy, tweet) want to sink the refractory in order to indirectly threaten those who would like to stop bowing to presidential lies and cover-ups. On the forums and social networks, the reactions are quite different, often of the kind "For once I agree with Hidalgo"... Not for long, because in this world where hypocrisy reigns, you have to quickly fall in line. The same evening of the publication, Anne Hidalgo felt obliged to deny any reference to the presidential couple (tweet, article).

    17. (D) Has brigittologist Isabelle Ferreira been drowned?

      Anna Summer had published on February 18 on a article where she considered as "false information" that "Brigitte Macron, née Trogneux, would actually be a transgender woman whose birth name was Jean-Michel". She has just published, this March 23, on the same site, a article titled "Isabelle Ferreira who was going to reveal information about Brigitte Macron was found drowned". Here it is in full :

      This is a disappearance that will cause a lot of ink to flow on social networks. After the arrest of several yellow vests at home as well as lawyers and military, a committed citizen has just been found 400 kilometers from home, dead in the middle of winter, by "drowning". One of her friends is testifying, and it's absolutely heartbreaking.

      Isabelle Ferreira, a committed citizen, was about, according to those close to her, to make revelations about Brigitte Macron. She even had an appointment with journalists for an interview but she did not go to the appointment. Normal, she was already dead, far from home, "near the parking lot of the Rance dam, sea side".

      Finally, this is what Ouest France [March 11] tells us. Yes, because she still had the right to her article in a major French newspaper, which is not in the habit of devoting articles to every death by drowning or to every suicide. But let's move on. The article does specify "that it was a drowning". But takes care to add. "It could be an accident or suicide but there is no evidence of third party intervention. An autopsy has been performed. The complete results are not yet available, but the first elements confirm that the drowning was recent. The woman had arrived the day before in St. Malo where she had rented a hotel room."

      And to make the narrative perfect, the reporter adds that she was in a precarious situation (when she had supposedly just paid for a hotel room and transportation), that an "investigation has been entrusted to the police to trace the background of this woman, who lived in the Paris region, and the circumstances of her arrival in Saint-Malo. Her situation seemed to be precarious. She was taken care of by the Samu social in Paris".

      According to those close to her, she was going to make revelations with the help of a journalist about the Jean-Michel Trogneux affair. It is probably a simple coincidence, a chance. But if thousands of citizens are questioning and investigating at this very moment, it is probably not for nothing. By the way, Amandine Roy who is being sued by Brigitte Macron for interviewing Natacha Rey who explained that she thought Brigitte was actually a transsexual, also paid tribute to Isabelle Ferreira.

      The most surprising, is one of the sms sent by Isabelle earlier this year [January 19], now public. One of her friends also tells what just happened. We leave it to you to judge for yourself.

      I just found something HUGE!!!
      The statute of limitations changed with the Schiappa law of 2018 and she can now be charged until Macron is... 48 YEARS !!!
      It takes a delegation of yellow vests to write to the prosecutor with great fanfare with the media and the whole mess to get her indicted.
      The Jesuit high school principal at La Providence High School in Ameins had an obligation to notify the prosecutor according to Article 40 of the Code of Criminal Procedure [clarification : 1, 2] but didn't do so and her parents are bragging that they didn't press charges according to the Law.

      Even stranger is the testimony of the person who was contacted by the police to announce his death. He publishes :

      This Wednesday, March 9, the police in Saint-Malo call me and tell me that Isabelle Ferreira is dead, that they found me in their last contacts and that they are looking for her family. She would have drowned, and it would be accidental. I am very surprised that she suddenly went 400 km away and went swimming in early March. I wasn't thinking about the dangers of tides or waves on walkers. In any case, her phone was not damaged by the sea then.
      My last contact with them was on Friday, March 4, when she called me before 9am to come to the 10th district to film something she didn't want to talk about. I told her I didn't have time and she asked me for the contact details of Olivier who does the Gilets Jaunes demonstration website. I give Olivier her phone numbers and at 12:10 pm I get her last text: "Thank you Luca. You're a real pal! Big big kisses. Isa". With Olivier, we hadn't talked about this until this announcement. He told me that he had called Isabelle at the end of the morning, and that she asked him to come with her phone to film, and she gave him an appointment in front of the Grand Rex at 6pm, but also at 9pm as he could only later, before he contacted her to cancel. But neither to him nor to me, she didn't make any sign of life in the afternoon. I saw that at the Grand Rex that night there was a show by comedian Paul Mirabel. These days, she was focused on the "sexual assault" of the teacher Brigitte Trogneux towards the minor student Emmanuel Macron. Contrary to what is written in the article Ouest France, she was not housed by the Samu Social but by the prefecture of police, following in 2018 domestic violence of his roommate, born in Saint-Brieuc (70km from Saint-Malo).

      The big question that hundreds of Internet users are asking tonight is "what was Isabelle Ferreira doing in Saint Malo ?" And many are worried that the hashtag #IsabelleFereira will disappear from Twitter. Worse it is already no longer suggested in automatic typing, which indicates that there is indeed a problem somewhere. But where? That's the question.

      On March 25, the official view was explained in a article from France Bleu Bretagne. In few words : "Circle, there is nothing to see and Brigitte Macron is obviously a woman".

      April 3. Nothing new either way. Everyone will be able to make up their own mind by reading these two articles.

      May 11. A article from the website talks about this case again, with the photo opposite featuring Isabelle Ferreira. Not much new, except that "Many are worried that the hashtag #IsabelleFereira will disappear from Twitter. Worse it is already no longer suggested in auto-type, which indicates that there is indeed a problem somewhere".

    18. (D) Second complaint against Natacha Rey

      In Appendix D 7, we had seen that Natacha and Amandine Roy were targeted with an invasion of privacy complaint, with a hearing on June 15. They also received another complaint with a hearing on April 5. This time, it is Jean-Louis Auzière and his wife Catherine Audoy who are suing for defamation. Here are excerpts from what Natacha Rey said on March 22 on her Facebook account, reactivated after a month-long censorship (with lost history) :

      As you may know, I have received 2 summonses for 2 proceedings, one of which will take place on April 5 at the Court of Lisieux (1st hearing only and we will ask for cancellation or postponement for various formal defects and anomalies) which will oppose me to the diabolical Auzière couple, protected by the Elysée. [...]

      These big rich people close to the power and to the Trogneux-Auzière children dare to claim from me, through their lawyer, astronomical damages, for having emitted a hypothesis, spoken in the conditional tense (it is necessary to try to find a rational explanation to the Brigitte -Jean-Michel/André Louis Auzière mystery, with the clues we have, since we have been lied to about everything since the beginning) and stating some implacable truths like the fact that the wedding photo of the so-called "Brigitte Trogneux" is a photo trick, a cruder montage, a BIG fake that leaves no doubt. [...]

      But bad faith and arrogance will be well and truly on display in this trial of the pot of earth against the pot of iron! If they could put me in jail, believe me they would, as long as I would bother them! I've already been held in custody 2 times TOTALLY illegally according to my lawyer, who will ask for compensation. They want war, they will have it, because I will not calm down, given that I am in my right, did not commit any crime, no offence ! These corrupters and manipulators do not scare me, will not stop me, and I still have many surprises in store for them. [...]

      On March 31, Amandine Roy presented on her site some pages of the two subpoenas :
      1. 6 pages of the second complaint with a hearing on April 5. Jean-Louis Auzière and his wife Catherine Audoy accuse Natacha Rey and Amandine Roy of defaming them, particularly because Natacha Rey believes that Catherine Audoy would be the surrogate mother of Brigitte's three children. In my opinion, she only expressed this as a hypothesis by explaining how it was very credible. If Mr. and Mrs. Auzière had agreed to discuss, she could have expressed herself differently, she had no choice and acted honestly without any intention to harm. As for Amandine Roy, all she did was interview Natacha Rey.
      2. 6 pages of the first complaint with a hearing on June 15.

      In my opinion, it is not a coincidence that the second complaint takes place before the elections. The fact that Brigitte Macron was born a man will be considered irrelevant, while it is the primary cause of the interest of Natacha Rey for the Auzière couple. Justice is therefore putting the cart before the horse by dealing first with a side issue without Brigitte. The big media will be caught in the trap by associating defamation and Brigitte Macron, while the latter will be erased by the judges. This complaint was drafted on the basis of a statement of facts drawn up by a bailiff acting at Brigitte Macron's request. She is therefore indirectly involved in this complaint. Knowing her perverse side, one can even assume that she is the one who triggered it for the reasons I just expressed. It is a pity that Justice had the diligence to deal with the second complaint (received on March 2) before the first (received on February 15).

      As for the first complaint, I stand by my opinion of the Appendix D 7, I think it will be withdrawn or cancelled. Natacha Rey and Amandine Roy are accused of infringement of the right to privacy and infringement of the right to image, against Brigitte Macron and her three children who are regulars in the celebrity magazines and against Jean-Michel Trogneux who we would be very interested to finally know ! It's all a bunch of hot air.

      I believe that Brigitte Macron and her lawyer have thus elaborated a real strategy to obtain condemnations on the side in order to dissuade other journalists from approaching the subject, by avoiding to treat what it is absolutely not necessary to treat : Are Jean-Michel and Brigitte Trogneux one and the same person ?

      April 8: I learn that the April 5 hearing has been postponed sine die. April 12: I learn that the hearing is postponed to October 12.

      April 23. I find Natacha Rey often clumsy, too exalted, but she is courageous and much more honorable than the journalists and bloggers who claim to be anti-Macron but remain stashed and refuse to talk about the pedo-criminal who became first "lady" of France, co-responsible for the appalling excesses of her spouse. Natacha has just published this statement : "Orders coming from the Ministry of the Interior have been given so that I can no longer express myself on the major social networks, such as Youtube, Facebook, VK or Twitter. This is not serious, I absolutely do not need it to carry out my mission". Are we still in a state of law when we muzzle citizens without a court decision ? Without even allowing the victim to defend himself? Where is the freedom of expression? While the Macronian lies are spread everywhere...

      May 2. The illumination of the new Chapter 29 confirms my impression. The first complaint is incidental, the second is more serious, as it points to a very likely error by Natacha Rey, which I have shared with many other brigittologists : Catherine Audoy is not the mother of the three Auzière children, and she is within her rights to take offense (if not that there were other ways to act). I think she will have no trouble proving that she is not the mother of the three children (DNA analysis, for example). The fact remains that to err is human, that Natacha Rey was acting in good faith and would have corrected her statements if she had been told the truth, a truth that the Auzière couple know and persist in hiding. In this respect, the defense should turn against them.

      The above May 10, 2022 article from the newspaper "Pays d'Auge Infos" reopens the subject of "transphobic rumors" by presenting Jean-Louis Auzière and Catherine Audoy as victims, they who had triggered Natacha Rey's police custody in a very inappropriate way. If we are to believe pages 11 to 13 of the "Gazette de la Justice de Proximité" of the Lisieux judicial court of April 2021 (pdf), Jean-Louis Auzière would nevertheless be a super-conciler. So why didn't he ask a colleague to settle the dispute? This is very revealing of the double face of this character. On May 19, the newspaper "L'informateur" picked up the article and its author, Julien Lagarde, added a paragraph voicing Natacha Rey's lawyer and stating that it is a "Trogneux Affair." Finally a journalist who makes an effort to better inform his readers. It has become so rare that it is good to underline it... He did not even go so far as to indicate the link to the present file...

    19. (D) Le Canard Enchaîné and Le Monde, two ways to disinform

      When one remembers the place that Le Canard Enchaîné attributed in its former issues to the spouses of the presidents of the Republic, one is surprised that Brigitte Macron is so little present in its current pages. When one remembers the mockery of the physical appearance of some politicians (Sarkozy's heels...), one is surprised by the silence on Macron's hairpiece. Times have changed, the Canard treats the Elysée's tenant with an unusual deference. He probably knows that Brigitte and Jean-Michel Trogneux are the same person because, otherwise, he would not have failed to castigate those who propagate such an idea. He had not deprived himself of the opportunity to attack the Saturday demonstrators: "Most often, their processions assemble an indigestible conglomerate where battalions of the extreme right and extreme left are mixed together, the whole decorated with a yellow vest sauce and a farandole of conspiracists of all stripes. Carried away by their delusions, some [...] pissed off by the syringe [...] fake news"... [extract from The Duck Year page 54 on July 2021]. Macron had to applaud with both hands, it helped to better control the unions and the left...

      With hindsight, it is telling that Le Canard felt at the time that there was a "great discrepancy in denouncing both the restrictions imposed on public freedoms since the beginning of the epidemic and the health pass, which aims to limit these restrictions." Yes, you read correctly, Le Canard was telling its readers that the health pass, i.e. apartheid, increased public liberties ! He was acting like a disciple of Macron, McKinsey and Big Pharma...

      At the end of March 2022, the Canard has nevertheless changed its tone, it even starts to become conspiracist. It goes so far as to unite its voice with the anti-vax and anti-Macron to teach its readers about the role held by McKinsey, as if it were a novelty. He thus recognizes that there has been a sort of conspiracy in the rich countries to force vaxxination. Mc Kinsey is an important cog in the wheel (Appendix C 13), it's good to recognize it, we'll have to dig deeper to reveal the role of Young Global Leaders (Appendix D 5), Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, the WHO, Big Pharma, the media... But we're far from there, the Duck is not yet ready to give itself a big "Pan on the Beak."

      "McKinsey: the incredible myopia of the French taxman" (reminder: "Facts & Documents" had revealed it ten months earlier, but it's a banned newspaper), "McKinsey's tax ideas", "Vaccination has already seized the government", the articles go on and on. Here's a video, taken from a tweet, showing a Canard revelation about the role of McKinsey consultant Maël de Calan (and supporter of Valérie Pécresse, article) in the "sanitary" policy of the French government :
      >>video>>> of 1 mn 46

      Mediapart and other media are doing the same as Le Canard by ignoring brigittegate. And there are the others, the few fringe media outlets that are talking about it and the mainstream media that choke on rejecting with horror the news as an obviously false rumor, quite often labeled as transphobic. I wrote about this in Appendix D 3. It was mostly in December. it has calmed down since. And now Le Monde devotes on March 31, for its subscribers a article entitled "The first lady and Jean-Michel Trogneux, itinerary of an infamous infox". Infamy is a word that Le Monde has never used to describe the government's provax policy, which has nevertheless caused thousands of deaths due to lack of care and dangerous injections. What is infamous is to attack a state lie... What foresight for this newspaper and these journalists ! In their charter, they flatter themselves to be independent, to work for quality, accurate, verified and balanced information, to take a critical look, to echo the pluralism of opinions, to reject any manipulation, to avoid approximations and biases etc. It is obvious on this example! And on the management of the Covid crisis etc.

      The article is intended to be scientific. It is accompanied by a twittosphere, a sphere of infamy that is supposed to make everything clear...

      The article starts out strong, everything goes : "anti-system", "far right", "ragot", "typical mechanics of conspiracy", "fake news", "infamous rumor", "defiance", "negativity", "visceral antagonism", "gutter polemic", "cracking its venom". All that's missing is "anti-Semite," "anti-Freemason" and "transphobic." Brigitte Macron's words are erected as beacons of truth and no facts are advanced about Jean-Michel and Brigitte Trogneux's previous existences. This is in the same line, even worse, as the article in this same newspaper of December 20, titled "Behind the rumor about Brigitte Macron, the fear of a Trumpization of political debates in France." At the time, it was felt that it was important not to let the election campaign be affected by this "improbable stink ball" that would prevent Macron's re-election. The unsophisticated reader will remember that this fuss concerns only a sliver of the twittosphere, "4,500 first accounts to participate" and "14,000 mentions of this topic". This appears to be very marginal, the reader will understand that it makes sense for something so "infamous"... At this point, it's complete misinformation. The real numbers are much stronger, to the point that twitter applied a partial censorship by deactivating some accounts (like Natacha Rey's for a month) and stopping the statistics on some hashtags Trogneux or Brigitte (hence the use of the word "first") (tweet). And then the Internet is not only Twitter as the article suggests, it is notably the Web. This page had a total of 330,000 hits (removing the 7,000 monthly hits from before) from January 22 to March 31.

      In the last three months, there have been 76,000, 81,000, 53,000 different visitors (removing the 4,000 from before, per month). The complete pdf file was downloaded 26,545 times from January 22 to March 31 and possibly distributed elsewhere. The Veronique/Brigitte voice comparison (red box), was listened to 11,238 times from January 25 to March 31. And Ode to Macron Mephisto (Appendix C 2) was listened to 11,212 times from February 4 to March 31, it's a moving video that shows how criminal Macron (under the influence of his mentors Brigitte, McKinsey, Big Pharma & Co.) was in the Covid crisis. Make it even more widely known, it gives a better understanding of why Macron should absolutely not be re-elected and continue to crack down "until the end".

      May 1. Here are the numbers for April:
      The above numbers go, through April 30, to 31,039 for the pdf, 13,886 for the voice comparison, 12,126 for the ode.

      The Canard Enchaîné, Le Monde and the other major media maintain the ignorance of their readership and audiences.

      Some media, like Blast (with this >>>video>>> of 6 min 28) push the disinformation a bit more intelligently by relying on some of Natacha Rey's information to deny it with Moadab and Blanrue's "counter-inquiry" (Appendix A 7), not to mention the evidence shown by "Facts & Documents", this site and a few others, especially the voice comparison that establishes Brigitte as the transsexual Veronique of 1977. This is a classic way of misinforming by targeting fragile elements (here physical appearance), erasing inconsistencies and ignoring solid and corroborating elements. Forgetting also the pedocriminality. With such denials, it is not surprising that, since December, the information continues to spread and even swells. See how I started this site on January 22, see what it has become. With other research poles, a citizen's survey (the "brigittologists") has been formed, the clues have accumulated, reinforcing our opinion. Since we now have proof that Brigitte Macron was born a man, this will continue, even if some elements may be challenged, or even recognized as false. Supporting Macron believing, in good or bad faith, that it is fake news will sooner or later lead to a dead end. The truth will eventually prevail.

      By chance, as I finish this Appendix, I discover the exceptional 16-page issue that France-Soir has just printed in 200,000 copies and distributed for free across the country. It is available in pdf format on this page

      Do I have to talk to the beggars? I'm afraid so, my Lord! -- And shit... Are they still there?

      France-Soir is a newspaper despised by Le Monde (article), Wikipedia (page), BFMTV (article) and other pro-complot media as conspiratorial. In my opinion, this is an indispensable site to counterbalance the partisan information of these mainstream media and make up your own mind. Failing to find any mention of Jean-Michel Trogneux in this April 1 issue, with prestigious signatures, we read these words from journalist Alexis Poulin (interview) :

      Five years ago, the media invented an exceptional character, a Mozart of finance, an accomplished philosopher, of an extraordinary intelligence, an enarque but also a comedian. enarque, but also an actor, a fine politician, dynamic, young, rich and formidable.

      This character did not exist. Behind this fiction, there was only Emmanuel, a Frenchman born under Giscard, raised in the provincial bourgeoisie, with all that it entails in terms of precautions, prejudices, and fears, and whose only exceptional fact was the hijacking of a minor. Crime transformed by the magic of media enslavement and systemic collusion, into a passionate and touching romance; the meeting with a future first lady prepared all her life for this role, having found the dream partner.

      The myth, when tested by reality, became a tragedy for the majority. The stage became an arena, and the play a circus game. Emmanuel, now Macron, was in reality a man without quality.

      President, after an unprecedented media bludgeoning, he retains power only through violence and the unfailing support of the oligarchy that made him king.
      Continued and end of this article in Appendix D 22.

      April 15. Le Monde's article is in full (amidst other articles) on this page. In particular, there is this comment by Pierre Lefébure  "no one can use such a rumor without discrediting himself. It is a threat against those who refuse a state lie and Le Monde is the spokesperson for this terrorism against its colleagues. C'est dénoncé dans cet article du journal Kairos.

    20. (D) Macron, beyond the lies, the cynicism

      After refusing to debate with the other candidates, after dismissing any meeting with voters (ah yes, the one with the sprinted questions, tweets), after keeping journalists away from the inconvenient questions, candidate Macron has resolved to do a single meeting, a big rally on April 2 at the Arena in Paris La Défense, with a capacity of 40,000. 30,000 spectators according to the mainstream media (35,000 for FranceInfo radio). Nothing stops the apartheid institutor, he is not afraid of the most shameless lies when we know to what extent he has done the opposite of what he promised. Here is an anthology of some of them through a collection of tweets. With one more scandal at the end, adding to an already long list (and this election fold distribution scandal is even more twisted : article). And a calamitous bilan. And many business, etc.

    21. (D) For immediate reinstatement of suspended caregivers

      April 5. The Covid vaccine requirement is not suspended for everyone; it still affects caregivers. So those who were suspended for this reason cannot return to their professions. The presidential election, with its two rounds on April 10 and 24, is an opportunity to immediately reinstate these suffering staff (article). Even retired physicians not vaxxed are being hunted by the College of Physicians (tweet). A article in France-Soir entitled "Candidates and public figures who defend the reinstatement of suspended caregivers" takes stock to separate the "good" candidates from the "bad" on this, in my opinion, paramount criterion.

      The following have declared themselves in favor of immediate reinstatement: Nicolas Dupont-Aignan (he is the only one to include it on his profession of faith), Marine Le Pen, Eric Zemmour, Jean-Luc Mélenchon. And that's all for this March 26 article. The other candidates can still express themselves in this sense. If I know the statement, I will add them. Everyone around can set this up as a voting priority.

      Left is the written remarks from January 4, 2022, right is the April 2022 profession of faith.

      What is certain is that Emmanuel Macron does not want this reinstatement. It was he who caused the exclusion and he wants to continue "until the end", he wrote. His electoralist will of gathering is only demagogy, lies, cynicism and perversion to use words used on other occasions in this file against the Elysian couple.

      When on a trip, you were questioned face to face with one of the 15,000 victims of your pseudo health policy, namely a non-vaccinated caregiver in tears, in total distress, begging for your clemency to have the right to work, because having for months no means of subsistence, not even the RSA, what did you do? As the cold monster that you are, You then had the indecency to give him an abject lesson in morality with two bullets of which you have the secret, talking to him about lack of "courtesy" and "kindness", while assailing him these perfectly inappropriate remonstrances with a nonchalance and an ignoble disdain for his precarious condition of which you are however the only craftsman and responsible, before proceeding the next moment as if nothing had happened to a few smiling selfies  ! Unbearable... [Olivier Probst, link, article from March 15]

      July 21. In these heatwave days, caregivers and firefighters are in short supply. After many months of ignoring the very existence of suspended personnel, the government, media, unions and professional organizations refute that this is a problem with distressing bad faith. Examples: a article from France-Info and a article from Le Monde. There, the number of suspended players is estimated to be "ridiculously low", "infinitely low". Yet, according to the official figures, 2% is much more. And still silence on early treatment and death of vaxxins, provax retain their media monopoly. + another article from Le Monde and July 22 Macron manages to continue to "emmerize until the end" (article), MPs have been fooled (article).

      The yellow vests and the arsonist firefighter in December 2018., the anesthesiologist in June 2020.

    22. (D) A second round without the extreme center is possible

      April 5. Let's finish reading (started at the end of Appendix D 19) Alexis Poulin's article in France-Soir on April 1 :

      The bloody repression of the Yellow Vests movement and the scam of the "Grand débat" should have alerted all editorial offices to the reality of Macronian power. Instead of an awakening of consciences, the project has been reinforced, through two tools specific to dictatorships : censorship and propaganda. This new campaign uses the codes of the previous one. But Macron has never governed. He has managed the country like a consultant, using quarterly targets, unable to see and understand what is foreign to him, having never stopped humiliating the French.

      A few days before the presidential election, the consent factory is not far from overheating. Yet a second round without Macron is possible. All we need to do is unplug the TVs.

      I don't believe in it and yet I'm sure it's possible to clear Macron in the 1st round. But by stirring up more than by unplugging the TVs. Because there is a huge fed up with the Young Global Leader puppet in the population. It is true that he has the big media at his beck and call to spread his propaganda in every home. Certainly, the French have been so sheepish for months that the McKinseygate is not enough to open their eyes, only the beginning of an awareness. Certainly Macron has managed to have as his main opponents only what is denigrated as the extreme left and the extreme right, which makes him appear as a paragon of moderation. And yet he is the leader of the extreme center, an extreme that has been subjected to unequalled aggression since the Second World War. Remember less than a month ago: all subjected to QR Code and the recalcitrant banned. This is facho-centrism as historian Patrice Gibertie rightly named it in a article from November 5, 2011. Excerpts (with the addition of a tweet) :

      The phenomenon is historically old, the "moderate" are not and they have always distrusted the people who vote wrong, they were very few in the ranks of the Resistance in 39/45 ... They supported Pétain as in Germany the Zentrum of Von Papen opened the doors of power to Hitler. [...]

      [quoting from a study by British political scientist David Adler conducted in a hundred countries and entitled "The Dictatorship of Moderation ? The international study that shows centrists are most likely to distrust democracy"] David Adler presents a very original result, disturbing even, so much so that it overturns the way we analyze the current situation. Traditionally, the decline of democratic values has been the concern of populists and protesters. But Adler shows that, if there is anything to worry about, it is rather the moderate voters, those who place themselves in the center (taken here in the broad sense, i.e. including the center-left and the center-right). The people who are furthest from democracy are therefore not the ones we think they are. Adler speaks of the "centrist paradox": the voters who are thought to be the most integrated in the democratic system are, on the contrary, those who believe in it the least. [...]

      This is David Adler's other important result: he shows that not only are centrists less sensitive to democratic values, but they are also more in demand of strong power. Thus, centrists are not only distant from democracy; they also have authoritarian tendencies. This attraction to authoritarianism can be explained by a form of incomprehension with respect to elections: it is the feeling that the people do not follow, and that they must be brought back into line. It is clear that for some years now, the results of the ballot boxes have been considered disappointing by some of the elites. The people vote badly.

      The success of populist parties regularly reinforces this mistrust. Voters are accused of not being faithful to democratic values. However, if we follow Adler's analysis, it is precisely the opposite: it is in the name of democracy that voters turn away from governing parties. In short, it is always the voters' fault, never the elites'. However, in a company, if a product doesn't sell, we don't have fun saying that it's because the customer isn't up to it.

      Voters who vote poorly are equated with would-be fascists, when many of them are instead aspiring to make democratic principles prevail.

      The other, more important risk is to discredit democracy. The situation is rather comical: it is the protesting parties that claim to be democratic (just look at the FN or the France insoumise, which are constantly calling for referendums) while the government parties hesitate to use the word, preferring to denounce populism and demagogy.

      The current situation reminds me of the 2005 referendum on the European Constitution. All the media, all the polls were bludgeoning that the Yes side would win. In the opposite direction, there was a tremendous mobilization and the No side won. And even if there was the Lisbon Treaty, there is still no constitution. Jospin in 2002, Sarkozy in 2012, Fillon in 2017 also had to win, they lost. There, looking at the polls, even if we must be wary, the trend is good  : a month ago Macron 31%, Le Pen 15%, Mélenchon 11%, yesterday Tuesday Macron 26%, Le Pen 23%, Mélenchon 16%. And on Sunday ?

      Imagine that the abstentionists start voting, that the people of droute, moderate or not, vote Marine Le Pen, that the people of gôche, moderate or not, vote Jean-Luc Mélenchon, that the undecided and the ecologists also vote Mélenchon because it is him who needs it the most to go up Macron. Then the extreme center will be defeated.

      But for that to happen we have to get moving. Stop undergoing and be active. Let the abstentionists vote. That the people on the right get rid of Zemmour and Young Global Leader Valérie Pécresse, that those on the left abandon Anne Hidalgo and others, that the ecologists abandon ARNmist Yannick Jadot. This is called the useful vote. Generally I refuse to do so, but this is an exceptional case.

      On a personal basis (I recall that I am an environmentalist voter sometimes sailing to the left or to the right), I wanted to vote Nicolas Dupont Aignan because he was the only one more or less correct in the Covid crisis. I promised myself not to vote for the provax Mélenchon. Too bad, you have to know what you want, I will still vote for him. He was still anti-pass and he wants to decrease nuclear power. And I may have convinced one or two Macron voters to vote for Dupont Aignan... Yes, let's also try to dissuade from voting for the extremist in the center.

      Let's not forget that the legislative elections are more important than the presidential election. In case of cohabitation, it is the Prime Minister who governs France, not the President of the Republic. So if Mélenchon or Le Pen are elected, there is no need to fear that it will be catastrophic since neither of them, as it is gone, will have a majority of deputies in the national assembly.

      So all against the extreme center in the first round!

      Tweets from #MacronOutsideTheFirstTurn: more lies and a thinly veiled threat to reinstate apartheid...

    23. (D) Against any return to a QR-Code apartheid

      April 11. As feared, the abstentionists did not mobilize enough and Macron achieved his first goal, he has Le Pen as his opponent in the second round. Mélenchon, Jadot, Hidalgo and Roussel fall headlong into the trap and will vote extreme-center. We find there all those who approved (with more or less nuances) the appalling sanitary policy of Macron, they are ready to do it again. Without the slightest hesitation, in the second round on April 24, for the only time in my life, I will vote Marine Le Pen, who is not her father (Betaface comparison 60% ?) and who does not risk having a majority in the national assembly, unlike the extremist Macron. And you, reader, do you really want the suspended caregivers to be reinstated in two weeks ? Do you reject any new apartheid with systematic control by QR Code ?

      Oooh, I'm shocked (and yet we've seen too much and too much...), I just read this, highlighted in yellow at 7pm this April 11 (article) (at 7:20pm, the headline has already disappeared from the front page, I had the good sense to screenshot it...) And millions of people vote for this psychopath knowing how much he lies !...

      "Emmerge the unvaccinated":"I said it in an affectionate way," Emmanuel Macron defends himself

      April 15. Between the two rounds,Lionel Labosse with his yellow wig becomes our first lady Jean-Brichèle for a chronicle titled "Macron vs Le Pen: The Plague or the Eczema?", with short videos. Hey yes, the extreme center is much more worrying than the extreme drouâte diluted with non-extreme drouâte. Lionel and I had voted white five years ago. Millions of left-wing and green voters who voted white, void or abstained then will vote for Marine Le Pen this time. And they will not vote for her party in the legislative elections, the Prime Minister and his government will not be on her side, she will not be able to apply her policies.

      Let those who today want to vote white or null or abstain realize that it is to give power back to Macron-Apartheid and go back to a totalitarianism of masked sheep. The media bias is appalling, the two candidates are not at all treated in the same way. Mélenchon and Jadot are as bad as they were with the mass vaxxination. Marine Le Pen, unlike Macron, has no chance of having a majority in the national assembly, they know that. The insoumis and the ecologists would have a chance to govern France with (and against) Le Pen, not with Macron. How can they be such poor strategists? Mélenchon and Jadot are committing suicide : we will remember that they supported Big Pharma, denied the dead and disabled of the vaxxins (see Appendix C 16) and kept Macron in power. No to the fasco-macronism of QR-Codes ! Let's reinstate suspended caregivers immediately !

      Two tweets. The one on the left set titled "General conditions of the Macron vote", divided into 6 parts: 1) Repression, contempt, lies and censorship, 2) Impoverishment and social destruction, 3) Betrayal of the French 4) Anti-ecological measures 5) Deindustrialization and excessive spending, 6) Affairs relating to Macron and his entourage (when you think we have a Minister of Justice under investigation !). Right  "Abstentionist, when you stick your head in the sand, don't forget that your butt is still up in the air!"

      April 16. I participated in an anti-fascist demonstration this afternoon with my slogans "Macron Facho, Macron Big Pharma No, Macron McKinsey, Macron QR Code No no no, Macron Apartheid No, No, Macron Facho No no no, 5 years is enough ! Let's reinstate the suspended caregivers immediately !". It did not please, but I continued, I am an anti-fascist, I do not have to be banned from this demonstration. Behind a banner held by sheep masked with an "anti-fascist collective", saying that Macron is from the extreme center did not pass. It must be said that they don't even know what an apartheid is, don't know the pharmacovigilance figures, don't know anything about early treatment, about people who died or were disabled because of vaxxins, about the countries that escaped Covid. They don't even know what cohabitation is in the 5th Republic. All "antifa" that they claim to be, they are as intoxicated by the TV and their political organs mélenchonistes or jadotistes as the Macronistes... We lived through a sanitary totalitarianism and they didn't even realize it and are ready for it to happen again. Ah, we are beautiful with anti-capitalists who help the re-election of Macron, the worst capitalist puppet ever. He is a criminal, he has killed and disabled thousands of people, victims of Covid (because he refused the treatments early) or victims of vaxxins. Yes, Lionel has the right formula, Le Pen is eczema compared to the brown plague Macron, especially since unlike him, she will not have a majority in the national assembly... The abstentionists or white voters are ostriches, as in the drawing above.

      April 19. We are witnessing an intense media hype to make us believe in a catastrophe if Marine Le Pen is elected. It was the same in 1981 for the election of François Mitterrand (article) and in 2005 for the No to the European Constitution. Lawyer Régis de Castelnau says "This blackmail of fascism is a lie and is only the mask of the fear of the people from above, of the elite bloc of losing its hold on our country" (article). Marine Le Pen wants to reinstate "the 15,000 caregivers expelled like dirt" by paying them the salaries "of which they were unjustly deprived" (article). And Youtube censors a video on "The Macron government's appalling treatment of unvaccinated caregivers" (article). On FranceInfo radio, the government urges pregnant women to get vaccinated despite the risk of miscarriage (see Appendix C 16), again repeating "All vaccinated, all protected." And Macron continues to brazenly lie about Covid (article). And the ostriches keep their heads in the sand....

      April 21. That's it, it's relief in the mainstream media, Marine Le Pen has been very wise, she has stayed in her place and Emmanuel Macron has unfolded his leftist and ecological speech without it shocking. One is not varnished with such irresponsible politicians. Forget apartheid, McKinsey, the tens of thousands of deaths that could have been saved by early treatment, the thousands of cripples from vaxxins. Le Pen and Mélenchon are Macronian sheep blinded by their ego when they could at least have joined forces to replace the 5th Republic by a 6th Republic preventing the tragic drifts of the current constitutional council. I will vote Le Pen in the 2nd round with as much disgust as I voted Mélenchon in the 1st round.

    24. (D) A fateful march to five years of quips

      For the left, AFP photo. Right resume of a tweet drawing accompanied by this text:"When we know how adept Macron is with symbols and that he plays it "Hamelin player" version state for his induction, any parent should start to tremble. For in the Grimm fairy tale the children were taken away, and alive, the parents never saw them again ".

      Beginning of a article from France-Soir headlined "Ode to Joy and Solemn March with the Young: Emmanuel Macron's much-maligned staging" :

      On Sunday, April 24, Emmanuel Macron was re-elected with 58.7% of the vote. He will therefore once again be the president of France, "failing to be the president of the French", and this for the next five years. For his inaugural speech, he arrived hand in hand with his wife, surrounded by several children of his campaign team members.

      This staging, if it pleased some, has indignant many others. Notably because Emmanuel Macron excludes neither the return of the vaccine pass, nor even mandatory vaccination for his next five years, and could therefore force more young people to be pricked. A stance that has been at the origin of successive liberticidal measures, themselves having led to a considerable increase in the suicide rate among children during the last two years.

      Note also that some of his collaborators (and friends) have been accused of incest, or even pedophilia, such as Olivier Duhamel or Claude Lévêque. As a result, this proximity displayed by Emmanuel Macron surrounded by young people, if it looks good on camera, sounds rather false on paper. Moreover, some Internet users could not help but to note the rather sheepish pout of Brigitte Macron.

      And here are some tweets :

      Left. Galen "My belief is that #Brigitte has been going through hell since December because of the #jeanmicheltrogneux case. She knows it's only a matter of time before everything comes out. She didn't want EM to run again, but her lust for power is stronger than anything. This couple is broken." Laurent Montel "Yes, Brigitte Macron has a problem: body closure, sadness, disgust ... Presumption of personal factor (disappointment, betrayal, infidelity). By making freeze frame, it is the couple which has a big discomfort... A bit like Cecilia & Nicolas Sarkozy. "Right. Raspberry of Bourges "To conquer without peril, one triumphs without glory." Caramba "Brigitte no longer smiles from the tower as before".

      Right. "Was little #jeanmicheltrogneux all sad last night or was he just pouting?" Verity France "Spectacular politics, the newly re-elected president surrounded by those who will work until 70 to pay off the 600 billion in debt made by their idol." EmmanueilMacaronade. "We wonder what the mummy is doing there.... The re-elected child needs to have his Mummy around. What about these kids? What are they doing there, have they adopted the Ténardiers or what??"

      What will be the consequences of the psychopath's denial for his loved ones and for all of us ?

      And a collection of tweets for the first quips of the new quinquennium: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15.

    25. (D) On a backdrop of accusatory reversals, more Elysian harassment

      If the last link (number 15) of tweets in the previous chapter points to an indirect return of McKinsey, it is to show that nothing changes in Macronie. The sheep and ostriches know this and continue to live with it. There was a time when such an election was followed by a presidential grace, but the suspended caregivers continue to be "embarrassed" "to the bitter end." It would take a political mobilization to reinstate them, the Mélenchon, Pécresse, Jadot & Cie have already forgotten the hospital and medical crisis... Without being worried, the presidential couple continues its harassments of all kinds.

      And this couple dares to present itself as a determined opponent of harassments! According to the technique of accusatory inversion presented in Chapter 22, they attack the harassments of social networks or those against schoolchildren. I have already shown at the end of Appendix A 17 to what extent Brigitte, guilty of sexual assault against a minor (benefiting from the complicity of the management of the high school La Providence in Amiens, which does not file a complaint) wants, through her husband, "criminalize sexual relations between an adult and a minor of 15 years". We know well the greenwashing, here is the pedocriminality-whitening at the highest level of the French state. Brigitte makes herself the hyper-champion of the denunciation of harassment... to be cleared...

      With the Macrons, the teaching profession is particularly harassed, we saw it with the hell of masks and tests (with teachers too amorphous, parents too...). Here are two recent illustrations with these tweets. For the first one admire, once again, the mastery and enormity of the accusatory inversion : Macron wants to enslave teachers and exclude those who don't adhere to his project (an apartheid against anti-projects...), and in the name of what is he doing it ? For "more freedom" ! And the apathetic journalist does not react to this psychopathic trick.

      On the second tweet, taking the header of a article from Médiapart, we see Brigitte Macron giving orders to the Education Nationale to harass a teacher she does not like. And why? Because the teacher would harass his students... In fact, it is the opposite, a mother who harasses the teacher. Excerpts from the article :

      She sends fifteen emails to the teacher, sometimes three pages long, during school vacations, or late at night, castigating his teaching methods and attitude. She doesn't understand her daughter's poor grades in literature. [...]

      "Yesterday evening : seven emails from you, one of which versed in insult, and this until one o'clock in the morning...", writes the teacher, copying the head of school and her assistant. He asks the mother to address, henceforth, to them directly. Among some teachers of the Rembrandt-Bugatti college in Molsheim, the method of Brigitte Macron's office does not pass. "The reaction of the rectorate is disproportionate, insists a colleague of Didier Jodin, who follows the case closely. It is not the role of a First Lady. If she absolutely wanted to react, she could have transmitted this message to the ministry. There, at least, a hierarchical scheme would have been followed. Mrs. Macron is neither elected nor a minister !"

      So, as if this teacher was not assaulted enough, Brigitte Macron added a layer ! Always the perversity of the Macron couple... And a hierarchy of the National Education which neglects the teacher from below to bend to the four wills of the top...

      This being said, the article of Médiapart erases what I have just written, it trivializes by giving the floor at length to the educational hierarchy, it remains politically correct. As Lionel Labosse denounces in a article of "Profession Gendarme" (with the pdf of the full article) : "The bobo reader will have his homeopathic dose of anti-macronism after having received two vaxins and four boosters of anti-lepenism. This reminds me of my favorite Bourdieu quote : " if one employs such precious minutes to say such futile things, it is because these so futile things are in fact very important insofar as they hide precious things "."

    26. (D) A fabricated life displayed to the public to be considered private!

      "Gifted enarque, this young leader very influential in the social world, wants to resign in January from all his mandates, ie the MEDEF and the presidency of APEC. [...] For the author, "an aristocracy has deviated from our democratic regime and has captured it for its own benefit."" (link). Thus was introduced Eric Verhaeghe when his first book was published in 2010. Without knowing this, I got to know him in 2021 during the Covid crisis on the site "Le courrier des stratèges" he hosts. When the facho-centrists imposed apartheid in France in July 2021, we needed reference points to motivate us to emerge from this totalitarian period. Eric Verhaghe was one of those with a article on July 26 titled "Why the health pass will blow up the epidemic and be Macron's Stalingrad." Then he showed us that our battle was moving in the right direction, on September 16 article "Macron's Stalingrad: Only 1% of unvaccinated caregivers suspended..." and November 10 article "Covid's Stalingrad : Macron takes first knee !"

      The strategist was brilliant, victory was in our grasp, we were well on our way. Then came the Brigitte affair in mid-December. As I wrote in the Introduction, it is Eric Verhaeghe who tells me. It's good timing, Brigitte is Macron's Achilles heel, we're going to knock him down, like the Trojans once did with Achilles. And while we are going to win Stalingrad, what is the gifted one doing? He almost disappears from the anti-Macron fight (Ukraine is more important...), forgotten Stalingrad, finished.... He who fought the "Caste", as he calls it, is one with it. We can guess his thoughts  "Hello, there is no brigittegate, it will pass, we will not hit Achille Macron in the heel (attacking the private life), it would be unworthy of us, only the head or chest". And the others, including Azalbert (France-Soir), Tillet (Yeti blog), Laïbi (Le libre penseur), to do the same...

      The life of Brigitte Macron, completely lying, is spread all over France and it should be considered private !!! France has a "First Lady" who is not even a lady and to continue to lie while ignoring her would do honor to France ! But we have fallen on our heads ! How can the "caste" so despise the citizens ! The virtue of example has been replaced by that of counter-example ! The presidential couple had illegal practices (false papers etc.) and a pedocriminal lives in the Elysée Palace in full view of everyone ("offense of sexual assault on a minor", as the very wise Wikipedia writes...) ! This is the country we live in !

      Time has passed, Macron has been re-elected with the media red carpet at his feet, Le Canard which is silent, Le Monde which lies (cf. Appendix D 11) and all the others... And now Eric Verhaeghe realizes that the people are grumbling against the first lady and that the wall of silence will eventually crack. To continue to keep silent disturbs his good conscience. He has one, that's something, others do not. He expressed himself in a article on May 1 "The Jean-Michel Macron-Trogneux affair, a French democratic malaise." The title alone is revealing  this affair does not shock him (he knows that the case is solid and tells the truth), he is only embarrassed that it bothers the lowly people, who are really ill-educated to dare to attack the Achilles' heel, in order to bring down this totalitarianism that continues to threaten them (and still martyrizes the suspended caregivers)... Start of article :

      After a long reflection, the Courier has decided to talk about the Jean-Michel Trogneux affair, which occupies many minds and many conversations in the most perfect silence of the subsidized media. We have chosen to talk about it because of this discrepancy between the conversations in town and the silence of the press, which is subsidized by the regime and cartelized by the billionaires who elected Emmanuel Macron. It seems to us that there is an indication of a disconnection that sums up the French democratic malaise in itself.

      Until now, we have never mentioned the excellent, breathtaking investigation by Xavier Poussard and his Faits & Documents, on the Macron legend, which he demonstrates with talent and rigor the complete forgery. From my point of view, the main revelation of this long and meticulous investigation is the systematic measurement of the distance between the official "narrative" and the facts such as indisputable evidence allows to trace them. But, until now, the Courier has always considered that the private lives of elected officials were not a political issue. After all, if Brigitte Macron is suspected of having had a sex change, and if there is convincing, plausible evidence to support that suspicion, what does it matter in politics? Everyone does what they want in their private lives, and it is nobody's business.

      A matter in every conversation in town. I recently hosted a dinner party at home and, to my surprise, the six guests I had invited that evening (and who did not know each other) spontaneously talked about the details revealed by Xavier Poussard about Brigitte and Emmanuel Macron's private life. And I brutally measured the political impact that this affair had on ordinary public opinion in France.

      On the substance, no guest was embarrassed by the suspicions of homosexuality or transsexuality that are now supported by circumstantial elements published for several weeks and never attacked by the presidential couple. On the other hand, all are convinced that the Macronian power is based on a logic of permanent lies. There is the staging for the little people, relayed by newspapers under orders, and there is the truth, totally different from this narrative. We could not find better evidence on the rupture between the people and the caste, which holds our system.

      Verhaeghe forgot the words of Stéphane Hessel "Indignant!". There has never been so much to be indignant about ! The excuse of privacy is not his own, it is all around us. I even hear, "Yes, okay, he assaulted a teenager, but since they love each other and got married, there was no trauma". No trauma when this teenager becomes a dangerous psychopath ? With thousands of unnecessary deaths and an eight-month apartheid ! We should shut up... and let him continue his exactions...

      All the media know, we are swimming in hypocrisy. It is becoming unbearable and many of us are exasperated. After the 1942 atmosphere of the second quarter of 2021, I have the impression that we have entered a pre-revolutionary 1788 atmosphere. The yellow vests and Francis Lalanne had understood it before. Ah that will do, that will do, the "caste" to the lantern!

      We still had a chance, despite the strategic error of Mélenchon to have supported the re-election of Macron. It was that he would become prime minister and that he would manage to calm the angers by taking them into account. He failed, but the voters still sanctioned Macron. In the second round of legislative elections, he lost his majority of godillot deputies. This is finally a brake on his omnipotence. With such a composition of the Assembly, the apartheid of July 2021 would not have been voted. The immediate reinstatement of the suspended caregivers would be a sign of the end of five years of absolute Macronie... The far center seems to have lost power.

      The slap in the face - Ungovernable! - The relative president - Out of order?

      The more time passes, the more the French know that "All vaccinated, all protected" was a state lie, and seem to find it normal... With such a refusal of reality, the Brigitte affair is not likely to break. I don't understand how our country can get so used to media lies...

      It is the middle of July 2022. It was in mid-July 2021 that the apartheid had been announced, when the French health situation was better (curve, 6,000 instead of 18,000 hospitalizations now, such is the result of the vaxxination) ! Who draws the conclusions ? I had then started my Covid page, of which this page is the second part. I was standing up with many other citizens to resist this unbearable segregation, this totalitarian will to inject the whole population with a dangerous experimental substance. We refused to enter an ultra-secure society controlled by QR-Code. Mélenchon & Cie were accommodating, they who refused to demonstrate. They wore the masks of submission and presented the Macronian passes, the beginning of a generalized digital coping, to go to a restaurant or to a cultural place. We're hardly out of that dark period, suspended caregivers are still devastated (like this nurse who went nuts assaulting a firefighter, article). A beginning of awareness, especially with McKinseygate (Appendix C 13), has occurred in public opinion, but there is still a long way to go before everyone realizes what a huge crime the ban on early treatment has been. And the continuous deception of the accusatory inversions (Chapter 22) in which we bathe. Even to the point of campaigning under the label of "Together", they who have divided the nation like not since 1942 and 1685.

      Still, we're pretty much out of it and I'm relatively optimistic that we won't go back. I have done my small part to broaden awareness and strengthen the will to resist. I am coming to the end of my commitment, which will have lasted one year. Thanks to those who will continue the struggle openly. In spite of their temporary weaknesses (who wouldn't have any?), I keep my confidence in Verhaeghe, Azalbert, Tillet, Laïmi, Fouché, Boutry, Wonner, Kennedy Jr, Vigano, Shaw, all those whose portraits I have drawn in Chapter 21, the others, the newcomers... So that there is no more apartheid in our countries.

      Distribute as much as possible the link, the #brigittegate hashtag, this entire page in pdf gb format, get the whole story out there!

      • Version gb 1.0 of January 24, 2022: Chapters 1 through 22.
      • Version gb 2.0 of January 25: added Appendices 1 and 2.
      • Version gb 3.0 of January 27: reduced pdf file size by 10 (French and English), added Appendix 5.
      • Version gb 4.0 of January 28: added Appendix 6, added Appendix - 7.
      • Version gb 5.0 of January 29: added Chapter 23.
      • Version gb 6.0 of January 30: reorganized appendices, formerly chronological (1, 2, 3...), now thematic (A, B, C, D).
      • Version gb 7.0 of January 31: reorganization of Chapter 23, with new title.
      • version gb 8.0 February 6: added Appendix D 4.
      • version gb 9.0 of February 12: added Chapter 24.
      • Version gb 10.0 of February 16: added Chapter 25.
      • Version gb 11.0 of February 18: added Chapter 26.
      • Version gb 12.0 of February 23: added Appendix A 10.
      • Version gb 13.0 of March 5: added A 12, C 5, D 11 appendices.
      • Version gb 14.0 of March 6: added Appendix A 13,
      • Version gb 15.0 March 13: added Appendix A 14.
      • Version gb 16.0 of March 24: added Appendix D 17.
      • Version gb 17.0 of March 30: added A 22 and A 23 Appendices.
      • Version gb 18.0 of April 4: added Table of Assumptions, added Appendix B 12.
      • Version gb 19.0 of April 8: added Chapter 27.
      • Version gb 20.0 of April 11: added Chapter 28.
      • Version gb 21.0 April 12: added Chapter 29.
      • Version gb 22.0 of April 28: rewrote Appendix A 20, added Appendix A 33.
      • Version gb 23.0 of May 1: added Part II of Chapter 29.
      • Version gb 24.0 of May 27:
      • Version gb 25.0 in préparation :
        • added Appendices B 15, C 20, A 42, C 21, A 43,
        • adding an Index of Civil Records and an Index of Documents after the Table summary of assumptions,
        • update Appendix A 9, end of Appendix D 26, add paragraph at end of appendices C 20, C 16 D 21, beginning of Appendix C 4,
        • updates to the Table summary of Assumptions.
          July 31. This version 25.0 partially corrects the scenario of version 24.0, as explained in Appendix A 43, in Conclusion and in the biography pdf in double page A4. A version 26.0, which will close this file, is planned in a few weeks, taking into account the news of the future issue of "Facts & Documents" devoted to the Brigitte Macron affair (issues 505 to 511 not being, perhaps the 512).
        • Version 26.0 in preparation: rewrite Appendix A 41, add Appendix A 44 and A 45

    This file is licensed under a Creative Commons by-sa license.